US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Did the Greens Win Election Fraud 2000? (english)
22 May 2003
Modified: 11:32:34 AM
In reality, the USA has no genuine elections. It has a continuous cycle of CIA-Mossad-style coup d'etats ranging from blatant assassination (1963) to military-financial trickery (1980) to those hidden behind proprietary computer code (2000)....
In reality, the USA has no genuine elections. It has a continuous cycle of CIA-Mossad-style coup d'etats ranging from blatant assassination (1963) to military-financial trickery (1980) to those hidden behind proprietary computer code (2000)....
Despite death threats delivered via "communists" by the Democratic Party / Federal Reserve Corporation / Mossad to stop posting on IMC, to hell with 'em.

If the following information is true, perhaps it explains one of the deeper reasons why Gale Norton and other crooks are "resigning" from "our" government.

Are Indians, a few genuine Greens, and a few unbribed judges saving the United States from LAWCAP and the transnational media-money monopoly?

Did the Greens win Election Fraud 2000 after all? (Yes, Ralph Nader did get far more real votes than reported by Zion's media.)

In reality, the USA has no genuine elections. It has a continuous cycle of CIA-Mossad-style coup d'etats ranging from blatant assassination (1963) to military-financial trickery (1980) to those hidden behind proprietary computer code (2000).

Think about it. After all, most of the published "news" is obviously nonsense.

Jonathan P. Chance
President of the United States

WASHINGTON -- U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth denied a motion Wednesday by Interior Secretary Gale Norton to limit the pay to a court-appointed Special Master investigating her violations of law and ordered the Interior Department to disclose how much it is paying private attorneys to defend its current and former employees from contempt of court allegations.

The judge said he was disturbed by provisions in the Interior department's 2003 appropriations bill that purport to limit the pay of court-appointed judicial officers in the long-running Indian trust mismanagement case.

The law simultaneously requires taxpayers to pay the entire cost of personal attorneys for 39 former or current government officials implicated in the commission of fraud and other litigation misconduct in the case.

In an 8-page memorandum and order, the judge admonished the Interior Department for its continuing misconduct.

"The appropriations provisions at issue in this matter appear to represent yet another attempt by defendants to evade the rule of law by any means available to them, no matter how duplicitous or underhanded," he wrote. "They also serve to demonstrate defendants' manifest hypocrisy."

Lamberth noted that Justice Department lawyers defending the government's admitted bungling of trust accounts held for hundreds of thousands of American Indians often have accused him of violating the constitutional separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government.

"This purported indignation stands in marked contrast to the alacrity with which defendants utilized the power of the executive branch to apparently persuade the legislative branch to undermine the effect of judicial orders."

"But this only scratches the surface of the defendants' profound hypocrisy," he said. "For, in addition to drafting a provision that would restrict the ability of judicial officials to receive compensation, defendants were simultaneously ensuring that their own attorneys would be fully funded at taxpayer expense."

"Defendants thus have no problem with spending taxpayers' money, as long as it benefits them. But when ordered to compensate judicial officers whose appointment was necessitated by their own misconduct, defendants suddenly became born-again fiscal conservatives."

The judge said he wanted to have all the facts of how much the lawyers are costing made public so that Congress will know how much money they are spending when they consider the next appropriations bill.

If Interior declines to pay Special Court Master Alan Balaran, Lamberth said that the Treasury Department, which is also a defendant in the lawsuit, "will foot the bill for services rendered by the special master."

Dennis M. Gingold, lead attorney for 500,000 Indians seeking a full accounting of billions of dollars of trust revenue, millions of acres of trust land, and other trust assets, said: "Judge Lamberth demands honesty and integrity in his court room. It is a shame that the Interior Secretary and the Attorney General do not share his views."

"This case has been about government hypocrisy and arrogance from the outset. It is a disgrace that the government would declare itself trustee for the nation's poorest people and then, 116 years later, obstruct every effort to provide those people with a full and fair accounting of their trust assets," he said.

For Additional Information:

Bill McAllister 703-385-6996 or 202-257-5385

To view the latest information concerning this case, go to

To unsubscribe from the Indian Trust mailing list, please click on the
following link or paste it into your browser:

************* - United States President. - TEA.

http://AntiWar.Com - Like World Wars? Fight 'Em Yourself. - R. Buckminster Fuller. - Operating Manual.

http://Bilderberg.Org - High Priests of Global Terrorism.

http://Cinetopia.Net - The Place of Motion.

http://Constitution.Org - Understanding Citizenship. - Money vs Wealth. - Beyond Greed.

http://HomePower.Com - Making Real Wealth.

http://HenryGeorge.Org - Understanding Economics. - Understanding Money.

http://OpenSecrets.Org - Who's Bribing Who? - Ah!

http://Public-Action.Com - True Or Not? Decide For Yourself.

http://Transaction.Net/money - What is Money?

http://Treasurynet.Org - How to Make REAL Money....

http://TheMoneyMasters.Com - A History of Banksters.

http://Vialls.Homestead.Com - Exposing Media Disinformation.

http://WhatReallyHappened.Com - CENSORED.

http://www.Monetary.Org - A History of Money. - Prosperity, Not War & Pollution. - Who Counts Our Votes? - Who Owns the Fed?

http://www.Rothschild.Com - Who "Owns" the "Free World"?

See also:
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


Another Link.... (english)
22 May 2003
In addition to exploring the vital links listed above, we suggest another useful site which we found while investigating Judge Royce C. Lamberth:

We don't know if Lamberth is quite the "good guy" he appears to be, but remember that SOME people inside The Establishment are not the evil villians that the media-money monopoly (including so-called "liberals") makes them out to be.

Remember: Who owns the media? Corporations. Who owns corporations? Banks that issue "money" out of nothing, such as the privately owned Federal Reserve (who continually and unlawfully hack our computers), the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Rothschild Group:


Most Democrats and Republicans are just puppets. And so are most high-profile political organizations.
See also: