Comment on this article |
Email this article |
News :: War and Militarism
Why are the Deocrats bowing to Bush?
11 Feb 2007
In this article I differ with Mr. Nichols on one regard: that the war began as Dick Cheney’s power trip” and George Bush’s flight of fancy”
It began with the deception that the 9/11 attack was engineered by Muslims, but instead it was a conspiracy of the highest governmental officials, and corporate heads that run this country’s economic life, with the help of Zionist Israel backing all the way. It was initiated for Cheney’s and Bush’s profit from the oil and drugs of the Middle East. These Globalists, New World Order proponents are committing Treason against the American people
John Nichols, one of the Nation’s best writers, author of the Genius of Impeachment, recently had a piece
Comments for "Pelosi, Planes and Partisan Propaganda"
in which he argued “
The Republican National Committee stoked it with emails to reporters and briefing papers supposedly exposing Pelosi's imperial style -- and ambitions. The predictable Sean Hannity declared that Pelosi "thinks she's the president" -- seemingly unaware that by referencing the presidency he was acknowledging his own dear leader's regal pretensions.
Republican members of the House actually brought the issue up on the floor of a chamber that should have been focused on the question of how and when to end a war that began as Dick Cheney's "power trip" and George Bush's flight of fancy" but has since turned into an international disaster. “
In this article I differ with Mr. Nichols on one regard: that the war began as Dick Cheney’s power trip” and George Bush’s flight of fancy”
It began with the deception that the 9/11 attack was engineered by Muslims, but instead it was a conspiracy of the highest governmental officials, and corporate heads that run this country’s economic life, with the help of Zionist Israel backing all the way. It was initiated for Cheney’s and Bush’s profit from the oil and drugs of the Middle East. These Globalists, New World Order proponents are committing Treason against the American people.
This is a real Dear John letter: rather than Cheney's war as a flight of fantasy, face reality and see the truth this war a war for profit and oil and Zionist neocons.
Dear John: As soon as we write you the truth they erase it.
Dear John: You make it sound as if innocent idiosyncrasies were the motivation. Dear John: get real! Cheney and Bush manufactured the Iraq war, as John ONeill said, Bush called for a way to invade Iraq as soon as he entered office! "Find me a way to do it he hold his cabinet.
Dear John: Seriously, these traitors are far from innocent. From being in PNAC, and writing Rebuilding America's Defenses these traitors manufactured this war from the Get go. They followed their Straussian leader to the hilt and found the way to get the American people to be fearful of a war on terror, falsely attributing to Muslims what they and Zionist Israelis carried out.
The Attack on the trade center, and the Pentagon. That would give them the go ahead with the war in Afghanistan, Iraq, and next Iran.
I'm getting a little tired of posting this stuff, but even if you don't read it and your regular detractors and supporters don't, I'm hoping somebody is paying attention.
"The blueprint for the "war on terror" is found in Netanyahu's 1986 book "Terrorism: How the West Can Win." In his speeches and writings, Netanyahu, whose father was the secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, and a leader in his New Zionist Organization, promotes the "war on terror" to be waged against Israel's enemies" Christopher Boylan
"Might there be a "fifth column" in America today made up of those forces that love Fascism and "official State religion" (and who want to help the Vatican achieve its goal of heading up a one-world religion and controlling a one-world government) that will betray the American people when we go under full-blown martial law? Surely inquiring minds would like to know. And surely this subject should be openly and fully discussed – especially by broadcast hosts who "claim" to represent the "alternative media" in this country!"
AIPAC wants you to die in Iran by Kurt Friday, May. 27, 2005 at 9:28 AM
As a primary example how AIPAC runs the foreign policy of the United States, consider Dana Milbank's AIPAC's Big, Bigger, Biggest Moment, published in the Washington Post. Milbank tells us: at the annual meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, held in Washington recently, the pro-Israel "political action committee" (or rather a political bribery and intimidation, to say nothing of espionage, committee or more accurately racket) is "here to stay" (according to Howard Kohr, executive director), that is to say no niggling little investigation by the FBI will put a kink in the pressure camarilla's operations. Getting busted stealing U.S. secrets, according to Kohr, is no big deal, although it is a "test of [AIPAC's] collective resolve" in its effort to dominate U.S. foreign policy in the name of Israel.
