Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this article |
Announcement :: Globalization
The Reason why the ARMY explores issues of living wills as more return from war with comas
Email: public_affairs (nospam) misc.pentagon.mil
25 Sep 2006
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:38:47 +0200
Von: "Jason Dedrick" <artinspace (at) gmx.net>
An: secarmy (at) army.mil, secnav (at) navy.mil, cno (at) navy.mil, proffice (at) jaxa.jp, oosa (at) unvienna.org, vice_president (at) whitehouse.gov, hartman (at) us-irelandalliance.org, webmaster (at) newmont.com, intelligence.hpsci (at) mail.house.gov, dcgordon (at) stanford.edu, SPAM (at) UCE.GOV, webmaster (at) kennedy.senate.gov, webmaster (at) unvienna.org
Betreff: A http://peru.indymedia.org/news/2006/09/35320.php--Psy-Op-D.O.D.-- Fwd: OOSA-Kennedy Internet Nuetrality & Latent Discovery-Peruvian oversight of tech-contracts-with limited intervention from X working through contracts with the Office of Science and Technology Policy for Senate Server Reform Bill based on the R.B.E.C. theory-effecting data input for the Senate Server Reform Bill with prejudice in contextual parsing applications based on preventive firewall technology from the revision of N.S.A. standards overseeing the nature of James Brady Hand gun Bill Prevention Act-as effecting or not effecting the TSA travel Registry and all profile technologies that enjoin pre-screening and functional destinations of senate content as submitted or collected in transition of the Senate Server Reform Bill. Fwd: Resource acquisition strategy for property before and after JUY, 2007 Fwd: Fwd: Veteran case may show tax-incentive program study with transitioning military powers effecting IRS case for a type of dev
Realistic investment practices and the case of requiring a Medical doctor to approve financial competency in decision making that requires a BANKER/DOCTOR to remove liabilities in cases of Medical Malpractice that reinforced the James Brady Hand Gun Bill Prevention act-as a financial tool for prevention of investment potentials that are infringes upon by the James Brady hand gun Bill prevention act when fiduciaries are used to collect and appropriate intellectual property and trade secrets with a tortuous interference in business expectancy-such that the army issues with case policy farming may show that the ARMY officer who agreed to compel for the uses of the military by a “key and locke,” member of the ARMED Services Committee as a means to adjudicate a method of obligation for competency in cases where military service members are injured during a time of war or during periods of transaction of resources for war preparation. The privacy of a last will and testament under the review of the policy of the veterans administration may how that when property escheats to the state in the unfortunate event of death for veterans with payee programs under conscription as directly relates tot eh case with j dedrick an and the family oil property and allegations based on the give you food take your food for oil in new mexico program do show that continued resources by ARMY officers shield case liabilities for captain Christine daly.- as the nature of recognition of personal assets of military personnel are private and confidential expect in periods of time in which an allusion to a future event of death allow a right of officers or medical officers to examine assets of military employees to violate the PRIVACY AND HEALTH related in last will and testaments see the following e-mail tot eh department of veterans affairs that was denied by way of prejudice to the case with “White,” and the army/BOeing Communication contract question with great anticipation by Senator John McCAIN TO THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY-see all Warsaw pact revision for wars that involve parapsychology influences into financial affairs of stanford graduates and J Dedrick -such that the army exploration of “issues,” of living wills as more return from iraq with brain damage and neutralized periods of investment potentials as such methodology in policy would allow doctors to act with financial investigations into cases where last will and testimonies are infringed upon by military activity as well as to support transgressions in military policy for minimum oil reserves as based on a policy study of military assets held by service members who would donate personnel oil in time of war by poor decision making due to brain damage as to reinforce a right of jurisdiction in all cases with the james brady hand gun bill Prevention act and all military cases of such in the Veterans Admonition-see e-mail that was deined and why the ARMY incessantly would defend a right of prejudice for xautoun-zengersbomb-hamurabeye.pdf.
Dear Vice President the ARMY/X,Y,Z, officer who is lying to about the denied transmission to your office with altering the content for business enliustemtn contentions profile should now be prosecuted for lying to your office about problem solving and backtracking through my alleagtions to support taht the e-mail was stopped by the basis of the follwing as rather than the later e-mail.
Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:32:57 -0800 (PST)
"jason dedrick" <tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
A18352315A -billet scouting for policy objectives with acquisition principles for the National Security Council members that have had interaction with J Dedrick "Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act." Fwd: 101_ways_2_Kill_Osama_Bin_Laden vs. 101_ways_2_Stop_Xau2.pdf_From_Publishing Fwd: State department mirror web-page complications with UIC.edu case dealing with J Dedrick Fwd: The enlistment business contentions profile- the FT rate conversion to the U.S. Naval Space Command with U.N. investigation for civil war payee with U.S. Allied Space Space Command features with training instructions for the SECNAV based on nucleaer capacity of FT rate in Space Command with targeting and landing arguments for crewed vessles--Fwd: civil war payee compromise-improper debriefing of the weapons officer*-xau2.pdf debentured webb-contract July 2006, not conscripted due to teh senate's arbitration of malice Fwd: The senate may not draft the Senate Server Reform bill without the The malice of arbitration and the Tyranny of the Majority xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/-Fwd: Not one Word was allowed in the gas chamber to pass from the son to the family, see international case with poltical refugee status saught in U.S. in light of legislative intent in oversight of case-Fwd: http://www.nps.gov/apco/pphtml/contact.html --forward with xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/ to the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park Hwy. 24, P.O. Box 218 Appomattox, VA 24522 Fwd: Civil War payee program with pensions may show planners in North procured disabled vet's for active duty behavior with psy-op stratgies that did not expose the Appomattox court house compromise features to stop war and not effect federal treasury $20.00 dollars turned into $25,000.00 due to a sticker was bad idea--Fwd: tabu-ki/not tabu-ki U.S. Space Command/U.S. NAVAL Space Command and the SECNAV's Misinformed enlistment by General Eberhart?Fwd: xau2.pdf--http://jtjames.spymac.com/ charlesswift (at) firstname.lastname@example.org-- Fwd: Seeking resources for presentation--Fwd: There is a direct "procedural dialogue," that is being maintained that holds a legal course of action with prejudice to the "court reporter/intercept," argument--To the Honorable Gordon R. England Secretary of the Navy dcgordon (at) stanford.edu and Sergey Lavrov -Balkans helicopter crash and 17 peace keepers? Fwd: Military to continue to pay Iraqi media: Casey http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060303/ts_nm/iraq_usa_newspapers_dc -- xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Was Orson Wells a terrorist by today’s standards and how does the FX T.V. show “Over There,” assert the rationale that media has motive if constrained to developing arguments Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-mjp Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-mjp Fwd: xau2.pdf and the right to petition the SECNAV for a "psychological warfare pin." Fwd: Victor Yushchenko's case forwarded to the U.N. due to State Department review of case conflict with Vladimir Danchev's right to political asylum--without a radio--postmaster (at) nioc-norfolk.navy.mil Fwd: DAVID - and the writings on the wall --xau2.pdf--David Sanborn Investigation Pending scapegoat--with army/navy conflict of interest--find a Jew hater with power to disguise investigation Fwd: : Miranda Rights in xau2.pdf may conflcit with the Miranda Rights as seen in this e-mail-3,000 italian troops withdraw from Iraq--maybe the 22-C.I.A. officers could be asked about Bath party retaliation Fwd: Symbolic Integrator and the reason why a e-mail was stopped from contextual examiantion with xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/Fwd: Requires xau2.pdf http:jtjames.spymac.com/ Lavrov's failed coercion Fwd: Fwd: The Doctor/Court Reporter--he or she must be a duly sworn in court reporter to review the content of the e-mail if the destination of reciprocities is stopped to remove liabilities of the P.C.E.O. baseline in efforts to insure a fair undue process is occurringFwd: Hedge Fund Organizers and the Donald Evans complication with Hedge Fund Organizing with the Veteran's Administration http://jtjames.spymac.com/--Fwd: Pen-Tax--Fwd: Secret Service Detail-- may show Fwd: Communications majors may ask about the F.T.C. violations for the do-not mail email registry functions with a type of e-mail recipients with a P.C.E.O. baseline--ScottMccain (at) yahoo.com --- Case logistics for a “U.N. three month training seminar,” for cadets may be discussed in light of the conflict with the e-mails in tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com: --Fwd: San Quentin protest and the F.B.I. case with organizers involved in the Van Nuy Guys case with the F.B.I. -- Fwd: Image-Nation and the Oz-12 gun in face video for pre-trial evidence--Fwd: Trial/Pre-Trial Review by fair an impartial P.C.E.O. jury in with due process to see if Jury Selection as a feature of multi-party representation to see if J Dedrick can be given a donated seat for case construction of the content in xau2.pdf Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-MJP, Fwd: Treasury Issues with the 25,000.00--> 20.00 bill See Secretary Snows' advise case feasibility? Fwd: directly relative to unique aspects of some D.N.A. and as relative to Northcomm’s data base policy for D.N.A. storage and tax-credits as consistent with demands of the F.B.I. and Interpol for the Virtual Case File management system; how could anything be wrong?Fwd: Credit or Debit Fwd: Mao-Tse Tsung’s “Rice-Field,” review --Fwd: Pt-109 and the Native Indian Gaming Infleucne in Universal's audience with Disney Infleunce in Orlando, FL--Mitchell's investigative senate for the CNO?Fwd: P.O. 371 Space Policy class with Air Force Oversight Fwd: LANCE BASS and J DEDRICK in Class action lawsuit against N.A.S.A. for prejudice with legislative devlopemental gain of the profiled aerospace seat industry**see tax-credit features in the U.N. method of the orbital slot assessment for offset differentials similar to method and process of intangible seat offset from xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/.Fwd: U.N. Investigation may show that artinspace (at) gmx.net is registered to user with location in U.N. location in Vienna Austria and may* allow discovery process to assist in the “Give you Food, Take your Food for Oil through hardship in New Mexico Program.”.Fwd: VET Tresspass to Tort's office for the D.A. in the state of Washignton -- Tresspass 2:05-cv-00470-MJP Fwd: Please forward to the regional office for the information resource security administrator of the U.S.G.S. for the N.S.F review of all grants dealing with N.S.F. features software development and management for resource acquisition behaviors and theories—This communication is based on sound process and method for determining functions of state and federal oversight of EROS data base consideration to the Senate Server Reform Bill function with features of complicated information management assessed against resource acquisition theories as applied to the P.C.E.O. baseline:--Fwd: FORD review of Green aspects of Concept Car with California legislators may x: Fwd: Please store with the secretary of senate with access only by the Armed Service Committee Members as some of the content was e-mailed to Governor Mit Romney and may be placed in the hands of the secretary of the senate with prejudice to senator x --as may assist in creating useful dialogues with the Governor to understand some Armed Service Committee issues effecting Massachusetts residents. FWD: F.T.C. complication with do not mail registry and method and process with the e-mail output--Fwd: The Artist Against Big Brother 1984 e-mails in account Fwd: Procurement features with the TSA for policy violations that support policy development with D.O.D. interest as Northcomm 'has or has," not reviewed content.Fwd: AMGEN Complications with "selective engagement theories," in Micro-Modular Robots forward to C.E.O.-- TACT PROJECT- Policy guidance on convergence function with F.T.C. management of e-mails as akin to the TACT project with case citation listed in e-mail as based on F.T.C. violation for continued developmental goals of the content in xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Fwd: Magnetic resonance imaging system abuse potentials in private war profiteering see presentation http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Fwd: A $20.01 cent dinner with a N.A.S.A. key note Speaker under teh C.E.I.S.S. Grant Funded ClassFwd: MEDIA-X and the WARNER contract with USA banks and Microsoft may have complications with former Stanford alumni-- lcheung (at) spaceadventures.com Fwd: The “Rothschild,” Scenario--“Nano-engineered,” threat.
