US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Politics
Co-Op America Report on Coca Cola's Record
14 Sep 2006
Modified: 10:41:19 PM
On its website, the Co-op America group summarized the recent record of Coca Cola during the years when Massachusetts Democratic gubernatorial candidate was a Coca Cola board member, counsel or consultant.
As recently as 2005, Massachusetts Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deval Patrick was paid over $3 million per year to represent the special corporate interests of Coca-Cola as a consultant. On its website, the Co-op America group indicated that Coca Cola failed to operate in a very socially progressive way during the period when Mr. Patrick served Coca Cola as either a counsel, board member or consultant. Following is an excerpt from the Co-Op America report on Coca-Cola:

1 Coca-Cola Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30313 USA
Phone: 404-676-2121

Current Campaigns
India Resource Center Coke Campaign
India Resource Center is working to end Coke’s corporate abuses in India. Water shortages, pollution of groundwater and soil, exposure to toxic waste and pesticides is having impacts of massive proportions in India. Over 70% of the population makes a living related to agriculture, and thousands of farmers in India have been affected by Coca-Cola's practices. According to the India Resource Center, Coca-Cola has destroyed the livelihoods of thousands of people in India; however, the extent of the damage as a result from exposure to the toxic waste and pesticides is yet unknown, as these are long term problems.

India Resource Center needs increased public involvement to stop Coke’s abuses in India. Click on the URL to learn more and take action now.

Corporate Accountability International Water Campaign
Coke, Nestlé and Pepsi are misleading consumers to believe that bottled water is healthier than tap water--but bottled water is actually less regulated than public water sources. Corporate Accountability International urges the public to tell Coke, Nestlé and Pepsi to end the deceitful promotion of their bottled water brands and to stop interfering in policies that protect public water. Take action now by clicking on the URL below.

Campaign to Stop Killer Coke
The campaign is working to stop the cycle of murders, kidnappings and torture of SINALTRAINAL (National Union of Food Industry Workers) union leaders and organizers at Coca-Cola bottling plants in Colombia. Since 1989, eight union leaders have been killed. The campaign aims to force Coca-Cola to prevent further bloodshed and to provide safe working conditions.

Complaints, Abuses, and Scandals
Health and Safety
The state government of Kerala has banned the production and sale of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the southern Indian state. Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan announced this decision in response to scientific studies, primarily by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), revealing hazardous chemicals, such as lindane, chlorpyrifos, and heptachlor, in the companies’ products. The decision also comes in the wake of a four-year campaign by the community of Plachimada to permanently close the soft drink giants’ operations in the region. Coca-Cola and Pepsi are now being banned in government and educational institutions by several states in India, including Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Chattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Delhi. Regulations to govern consumer safety for soft drinks are underway in India.

On July 1, 2006 community leaders from Mehdiganj, India ended a seven day hunger strike protesting Coca-Cola’s bottling operations. Activists were asking that Coca-Cola take responsibility for the negative ramifications its bottling plant had on surrounding villages, including water shortages, pollution of agricultural land and groundwater, illegal occupation of land, tax evasion, and poor treatment of its workers. The Central Pollution Control Board of India (CPCB) has agreed to set up an inquiry regarding Coca Cola's role in water contamination. Nearly 1,000 people from over 40 surrounding villages attended events and activities in support of the campaign.

-- India Resource Center, 08/09/2006
Source URL:

The Centre for Science and Environment’s (CSE) comprehensive study, covering 25 different manufacturing plants over 12 Indian states, found dangerous levels of pesticides in all samples of the Coca-Cola and Pepsi products tested. On average, Coca-Cola drinks contained 27 times higher pesticide residues than the standards outlined by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). According to CSE this poses serious health effects; even small doses of pesticides such as lindane, chlorpyrifos, and heptachlor, are known to cause cancer, neurological problems, and other health disorders.

