US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Regarding Space Shuttle Columbia: Radioactive substances onboard (english)
03 Feb 2003
Here is some backround information regarding the Columbia Space Shuttle and its contents. More information is sought, and I will keep you posted on the results.


Bruce Gagnon
(352) 337-9274
globalnet (at)

Karl Grossman
(631) 725-2858
kgrossman (at)

Loring Wirbel
(719) 481-3698
lwirbel (at)

In mourning the tragedy of the Columbia shuttle, the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power In Space stresses that it came as NASA has been moving to greatly expand its program to use nuclear power in space and underscores why deadly atomic materials must not be used in space operations.

In what it calls Project Prometheus, NASA seeks to broaden its $1 billion Nuclear Systems Initiative begun last year and include development of a nuclear-propelled rocket.

Moreover, NASA is planning for additional nuclear-powered space probe launches and to put atomic power to other space uses, noted Global Network Coordinator Bruce Gagnon.

"While Columbia did not appear to have a nuclear payload on-board, consider the consequences if a rocket powered by a nuclear reactor came down in pieces over Texas or elsewhere on earth,” said Professor Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State University of New York and author of “The Wrong Stuff: The Space Program’s Nuclear Threat To Our Planet,” narrator of “Nukes In Space” television documentaries and a Global Network board member.

In coming months—in May and June -- NASA intends to launch from Florida two rockets both carrying rovers to land on Mars, rovers that are equipped with plutonium-powered heaters. The Global Network has been conducting demonstrations to protest these launches.

Gagnon points out that NASA’s own Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) says that “the overall chance of an accident occurring” for each launch “is about 1 in 30” and "the overall chance of any accident that releases radioactive materials to the environment is about one in 230. "People offsite in the downwind direction...could inhale small quantities of radio nuclides" the NASA EIS says.

"These are high odds for disaster which could impact—as NASA admits—on people as far as 60 miles from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida,” said Gagnon.

“These and other NASA space shots involving materials must be cancelled in the wake of the Columbia disaster and safe space energy systems be used instead,” stressed Gagnon.

Said Grossman: “Space exploration is dangerous but to include nuclear poisons in the equation makes any accident far, far more deadly—and it is unnecessary. In recent years there have been breakthroughs in energizing space systems safely especially through the use of solar technologies. But NASA under Director Sean O'Keefe is partnering with nuclear interests to heavily nuclearize U.S. space operations. The Columbia disaster must show us the awful folly of this atomic space path.”

In recent years Congress has cut funding for the space program (in particular funding for shuttle maintenance) and NASA has turned to the Pentagon for financing of many of its missions. NASA’s O’Keefe said upon taking the helm of the space agency that all future missions will be dual use – with the military now in control of the space program.

Loring Wirbel, a technical editor and Global Network board member based in Colorado, stressed that “the shuttle accident occurring on re-entry, which is always been touted as much safer than launch, should serve as proof that NASA's planned nuclear propulsion program is far too dangerous to be considered.”

Also, “the hazards involved in aggressive space use also suggest that broader military use of space for first strike warfare or weapons in space is a dangerous game,” said Wirbel.

- END -

Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 90083
Gainesville, FL 32607
(352) 337-9274
globalnet (at)


Recent disclosures on National Public Radio indicate that there were radioactive sources on board the space shuttle Columbia. Sherrif Thomas Kerss from Nacogdoches, Texas told NPR tonight, "There was radioactive material on board" and that retrieval operations would be testing debris for radioactivity.

On Monday, February 3, the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space will issue a Freedom of Information Request to NASA. We will seek full discolsure of the type, the amount, and the purpose of radioactive material on board Columbia.

The Global Network also is deeply concerned about the independence of the commission NASA appointed to investigate this accident. It is dominated by retired military and aerospace industry executives with vested interests in the outcome.

- END -

Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 90083
Gainesville, FL. 32607
(352) 337-9274
globalnet (at)

I will keep you posted as I get new information.
See also:
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.