Condi Rice and "congressional leaders" were in attendance, according to Milbank. "AIPAC is a demanding crowd, and even Rice, introduced as a 'very special friend,' did not satisfy universally. The participants applauded heartily her reminder that Bush did not meet with Arafat, but when she said Arafat's successor, Mahmoud Abbas, 'is committed to both freedom and security,' and when she mentioned more U.S. funds for Palestinians, the room was quiet." In other words, for the AIPAC faithful, helping out the Palestinians in any way is seriously frowned upon-no doubt a lot of them feel the same way Ariel Sharon and the Likudites do: the Palestinians (or "beasts walking on two legs," as the warm and fuzzy former PM of Israel, Menachem Begin, once characterized them) should expect nothing, maybe a few more "operations" (collective punishment and mass murder), and they should most definitely think about emigrating, maybe to Antarctica. Obviously, there is nothing Mahmoud Abbas can do except convince his people to walk across the desert, maybe with a bit of prodding from the munificent IDF, and settle in western Iraq or maybe somewhere in Jordan (AIPACers and Zionists consider Jordan the "real" home of the Palestinians, although none of them have ever lived there, or very few of them did until Israel ran them out of the country at gunpoint in 1948).
Milbank tells us "the attendees overall showed an impressive ideological discipline-right down to AIPAC's multimedia show, 'Iran's Path to the Bomb,' in the convention center's basement" (in Washington, a lot of things happen in basements; ask
Oliver North). AIPAC and well-placed Zionists in the Pentagon and White House have a fixation about Iran and its supposed desire to get its hands on a couple nuclear bombs, ostensibly to "push the Jews into the sea" by way of radiation.
The exhibit, worthy of a theme park, begins with a narrator condemning the International Atomic Energy Agency for being "unwilling to conclude that Iran is developing nuclear weapons" (it had similar reservations about Iraq) and the Security Council because it "has yet to take up the issue." In a succession of rooms, visitors see flashing lights and hear rumbling sounds as Dr. Seuss-like contraptions make yellowcake uranium, reprocess plutonium, and pop out nuclear warheads like so many gallons of hummus for an AIPAC conference.
Of course, the IAEA was absolutely spot on about Iraq-it did not possess nuclear weapons or, for that matter, many other weapons, or at least not weapons of a threat to Israel (remember Condi's "smoking gun" and "mushroom cloud" in response to Hans Blix's assertion that Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction, to which stand-up comedian Ari Fleischer replied: "The problem with guns that are hidden is you can't see their smoke.”). It is a nostalgic addition for AIPAC to add a yellowcake uranium processor to their circus sideshow. It reminds us of the fiction Saddam was also in pursuit of the fabled yellow cake.
Of particular interest at the AIPAC confab was a "debate" between Rep. Jane Harman ☼ ☼ (D-Calif.) and the Prince of Darkness himself, Richard Perle, former runner-up for the Jonathan Pollard "Sell Out Your Country" Award (he was investigated by the Justice Department and found to have violated US policies relating to unlawful transmission of sensitive classified US information to Israel).
Perle drew cheers for denouncing Palestinian anti-Semitism and the French. Harman mentioned that an aide once worked for AIPAC, called her audience "very sophisticated" and celebrated Yasser Arafat's death as "a blessing." Debating a hard-liner in front of a pro-administration crowd, Harman heaped praise on President Bush, calling the Iraqi elections "sensationally impressive" and moving to "applaud" or "commend" Perle and the administration a dozen times. "Richard is right, and so is President Bush," she said at one point.