-- Centre for Science and Environment, 08/02/2006
Source URL:

Health and Safety
According to the India Resource Center’s June 2006 report “Ground Water Resources in Plachimada,” there are harmful long-term effects to Coke’s operations, such as extreme water shortages, harvest shortages contamination of soil and groundwater, and serious health problems for local villagers and former workers. All 9 water samples, collected within a one kilometer radius of the plant, failed to meet the safety standards for drinking water as outlined by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) as the samples contained excessive levels of dangerous toxic chemicals. Coca-Cola has avoided answering to the Indian government and people on the issue of water contamination due to cadmium in the Plachimada plant’s sludge. Two previous orders by the Kerala Pollution Control Board were ignored: one called for Coke to build an effluent treatment facility to deal with wastewater, the other required the company to pipe potable water into communities for residents most vulnerable to water shortages.

Coca-Cola breached Indian law at its Plachimada bottling plant in southern India by continuing its “trial operations” on August 8, 2005. The Kerala State Pollution Control Board subsequently ordered Coke to "stop production of all kinds of products with immediate effect" at the plant on August 19. The Plachimada plant was originally pressured to stop operations in March 2004 due to complaints from the local community about pollution and an alarming loss of potable water.

In January 2004, the Indian parliament banned Coke and Pepsi products from being sold in its cafeteria. According to the non-profit group CorpWatch, "The ban came as the result of tests, including those by the Indian government, which found high concentrations of pesticides and insecticides, including lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos, in the colas, making them unfit for consumption. Some samples tested showed the presence of these toxins to be more than 30 times the standard allowed by the European Union."

The India Resource Center also notes that Coca-Cola was implicated in a bribery scandal involving Kerala Pollution Control Board member K.V. Indulal. In 2003, Mr. Indulal maintained that the level of pollution coming from Coke’s bottling plant in Plachimada met acceptable standards. Shortly thereafter, the BBC and the Kerala Pollution Control Board launched separate investigations, both of which found environmental conditions beyond tolerable levels.

-- India Resource Center, 06/01/2006
Source URL:

KLD Research & Analytics Inc has removed Coca-Cola from its Broad Market Social Index (BMSI), a listings of companies which pass KLD’s standard for corporate responsibility. Large institutional investors will ban Coca-Cola from its CREF Social Choice Account. As of December 2005, the CREF Choice Account held more than 1.25 million shares of Coca-Cola common stock, valued at over $50 million.

-- Common Dreams Newswire, 07/18/2006
Source URL:

Shareholder Resolutions
At the 2006 shareholder meeting, the New York City Employees Retirement System and Presbyterian Church are calling on Coke to "establish a special committee of independent directors, with authority to retain independent experts as needed, to oversee the company’s sponsorship of an independent delegation of inquiry to Colombia to examine the charges of collusion in anti-union violence that have been made against officials of Coca-Cola’s bottling plants in that country; and that the delegation includes representatives from U.S. and Columbian human rights organizations and be charged with preparing and presenting to the special committee and the Board a report on its findings, which will be made available to the shareholders by the next annual meeting of the Company."

-- Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, 05/01/2006
Source URL:

Shareholder Resolutions
At the 2006 shareholder meeting, the As You Sow Foundation is calling on Coca-Cola to "review the efficacy of its container recycling program and prepare a report to shareholders, by September 1, 2006, on a recycling strategy that includes a publicly stated, quantitative goal for enhanced rates of beverage container recovery in the U.S. The report, to be prepared at reasonable cost, may omit confidential information."

-- Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, 05/01/2006
Source URL:

Water Rights
The Supreme Court of Panama issued a $300,000 fine to Coca-Cola for a massive chemical coloring spill in the Bay of Panama and a nearby river. According to Panama's National Environmental Authority, 4,500 liters of chemicals spilled from a Coke processing facility turning a portion of the bay and river red, causing contamination and negatively impacting the environment.

-- Polaris Institute, 04/20/2006
Source URL: none available

Human Rights
The London-based anti-poverty group, War on Want, released a new 'alternative report' on Coca-Cola, exposing the company's abuse of human rights and natural resources in Mexico, El Salvador, India, Guatemala, Colombia and Turkey. Cited abuses include suppressing unions, toxic dumping on agricultural lands, and exhausting water resources for its bottling operations.

-- War on Want, 03/20/2006
Source URL:

Lawyers representing thousands of apartheid victims at an appeal hearing in New York will revive 2002 compensation claims against foreign multinationals they accuse of aiding and abetting apartheid violence. Implicated corporations include BP, Barclays, Hewlett-Packard, Credit Suisse, Coca-Cola, DaimlerChrysler, Ford and Shell Oil. The plaintiffs and some 29 civil society groups and individuals allege that companies that supported the apartheid state violated the Sullivan code and US's constructive engagement policy designed to fight descrimination. Violations involved such activities as providing the regime with armoured vehicles for patroling townships, and creating the pass book which non-whites were required to carry to authorize their passage in otherwise white areas.

-- Independent Online, 01/22/2006
Source URL:

In August of 2005, Coca-Cola settled a discrimination lawsuit regarding its hiring practices in Harahan, Louisiana. The Labor Department found that Coke’s hiring standards were not uniformly applied, resulting in 800 women and minorities being unfairly bypassed for merchandiser positions. Coke promotes itself as an equal opportunity employer, however an investigation by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs proved otherwise in the cases of these men and women. The company settled on paying $340,000 in back wages to those subjected to hiring discrimination, and has agreed to hire 42 of the women and minority applicants who were originally rejected.

--, 08/11/2005
Source URL:

Water Rights
Coke, Danone, Pepsi and Nestle werethe major targets of a 2005 Polaris Institute report exposing the darker side of the water industry. “Inside the Bottle: An Exposé of the Bottled Water Industry” highlights the abuses of these corporations, ranging from fraudulent advertising and ruthless water privatization to the distribution of unsafe water. These companies dominate the world’s bottled water market.

-- Polaris Institute, 01/01/2005
Source URL:

Human Rights
The US-based International Labour Rights Fund, and the US United Steelworkers filed a lawsuit against Coca -Cola accusing its franchised bottle plant in Colombia of using paramilitaries that allegedly have killed union organizers who tried to unionize workers at the bottling pla. In March 2004 a ruling by the Florida federal court dismissed Coca-Cola, while finding that the plaintiffs may continue with the suit against local bottling companies. The plaintiffs say they plan to appeal the ruling, claiming that a new agreement between Coca-Cola and its bottlers justifies the suit's claim against all the original defendants.

-- Ethnic NewsWatch, 06/04/2004
Source URL: none available

Toxic Emissions or Discharges
In July 2003 a BBC investigation revealed dangerous levels of toxic metals and a known carcinogen--cadmium--in a waste product from the company's plant in Kerala India and which the company had given to local farmers to use as fertilizer. The BBC radio show "Face The Facts" took water samples from the wells surrounding the company and had the fertiliser analyzed in Britain. Analysis conducted at the University of Exeter revealed that not only was it useless as a fertiliser but it contained a number of toxic metals, including cadmium and lead. The water in near-by wells also had levels of lead "well above those set by the World Health Organisation," the BBC said.

The plant had also come under attack from local community members because of its use of water resources. In April the Kerala government revoked the water-use permit of the plant because of fears that the exploitation of groundwater would lead to serious ecological damage and drought. A Parliament member from a local district warned that disruption of water supplies could affect not just drinking water but also irrigation in an area known for its rice paddies. Since May 2002 there have been daily pickets outside the plant. Coke denied the charges and insist that groundwater levels have not been affected by it facility. The revocation was overturned in court.

-- BBC News, 07/24/2003
Source URL:

Unfair Competition
Coca-Cola is the focus of criticism for targeting children and schools with their aggressive marketing campaigns. Coke secures exclusive distribution rights in schools across the country by pressuring institutions with greater budgetary needs. The corporation unabashedly waves advertising dollars in the face of school districts to gain visibility and lock young consumers into a life of brand loyalty to Coca-Cola. By cornering the market, opposition groups claim that children are not given any healthy options to choose from. As of 2005, a handful of school districts and universities have successfully broken from commitments to exclusively sell Coke products on their campuses. Some of these schools include the following: Bard College, New York; Carleton College, Minnesota; Lake Forest College, Illinois; National College of Art and Design, Ireland; Trinity College, Ireland; University College, Dublin; Salem State College; College Dupage (Illinois); Oberlin College (Ohio).

-- Polaris Institute
Source URL:

Worker Rights
Coca-Cola workers in Turkey and Indonesia have had to face mass firings for their efforts to improve labor conditions. Employees of at least two of Coke’s bottling facilities in Turkey have found themselves jobless after openly working to initiate union activity. When workers protested the firings, they were met with police violence. Turkish laborers and their family members were attacked by police again while in the midst of talks with the management at one plant.

In Indonesia, Coca-Cola is PT United Can Company’s largest and most important customer. Therefore, when the packaging company decided to intimidate 48 workers for openly forming a union, Coke could rightfully have intervened, using economic incentives to get PT to act ethically. The 12 leaders of unionization efforts have been fired, and the other continue to be harassed by PT management. Coca-Cola has yet to take action or make a statement regarding the ill treatment of workers.

-- United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS)
Source URL:

Legal Disputes
Coca-Cola has allegedly conspired with the government of Uzbekistan against Mansur Maqsudi’s company after he fell out of favor with the nation’s authoritarian ruler Islam Karimov. The arbitration claim seeks more than $100 million in damages, claiming that Coca-Cola actively aided Karimov’s government in stripping Mr. Maqsudi of his majority share in Coke’s bottling facility in Tashkent.

-- CorpWatch, 06/13/2006
Source URL:

Executive Compensation
In 2005, E. Neville Isdell, Chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Company, earned $12,350,336 in compensation including stock option grants from the Coca Cola Co.

-- AFL-CIO, 04/05/2006
Source URL:

Worker Benefits
In October 2002 AIDs activists worldwide planned demonstrations and rallies to protest Coca-Cola, which they insist must do more to help and treat HIV-infected workers and their families in Africa. Although the company had recently increased its benefits to provide anti-retroviral drugs to employees and spouses of its bottling companies in Africa, activists allege that the initiative will cover only 35 percent of Coke's bottler workforce in Africa and that its proposed 50 percent cost-sharing scheme will be too expensive for small and medium-sized bottlers.

--, 10/17/2002
Source URL:

In May 2002 Coca-Cola agreed to pay $8.1 million to more than 2,000 female employees who were underpaid by the company. Forty-two million will be paid under an agreement the company struck with the U.S. Department of Labor and will go to 980 current and former employees in Coke's Atlanta-based corporate operations, mostly in professional-level jobs. An additional $3.9 million will be paid voluntarily by the company to 1,100 current and former female employees in Coke's North America operations.

-- Savannah Morning News, 05/26/2002
Source URL: none available

Health and Safety
In August 2003 the head of the India-based Center for Science and Environment told reporters the levels of pesticides in Coca-Cola products in India was 30 times higher than guidelines used by the European Union. Levels of pesticides in rival PepsiCo brands tested were 36 times higher than European Union standards. The Center acknowledged that Indian brands also have high pesticide levels, because agricultural pesticides are in the country's ground water, but said the focus was on Coke and Pepsi because they account for more than three-fourths of the bottled soft drinks consumed in India. India has no laws banning pesticides in soft drinks. Top executives of Coke and Pepsi held a rare joint news conference denying the allegations and demanding to know what laboratories did the testing, and how the research was conducted.

-- Environmental News Network
Source URL:

Health and Safety
According to CorpWatch, Coca Cola laces the beverages its sells in India with large doses of caffeine, which is known to be addictive, without citing it on the labels. The Indian group, Centre for Science and Environment, reportedly demanded that Coca-Cola display labels with "advisory statements to the effect that the beverage contains caffeine and the same is not recommended for children, pregnant or lactating women and individuals sensitive to caffeine."

-- CorpWatch, 02/06/2004
Source URL:

In October 2003, Coca-Cola paid $540,000 to former finance manager, Matthew Whitley, an employee who claimed the company inflated its profits and knowingly sold contaminated drinks. Whitley, who lost his job one month after making “whistleblowing allegations,” sued Coca-Cola for unfair dismissal. That same year, an Iranian court levied a 7.15 million dollar fine against the Coca-Cola Company for violating its contract with an Iranian soft drinks counterpart, Nushab Soft Drinks Company. Chairman of the Iranian company accused Coca Cola of using the United States’ sanctions against Iran as pretext for suspending the investments specified in their contract with Nushab.

-- BBC News, 10/08/2003
Source URL: none available

Legal Disputes
In August 2003 Coca-Cola offered to pay up to $21.1 million to Burger King and its restaurants to repair damage caused by allegations that Coke's employees rigged a marketing test of Frozen Coke at the fast-food outlets. The announcement came after a former Coke manager claimed the company rigged a marketing test of the popularity of the new drink and artificially boosted equipment sales. Under the terms of the proposal, Coke will pay $1,000 to each restaurant that had a Frozen Coke machine installed as of May 2000, part of any repair costs for the machines and make up any losses that Burger King franchisees had with the equipment. Eighty percent of the Burger King franchises who tested the equipment have to agree to the terms of settlement.

-- Associated Press, 08/12/2003
Source URL: none available

Toxic Emissions or Discharges
In May 2003, Coca-Cola de Panama was fined US $300,000 for polluting Matasnillo River in Panama.

-- CorpWatch, 07/10/2003
Source URL: none available

In March 2004, Coca Cola admitted the UK version of Coca-Cola's Dasani brand bottled water is really treated water from London’s public supply.

-- CorpWatch, 03/04/2003
Source URL:

In 2002 Coca-Cola was among the first companies to deduct the value of executive stock options as an expense.The action was taken in response to increasing public demands for clear and complete financial statements. Prior to the corporate accounting scandals many companies relied heavily on options to compensate executives but did not deducted them as expenses. Analysts blame the use of large numbers of options that aren't reflected in earnings for creating incentives for executives to artificially inflate stock prices.

-- San Jose Mercury News, 08/06/2002
Source URL: none available

Corporate Influence
Danone Waters North America, now fully-owned by Coke, has partnered with the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) to promote flourinated bottled water for children. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has expressed concerns that the AAPD is endorsing Coca-Cola, "a company whose products cause tooth decay, obesity, and other health problems in children."

-- Polaris Institute, 04/20/2006
Source URL:

Special Awards
Coca-Cola was named as one of the "Worst Corporations of 2004" by Multinational Monitor. The company was named to the list for the "extensive documentation of rampant violence committed against Coke's unionized workforce by paramilitary forces." The publication cites an April 2004 report from a delegation headed by New York City Council Member Hiram Monserrate that says, "To date, there have been a total of 179 major human rights violations of Coca-Cola's workers, including nine murders. Family members of union activists have been abducted and tortured. Union members have been fired for attending union meetings…Most troubling to the delegation were the persistent allegations that paramilitary violence against workers was done with the knowledge of and likely under the direction of company managers…Shockingly , company officials admitted to the delegation that they had never investigated the ties between plant managers and paramilitaries"

-- Multinational Monitor, 12/01/2004
Source URL: none available

In January 2004 Coca-Cola announced that it was being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over allegations against the company in a wrongful-termination lawsuit. The investigation stems from a lawsuit filed by a former finance director in Coke's fountain division who accused the company of committing $2 billion in accounting fraud, discriminating against minorities and women and manipulating inventories.

--, 07/23/2004
Source URL: none available

In 2002 nine former and current Coca-Cola workers filed three class-action lawsuits against the company claiming it bilked workers out of $200 million in pay over a four year period. In the lawsuits workers alleged the company had managers manipulate an electronic timekeeping system and to eliminate overtime hours worked by merchandisers. Other workers claimed they were harassed out of claiming overtime hours by managers, who would berate and belittle them. In 2001 Coca-Cola paid $20.2 million to settle a lawsuit filed by salaried employees claiming they were cheated out of overtime pay.

-- Reuters, 12/04/2002
Source URL: none available

In May 2002 several Coca-Cola workers in Dallas claimed the company was re-packaging and selling nearly-expired soft drinks to minority neighborhoods at lower prices. One worker who made deliveries for the company to both white and black neighborhoods said that soda in the white neighborhoods which was a month short of its expiration date was shipped back to the bottler for re-packaging with new expirations dates and then delivered to minority neighborhoods where it sold for almost half the price. The company denied the claims.