vice_president (at) whitehouse.gov, Elena.makovskaia (at) usri.org, xau2pdf (at) httpjtjames.spymac.com, Karen.Bligh (at) usris.org, john.Garcia (at) state.nm.us, essay (at) jice.org, wugu (at) un.org, recruitment (at) osce.org, intelligence.hpsci (at) mail.house.gov, torre (at) nsc.navy.mil, charlesswift (at) gmx.net, senator_bingaman (at) bingaman.senate.gov, senator (at) biden.senate.gov, senator (at) dorgan.senate.gov, russell_feingold (at) feingold.senate.gov, senator (at) kennedy.senate.gov, senator_leahy (at) leahy.senate.gov, senator_lugar (at) lugar.senate.gov, senator (at) shelby.senate.gov, olympia (at) snowe.senate.gov, logsdon (at) gwu.edu, oosa (at) unvienna.org, qr2555 (at) usma.edu, scottmccain (at) yahoo.com, lavrov (at) unoosa.org, johnbolton (at) unoosa.org, dcgordon (at) stanford.edu, russ (at) mindpollen.com, artinspace (at) gmx.net, dtorok (at) ftc.gov, ews (at) us.ibm.com, giftshop (at) oldnorth.com, wwwmail.boeing2 (at) boeing.com, public_affairs (at) misc.pentagon.mil, ecb (at) secretservice.gov, kofiannan (at) unvienna.org, angelamerkel (at) gmx.net, alw (at) peaceinspace.com, chancery (at) president.lv, underseawarefare (at) navy.mil, u.s.copyright.office (at) loc.gov, yandex (at) webmaster.ru, copyright (at) yahoo-inc.com, northcompa (at) northcom.mil, info (at) simmonsforcongress.com, hipaa (at) nhyoko.med.navy.mil, edspace (at) nasa.gov, dlogsdon (at) uschamber.com, julie.simard (at) space.gc.ca, marketing (at) ballard.com, mayor (at) lacity.org, "Carol Rosin" <rosin (at) west.net>, flo (at) state.gov, lavrov (at) unvienna.org, imag (at) telus.net, info (at) canadacoucil.ca, "Shambhala Music Festival Ltd." <info (at) shambhalamusicfestival.com>, info (at) hpowercanada.com, mayors (at) pcf.city.hiroshima.jp, nobuyuki.idei (at) jp.sony.com, stringer (at) pdp.crl.sony.co.jp, info (at) guatemala-embassy.org, info (at) estemb.org, emwas (at) colombiaemb.org, Embaguat (at) sysnet.net, piracy (at) apple.com, countyadmin (at) vulcancounty.ab.ca, publisher (at) vulcanadvocate.com, inquiries (at) vfs.com, jan (at) vfs.com, scottlew (at) vfs.com, WilliamClayFordJr (at) ford.com, JamesPadilla (at) ford.com, Mike.s.zafirovski (at) boeing.com, hong (at) bpf.org, "Kim Chinha" <asteroidgirl (at) yahoo.com>, e.lequeux (at) tiscali.fr, info (at) amnesty.ca, info (at) ccadp.org, "Carol (VAN) Parnell" <PARNELC (at) telefilm.gc.ca>, "Brooke Burgess" <brooke (at) brokensaints.com>, "Dave Huynh" <aquablue740 (at) yahoo.com>, janetcedarspring (at) hotmail.com, xebdra13 (at) msn.com, davidsoe (at) newschool.edu, freedmail (at) newschool.edu, crum (at) earthling.net, tessa (at) thequayles.com, hollywood (at) 555.com, lcheung (at) spaceadventures.com, fuelcell (at) fuelcellstore.com, adisonbaines (at) zosa.com, oiginv (at) ucia.gov, johnk (at) dva.wa.gov, dick (at) dva.wa.gov, zubrin (at) aol.com
xau2.pdf with notes as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/ will be used in case.
Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act:
The act is named for former white house press secretary James Brady, who was disabled by a gunshot wound sustained during and attempted assignation of president Reagan.
What is prevention? What is prejudice? What do the National Security Council members feel about the lawsuit against the White House press sectary McClellan?
I asked the jurors a single question? I said to them-ladies and gentlemen of the political economic social and organizational order over seeing the court reporter’s rendition of the case as recorded? I jest- Really I ask such a thing in a opening statement to infer that your P.C.E.O. diversity is appreciated in review of the complicated issues effecting a taxed internet proposal that is based on the Senate Server Reform Bill and input liabilities of the bill as the secretary of the senate may feel input prejudice is based on mixed content and mirror collection tactics that support a away to remove liabilities of the senate; yet that do not? I ask you today to identify the reason why we refer to the Brady Bill as the Brady bill and not the Hinckley Bill? Honorable service to the country, exemplary service in the line of duty, a bullet for the president-a press secretary’s disability that was the aftermath of such service to one’s country. The irony is that in the street you tell a person that man or has been placed under the legislative confines of the Brady Bill and they steer away from it meaning to infer that he or she must be a crazed gunman-the slander is immediate and the assertion is that James Brady was Crazy and that third parties needed to be protected from James Brady: however, the irony is in fact that it should be called the Hinckley Bill-as in this case, honorable service with honor duty placed a man under such a bill and therefore did not assert that the duty was as exemplary—or even under any position of a line of fire-yet, that his press assertions of the national image and direction of a nation were semi-contrary to the opinions of the press secretary of the White House; the Brady bill in this case was used with malice in concert to the function of the prejudice that it conformed around a case construction. Such a case construction the that F.B.I. used it as defense for entrapment and made gainful attributes to the bill for reasons that we would rather not dispute in 5,000 “fly papers.” With a silent petition against the White House press secretary for defamation against the Ft-A School for passing a “Hinckley,” through FT-A school training which would never happen-as to assert such incompetence could be fostered in training the brightest minds in the U.S. NAVY for the Nuclear Submarine fire control position—such that slander would engage the public affairs office of the Pentagon if the content in question for xau2.pdf were not of sound principle and of a reasonable and cognizable theory.
We asked the White House Press Secretary if the Public Affairs office of the Pentagon had had knowledge of the complicated issues that would effect the public perception of the Bill for the Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. He said in a simple review I would hope if I were injured by taking a bullet for the president that I would have a “Brady Gun Bill placed over me,” in my disabled state to protect me from Hinckley- the crazed gunman? It would be an honor to take a bullet for the presiedn4t if I was called upon to do such or become injured in the line of duty and receive such a bill-after all, it is named after my predecessor. This case sir’, can you comment on why a young man is suing your office under the company name first amendment productions, and why he registered the company name while in the court room, what is the difference of a company before entering into a legal dispute and during a legal dispute? Due, your homework, it’s due process of course, and the right of the veteran under the Brady Bill, not the Hinckley Bill, to engage in a business through the National Veteran’s Business Development Corporation after July 2006 for a dispute with a on-line company ? Joking, he says…I think its funny, the young man was injured in the NAVY and the ARMY had a conflict of interest with a issue the press secretary should have commented upon as seen in xau2.pdf on http://jtjames.spymac.com/.
This all based on the speculative conversations of course for the Jury to predicate upon the functions of the allegations of “billet scouting for policy objectives with acquisition principles,” as the case was based on a an enlistment rationale of with a selection process and a required feature of policy planners with implementation models. We ask the jury to identify with the feature of prevention and the basis of speculative reasoning. Where would you find models for economic reasoning with speculative software? Most would say, ‘I guess in software derived from behavioral modeling of the stock market-to such no software has ever been made so refined to understand all the human behaviors in investment practices- we hope.’ We continued on and ask the press sectary about prevention and how to model the best formulaic policy and legislative goal of prevention around the Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, and said; J Dedrick is perfect for the job—which we will prove to you in the court…very few people could have seen the situations that occurred in many of the market events we will prove were speculated by J Dedrick prior to their investment potential being realized. We will ask the court to find investment models made form his own ideas, actuary tables made from his very own theories, we will ask the Jury to review the ideas and place them in context to his ideas as seen in this proposal. That was almost dropped from a plane over Hollywood to resolve a conflict of interest and the idea we will refer to as the “fly-paper,” as to say let fly the paper or let the paper catch fly’s on the wall.
You will be asked to understand a few metaphors dealing with planning features of the strategies of the interaction, and procedural dialouge of J Dedrick with a body acting with a constant applied force, with legislative intent or developmental gain, that you will decipher in the context of the arguments set to the single document as you attempt to understand the behavior of J Dedrick in his financial and health related behaviors. Very few facts will be placed to affirm these behaviors are suggested to be a based on rational behavior other than to assert in the court room you will have to render a verdict based on his dialogue with “our,” case against the Press Secretary of the U.S. by which in an ironic displacement, as jurors with personal lives, you may, if you feel a public trust has been violated in the counter argument with supplemental evidence file a civil litigation after the court renders a verdict against the press secretary as well; your motive is contingent upon your ruling* as, you may file a class action lawsuit if you feel a lack of evidence in support of; allegations, legal theories and suppositions is counter motion to the development of the bill with prejudice to the content of the presentation material you are going to read and review with prejudice and without prejudice.
The jury will review the assessment of 100 enlisted army personal with 10 Army officers, 100 Enlisted Naval employees and 10 Naval officers who have reviewed the case presentation xau2.pdf with all notes* included in the service record with document tampering and the single leave chit of the Young man as screw member aboard the U.S.S. Constitution and been asked a series of questions; questions that were based on determining if the document you are about to read and deliberate upon is a function of “psy-op,” if dropped over Hollywood to achieve publishing over the context of the Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act used with prejudice in a wrong format that should be renamed the Hinckley Bill. The White House press secretary asked the secretary of the V.A. if this was the best way to deal with the Honorably discharged Veteran’s case-speculatively asserting the Public Affairs office of the Pentagon received the case presentation that is stored is placed in the Whatcom County Superior Court House for complications with the release of funds in Lou of the complications with the fly-paper and the vehicles that he press secretary jokingly said: could you image me in that thing talking about 101_ways_2_Kill_Ossama_Bin_Laden-I would probably get shot.
80% of the person’s may have feel the research done at Sepulveda veteran’ administration dealing with the Analog environmental condition for heightened theta brain wave activity in analog environment may have responded that; work done at the National Space Biomedical Research was warrant enough to solicit a proper investigation and that all supplemental behaviors were contingent upon culpable neglect with an inferred “totality of propositions,” that led to the assumptions that oversight was conditional upon the success as implemented to insure that person’s in Hollywood knew the behaviors of certain cases and that they should never use the FT position for gainful machinations of oversight of legislative bills with “billet scouting from congressional liaisons of suspect characteristics*.” The men and women of the ARMY and NAVY were asked these important question as not cited—and did feel that it was in fact a “psy-op,” of the U.S. Government after or (x) a “L.E.D.-fly-paper,” drop.
The Jury-you persons who must have the document xau2.pdf to review the ARMY/NAVY conflict will be required to review the ARMY and NAVY answers to the some questions that assist in understanding all the e-mails in context to the answered that are given. You will see a wry sense of humor with some eccentric behaviors- we started today with a little concept the young man came up with; It was for this little production a 1-hour special each week during the event production that involved Ian Guilland and the Singer, Songwriter fifty cents that dealt with non-lethal weapons and that had some special guest from the 1999 World Trade Organization protest-who had since gone into business manufacturing non-lethal weapons for officers to shoot protestors that did not involve battering rams to faces, with special guest from the Peru revolt at the gold mining company in Peru, in 2004 who talked about preparedness in protest activities in which you may be shot with rubber bullets; Ian Guilland could shoot $00.50 with a/many/six rubber bullets and show the coolest little non-lethal gadgets the government is providing for protest activities. With a gun rack in the futuristic horse drawn carriage holding the weekly sales with the N.R.A. oversight to protect J Dedrick from Hinckley “look a likes,” or “behave a likes”—the joker said-we could even do a rendition of the scene in “Planet of the Apes,” along the way to destination x, prior or (X) to the “fly-paper,” in which the dude gets caught with a bolo net in front of the carriage with a picturesque image in slow motion of the head of fifty cents landing.
The young officers and enlisted personal were then asked if they felt that Senator Kennedy’s name in the document was a type of slander or infringement upon the office of Senator Edward M. Kennedy-they said it was fifty/fifty chance that it was if the ARMY/NAVY conflict was not resolved by the public affairs office of the Pentagon in the Fly-paper argument modality of thought-as it was obvious the young man could sue the White House Press Secretary to remove any slander along the way…of the carriage production , you remember the event with the vehicle, that promotes peace with progress and all that happy who haw, and that—the officers, were asked;
When you look at the future; all the young men and woman who want to be actors artist, dreamers and so on, you tell them to shut up and man the damn post-recite your eleven general orders, and say if you want to be an artist look at this booklet-see that god damn good looking man there on the U.S.S. Constitution that pressured the British Columbian government to turn over a criminal syndicate that was entrapped into behavior that were oh so not becoming of the “psy-op’s,” Hollywood drop with a little letter to the Mayor in L.A. in a extraditing way. The SECNAV was asked by the press secretary about J Dedrick and due to a long standing tradition of an oversight of content like what was in xau2.pdf-he responded did Hollywood feel that the public affairs office of the pentagon was ready to defend the first amendment for one day each year or not? I mean it was like A or B—the armory was for the bill of rights or the other way around before or after in context to the defense abuse of the FT position for gainful policy implementation of resource acquisition over family property.
your motive is contingent upon your ruling* - Therefore your motive may be increased if you are not given proper evidence and right to latent discovery to achieve a verdict; however if no evidence is given and all the admissible evidence is based on the right to petition within the confines of legislative development then-your behavior will effect the outcome of the Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.
“Billet scouting from congressional liaisons of suspect characteristics*.”-the use of the Brady bill to support investigation into contacts with limited characteristics that show prevention may have been more aptly applied to models that made inquiry of coffee acquaintances-as a cup of coffee or a sexual exchange of fluid may be unjust reason for interrogations limits of policy development in case oversight as feedback from person of suspect interrogation is of viable deduction for policy development and asserts forced development is controlled by the oversight by the White House with prejudice tot eh content of xau2.pdf that is not based on irrelevant context to F.T.C. trespass theories effecting the secretary of the senates right to receive information that may allow a policing function to offset the prejudice prevention modeling with software behaviors...
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:22:39 -0800 (PST)
"jason dedrick" <tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Request for funds from personal savings
dick (at) dva.wa.gov, csp (at) cspassociates.com, logsdon (at) gwu.edu, roger.anderson2 (at) med.va.gov
The following is a request for funds from personal
savings of Jason Dedrick through the Congressionally
appointed Legal Custodian Richard Vanesky and his
appointed case manager. This request should be
forwarded to the Federal V.A. for legal issues as
relates to the attorney of the Secretary of the V.A.
if denial of funds is reciprocated or not
I Jason Dedrick/James Dedrick do request from personal
savings the funds necessary for a one hour legal visit
to draft a "Last Will and Testament," to insure that
my personal "Interest," and "Investments," are
isolated as assets real or otherwise intellectual and
protected as personal property for transfer to the
recipient of choice either state or next of kindred in
the unfortunate event of death; to the "State," of
choice as an escheated asset under care and
maintenance of self and based on denial of required
insurance funds by non-court appointed legal custodian
for like protection of best interest and investment of
self. To insure that this escheated asset labeled the
"Art in Space Foundation," business plans may not be
sent to the Federal Government body in such an
unfortunate event. This due to the fact of the
inherent value of my assets real or otherwise
intellectual as applied to production efforts in
region most benefiting the body politic for methods
involved in a development of a financial institution
for public research and development with respect to
public space policy. However discussion with legal
representative based on the debentured web-contract
will be isolated to geography be that the state with
the greatest benefit _____________, as well as my
Due to recent continued denied request for all
business related request , I hereby make this request
of sound mind and for the better interest insuring the
management of my personal intellectual property based
on patent worthy model approaches to business
development with regional value are not placed in a
"position of tortuous interference with business
relationship,' through W.D.V.A.non-compliance with
geographical decision making for small business
related request from best "interest," and
"investments," with personal savings as is relevant to
denial of request one.
This "Communication," may not be viewed as a notice of
potential suicide attempt as I have no intention of
suicide yet, do feel that personal property is
threatened through intent to breach fiduciary duty
with neglect of congressional duty and investigative
interference for "tortuous business interference."This
feeling of threat is based on Sharon Lyndelys
assessment that an emergency is warranted when a
veteran is living without food and shelter, and a true
emergency would be not living. Since I have recently
been placed in a position of an emergency I feel that
a True emergency is the logical next to receive a
liable reciprocation from the Veteran's
Administration. This "Communication," for legal
assistance is to draft last will and testament for
geographical issues with my personal investments and
interest may not be disallowed; by the Federal V.A. or
the State as the disposition of the eschewed assets
may be in conflict with 38 U.S.C. 5502 (6) State
Regulation or Control as "Political Gifts," vs.
"Scientific Gift," as intellectual property is derived
>from theory based on Jason Dedrick's; Treatise on
gravity and its implications on social and behavioral
sciences; memory, judgment and consciousness in zero
gravity or subtitled z-axis propagation theory.
Respectfully, Jason Dedrick/James Dedrick
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:41:00 -0800 (PST)
"jason dedrick" <tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Fwd: A18352315A -billet scouting for policy objectives with acquisition principles for the National Security Council members that have had interaction with J Dedrick "Gun Control Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act." Fwd: 101_ways_2_Kill_Osama_Bin_Laden vs. 101_ways_2_Stop_Xau2.pdf_From_Publishing Fwd: State department mirror web-page complications with UIC.edu case dealing with J Dedrick Fwd: The enlistment business contentions profile- the FT rate conversion to the U.S. Naval Space Command with U.N. investigation for civil war payee with U.S. Allied Space Space Command features with training instructions for the SECNAV based on nucleaer capacity of FT rate in Space Command with targeting and landing arguments for crewed vessles--Fwd: civil war payee compromise-improper debriefing of the weapons officer*-xau2.pdf debentured webb-contract July 2006, not conscripted due to teh senate's arbitration of malice Fwd: The senate may not draft the Senate Server Reform bill without the The malice of arbitration and the Tyranny of the Majority xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/-Fwd: Not one Word was allowed in the gas chamber to pass from the son to the family, see international case with poltical refugee status saught in U.S. in light of legislative intent in oversight of case-Fwd: http://www.nps.gov/apco/pphtml/contact.html --forward with xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/ to the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park Hwy. 24, P.O. Box 218 Appomattox, VA 24522 Fwd: Civil War payee program with pensions may show planners in North procured disabled vet's for active duty behavior with psy-op stratgies that did not expose the Appomattox court house compromise features to stop war and not effect federal treasury $20.00 dollars turned into $25,000.00 due to a sticker was bad idea--Fwd: tabu-ki/not tabu-ki U.S. Space Command/U.S. NAVAL Space Command and the SECNAV's Misinformed enlistment by General Eberhart?Fwd: xau2.pdf--http://jtjames.spymac.com/ charlesswift (at) email@example.com-- Fwd: Seeking resources for presentation--Fwd: There is a direct "procedural dialogue," that is being maintained that holds a legal course of action with prejudice to the "court reporter/intercept," argument--To the Honorable Gordon R. England Secretary of the Navy dcgordon (at) stanford.edu and Sergey Lavrov -Balkans helicopter crash and 17 peace keepers? Fwd: Military to continue to pay Iraqi media: Casey http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060303/ts_nm/iraq_usa_newspapers_dc -- xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Was Orson Wells a terrorist by today’s standards and how does the FX T.V. show “Over There,” assert the rationale that media has motive if constrained to developing arguments Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-mjp Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-mjp Fwd: xau2.pdf and the right to petition the SECNAV for a "psychological warfare pin." Fwd: Victor Yushchenko's case forwarded to the U.N. due to State Department review of case conflict with Vladimir Danchev's right to political asylum--without a radio--postmaster (at) nioc-norfolk.navy.mil Fwd: DAVID - and the writings on the wall --xau2.pdf--David Sanborn Investigation Pending scapegoat--with army/navy conflict of interest--find a Jew hater with power to disguise investigation Fwd: : Miranda Rights in xau2.pdf may conflcit with the Miranda Rights as seen in this e-mail-3,000 italian troops withdraw from Iraq--maybe the 22-C.I.A. officers could be asked about Bath party retaliation Fwd: Symbolic Integrator and the reason why a e-mail was stopped from contextual examiantion with xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/Fwd: Requires xau2.pdf http:jtjames.spymac.com/ Lavrov's failed coercion Fwd: Fwd: The Doctor/Court Reporter--he or she must be a duly sworn in court reporter to review the content of the e-mail if the destination of reciprocities is stopped to remove liabilities of the P.C.E.O. baseline in efforts to insure a fair undue process is occurringFwd: Hedge Fund Organizers and the Donald Evans complication with Hedge Fund Organizing with the Veteran's Administration http://jtjames.spymac.com/--Fwd: Pen-Tax--Fwd: Secret Service Detail-- may show Fwd: Communications majors may ask about the F.T.C. violations for the do-not mail email registry functions with a type of e-mail recipients with a P.C.E.O. baseline--ScottMccain (at) yahoo.com --- Case logistics for a “U.N. three month training seminar,” for cadets may be discussed in light of the conflict with the e-mails in tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com: --Fwd: San Quentin protest and the F.B.I. case with organizers involved in the Van Nuy Guys case with the F.B.I. -- Fwd: Image-Nation and the Oz-12 gun in face video for pre-trial evidence--Fwd: Trial/Pre-Trial Review by fair an impartial P.C.E.O. jury in with due process to see if Jury Selection as a feature of multi-party representation to see if J Dedrick can be given a donated seat for case construction of the content in xau2.pdf Fwd: 2:05-cv-00470-MJP, Fwd: Treasury Issues with the 25,000.00--> 20.00 bill See Secretary Snows' advise case feasibility? Fwd: directly relative to unique aspects of some D.N.A. and as relative to Northcomm’s data base policy for D.N.A. storage and tax-credits as consistent with demands of the F.B.I. and Interpol for the Virtual Case File management system; how could anything be wrong?Fwd: Credit or Debit Fwd: Mao-Tse Tsung’s “Rice-Field,” review --Fwd: Pt-109 and the Native Indian Gaming Infleucne in Universal's audience with Disney Infleunce in Orlando, FL--Mitchell's investigative senate for the CNO?Fwd: P.O. 371 Space Policy class with Air Force Oversight Fwd: LANCE BASS and J DEDRICK in Class action lawsuit against N.A.S.A. for prejudice with legislative devlopemental gain of the profiled aerospace seat industry**see tax-credit features in the U.N. method of the orbital slot assessment for offset differentials similar to method and process of intangible seat offset from xau2.pdf http://jtjames.spymac.com/.Fwd: U.N. Investigation may show that artinspace (at) gmx.net is registered to user with location in U.N. location in Vienna Austria and may* allow discovery process to assist in the “Give you Food, Take your Food for Oil through hardship in New Mexico Program.”.Fwd: VET Tresspass to Tort's office for the D.A. in the state of Washignton -- Tresspass 2:05-cv-00470-MJP Fwd: Please forward to the regional office for the information resource security administrator of the U.S.G.S. for the N.S.F review of all grants dealing with N.S.F. features software development and management for resource acquisition behaviors and theories—This communication is based on sound process and method for determining functions of state and federal oversight of EROS data base consideration to the Senate Server Reform Bill function with features of complicated information management assessed against resource acquisition theories as applied to the P.C.E.O. baseline:--Fwd: FORD review of Green aspects of Concept Car with California legislators may x: Fwd: Please store with the secretary of senate with access only by the Armed Service Committee Members as some of the content was e-mailed to Governor Mit Romney and may be placed in the hands of the secretary of the senate with prejudice to senator x --as may assist in creating useful dialogues with the Governor to understand some Armed Service Committee issues effecting Massachusetts residents. FWD: F.T.C. complication with do not mail registry and method and process with the e-mail output--Fwd: The Artist Against Big Brother 1984 e-mails in account Fwd: Procurement features with the TSA for policy violations that support policy development with D.O.D. interest as Northcomm 'has or has," not reviewed content.Fwd: AMGEN Complications with "selective engagement theories," in Micro-Modular Robots forward to C.E.O.-- TACT PROJECT- Policy guidance on convergence function with F.T.C. management of e-mails as akin to the TACT project with case citation listed in e-mail as based on F.T.C. violation for continued developmental goals of the content in xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Fwd: Magnetic resonance imaging system abuse potentials in private war profiteering see presentation http://jtjames.spymac.com/ Fwd: A $20.01 cent dinner with a N.A.S.A. key note Speaker under teh C.E.I.S.S. Grant Funded ClassFwd: MEDIA-X and the WARNER contract with USA banks and Microsoft may have complications with former Stanford alumni-- lcheung (at) spaceadventures.com Fwd: The “Rothschild,” Scenario--“Nano-engineered,” threat.
vice_president (at) whitehouse.gov, Elena.makovskaia (at) usri.org, xau2pdf (at) httpjtjames.spymac.com, Karen.Bligh (at) usris.org, john.Garcia (at) state.nm.us, essay (at) jice.org, wugu (at) un.org, recruitment (at) osce.org, intelligence.hpsci (at) mail.house.gov, torre (at) nsc.navy.mil, charlesswift (at) gmx.net, senator_bingaman (at) bingaman.senate.gov, senator (at) biden.senate.gov, senator (at) dorgan.senate.gov, olympia (at) snowe.senate.gov, logsdon (at) gwu.edu, oosa (at) unvienna.org, qr2555 (at) usma.edu, scottmccain (at) yahoo.com, lavrov (at) unoosa.org, johnbolton (at) unoosa.org, dcgordon (at) stanford.edu, russ (at) mindpollen.com, artinspace (at) gmx.net, dtorok (at) ftc.gov, ews (at) us.ibm.com, giftshop (at) oldnorth.com, wwwmail.boeing2 (at) boeing.com, public_affairs (at) misc.pentagon.mil, ecb (at) secretservice.gov, kofiannan (at) unvienna.org, angelamerkel (at) gmx.net, alw (at) peaceinspace.com, chancery (at) president.lv, underseawarefare (at) navy.mil, u.s.copyright.office (at) loc.gov, yandex (at) webmaster.ru, copyright (at) yahoo-inc.com, northcompa (at) northcom.mil, info (at) simmonsforcongress.com, hipaa (at) nhyoko.med.navy.mil, edspace (at) nasa.gov, dlogsdon (at) uschamber.com, julie.simard (at) space.gc.ca, marketing (at) ballard.com, mayor (at) lacity.org, "Carol Rosin" <rosin (at) west.net>, flo (at) state.gov, lavrov (at) unvienna.org, imag (at) telus.net, info (at) canadacoucil.ca, "Shambhala Music Festival Ltd." <info (at) shambhalamusicfestival.com>, info (at) hpowercanada.com, mayors (at) pcf.city.hiroshima.jp, nobuyuki.idei (at) jp.sony.com, stringer (at) pdp.crl.sony.co.jp, info (at) guatemala-embassy.org, info (at) estemb.org, emwas (at) colombiaemb.org, Embaguat (at) sysnet.net, piracy (at) apple.com, countyadmin (at) vulcancounty.ab.ca, publisher (at) vulcanadvocate.com, inquiries (at) vfs.com, jan (at) vfs.com, scottlew (at) vfs.com, WilliamClayFordJr (at) ford.com, JamesPadilla (at) ford.com, Mike.s.zafirovski (at) boeing.com, hong (at) bpf.org, "Kim Chinha" <asteroidgirl (at) yahoo.com>, e.lequeux (at) tiscali.fr, info (at) amnesty.ca, info (at) ccadp.org, "Carol (VAN) Parnell" <PARNELC (at) telefilm.gc.ca>, "Brooke Burgess" <brooke (at) brokensaints.com>, "Dave Huynh" <aquablue740 (at) yahoo.com>, janetcedarspring (at) hotmail.com, xebdra13 (at) msn.com, davidsoe (at) newschool.edu, freedmail (at) newschool.edu, crum (at) earthling.net, tessa (at) thequayles.com, hollywood (at) 555.com, lcheung (at) spaceadventures.com, fuelcell (at) fuelcellstore.com, adisonbaines (at) zosa.com, oiginv (at) ucia.gov, johnk (at) dva.wa.gov, dick (at) dva.wa.gov, zubrin (at) aol.com, mail (at) rsce.ru, majordomo (at) us-cert.gov, kevinphagen (at) ibc.com
The Signed Gorbachev $2.00 bill on the Willy Wonka fly-paper:
The “Fly-Paper,” had a chain link domino effect for a type of lawsuit or case petition in a court of due process with a court reporter that was not bias in collection of ;books, documents, and summary of findings with prejudice to the content of the “fly-paper,” effecting the aerospace industry and long range visions of a Disneyland on the moon by 2032 with the Japanese Space Agency influence in good economic relations with similar projects of the content in xau2.pdf as seen on http://jtjames.spymac.com/.
We had a series of fly-paper leaflets of xau2.pdf that were in group clusters with a “Willy Wonka Silver Certificate*,” for one seat to outer space to be placed into the context of the competition. The
“Willy Wonka Silver Certificate A18352315A*,”-Gorbachev said in America the Mob Rules as it does in Europe and Russia and in Italy-wit the exception of “our/my/PUTIN,” style apology for the attempted assassination of the Pope in the early eighties. Our countries for many years have admires the birth place of the renaissance Italy-and the type of sponsorship applied to artist that engage in projects that have along range vision and that have a palpable substrate. The Berne Convention’s birth place was Italy and began in the late 1900 century before a 100 year war…our contrition to this seat to outer space for an artist will help in the worlds greatest competition for a seat that any country has seen. Many artists all vying for the seat many judges and the home of the art will be in Italy or Alaska-new works new doors for the cathedral and the Vatican a competition between the donatellos’ of today, the Michelangelo’s of tomorrow, a dreamers artist songwriters, all to engage in the manner of peaceful competitions. My place in History may show our influence in Hollywood is changing but, our interest in an apology for the actions taken against the Pope will be placed in context to the giving of the seat and the expenses to gather the support for the competition of the highest caliber artists in the world.
I have signed on a two dollar bill and defaced it with democracy with a caveat promise/security for the seats, seat to be placed in context to the document xau2.pdf and the very sane and rational approach to the 50 year initiative of the Bakniour Cosmodrome as seen on the lease of the Cosmodrome to Nurtselan Nazerbayev and as seen on the debentured web-contract for the sale of intellectual property to the Science Fiction Forums, Disney, China, or any others’ who’s long range vision of a mission to Mars is to [see the debentured web-contract and web-bond in xau2.pdf that will solicit legal resources for a enlistment dispute after July of 2006,] the process of which we as a democratic union of confederate nations and here in a new country where I live with the expectation of a true democracy as yet, I have not seen in conflicts arising the case with J Dedrick and the document xau2.pdf that I have managed to render a process of donated seat to outer space for the conflicts on the document that has fallen in the fly-paper with one signed promissory note on a silver certificate; I realized that the littering expenses were extreme for each document, dropped in the “Fly-Paper,” zone except that each document was signed and as such was a work of art and managed to make quite an impression on free market economy tactics and strategies for new media marketing events similar to the blanketed island in the south pacific by that one artist.
I was not responsible for the action that took place but, in providing the seat I feel that a review was warranted to express my interest sin not being alleged to have planned the Cessna activities in the “fly-paper,” drop zone over Hollywood . The full document xau2.pdf was placed in a printing shop in Peru for period of time to find a way to print the 5,000 copies and the group in Vancouver felt so frustrated about the expenses in the F.B.I. case with prejudice to J Dedrick who never had any real interaction with the Van Nuy Guys that they said that they would assist in recouping expenses in the printing at later time if the British Columbia Mounties were not informed for J Dedrick’s reason for placement in the Evergreen Motel, Room 103 in Bellingham Washington and the conflicts of interest in the ARMY and NAVY with content in xau2.pdf . Later in the history of psy-ops the document was called the “The ARMY-NAVY sandwich Sci-Fly-Paper xau2.pdf.”
I hope that in keeping good relations with the embassy in Los Angeles the soviet Unions was allowed to insure themselves from inflection in the fly-paper by reviewing all the documents with notes in the e-mail account tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com and in the document xau2.pdf to insure that context of the document related tot eh service aboard the U.S.S. Constitution of J Dedrick as related to the service record and investigations by the NSA into the Russian/Mexican drug smuggling, tunnel in southern California and influence in Hollywood as well as the so-called “Harriet Tubman,” in Bellingham with influence in British Columbia and Hollywood. We, not including J Dedrick, have for some time in the transition from a the fall of the soviet union changed many strategies in service industries to assert that shadow economies are not solely based on pressures of intangible assets; bit, that coercion of behavior in acquisition strategies show us many similarities in the U.S. and the Soviet union in changing market places by which out orbital slots will not be pressured upon by the conflagration of the F.C.C. goals for major telecommunication companies that may assert a leasing potential in Russian orbital slot managements may have long term gain acting against the promise function of the lease-we assert that our promises are sound-yet, in the long range our landlord tenant dispute may cause complications with the orbital slot assessments that affect U.S. Commerce if we change direction on moment notice as it is our compunction to do so-not including J Dedrick.
The entrapment of a nation into Iraq was feature of the F.C.C. influence in our failing infrastructure of satellites and remotes sensing powers of influence in many nations. We have realized that in time our leasing features of orbital slots with the work engaged by Sergi Lavrov at the U.N. not including the “Oil For Food scandal with sanctions thought to be a feature of entrapment into Iraq by the Soviet planner for Vladimir Putin,” that we have come to the consensus that our orbital slots may have features of disruption to U.S. Planners and that we may lease them with privilege-so that we may take consideration to developmental gain. This process inordinately complicated, and based on some features of very practical aspects of understand some aerospace interest in the sale/traded commodity of differential assets of intangible seats offset by the 50,000 members of on-line work harvesting through the Bakinour services or Japanese company in New Mexico that does not solicit the F.B.I. for entrapment measures against oil property owners in New Mexico see the “Give you Food, Take your Food for Oil in New Mexico through the Texaco hardship program,”-we will not allow another Greg the “Bear,” Olsen to solicit Nazerbayev and Ruscosmos interaction with Boeing aerospace if the feature of the slander is based on prejudice to the advantaged to commercial aerospace influences with/on/around/near/by/through/backtracking from/ the “The ARMY-NAVY sandwich Sci-Fly-Paper xau2.pdf,” and all complications with a enlistment dispute case after July 2006-The Vulcan—The God of Fire and Forge.
The Vulcan, L.A.wsuit:
Scenario position of privilege for Wally Sholdice; It was imagined that when paramount was able to pressure a lawsuit against the city of Vulcan for an infringement upon a market demographic of Vulcan’s name and trademark as constrained to a feature of marketing potentials for the star trek audience demographic that a city official may have through that if the city expended its horizons to reach out to the sci-fi audience abroad that a method to remove the lawsuit could effectively engage the city council members to pressure influence with gainful projects. The people in “ Vulcan , Alberta ,” also felt that an observatory may strengthen the city’s image as well as the project of the “Art in Space Foundation.” with a museum in Vulcan may have done the same. The condition of the lawsuit was one such that forced a type of aggressive change in city council members expenditures to remove the lawsuit potential so that the city would not be held under a corporate thumb effecting agricultural resources, as they currently do with J Dedrick an the case feigning by the D.A.’s office thought to be some type of legislative assistance to the city in Alberta that caters to a sci-fi demographic due to unique name and building construction sin city almost 60 kilometers south of Calgary.
The city was questionable about the nature of the lawsuit that petitioned resources from the province of Alberta to pressure a review of the demographics liabilities that did effect Paul Allen prior to the merger of DreamWorks and Paramount Studios with a 734 million dollar/tax write off gain. The structure of the tax-write off was one such that an infringement with the studio lawsuit for Paramount lawsuit with Vulcan placed the company under a parent company of Paul Allen such to reinforce the position of privilege over the city; as if to say now the lawsuit it two fold and infringement upon the trademark value of Vulcan companies owned by Paul Allen and the infringement upon the initial case structure by Paramount Pictures.
The case 2:05-cv-00470-MJP with initial papers for a request for legal fees was denied due to a feature though to relate real assets, a vehicle, owned by J Dedrick of a greater value than $2,400-however in conflict with real liability of request seven related tot eh office of senator Edward m. Kennedy for case conflicts of interest with the service record for an employee of the military who lived in Charles Town Navy yard who had the right to seek a case manager from the city of Massachusetts that showed a conflict of interest with the release of funds with prejudice against the content of the “Art in Space Foundation.”
The theory is such that if the City of Vulcan purchased the building of the evergreen motel from under the current landlord tenant agreement that a complicated feature of neglect by the D.A.’s office would show a type of neglect that is solicitation against the City of Vulcan Alberta . This hereafter referred to in the case structure by employees in Alberta as the case of “ramblings,” or “diarrhea mouth,” that show that J Dedrick may have been wrongfully placed in positions of prejudice used to pressure the city administrator into defensive postures to prevent future solicitations of political power in Alberta through a large case that may show to reason a type of agricultural gain could have been reinforced though an impending lawsuit or ever present peril of a loss. The infringement upon the capacity of development may a have shown that diversity in market structure would have had greater development with J Dedrick’s direct presence in the development of a museum in Alberta that was not infringed upon by the standards of the D.A.’s abuse of veterans in the state of Washington with gain for Paul Allen.
Concatinated series e-mail with contextual integration to xau2.pdf as developed in light of army/navy conflict of interest with the Public Affairs office of the Pentagon.
From: jason dedrick [mailto:tsiolkovsky_gravity (at) yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Sharon (at) DVA.WA.GOV
Subject: Legal Custodian denied attorney fees to litigate against the custodians privilege of position; therefore I can only assume that the legal custodian is a lawyer and will meet with me about my legal issues.
Legal Custodian denied attorney fees to litigate against the custodian’s privilege of position; therefore I can only assume that the legal custodian is a lawyer and will meet with me about my legal issues. (X) represent omission of content.
Sent to "Lawyer," or "Legal Custodian," if legal fees have been denied due to position of privelage?
Request for assistance in a discovery process against the W.D.V.A. requires urgent consultation.
Petitioner asserts that upon Naval Enlistment for reasons related to legal complications of a sole proprietorship of a company names Mar’s Property Management and Asset Resource Systems or hereafter referred to as MP-MARS© that enlisted recruiter was given a copy of a document/contract referred to as a “Debentured Web-Contract,” registered and dated with witness testimony. The petitioner asserts that a enlistment was based on the premise of legal assistance for complicated treaty problems relative to the document as related to a proprietary process developed over the previous few years under which time the U.S. Space Command had observed development in unofficial classes for space policy taken at Colorado State University . Also during which time many independent contacts related to the development of a proprietary concept and counter point marketing platform was developed.
During enlistment period attempts were made to sustain momentum with the project under the prospect of the enlistment promise for small business operations in the Navy as active service member. This problem of the enlistment for legal interests in the Debentured Web-Contract even after visits with the current Staff Judge Advocate for the Bremerton Naval Base then Lt Cmdr James Link stationed in Groton were compounded in that a private business operating within a capacity of the Washington State as a nuclear trained weapons operator on a “Fast Attack,” Submarine-in Overhaul. This development caused many political complications and after communications to the Senator from Washington Maria Cantwell for small business issues many problems began developing not consistent with previous investigations from the Office of Personal Management.
The legal process developed to protect intellectual property was “Unintentionally,” managed through a process related to the administrative function of the discharge process three days prior to the Declaration of War with Iraq . This relative tot he reason for discharge as based on improper health care for political reasons based on the organizational goals of the “Art in Space Foundation©,” managed under presumptions of enlistment based on legal assistance for business that are not within the scope of the Small Business Administration.
The medication process was little more than a investigative utility for access to all known data on myself with objective goals for a process to maintain a “tortuous business interference,” as to usurp intent or manufacture motive to establish a pre-enlistment criteria…satisfied only by the goal of the development of a media platform to communicate about deficiencies in public space policy and therein science and technology policy deficiencies that do not establish a average citizenry in space-under such later discoveries as may be called the lack of enlisted space rates for a (XXXXXXX)
OMMITTED CONTENT TO THE STATE MANAGED SERVER. A total of eight paragraphs.
I have included snippets of facts that I tried to compose around elements of my case that I felt could assist me in my case efforts; as I was given no legal help and I am not a lawyer I am uncertain if it is even legible, it is just a big brainstorm of statutes and complications in my case with aspects of arguments relative to a process involved in a investigation that is criminal and politically driven to justify the medication process as a means to foster an investigation. After six years of fighting a process developed to detour privatized space that has even medicated me for political issues relative to my nuclear weapons occupation and personal business aspirations that I am scarcely able to sit and write as I was able to prior to medication based on my production and enlistment relative to the closest position of a “Average Citizen,” space based occupation in a crewed vessel that was not a potential rate with certainty upon enlistment due to the process of the “Submarine Computer Electronic Field,” and hence arguably removes the intent that is political in nature as the relationship of a target motion analyst is relative to landing operations for space related activities with respect to celestial bodies.
[i]State Statutes on Claims Against Government Entities.
Sustained Tortuous conduct in economic relations by --The U.S. Army/The Federal V.A./ and the W.D.V.A.
What did the W.D.V.A. do with financial request as a legal custodian in charge of personal estate including viable business plans and intellectual property based on elements reliant on a type of strategy----Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Who would be called to testify based on the Office of Public Health’s liability for the state of Washington in reflection of all occurrences with in the state of Washington for a Tort case with international complications that reflect rational business goals developed around asset creations driven by interactive tax-incentives .
Government and state agency employees: Richard Vanesky/ Sharon Lyndley/ Carol “Seaman,” Smith/
Negligence of Governmental Functions: 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b) –
Filed with the Whatcom County Court house against Richard Vanesky for a Neglect of Congressional Duty:
Civil liabilities for misappropriation of trade secrets for a Sharon Lyndley with and intent to Breach of Fiduciary Duty:
Identify “Discretionary Acts,” and “Omissions,” of each government employee that are identified by state compliance with the FTC for small business goals fostering fair and competitive business access to capital for the company “Art in Space Foundation,” as potential by the National Veteran’s Business Development Corporation based on compliance and minimum veteran benefits for the 108th congress title 15 § 657-700.
Time limit for commencing action is based on: 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680
I have filed an Administrative claim1 that has been acknowledged as a complaint by Cheryl White of the Federal V.A. as she spoke with the filing staff at the Bellingham Municipal Court about the fee waiver document and the filing of petition A054-0094 for harassment charges based on “Neglect of Congressional Duty,” by Richard Vanesky, yet no response in written format has been made for complaint, properly filed with the county court for issues relevant to the filing for “Tortuous
Time limit for commencing action
public_affairs (nospam) misc.pentagon.mil (unverified)
25 Sep 2006
Time limit for commencing action is based on: 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680
I have filed an Administrative claim1 that has been acknowledged as a complaint by Cheryl White of the Federal V.A. as she spoke with the filing staff at the Bellingham Municipal Court about the fee waiver document and the filing of petition A054-0094 for harassment charges based on “Neglect of Congressional Duty,” by Richard Vanesky, yet no response in written format has been made for complaint, properly filed with the county court for issues relevant to the filing for “Tortuous business interference.”
The obtainment of written letters from the W.D.V.A. is the premier reason the case was begun as to the intent of the initial compliant sent on Sept 15th 2004, as an attempt to abolish sovereign immunity to make desirable the that the governmental agency in question the W.D.V.A. be held to the same standard as a private party; in order to promote uniform application of the law and the salutary effect of incentives created by the potential for liability, as to insure that governmental entities such as the W.D.V.A. are held to the same standard as private parties.
Therefore the removal of liabilities for all communications prevalently has been the misconduct that warrants the abuse of and in effect sustains the argument for “tortuous interference in business expectancy,” therefore the petitioner argues that the attempt to gain a written notice for complaint through the agency has been denied as no communication reciprocations have been made by Congressionally appointed fiduciary and little from his, Richard Vanesky’s, case manager, has been made that does not attempt to remove liabilities for “tortuous interference with business contracts.” As improper means were being used to obtain trade secrets through denial of and withholding of, living expenses, water, transportation as may have begun the iterations of Complaints/Request to resolve liabilities governing the W.D.V.A. to insure Federal Compliance with agency efforts that do not create “Tortuous Business Interference.”
In order to sustain a liability through a complaint or a request a value must be presented to promote a liability as to insure that proper Federal Compliance is managed as not to further sustain “Tortuous Business Interference.”
Denied-- “Order to Proceed without Payment of Fees.”
Denied—“ Petition for Harassment.”
Court Docket—Denied Motion “Ex Parte,”
Tape—“Sharon Lyndley,” and the call to the “ Olympia Police,” with police consent to drive without license and registration.
Identify Money Damages—
Based on acknowledgment that current work efforts as identified by 38 U.S.C.A. 101 that the petitioner is working within the parameters of active military personal, then damages are assessed based on pay difference from continued service at rate advancement, this not excluding a potential for a debt to be owed, as 100% disability is approximately two pay grades higher than what was being received upon change of duty station from the Bangor Submarine Base to Bellingham proximity for reasons not to be made public through court proceedings. This pay difference, however to be offset by the damages resulting from contractual interference through Tortuous conduct in economic relations. Uncontrolled results due to lack of organized intelligence infrastructure and domestic interaction with initial intelligence goals created adverse effects threatening to personal “Intellectual Property.”
Continued service and rate advancement from 18th month to 60th month with 12 month extension. “As although identification was made that petitioner had claimed to have been on Ritalin for self medication no attempt was made to gain positive confirmation as it was not known during enlistment that the petitioner could not obtain prescriptions from outside medical care provider. A simple urine examination by the medical officer involved in mental health examination could have divested with confirmation that medication was in fact working within the shelf life of the medication and that statements made were true. As to remove the uncertainty that would have later precipitated given nature of the identification of work as rendered in work rendered from Aug 15, 2003 .
DAMAGES RESULTING FROM Tortuous conduct in economic relations:
Future Marketability as an asset to a corporation or other as relates to niche market industry for sci-fi audience and promoting a political/economic/social new media platform by which to lobby U.S. interest with respect a U.S. led mission to Mars.
1) Acceptance into the Vancouver Film School is measure to identify the marketable potential as it is the number two film school in the world; however the true damage has occurred during a period of time in which congressional appointment of the legal Custodian Richard Vanesky and the Federal Field Investigator for the V.A., have promoted unfair business practices that have based upon Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
2) Similar production efforts with grant worthy approaches N.A.S.A. Mar’s Haughton project with the Mar’s Institute as relates to “New Media,” and marketing strategies for pre-liminary marketing strategies in niche market audiences that were in conflict due to “Vulcan, Alberta and Vulcan, Inc.”
a. The complex issue here is in the value and its unique non-derivative nature that the Tortuous conduct in economic relations, was resulting from the contract with the multiple sclerosis society and the financial letter of consent from the town financial economic advisor, Georgi Popovich, as complications were resulting from international campaign with positive momentum through an international non-profit company[ii].
3) To show value in production efforts one must show a parallel success and that my production met the “ requirements,” of an another production began after and completed during my design and concept phase for planning.
a. Show the communications[iii] with Marc Boucher and Eligar Sadeh under U.S. Space Command observation.
b. Isolate the time magazine from last year with Dr. Robert Zubrin’s comments that paralleled my article that was written during my stay aboard the U.S.S. Constitution.
Time and place that damages occurred--
Six months—Sept 15, 2004 to March 15, 2004 .
Six months and residency complications for lawsuit based on liabilities issues with Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
§ 14.6 Discretionary Function Examples--
RCWA 64.40.020--Applicant for permit—actions for damages from governmental actions. (1) Owners of a property interest who have filed an application for a permit have an action for damages to obtain to obtain relief from acts of an agency which are arbitrary, capricious, or unlawful, or exceed lawful authority, or relief from a failure to act within the time limits established by law: provided that the action is unlawful or in excess of lawful authority, or it should be reasonably have been known to have been unlawful or in excess of lawful authority.
(Request disclosure[iv] for police comments and receipt of fax made on the closure of the murder investigation of Robert Eugene Stickle my grandfather who was bilked out of more than $600,000.00 and left with 500.00 dollars on his death bed with not even enough for proper burial, as during this period of obtaining emotional support, financial support, and witness testimony, a concurrent murder investigation was begun as death threats had been presented to my mother from the Chambers family. This fact presented based on the communication to Jo Laduke, the murder investigator from Scottsdale Arizona who closed the case shortly after the fax to Jo Laduke was made with the presentation to provide testimony as a material witness against the Chambers as I my ex-girl friend and I were witness to the method of the bilking and the use of chemicals to induce euphoric feelings.) This however was not the case, and thereby all request were threatened and not protected by the liability of the W.D.V.A. of protected intellectual property that was proprietary and strategic financial information or otherwise and hereafter referred to as trade secret information based on the “Art in Space Foundation©,” model process for the Debentured Web-Contract and board game herein enclosed as proprietary.
Damages also assessed on controlled communications as per recent discovery on server of my e-mail account in which all denied e-mail recipients were forwarded in one e-mail weeks after initial delivery due to methods associated with communications to the Department of State to gain method of liability maintenance as per state statutes 14.3 for liabilities methods in insuring that communications were stored with measure for litigation. To review method or process by which this was utilized to insure that it is noted to coincide with work efforts in consignment with information strategies with respect to outline of work objectives as measure to identify what constitutes active duty employment as per 38 U.S.C. 101
1) Does the challenged act, omission, or decision necessarily involve a basic governmental policy, program, or objective.
a. Does the W.D.V.A. policy have the right to maintain independent investigations that threaten intellectual property, or omitted trade secrets from the proposal from the “Art in Space Foundation,” under strategy, that would have benefited the state of Washington ?
i. If this policy is contradictory to Federal Investigations maintained under the Secretary of the V.A. as to preserve the integrity and protection of the Veteran and not to create methods for intellectual property fraud through “improper means,” of acquisition through Tortuous conduct in economic relations with Professional Negligence—Continuing Course of Treatment, with neglect of congressional duty.
2) The numerous acts, omission, and decisions by the W.D.V.A. have been made under guidance of a liabilities investigation and therefore have caused instructions to be contrary to W.D.V.A. policy and Federal Guidelines.
a. Receiving faxes containing proprietary data through behavioral coercion through denial of food, water, and health related issues as protected by health code inspectors.
i. Mice droppings and filthy habitat upon return of March.
1. Refer to DNC2RNC March,
b. Does the omission of the requirement of the Fiduciary to review any “Qualified real Property,” of “Estate,” based on “Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act,” Chapter 83.110 that would have caused Tortuous conduct in economic relations, of the Debentured Web-Contract, the Key component of the “Art in Space Foundation©,” proposal that contained the futuristic horse drawn carriage that was cited as the reason for the medication of Olanzapine, and therein created the justified appointment of a legal custodian.
c. Lack of concern for insurance issues protecting personal property real or otherwise intellectual “Misappropriation of Trade Secrets,” with acquisition through improper means.
1. Allowing Hallie Richards the landlord at the time consent to (x) onto the premise during period of time in which I had left the State “Temporarily,” to gain emotional, financial and legal support to maintain witness testimony that was valid in court with support of Erin Jo Alvarez’s deposition[v].
2. Allowed Hallie Richards access to personal funds to begin repairs on my house during period of time in which I was not living in the house or under a proper lease due consistent breach of fiduciary duty with a duty of non-interference § 22.2
3. Eviction notice from Sharon Lyndley[vi] the appointed case manager of the W.D.V.A., because she would not communicate to me in person, or through liable format in any method that could hold the W.D.V.A. accountable as to promote third party liabilities.
a. Used Hallie Richards to promote a third party removal of liabilities.
b. Hence the reason for the insurance purchase for renter’s agreement based on hotel stay for protection of computer, from theft, as I was not reciprocated to by Sharon lyndley during an eviction process and had upon the drafting of an eviction notice actually changed personal answering message to state that she would not respond to anything less than a “Emergency,” or “True Emergency,[vii]” that did in fact correlate with the new dates on the new Eviction notice drafted from the landlords who had previously damaged house, and began repairs on it in an attempt to steal money[viii] from personal account, as created through duty of noninterference and third party liabilities.
d. § 14.6 was the abuse of state managed policy by the W.D.V.A. used to insure protection of liabilities by stating that the act, omission, or decision my both Richard Vanesky and Sharon Lyndley made satisfied under the pretense that it helped accomplish the policy and program that being to protect the veteran’s assets
i. Did the petitioners “request/complaints,” (x) in reciprocal behavior that is satisfied as work rendered in “Policy Development,” for technology and innovations programs as realized by the Federal Civilian Agency contract with the Federal V.A. during major liabilities assessment for management of vets world wide with more than 2.7 billion dollars in liabilities insurance issues and handling over 100,000 vets. And did this reciprocation potentially change the course and or outcome of state centered policy objectives for like or similar goals through the in-appropriate use of investigative measures as per Richard Vanesky’s Testimony[ix] to utilize personal assets intellectual or real associated to “Trade Secrets,” as realized in strategies with respect to the Debentured Web-Contract.
3) Was the act, omission, or decision to maintain minimum compliance with respect to Jason Dedrick’s request made as to insure that basic police evaluation, judgment, and expertise could not be maintained as to insure the participation on the part of the governmental agency not then involved as to further damage valuable trade secrets and further be involved in Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
4) Does the W.D.V.A. possess the requisite constitutional, statutory or lawful authority and duty to do or make the challenged act, omission, or decision.
a. Did “inappropriate means,” as relates to “Misappropriation of trade secrets,” through the W.D.V.A. alter behavior, of wrongfully medicated petitioner that insured Federal V.A. compliance with respect to disability award as merit for investigation and create the converse requirements to facilitate the policy needed to use “Intellectual Property,” through investigation of the W.D.V.A. to create a liabilities investigation[x]
1) Where there is a legislative intent to impose a duty of care;
a. Was the Tortuous conduct in economic relations, not evaluated based on the diagnosis and the other financial information as the two should have traversed based on the current liability that has been presented financial and health privacy[xi] and where the two traverse with financial gain as perceived through the liabilities assessment herin.
b. § 14.8 the exception to the rule for legislative intent applies when it is evidenced that a particular class of (x) has been protected; as a Veteran, based on the § 14.8 Public Duty Doctrine-legislative intent I may bring a TORT action against the government entity for the violation of the Statute- Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” as per § 22.31 misappropriation of trade secrets.
i. Witness testimony to the preferential treatment of Veteran’s with disabilities like Multiple Sclerosis vs. Veteran’s (x) disabilities under their case management.
1. Inferred logic or rationale that decisions were based on preferential treatment as opposed to “Tortuous conduct in economic relations.”
2) § 14.9 Where there is a “special relationship-”
a. The response from Executive Director John King prior to release from the NAVY[xii] is evidence that one e-mail begets a response when you are not under the W.D.V.A. care but, when you are you will not receive any reciprocation from any level of the W.D.V.A.
1. Does a privities* or direct contact between public official and injured plaintiff exist:
a. Does an e-mail reciprocated during active duty under the pre-tense of future interaction that led petitioner to Bellingham for Vocational Rehabilitation constitute as “direct contact.”
b. Does the public Official owe a duty to an injured person as a specific individual; in cases where decision making is guided by non-standard methods of liable “Communications.”
2. Did the public official give express assurances?
a. Verbal and as inferred through the e-mail.
3. Did the plaintiff rely on assurance?
a. I moved to Bellingham to be with in the proximal relationship of the requirements for the Vocational Rehabilitation Program to send me to school while I worked on my production.
i. Was I directed to Bellingham against the better business interest of my production to be entrapped by a Federal Field Investigation under a wrongfull medication of a“Psychotropic drug haze,” that did little more than set the ground work for a prosecution of and slew of witnesses to confirm the disability rating in the event of a petition for “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” against the U.S. Army for their interpretation of my “Art in Space Foundation Production©,” as 38 U.S.C.A. 5711 Authority to issue subpoenas may with un-just investigative powers authored through policy of the Federal V.A. and the Veteran’s Administration as per the Secretary of the V.A.
1. Issues subpoenas for and compel the attendance of witnesses within a radius of 100 miles from the place of the hearing.
2. Require the production of books papers documents and other evidence;
a. This single statute has threatened my intellectual property and my communications with respect to my production therefore I request a discovery[xiii]
3. take affidavits and administer oaths and affirmations;
4. aid claimants in the preparation and presentation of claims;
5. make investigations and examine witnesses upon any matter within the Department’s Juristiction.
ii. Behavior of the W.D.V.A. prior to release from the NAVY was one such that I could e-mail from the Executive Director and gather a response yet after release I could not get a phone call from Congressionally appointed custodians who are acting in felonious behavior.
1. This public duty has been defaulted on when person is under the care of the party who should be examined by the Public Duty Doctrine-Special Relationship Exceptions.
b. Sharon Lyndley has acted on behalf of research for the resolution of James Dedrick, to either further promote behavioral augmentations based on literal co-dependency, congressionally managed and utilized to process misappropriations of trade secrets through improper means of obtaining information from a “psychotropic drugged,” Veteran under circumstances in controlled environments with “defiant interaction,” to the assertion of mental health examinations consistent with psychotic assertions as the reason for psychosis and legal custodian.
i. Hallie Richards third party involvement with Sharon Lyndley under felonious behavior.
1. Does the (X) exist to further purport the evaluation of a work environment as per 38 U.S.C.A. 101.
a. Elements under control in broad concepts with validation through denied request:
1. Observation of people called; including the Office of Naval Intelligence which suggested I contact the F.B.I. about my problems with respect to my then suspicions.
1. Forced me to walk and rely on (x) from hitchhiking to gather water and do laundry and obtain food as to insure that request one was responded to as was requested with written letter of explanation to the business interaction of the request as to help identify the rules and boundaries of decision making when the legal custodian is placed through non-court appointed congressional interference with respect to “Tortuous conduct in economic relations.”
1. Denial of request related to business opportunities in Whatcom County .
1. Denied birthday money for Erin Alvarez[xiv], Melanie Alvarez
a. Request 23 was measure to remove liability on the part of the W.D.V.A yet, only as Erin Alvarez was placed in a liable position by the State of Washington as she had stated that she from kindness and detest for the W.D.V.A. would assist me in making simple contact with her.
b. Further, Mr. (x) of the W.D.V.A. had difficulty in receiving the document in question as is the same with (x) more than 3 times as the final page output was page 18 of fax that would have been sufficient to remove liabilities.
2. Profile abuse- Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency.
a. Meeting the conditions required to make a request for discovery of findings[xv] in pre-trial based on the following elements; “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” “Special Relationships,” “Controlled Environment,” “Wrongful Medication,”
3) §14.10 Where the government has engaged in “Volunteer,” rescue efforts; or
4) §14.11 Where the government is guilty of a failure “ failure to enforce,” a specific statute.
a. Government agents responsible for enforcing statutory requirements posses actual knowledge of a statutory violation.
i. Since the petitioner filing claims against the W.D.V.A. under “The Federal Torts Claim Act,” requires information to discover if the W.D.V.A. had a failure to enforce a specific statute, the Petitioner request the discovery[xvi] of the government agent’s actual knowledge of a statutory violation and request subpoenas be made by the Federal V.A. with witness testimony and with the necessary seal of the United State’s Veteran’s Administration.
ii. They fail to take corrective action.
1. What actions were taken besides a new “Individual,” policy that discriminated and further promoted “Tortuous conduct in economic relations?”
iii. A statutory duty to take corrective action exist; and
iv. The plaintiff is within the class the statute intended to protect.
1. § 14.8 Veteran’s Class
b. duties does the W.D.V.A. have to the public to report any issues and what minimum requirements are needed to convey the false image to recover liabilities.
i. Does the W.D.V.A. have duty to report information that will not keep them held liable if it is in the better public interest?
1. must do so with recognition and citation.
5) § 14.12 Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Immunity
a. insure that the submission to the Congressional Committee on oversight for abuse and fraud oversee the potential for review of statutes for the state of Washington in reflection of guidance from Cheryl White, and Carol “Seaman,” Smith to direction of caseworkers to insure that the immunities granted caseworkers in the appointment of fiduciary during a disability award which is synonymous with a judicial phase of a custody proceeding which is akin to a secretary’s phase in award of disability are not extended to states party to investigation process if fact finding or investigative authority of the Veteran’s Administration if the books, papers, documents, and other evidence are perceived to have value in cases where Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” has precipitated the investigations merit by which rights and immunities have been imposed through congressional appointments of legal custodians. This liability imposition upon the State of Washington is further aggregated by the fact that the competeting industry that could have givine value to production was in the State of Washington in which the intial Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” occurred through the U.S. Army.
i. Did Sharon Lyndley receive advice from Cheryl White during period of time in which immunity was granted to Cherly White and not the State of Washington
1. Was this appropriate as per guidance from Executive Director John King’s policy and the W.D.V.A. for her to Carry out Statutory Duty
a. Most recent behaviors have been based on two fold decision making model for policy with respect to casework for Jason Dedrick/James Dedrick-
i. True Emergency vs. Emergency
2. Follow procedures dictated by statutes and superiors; and
3. Act reasonably in doing so;
i. Case workers are not immune in investigations with allegations of child abuse.[xvii]
6) § 14.20 Time Limits
a. § 14.20 RCWA 4.96.010. Tortuous conduct of local governmental entities-Liability for Damages
Insurance Complications with respect to liabilities protection for loss of intellectual property through un-insured property and the W.D.V.A. intent to “Breach of Fiduciary Duty,” through communications made without consent from Sharon Lyndley given to the Landlord Hallie Richards to enter the property forcefully,
SUPPRORTIVE CLAIMS BASED ON PRIMARY CLAIM:
Intential Torts Created by Investigative Officers-
Witness testimony by my mother to the fact that she, Carol “Seaman,” Smith told the petitioner’s my mother that I thought, “Jesus was going to Get me to Space,” as abuse of processx, since process was within her right to disclose to my mother after the forced involvement of my mother due to abuse of process (22.8) in the Olympia W.A. based march for the DNC2RNC, that has further complicated liabilities issues with respect to personal property.
This was not a discretionary act as it was made to sustain the merit behind the disability award, and character assassination.
Tortuous conduct in economic relations § 22.8 The rule in Washington is that interference is justified where the one interfering is exercising an absolute right that is equal or superior to the right that is invaded.
RCW 4.96.010 “All political subdivisions, municipal corporations and quasi municipal corporations of the state, whether acting in a governmental or proprietary capacityx, shall be liable for damages arising out of their tortuous conduct, or the tortuous conduct of their officers, agents or employees to the same extent as if they were a private person or corporation.
The proof of proprietary capacity of the W.D.V.A. is based on the promoted service of Federal Trade Communication violations for purchases in cash, Canadian or American, for the intellectual property contained in request/complaints that are unique and relate to the business that has been placed in “Arrested Development,” or as resulted in damage from “Tortuous Business Interference,” through improper means and abusive misconduct with intent. The trade secret value of request/complaints are only based on contingent value of production efforts without “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” as relevance is based on interaction and marketable value of “Likeness,” and or “Personal Interaction,” as per Vancouver Film School and personal health and well being in production efforts. Refer to page ___, of request labeled request 12 and 18 for review of proprietary capacity for sale of intellectual property as associated to section (j) of the proposal for the “Art in Space Foundationx.”
Filing with the Office of Risk Management for Tortuous conduct in economic relations, against the W.D.V.A.,/Army/Veteran’s Administration
requires first filing to be in compliance with state Statutes § 14.4
Arguments for not filing--
Description of the Injury: Upon entering into Madigan hospital for a reportedly “Bias*,” claim of manic depression and a manic attack, I received a review of medication to be prescribed based on initial examination by which personal intellectual property contained in the “Art in Space Foundation Proposal,” based on niche market strategies and pre-occupation with a product as a symbolic representation of a philosophy behind business philosophy and reason for enlistment. Petitioner alleges that conversations with Capt. Christine Daily were based on complications resulting in frustrations not manageable by Command for complications with L.P.O. as he was D.A.P.A. coordinator and this would have created a conflict of interest with respect to enlistment.
Conversations began to focus on my “business aspiration,” and why I joined and how recently I had communicated to the Office of the Senator Maria Cantwell for assistance in small business administration issues for active personal interested in non-profit companies or for-profit. However, I did “silently,” acknowledge the complications in a political scenario based on a company managed while under active duty, as a nuclear weapons operator after declaration of War-Time and felt that primary deficiencies, resulting in my Visit were based on lack of enlisted rate conversion from the position of “Target Motion Analyst,” or more commonly known as “FT,” to a enlisted space rate in the U.S. Navy Space Command and Space Cadre, as initial enlistment was based on desires to be the closest to a crewed vessel with respect to a enlisted rate in space sciences and manned presence; this correlating precisely with grant objectives of my company. The same company that used a trademark image or visual/symbolic, philosophical reference of a futuristic hose drawn carriage purporting to suggest through visual I interaction: if we are not returning to the Moon then we should just build futuristic horse drawn carriages and sell high tech gadgetsx.
This image mimicked in many ways throughout the proposal for the “Art in Space Foundation,” was integral to success of and viability of “New Media,” production based on methods for grant research and applications required to facilitate financial minimum requirements for success. However, deficient enlistment process, coupled with inadequate legal provisions for enlisted personal with interest in nuclear sciences and business operations, planned or actively participated in, with manned space objectives created requirements for solutions to legal issues not reciprocated due to deficient policy models to deal with larger umbrella problems. As relates to marketing strategies for sponsor’s and remuneration methods through complex tax-credits that stimulate privatized space efforts and asset creation through collaborations for a financial institution such as developed by myself called Mars Property and Management Asset Resource Systems hereafter referred to as MP-MARS©; were improperly perceived by deficient policy apparatus or medication of Olanzapine was a method of Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
The initial medication and continued professional negligence-continuing course of treatment, was originally facilitated by a method for Tortuous conduct in economic relations, due to the fact that Capt. Christine Daily did review the images and concurrent financial information with respect to contracts and obvious intellectual property related to then damaged relationships.
Therefore, based on the
Interference with Contractual Relationship:
22.2 interference with contractual relations—overview
1) Existence of a valid contractual relationship;
a. Multiple Sclerosis Contract--
2) Knowledge of the contractual relationship on the part of the inferior;
a. Provide copy of the medical health evaluation with proof of examination; and that this document was in fact faxed to Sharon Lyndely
3) intentional interference inducing or causing a breach or termination of the contractual relationship
a. “Intentional Interference,” Petitioner asserts that intent to breach fiduciary duty is a form of intentional interference as negligence is promoted.
i. [xviii]Denial of self governed “dispositive instrument,” legal fees,” from personal savings associated with “Last Will and Testament,” to divest personal property upon death to either “family,”
state,” financial institute,” or treaty participant state of choice of the “Antarctic Treaty,” as to insure that licensing issues or royalty potentials of “Intellectual Property,” were passed downed in last will and testament.
1. Qualification of real property based on insurance from art prospective of “initial value.”
2. “Intial Value,” of insured property as intellectual based on insurance premium for art see “Insurance Evidence,” is based on sustaining that the “revenue tax,” spent in order to fit minimum criteria for “Estate,” definition.
3. Based on section 2032A Internal Revenue Code payments through insurance as “validation only.”
b. Motive for retaliation based on letter to F.B.I. and calling police on Jason Dedrick.
c. Non-compliance of Federal Guidelines as per letter* evidenced in petition.
i. Improper motive or purpose- personal dislike or using state investigative powers to leek trade secrets through the office of the Attorney General or misappropriations of trade secrets, or using state investigative powers to ascertain value of proprietary data through liabilities presented.
1. Was Sharon Lyndely informed of her Civil Liabilities in reflection of handling my strategic information as a trade secret and did this create an inability for communications that were based on Congressional appointment; further was this measure for intentional interference and or duty of non-interference?
2. ACTION/MOTION –For discovery of investigation that have been so-called to have been begun by the W.D.V.A. to insure the removal of liabilities.
a. Reason to insure that the Federal V.A. investigation and incident expenses to investigation are not used to conscript data or discern through inappropriate means the means to acquire substantial methods or expropriate funds through investigations and work rendered as per 38 U.S.C.A. 101.
ii. Wrongfull means-
d. Whatcom county interference; denial of request one.
4) resulting damage to the party whose contractual relationship has been disrupted; and
a. Medication of Olanzapine intial “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,”
b. Professional Negligence—continuing course of treatment
5) a duty of non-interference on the part of the defendant.
Submit into evidence all faxes to showcase the method of identification of problem through faxes, as nothing with decisions of W.D.V.A. and Federal V.A. and duty of noninterference seemed to make rational sense as I with consensual validation none of the decisions were legal by measure of a justified disability award.
The following is a brainstorm based on an actual case structured around my problem.
Lincor Contractor V. Hyskell
1) Damages were based on a non-construction assessment and required liabilities investigations after first filing and the privilege of the interference with contractual relationship was with-privilege from congressional appointment of legal custodian, through legislative intent , as no assertion was made to an absolute right which is equal to or greater than the right that is invaded, other than the appointment of the fiduciary that were in fact based on investigative methods for Tortuous conduct in economic relations, as an omission and duty of non-interference caused improper means to be applied as measure to have misappropriation of trade secrets.
i) The concept of planning and design phase is not altogether new in research and development phases toward integrated systems, I.E. cars, vehicles and other aspects of developments that should be protected by public duty of investigators who protect interest of that “right to privacy in planning.” It is though new in a ever evolving economy focused on mixed marketing strategies, and convergence marketing* that innovation and competition is founded upon well laid plans. The planning involved in a development of an integrated system requires privacy, and rights that are not to be violated by intrusion based on suspected fraud, unless proven to present absolute right which is equal to or greater than the right that which is invaded.” Investigative means in this case are present by the measure of the Federal V.A. as means for invasions of privacy without liabilities or signed non-disclosure agreements on the part of the invading group. into planning or design and concept phases for persons* should be granted the same as if it were a corporation, government research and development facility holding true to methods of insurance that is secured by the rights of the citizen; with respect to the nation of origin.
ii) The “right to privacy in business planning,” with respect to pre-liminary marketing strategies for certain events in the future such as stellar phenomenon like a comet, or like a season, may not be privileged to inspection as the principle guiding force with established pattern in relationship to the development of marketing strategies around event; integrated systems for such certain events may be protected at all cost as future events reliant upon patterns reckognized by national pride are elements centered on social sciences and therein relate to marketing strategies. The premier question in this case is to be understood that the certain event that was measure for promotion of contract in question of breach by measure of “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” was a U.S. Led Mission to Mars. The “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” though was not with consent for private enterprises in respect to all necessary preliminary marketing measures required to suite policy complications for vehicles with nuclear propulsion/or nuclear trained personal that would incite policy studies for dismissal of logic as perceived weapons in space, through the priming efforts with the “Art in Space Foundation©.” Especially not if the method of planning and design phase for this activity was so desired that medication and investigation was the required method of information extraction from public policy awareness production.
2) Litigation began between the parties and was consolidated for trial; yet, the W.D.V.A. upon acknowledgement of liabilities, presented use position of privilege, to interfere with litigation through denial of resources within their control in order to interfere with contractual relationships, with legislative intent and with intent to gather further information for mis-appropriation of trade secrets.
a. Evidence in the case was presented to insure the acknowledgement of the severity that was placed upon them, with legislative intent was not disregarded
b. Information contained within the pre-trial complaints of the party and request for resolution to complaints were and were not forwarded within the proper policy guidelines for W.D.V.A. minimum policy requirements.
i. The position of privilege, through state managed investigative potentials, as per Richard Vanesky’s statement.
ii. This position of privilege through proprietary capacity of the W.D.V.A. for previously asserted Tortuous conduct in economic relations, from the U.S. Government while in the State of Washington with legislative intent to disrupt contract has further postponed all advantages maintained up until the point of the initial damage and resulting damages of lost potential earnings.
c. Findings that would carry into the judgment under assumptions on the theory that after judgment was found that petitioner could continue on to complete project and work within the capacity and at the capacity, however if petitioner could not work at the capacity then the judgments could be based on a successful model vs. a non successful model based on permanent impairment or that resulting damage was akin to contractor interferences with the land plot by poring oil all over the future building site and ruining the property and hence slowing down construction efforts, and making irreparable repairs that would have prevented future habitable conditions were the property complete.
d. To fix the damages, the property would have to be renovated in this scenario or given the best repair methods known, Maryland Walter Reed, John Hopkins University ,
i. New methods involved in neurological repair to revert damages done by Olanzapine
ii. New Liver for damages done to Liver.
iii. “Recovery Period,” that is not threatening progress of production as to insure fair competition as relates to Tortuous conduct in economic relations is kept in line with potentials engaged priot to the Tortuous conduct in economic relations by the Federal V.A. as un-fair advantage was made by opportunity presented in light of error caused by deficient policy within the U.S. Army to deal with the complications of legal assistance for debentured web-contract which later resulted in political liabilities not manageable under.
iv. It is nearly impossible even with the best methods of therapy to undergo treatment as the premise of what was considered to be treatment for the better was fundamentally aligned with Tortuous conduct in economic relations, and further evidenced by legislative intent through improper means of misappropriations of trade secrets, also this couples with testminoy from Dr. Marge Bone that treatment in itself when governened by the Government in conflict with this petition is not treatment bu Work rendered without proper re-numeration for elements of controlled environment and observation of day to day work and the loss of liabilitles protection have don elittle more than force upon the petitioner instances and circumstances by which all content is placed under the approves loss of ownership through congressional interference in Tortuous conduct in economic relations; therefore it is nearly impossible to be placed in the position the contractor would have been had the contract been performed.
v. REHABILITION: The attempt though none the less should be considered to rehabilitate the Veteran without government interference as the mental health standards of reporting with respect to the establishment of 38 U.S.C. 101. This attempt to place the Veteran in the position he would have been in had the contract been performed or even further pursued; with proper legal advice not managed by privilege of the litigating parties.
vii. This removal was however, with consent of the Federal Field investigation that managed to force Jason Dedrick into living situations without liable contention for protection of business interest there further sustaining investigative practices that maintain Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
viii. The contract with the Multiple Sclerosis Society was reasonable under the initial enlistment with promises made by the “actual recruiter,” with Witness Testimony for Legal Advice provided by the NAVY as related to the documents presented to the Recruiter in registered format under sworn testimony. in reflection of the contract also to be reviewed with legal advice for the intent upon enlistment to bind future services through contracts requiring legal revision by NAVY JAG CORP, as reasons for enlistment. A initial interest were based on the problems presented during the U.S. Space Policy Class and Observation by the U.S. Space Command that I flet had threatened by Right to Privacy in Business Planning, as by the evidence[xix],
ix. Discovery of Legal Assistance provided under the U.S.M.J. and the legal advisements upon enlistment.
x. NAVY requirements in situations where enlistment is based upon receiving legal assistance to further create and sustain contract potentials with respect to small business maintenance while in the U.S. Military, as duty of non-interference in cases where visits to seek legal council on matters where maintained under enlistment promises made with witness testimony and with document received by recruiters in witness testimony.
xi. Petitioner asserts that his small business and grant potentials or equally proportionally studies through the Ford Foundation or other foundations with decent intent were based on elements derived from the contract for the Debetured Web-Contract and the non-profit parent company the “Art in Space Foundation©,” the small business intentions were given and the extent of legal advice was given under witness observation. The primary reason for complications under the contract’s dynamics that were required to make a successful business model from the Debentured Web Contrract and did require assistance from the U.S. Navy were as follows.
xii. The premise of the Digit* or Debentured Bond was in conflict for tax-reasons associated to the model as a for-profit company with the approach of the company MP-MARS© would have required employment securities and other un-employment[xx] issues to be
xiii. Conflicting employment securities with respect to the financial institution method verses the for-profit method as applied to the Debentured web-contract model was reliant upon legal assessment that did not leave the researcher or business deveoper would be exposed to liability and situation by which work content could be funneled out of hand and ownvership. However, the real comp;lication was casued by the drafting of the complex document upon the guidance of public policy reform for science and technology as a means to insure D.O.D. directives traversed with industry in space not managed by soley defense interaction. The conflict of policy development of the contract an its developmental procedure was assessed initial upon two standing international treaties; the Antarctic Treaty and the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 to insure that value in space property was not developed around nuclear studies without proper policy structure to accommodate American entrepreneurial studies with NAVY legal assistance as to insure no liable contact with U.S,. Government was made if perception of assessment was that to obtain legal policy studies for nuclear violations of these studies.
xiv. Therefore the grounding policy work was to insure that the potentially misconstrued policy objectives after initial review was made from documents delivered to the U.S. NAVY upon enlistment, to infer active participation by U.S. government in nuclear advances through space with respect to contract and potential treaty violations, that insured information policy could be aligned with tactics required for secondary observation map of employment as per 38. U.S.C. § 101 However the release of Jason Dedrick the petitoner as a FCSN over a FTSN gave unfair advantage for “legal financial consolidated review,” under auspice of investigation formed under Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” that would not have been allowed under the conditions of executive orders placed on recently released nuclear weapons operators; as N.S.A. would have been given standard procedural compliance with any operation under consent of the C.I.A. that would have not been solely under the management of either the S.O.S. or the S.O.D. as the financial cross referencing of data associated through all financial agencies including the W.D.V.A. and the Veteran’s Administration and even the Investigator’s would have been under review for the method of transduction for financial study through tax-payers dollars and through human subjects testing and with irreversible damage to the petioner’s. No other governemtal body other than the U.S. NAVY would have had the measure to manage apolicy study based on traty complications of Antarctica and developments of financial institutions operating substantial information management in Antarctic for information securuties studies could have been managed. Therefore the requirement of legal protection of potential business plans were within the neglect of duty by U.S. NAVY personal if the C.I.A. had informed them of the abuse to their nuclear submarine policy by way and measure of manipulations and control tactics in psychological warfare with potentials for deceiving the SECNAV and the Secretary of Defense.
xv. A contract based on a promise of “renumeration,” either in form of services or monetary is a contract that may be defaulted upon if money or services or not rendered in light of contract. A “Breach of Contract,” as per “method,” of continued employment through intentional malpractice with Tortuous conduct in economic relations
[i] Motion for disclosure of case or investigative findings through Discovery in any capacity for use by the Veteran’s Adminstration, to be used only for the petition against the U.S. Government for “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” as initial acceptance to the Vancouver Film School involved life story as produce, and thereby is of value in secondary production in the event of a granted petition.
[ii] Strategies disclosed in case as to insure that they are not release in non-liable disclosure, the primary method to insure that a moving event vehicle or “New Media,” platform to maintain its contract obligations from the M.S.S. Society was based on a For-Profit change of company operations at the border called a piggy back promotion. The primary complication in the development of strategies in line with a company that moved was origin and tax-laws and destination and tax-laws since product was related to service that in an international sense would have appeared to cerate a lobbyist attempt to insure D.O.D. goal tasking or N.A.S.A. D.O.D. directed goal tasking would accommodate U.S. interest in primary market-see non-disclosure agreement, to insure a seamless transfer of company objectives with respect to the for-profit MP-MARS©. The complex problems related to a business that moved were speculated and well considered and did require many years of preparation for this project. Primary statistical data would have been formed through a differential examination of (R-12) and business operations of the first event production using a futuristic horse drawn carriage.
[iii] Communications with Marc Boucher and Eligar Sadeh
[iv] Request for disclosure
[v] Deposition from Erin Alvarez
[vi] Eviction notice from Sharon Lyndley
[vii] Recorded Phone Message.
[viii] Felony act on the part of the W.D.V.A. in excess of $ 6,000.00 attempt to conspire against a honorably discharged veteran with malicious intent, through a backfired attempt to interfere in Tortuous conduct in economic relations, through misappropriations of trade secrets reliant upon strategies of the “Art in Space Foundation©,”
[ix] Discovery of investigative limits and outcome of state managed investigation, as per R VANESKY AND HIS COMMENT MADE TO
[x] All elements of liabilities investigations by state of Washington must be reviewed on the merit that if the work engaged suits a “minimum requisite,” of work applied toward construction of policy making programs for technology and innovations programs for the Unisys contract it must be considered as work related to employment as per 38 U.S.C. 101, as the initial medication occurred in the state of Washington during active duty as relates to Tortuous conduct in economic relations. This however based on the duty to assert liabilities on the W.D.V.A. as elements of their “proprietary capacity.” As per § 14.3
[xi] Document linking two aspects related to financial data and health data have created the Veteran’s liability for the professional neglect-continuing course of treatment with respect to Congressional appointment of legal custodian as a concept of health records and administration for complex database linking systems was measured into the method of congressional interference through legislative intent to impose duty of care; Tortuous conduct in economic relations.
[xii] John King e-mail
[xiii] Discovery of the Federal V.A. findings 38 § 5711through field investigator based on Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” as primary literature has been developed under a period of potential abuse by the Veteran’s Administration to protect Dr’s giving care under Professional Negligence-Continuing Treatment or Course of Action. 1. Matter’s within Jurisdiction of Department; Former § 131 of this title granting Secretary power to issue subpoenas, requires production of Books, Papers and other evidence, make investigations and examine jurisdiction of department authorized administrator to issue subpoenas requiring president of trades schools school corporations records respecting its purchases of tools and supplies for cost of which it presented claims to Department under War Contract for War Veteran’s Vocational Training in corporation’s schools, general trade schools vs. U.S.
[xiv] Request for discovery of Erin Alvarez to be sure that I am protected.
[xv] Meeting the conditions required to make a request for discovery of findings in pre-trial based on the following elements; “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” “Special Relationships,” “Controlled Environment,” “Wrongfull Medication,”
[xvi] Discovery of Sharon Lyndley’s knowledge
[xvii] Discovery of case worker files for Melanie Alvarez as resulting complications of an attempt by Erin and Melanie to corroborate an allegation of molestation through social services as to insure a method for corroborating evidence needed for committal with respect to 71.34 RCW (d) as per false accusations required by the party with respect to Canada’s film industry respective of Ventura,C.A. and recent F.B.I. filings and previous Bellingham/Redmond ties.
Social services testimony from Melanie have been coerced through local community and may draw upon witness testimony of the Redmond operation five surrounding houses and
This Discovery based on the family feud with the Chambers and their drug and porn industry affiliations in Washington State and Arizona tie through Hallie Richards for the methods of corroboration with intent to articulate a conspiracy that extended into nuclear service with assistance from $100,000,000.00 toward legislative efforts to clean up through “I am certain that the conversations on N._._. after declaration of war will showcase initial planning party under the Mattigan base records for incoming calls during march 12-2003-as to insure that conspiring party was held accountable in case of a altered congressional review for successful sting operation in Bellingham resulting in a move of those individual who brought Vitaly to Bellingham to insure conspiracy aligned with Bangor objective for state legislature with respect to Senator_________, as nuclear submarines were a bit of a distaste for female co-conspirators who did not mind having co-conspiring reports with officer queen at the Bellingham police department who listed problems at the work source center as precipitant from nuclear radiation.
[xviii] United State Tax Apportionment Act—83.110.010. Request “Discovery,” of a written explanation for denial of all request made since Sept 15th, 2004 from both the state Washington Department V.A. and the Federal V.A. as denial of funds for research with legal assistance associated with “Excise Tax,” as per 4980(d) of the Internal Revenue Code that is “Imposed,” by “Federal Law,” on personal property upon death-this currently involving “Qualified Real Property,” as currently “insured art,” from aspects of the “Art in Space Foundation.” Denial of request for litigation fees to create a legal will and testament through Congressionally appointed legal custodian of the State during an investigation period under which the Federal Investigator has used federal and state dollars to produce; books, papers, documents and other evidence through “inappropriate means,” that did in fact create Tortuous conduct in economic relations, through mis-appropriation of trade secrets relevant to the content under which has qualified as real property through insured art; and further threatened methods of “dispositive instruments,” in which excise tax would have been under the guidance of the fiduciary in the event of a death. Therefore denial of all request has threatened the legal dispositive instrument required to protect personal property and therefore the appointment of a legal custodian must be reviewed as nothing more than Tortuous conduct in economic relations, as relates to the content of the “art in space foundation,” and through privileged interference with contractual relations as per § 22.8 further since the Veteran’s Administration would have been in charge of timely payments of excise tax as per fiduciary duty through 38 U.S.C.A. 5502; this conflict however shows the necessity of the litigation to be managed from the State Statutes of Washington state and not the Federal V.A. as per 38 U.S.C.A. 5502 the definitions for fiduciary duties relates geographical elements as: in the event of the beneficiaries death, to the beneficiaries representative, except otherwise provided by law; however, payment will not be made to the beneficiaries personal representative if, under law of the beneficiary last legal residence the beneficiaries estate would escheat to the state. Therefore, state managed funds with interference with contractual relationships-as privilege for state initiated Tortuous conduct in economic relations, in this circumstance by which improper means by affirmative mis-conduct are used to gather; books, papers, documents and other evidence through denial of funds for food, water, transportation would have in the event of death been forwarded to the state. Further, When the W.D.V.A. is a political subdivision its duty of non-interference as per Federal TORTS requirements may not be used to collaborate investigations that the Secretary of the V.A. has already given incident expense for as their was no court presiding for the appointment of the legal custodian and therefore is further evidenced behavior for legislative intent that has promulgated Tortuous conduct in economic relations, with a damage that is life long and has threatened future work and has created the disability to undermine value of product that is listed as a pre-occupation or is a symbolic representation of a philosophy; through pre-occupation with futuristic horse drawn carriage.
[xviii] Discovery of statement as to the reason for the removal of the medication with advisement on the FFRDC’s and grant funding complications from the N.S.F. that would have cost her a job and the Veteran’s Administration would have been under investigation for Human Testing or as positively applied continued service as the signing of the non-disclosure agreement was consent that petitioner had value of conscious concern for intellectual property under litigation principles aligned with this case.
[xviii] Hard-Drive with scripts from Stanford University and or from the U.S. Space Command third party liability pre-cursive to the Mar’s Society Conference at Stanford in 2001.
[xviii] Discovery of cross referencing of un-employment issues relates to Jason Dedrick with potentials for examination in “Consolidated Legal Environment,” under the contentions of fraudulent enlistment as misdirected and the “Tortuous conduct in economic relations,” with improper means through privilege medication a