US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Talking About Class: An Anarcho-Communist Primer (english)
25 May 2003
Why is the concept of class so important to anarchists? Why are we constantly talking about classes and class struggle? Some of our opponents accuse us of living in the past, they claim the working class is dying out. After all you don't see too many workers wanderng around in donkey jackets, cloth caps and heavy boots. So that settles the question, doesn't it? No, it doesn't, so let us get away from silly caricatures and get down to basics.
by Bete Noire (NEFAC-Montreal)


Why is the concept of class so important to anarchists? Why are we constantly talking about classes and class struggle? Some of our opponents accuse us of living in the past, they claim the working class is dying out. After all you don't see too many workers wanderng around in donkey jackets, cloth caps and heavy boots. So that settles the question, doesn't it? No, it doesn't, so let us get away from silly caricatures and get down to basics.

The modern world, like societies that preceded it, does not consist of a single group of people who have more in common than they have dividing them. Sadly, there is no single "humanity". Not yet, anyways. In every country there is still a division of people into classes which have conflicting interests.

Classes are defined by their relationship to the means of production; their relationship to the factories, machinery, natural resources, etc., with which the wealth of society is created. Although there are groups such as the self-employed and the small farmers, the main classes are the workers and the bosses. It is the labour of the working class that creates the wealth. The bosses, through their ownership and control of the means of production, have legal ownership of this wealth and decide how it is to be distributed.


Only a part of this wealth is returned. Some is paid as wages, some as the "social wage" (hostpitals, schools, public services and so on). The rest is creamed off as profit. But labour creates all wealth. An apple on a tree is worth nothing until someone picks it, coal in the ground has no use until someone mines it. What is known as "surplus value" or profit is stolen wages.

The working class is the majority in Canada today. All who work for a wage, salary or commission are in its ranks. It consists of all who have to sell their ability to work to those in control. It makes no difference if you work in a factory, office, school, hospital or shop. It makes no difference if you work with your hands or your brain, whether you wear overalls or a suit, whether you earn "good" or bad wages.


The unemployed also form part of the working class. Social welfare programs are made to those who have worked ad those who may potentially provide some employer with their labour power. It is a condition of payment that a claimant is "available for and actively seeking work". Needless to say, partners and children of workers are also part of the same class, as are the retired.

The interests of the working class (wages, working conditions, jobs, useful public spending, etc.) are in constant and inevitable conflict with those of the boss class. The seek to maximise their profits and gain an advantage over their competitors at the expense of the workers.


Anyone who talks about "social partnership" -- about labour and capital working together for the benefit of all -- is talking nonsense. What rights we have and gains we have made have been the result of long and often bitter struggles. The bosses only give such rights and concessions as they are forced to. In times of recession, such as now, they try to make workers pay through job losses, cuts in real wages, cuts in public spending, productivity deals, etc. for the crisis that is a periodic and inevitable product of capitalism.

Although capitalism oppresses people on many different levels (race and sex to name but two), it is the exploitation of our labour that is fundemental to the system. It is on this front that the fight for a new society will be won or lost. If we can reclaim that aspect of our lives, the system can be overturned and replaced with something much better.


The working class are brought together in large towns and cities. At work we co-operate with others. Each person has to do their bit so that the person at the next stage of production can do theirs. In the services it is the same; in hospitals, schools and offices. This means that the working class can be a force capable, not only of rebelling against injustice, but of taking over and recreating society in it's own interests.

As a class we have to think and act collectively. In a strike you need the support of your workmates and of the workers in the supplier firms. Individual action won't get you very far. We have to co-operate. The same applies to the mammoth task of creating a new society. We cannot divide up an office or factory between all the workers there. We act as a group or not at all. This collective nature that is part and parcel of our class provides the basis for the solidarity and mutual aid we will need to scrap the old order and build a truly free and egalitarian society.

The working class are those with the most to gain from the abolition of capitalism, and we're also the ones with the power to change society, because capitalism depends on our continuing to support it. Whenever we take action to improve our wages or working conditions, we realise that we are stronger when we stand together, and we cut into the profits of our bosses. And the more successes we have in campaigns like this, the more we realise that we don't have to stop there, with small gains and reforms, but that we're able to fundementally change society so that it serves all of our interests.


However, just because someone is a worker it does not always follow that he or she will think of themself as a worker, or realise the potential for change that the working class collectively possesses. We all know of workers who sometimes identify with their boss, or unemployed people who become demoralised and totally isolated from any sense of belonging to the working class. And there are plenty of ignorant academics running around talking rubbish about a new "sub class" and a "natural conflict" between those with jobs and those without.

Class consciousness, an awareness of our common interests and the potential we have for real change, needs to be encouraged and strengthened. This is one of the tasks of an anarchist organisation.

The struggle between the classes will only come to an end when the boss class, and the State which protects their priveleged positions, are overthrown. Nationialisation or State control of the means of the production would not mean an end to class society. It would simply mean the replacement of individual capitalists by a bureaucratic State-capitalism. Like their predecessors they would be in control and would have their final say about what happens to the wealth we create. Whether they like it or not this would be the logical outcome of the statist politics of the 'International Socialists', 'New Socialist Group', or the 'Labour Left'.


Only the direct control and management of production by the working class themselves can end the class division. A classless society is not possible without this.

Everyone affected by a decision should have a say in making that decision. Production in an anarchist society would be managed by an elected workers' council in each workplace. Planning on a higher level would be subject to the agreement of delegates from the councils, delegates who would be subject to a mandate from their members and instantly recallable if they don't do the job they were elected to do. In such a society the wealth would be created and managed for the benfit of all. There would be no elite of bosses or rulers. This is the vital precondition for real freedom.


The Northeastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists (NEFAC) is a bi-lingual (French and English) organisation of revolutionaries from the northeast region of North America who identify with the communist tradition within anarchism. We oppose all forms of oppression and exploitation, and struggle for a classless, stateless, non-hierarchical society.

To achieve such a society we must bring an end to patriarchy, white supremacy and class domination; smash State power; expropriate the wealth of the rich; abolish the wage system and market economy; and socialize the means of production and distribution for the benefit of society as a whole. This means nothing short of social revolution, which can only emerge from autonomous social movements and the revolutionary self-activity of the working class.

NEFAC is not a large organization, and we have no pretensions about our importance. However, we are convinced enough of our ideas to want to spread them as widely as possible, both by propaganda and involvement in social movements and popular struggles. If you agree with our politics and support our activity, please get in touch!



La Bete Noire
c/o Le Trouble
C.P. St.-Andre, B.P. 32018
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4Y5, Canada
email: mtl (at)
(French-speaking General Secretariat)

Roundhouse Collective
c/o Black Planet Books
1621 Fleet St.
Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
email: roundhouse (at)
(English-Speaking General Secretariat)
See also:
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.