US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Corporados at War (english)
31 Mar 2003
The Guardian digs up more dirt on The Prince of Darkness and the Bush regime
Guardian | Unfinished businessUnfinished business
Richard Perle's resignation highlights questions over US economic involvement in
postwar Iraq, writes Brian Whitaker
Brian Whitaker
Friday March 28, 2003
The Guardian

Amid admissions that Iraq has surprised the invasion forces with the strength of
its resistance, and official predictions that the conflict will last longer than
originally expected, there is news from Washington that Richard Perle, chief
architect of the war, has resigned as chairman of the Pentagon's influential
Defence Policy Board.

Mr Perle says he resigned to stop allegations about his business interests
becoming a distraction from the "urgent challenge" of invading Iraq, but he
apparently intends to stay on in a more minor role.

In 1996 Mr Perle, nicknamed the Prince of Darkness, was the main author of a
report entitled "Clean Break" whose contents were revealed by the Guardian last
September (Playing skittles with Saddam, September 3 2002). This set out a plan
to protect Israel's strategic interests by reshaping the Middle East, starting
with regime change in Iraq.

Last week, the Guardian disclosed Mr Perle's links to an intelligence-related
computer firm that stands to profit from war with Iraq (Pentagon hawk linked to
UK intelligence company, March 21 2003). Mr Perle has denied separate
allegations published earlier this month in the New Yorker, and threatened to
sue the magazine in Britain, where libel cases are much harder to defend than in
the US.

According to a report to be published today by the US watchdog Center for Public
Integrity, at least 10 out of 30 members of the Pentagon committee are
executives or lobbyists with companies that have tens of billions of dollars'
worth of contracts with the US defence department and other government agencies.
Britain's chief military officer in the Gulf, Air Marshal Brian Burridge,
yesterday attacked American moves to hand over the running of Iraq's largest
port to a company which has a history of bad industrial relations and has faced
accusations of union-busting.

The firm, Stevedoring Services of American, has been awarded a 3m contract to
manage Umm Qasr by the Bush administration. Britain argues that the port should
be run by Iraqis once it has been made secure.

Another contract in Umm Qasr - for construction work - has gone to a subsidiary
of Halliburton, Vice-President Dick Cheney's old firm.

Meanwhile, the arrival of the first ship carrying humanitarian aid to Umm Qasr
has again been delayed because of the continuing risk from mines.
George Bush and Tony Blair ended their summit at Camp David yesterday with a
joint press conference where they vowed to fight "for as long as it takes" to
remove Saddam Hussein from power. But with growing perceptions in the Middle
East that the invasion is aimed at conquering Iraq rather than liberating it,
there is also a growing possibility that the removal of Saddam will not mark the
end of the war.

From Camp David, Mr Blair went on to New York for talks with the UN
secretary-general, Kofi Annan. Discussions centred on plans for a new security
council resolution to restart the oil-for-food programme on which 60% of Iraqis
depend for their survival.

The bombing of Baghdad continued overnight and a BBC correspondent in the city
said the explosions heard were among the most violent since the start of the
war. Targets included an Iraqi communications centre which was hit by two
4,700-lb "bunker-busting" bombs, according to US officials.

Following the parachute landing by about 1,000 troops to secure an airfield in
northern Iraq on Wednesday, US cargo planes have begun delivering military
supplies there, along with 200 more troops.

One of the main difficulties facing the invasion forces almost everywhere in
Iraq is distinguishing soldiers from civilians - and the Baghdad regime is
clearly putting civilians at risk by deliberately confusing the picture.

A "pooled" (and apparently censored) report by a Reuters correspondent this
morning describes an attack by US marines on a bus near Nassirya in which 20
Iraqis were killed. The dead were wearing some civilian clothing and were said
to be carrying papers that identified them as members of the Republican Guard -
though the report says that only two guns were found on the bus.

British and American rules of engagement normally require clear evidence that
targets are armed and hostile before troops can open fire. But because of the
Iraqi use of non-uniformed fighters, troops are finding themselves in the
invidious position of having to make split-second judgments.

This bodes ill for any future attempt to capture Baghdad. The Iraqi defence
minister, Sultan Hashem Ahmed, was quoted yesterday as saying the capital
"cannot be taken as long as the citizens in it are still alive".

Guardian Unlimited Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003

Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.