-- CBS News, 05/21/2002
Source URL: none available

Brands and Affiliates
Brands: A&W, Barq's, Caffeine Free Coca-Cola Classic, Caffeine Free Diet Coke, Cherry Coke, Citra, Coca-Cola C2, Coca-Cola Classic, Crush, Dasani, Diet Barq's, Diet Cherry Coke, Diet Coke, Diet Mello Yello, Diet Sprite, Dr. Pepper, Fanta, Five Alive, Fresca, Fruitopia, Georgia Coffee, Hi-C, Mello Yello, Minute Maid, Mr. Pibb, Nordic Mist, Odwalla, Powerade, Santiba, Simply Orange, Sprite, Surge, Tab

- 55th & 5th Avenue Corporation - New York, NY
- Aviation Department-Coca-Cola Company Inc. - Atlanta, GA
- Barlan Inc. - Atlanta, GA
- Bottling Investments Corp. - Atlanta, GA
- Caribbean Refrescos Inc. - Cidra, PR
- Cleveland Coca-Cola - Cleveland, TN
- Coca Cola de Chile, S.A. - Santiago, Chile
- Coca Cola Ltd - Toronto, Canada
- Coca-Cola Bottling (Luanda) - Luanda, Angola
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co Consolidated - Greenville, SC
- Coca-Cola Corporation - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola de Espana - Madrid, Spain
- Coca-Cola Drikker A/S - Oslo, Norway
- Coca-Cola Enterprises - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola Export Corp. - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola Financial Corporation - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola Fountain Inc. (Division) - Chesterfield, MO
- Coca-Cola Fountain Inc. (Division) - Irvine, CA
- Coca-Cola G.m.b.H. - Berlin, Germany
- Coca-Cola Great Britain & Ireland - London, United Kingdom
- Coca-Cola Holdings Overseas Ltd. - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola Industrias Ltda. - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Coca-Cola Interamerican Corp. - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola Interamerican Corporation - San Jose, Costa Rica
- Coca-Cola Ltd. - Halifax, Canada
- Coca-Cola Ltd. - Kelowna, Canada
- Coca-Cola Ltd. - Stellarton, Canada
- Coca-Cola Ltd. - Toronto, Canada
- Coca-Cola Ltd. - Trois Rivieres, Canada
- Coca-Cola Norge A/S - Loerenskog, Norway
- Coca-Cola North America (Division) - Houston, TX
- Coca-Cola North America - Allentown, PA
- Coca-Cola North America - Dunedin, FL
- Coca-Cola North America - Overland Park, KS
- Coca-Cola North Latin America - Mexico, Mexico
- Coca-Cola South Pacific, Ltd. - Sydney, Australia
- Coca-Cola Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd. - Johannesburg, South Africa
- Coca-Cola Trading Company - Atlanta, GA
- Coca-Cola USA - Atlanta, GA
- CTI Holdings Inc. - Atlanta, GA
- Inmex Corporation - Atlanta, GA
- Minute Maid Company Canada, Inc. - Peterborough, Canada
- Odwalla, Inc. (Unit) - Half Moon Bay, CA
- Schweppes Beverages - Watford, United Kingdom
- Soft Drink Services Company - Atlanta, GA
- The Coca-Cola Company - Atlanta, GA
- The Coca-Cola Company - Bellevue, WA
- The Coca-Cola Company - City of Industry, CA
- The Coca-Cola Company - Columbus, OH
- The Coca-Cola Company - Dallas, TX
- The Coca-Cola Company - Hollywood, FL
- The Coca-Cola Company - Houston, TX
- The Coca-Cola Company - Huachuca City, AZ
- The Coca-Cola Company - Naugatuck, CT
- The Coca-Cola Company - Ontario, CA
- The Coca-Cola Company - Plano, TX
- The Coca-Cola Company - Waltham, MA
- The Coca-Cola Company - Washington, DC
- The Coca-Cola Enterprises - Atlanta, GA
- The Coca-Cola Export Corporation - Atlanta, GA
- The Minute Maid Company - Paw Paw, MI

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.