US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Who Is Ahmad Chalabi? (english)
09 Apr 2003
The "stop Chalabi" movement is in full throat, we see from the wires over the weekend. No doubt it perked up with the news that
500 Iraqi exiles, assembled under the aegis of the Iraqi National Congress, are being assembled to enter southern Iraq. Right on
cue, the foreign affairs columnist of the New York Times, Thos. Friedman, rushed out a column warning President Bush against
the "ideologues" within his team "who have been dealing with the Iraqi exile leaders and will try to install one of them, like Ahmad
Chalabi, to run Iraq."
Mr. Friedman then went on to write an amazing sentence for a man who has been covering foreign affairs throughout this whole
period. "I don't know any of these exiles," he confessed. He insisted he has nothing against any of them personally. But it sort of
makes one wonder. The United States Congress went to the trouble of passing a strategy setting law — the Iraq Liberation Act —
in 1998, which established regime change as American policy as a matter of law. It acted largely to support the exiled Iraqi
democrats and following extensive testimony by Mr. Chalabi. It’s hard to imagine how a serious foreign affairs columnist could
avoid the temptation to seek at least one get-acquainted interview.

In the case of Mr. Chalabi, he would meet a man who has nursed the dream of liberating Iraq from the clutches of Baathist
thugs and murderers for decades, despite continual attempts to throw sticks in his wheel by powerful enemies and various
entrenched interests. His detractors conjure relatively few criticisms of the man, one of them being that he has lived for so long
outside of Iraq — he fled in 1958 after the royal family’s overthrow — that he has no support on the Iraqi street. That can be tested,
of course. But our impression is that Mr. Chalabi has created over the years an impressive network of intelligence and political
contacts inside of Iraq, many of them cultivated while he was spending much of his time living in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq
between the end of the first Gulf War and 1996.

As for the notion that he is either unknown or unpopular, our sources inside Iraq tell us that Mr. Chalabi, just arrived at the
liberated city of Nasiriyah with his Free Iraqi Forces, was welcomed with open arms, with the local notables even inviting him to
stay at the governor’s mansion. And the suggestion that Mr. Chalabi is a pliant follower of the United States is ridiculous. The DCI,
George Tenet, has been deriding him all around town. He is looked down upon by the Cable News Network’s Iraq expert, Kenneth
Pollack, himself a former analyst at the CIA. The State Department, the Saudis and the heads of other Arab dictatorships in the
Middle East want nothing to do with him.

Mr. Chalabi, in other words, has all the right enemies. The reason that crowd dislikes him is simple: he is not one of them. He’s
independent-minded, secular, democratic, and loves liberty. He doesn’t suffer fools. The CIA has spent millions of our dollars
trying to buy off tribal loyalties in Iraq’s south. They have little to nothing to show for it. But it’s starting to look like Mr. Tenet’s
shop is seeking to undercut a contender like Mr. Chalabi just to protect its own troubled program. Mr. Friedman wants President
Bush to travel to the West Bank to see how an occupation shouldn’t be handled. It’d be fine with us. But we suspect that what Mr.
Bush would tell Mr. Friedman and his friends on the West Bank is that America isn’t planning an occupation of Iraq but a
liberation. And for that there will be a need for Iraqis who understand the idea of liberty, have devoted their lives to nursing the idea
during their country’s years of darkness and can articulate the idea of liberty for the Iraqis so they themselves can decide.
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.