But after half an hour of this, Harman could not keep up. Perle provoked cheers from the crowd when he favored a military raid on Iran, saying that "if Iran is on the verge of a nuclear weapon, I think we will have no choice but to take decisive action." When Harman said the "best short-term option" is the U.N. Security Council, the crowd reacted with boos.
In other words, when it comes to Israel and bombing Muslim and Arab nations (and forcing so-called "elections" on them), there is little difference between Democrats and Strausscons such as Richard Perle. It would seem the only difference between to two camps is in regard to Iran-Democrats such as Harman want a check for mass murder written by the United Nations while Perle believes no such check or permission is required and wants the United States to go it alone and bomb Iran in the name of AIPAC and Israel.
Iran will be attacked, maybe next month, possibly down the road a stretch (see Scott Ritter's analysis). Naturally, this will be an unmitigated disaster since Iran will not stand still and do nothing during and after the bombs fall. "The entire Zionist territory, including its nuclear facilities and atomic arsenal, are currently within range of Iran's advanced missiles," a senior Iranian official said last August. An attack on Iran "could only be carried out by angry or stupid people. For that reason, officials of the Islamic Republic must always be prepared to counter possible military threats," declared Yadollah Javani, head of the Revolutionary Guards political bureau. "Iran would respond within 15 minutes to any attack by the United States or any other country," an anonymous Iranian official linked to the ruling mullahs told Borzou Daragahi of the San Francisco Chronicle in February. "Iranian authorities," Daragahi continues, "say they have been getting ready for a possible attack. Newspapers have announced efforts to increase the number of the country's 7 million-strong 'Basiji' volunteer militia, which was deployed in human-wave attacks during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. Iranian military authorities have paraded long-range North Korean-designed Shahab missiles before television cameras." But the Iranians, paying heed to the lessons on guerilla warfare against the United States in Iraq, are not limiting their potential response to conventional military readiness. "Over the last year, they've developed their tactics of 'asymmetrical' war, which would aim not at resisting a penetration of foreign forces, but to then use them on the ground to all kinds of harmful effect," a military expert based in Tehran added. It is also a sure bet the Iranians would stir up trouble in neighboring Iraq if the United States or Israel invaded.
So here's what Richard Perle and AIPAC are not telling you: if Iran is invaded (or simply bombed) it will respond in kind and this will necessitate a more robust military response by the United States, i.e., more bullet-stoppers will need to be thrown into the mix. Since the Pentagon is having big problems recruiting soldiers (even the cell phone generation, more or less lost in oblivious consumerism, realizes joining the military may translate into serious bodily harm or even death), if all hell breaks loose in Iran and Iraq, as the Iranians warn, the only option will be to kick start conscription, otherwise known as involuntary servitude, or less politely slavery.
In essence, Richard Perle and AIPAC want you to donate your kids (or yourself) to the plan for Greater Israel and the long-envisioned Pax Israelica empire. Perle and the Strausscons realize they cannot attack Iran without a large influx of troops (a fact mentioned by the Strausscon William Kristol, who more or less, between the lines, asked for military conscription since brow-beating military recruiters bearing fistfuls of sign-up cash at the local mall or high school are not working out).
Maybe by this time next year, while AIPAC is chewing through "26,000 kosher meals, 32,640 hors d'oeuvres, 2,500 pounds of salmon, 1,200 pounds of turkey, 900 pounds of chicken, 700 pounds of beef and 125 gallons of hummus," as Milbank notates, your 20-something son and daughter will be slumped over MREs (Meals Ready to Eat) in a foxhole somewhere in the Persian desert with deadly depleted uranium blowing around. Since there are 66,622,704 (as of 2002) Iranians, and many of them are young males, and 24,001,816 Iraqis (minus a hundred or more thousand, killed over the last couple years by "our troops" under the vicious guidance of the likes of Donald Rumsfeld), we can expect the (unphotographed) flag-draped caskets to arrive at Dover AFB in record numbers.
Why Congress won't stop Bush from Iraq surge and war with Iran
Iran is Not a Threat to the U.S. nor Israel
The Media is spinning the threat of Iran having nuclear weapons in three years. But evidence proves these weapons once acquired will be of no effect.
The real threat to America is from its enemies from within collaborating with America's true enemies without.
woman alive at hole plane made WTC
Iran's Nuclear Steps Quicken, Diplomats Say Tehran reportedly is gearing up for uranium enrichment. A split in the Security Council may impede efforts to halt the program.
Russians Helped Iraq, Study Says Papers Show Hussein Was Tipped Off About U.S. Strategy During Invasion
July 25, 2005 Cheney's Plan: Nuke Iran Stand athwart the apocalypse, and shout: "No!" by Justin Raimondo A recent poll shows six in ten Americans think a new world war is coming: the same poll says about 50 percent approve of the dropping of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. Somewhat inexplicably, about two-thirds say nuking those two cities was "unavoidable." One can only wonder, then, what their reaction will be to this ominous news, revealed in a recent issue of The American Conservative by intelligence analyst Philip Giraldi:
"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing – that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack – but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections."
Two points leap out at the reader – or, at least, this reader – quite apart from the moral implications of dropping nukes on Iran. The first is the completely skewed logic: if Iran has nothing to do with 9/11-II, then why target Tehran? As in Iraq, it's all a pretext: only this time, the plan is to use nuclear weapons. We'll wipe out the entire population of Iran's capital city because, as Paul Wolfowitz said in another context, "it's doable."
The other weird aspect of this "nuke Iran" story is the triggering mechanism: a terrorist attack in the U.S. on the scale of 9/11. While it is certain that our government has developed a number of scenarios for post-attack action, one has to wonder: why develop this plan at this particular moment? What aren't they telling us?
I shudder to think about it.
The more I look at it, and the more I think of it, the more I sense a monumental evil casting its shadow over the world, and I have to tell you, it makes me wonder how much more time I want to spend on this earth. In my more pessimistic moments, I doubt whether we can avoid the horrific fate that seems to await us just around the next corner, the next moment, looming over the globe like a gigantic devil stretching its wings and blotting out the sun.
It seems to me that the question of whether life is really worth living anymore is inextricably bound up with the question of whether or not these madmen can be stopped. If not, then the only alternative is to live it up while we can and laugh defiantly in the face of the apocalypse. Why write columns, why comment at all, if we can't have any effect on the outcome? On the other hand, some ask
"Surely the New York Times and the Washington Post can find a lede here: 'US has plan to nuke Tehran if another 9/11.' Can we get at least a bloody story out of this?"
Might I suggest another lede?: "Armageddon approaches." Or perhaps, for the literary-mind secularists among us: "After many a summer dies mankind."
Where oh where is the "mainstream" media on this? That's a laughable question, because the answer is heartbreakingly obvious: they are nowhere to be found, and for a very good reason. As the Valerie Plame case is making all too clear, the MSM has been a weapon in the hands of the War Party at every step on the road to World War IV. It's an American tradition. As William Randolph Hearst famously put it to an employee in the run-up to the Spanish-American conflict of 1898:
"You furnish the pictures, I'll furnish the war."
Any objective examination of the Anglo-American media's role as a megaphone for this administration's "talking points" would have to conclude that the Hearst school of journalism has been dominant since well before the invasion of Iraq. Aside from the post-9/11 hysteria that effectively swept away all pretenses of a critical stance, the MSM was well acclimated to simply reiterating the U.S. government line on matters of war and peace all through the Clinton era, when friendly media coverage of the Balkans and numerous other Clintonian interventions habituated the press corps to a certain mindset. By the time the Bush administration set out on a campaign of deception designed to lie us into invading and occupying Iraq, the MSM was largely reconciled to playing the role of the government's amen corner.
With the U.S. and British media in the pocket of the Powers That Be, what hope is there that the American people – who don't believe anything if they don't see it on television – will awaken to the danger in time? Again, in my more pessimistic moments, there doesn't seem to be any such hope: television news seems firmly in the camp of the War Party, and the "mainstream" print media also doesn't seem a likely venue for this kind of reporting.
On my more optimistic days, however, I almost believe it's possible to outflank the War Party on the media front – because the Internet is a mighty weapon that will defeat them in the end. A recent Pew study shows that this is not just a technophilic fantasy:
"The Internet continues to grow as a source of news for Americans. One-in-four (24%) list the internet as a main source of news. Roughly the same number (23%) say they go online for news every day, up from 15% in 2000; the percentage checking the Web for news at least once a week has grown from 33% to 44% over the same time period.
"While online news consumption is highest among young people (those under age 30), it is not an activity that is limited to the very young. Three-in-ten Americans ages 30-49 cite the Internet as a main source of news.
"The importance of the Web for people in their working years is even more apparent when the frequency of use is taken into account. One-third of people in their 30s say they get news online every day, as do 27% of people in their 40s. Nearly a quarter of people in their 50s get news online daily, about the same rate as among people ages 18-29."
What this means is that we can put the news the MSM won't cover – e.g., the story about Cheney's Dr. Strangelove plan to strike Iran – on the front page of Antiwar.com and potentially reach one-in-four Americans. Last month we had over 2 million readers; this month is headed toward the same range – and that's in summertime, a traditionally slow time for us. Yet we're setting new records.
This, it seems to me, is the only reason for hope: a strategy of doing an end run around the mass media. We must mount a last desperate attempt to stand athwart the apocalypse shouting "No!" The alternative doesn't bear thinking about.
Never for a minute did any of us who founded Antiwar.com imagine we would one day be front and center in a twilight struggle to protect the country and the world from such a monumental evil, and yet here we are, a band of hobbits up against all the dark powers of Mordor. Without getting any more melodramatic than is absolutely unavoidable, I can only note that we've come a long way on our quest to rid the world of this particular Ring of Power, and the battle seems to be reaching some sort of dramatic climax. As to whether or not the Cheney-neocon-War Party axis of evil will be defeated in the end, no one can confidently predict at the moment. Yet one thing does seem clear: as long as Antiwar.com is around, we have at least a fighting chance.
I want to thank each and every one of our readers who have supported us down through the years, even as I remind them that their future support is even more vitally important than ever before. Together we can beat the War Party – but not without constant vigilance. We stand on the watchtower just as long as you, our readers and supporters, keep us there. I hope and trust we will continue until the end – whatever that end may turn out to be.
See Plunger's revelations of the influence of Fascist Marxist Zionist neocons and Israeli in America. http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=162590
Libby Trial: Lawyers Clash Over Motive
See the war profiteering records of VICE President Cheney and President Bush.
snip FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH!!!! author: ALLWHOCARE see summary in article below SUMMARY: http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/253152.shtml
(DETAILS) Four Traitors: The Devil is in the Details! Impeach
Martha Stewart got jail time for lying about insider trading. Cheney sold his Halliburton Stock while he knew the Dresser purchase carried asbestos liability and the Halliburton stocks would plunge,(all others who owned it at that time, including pension plans lost big time) and he wasn't charged with inside trading,
Instead he was able to be appointed by the Supreme Court as VICE president,after Delay's cronies stopped the count in brother Jeb Bush's Florida, and as present commander in chief that day in the underground bunker, leader of multiple drills were going on in a simulation of planes attacking buildings, to confuse ground workers on 911, even though Condolesa Rice, who had to be evacuated from a G8 summit in Italy to aircraft carriers because of threats to attack hotels with airplanes months earlier, said "who would ever dream anyone would use jet liners as weapons, Cheney had plans with PNAC for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq way before 911,and in Rebuilding America's defenses it was said a New Pearl Harbor was needed. Bush had told Paul O'Neill, economy chief who quit, he wanted to finish Sadamn two years before 911.
Rumsfeld at the Pentagon screamed there are absolutely no survivors... and couldn't account for the missing defense money....4.5 Trillion dollars couldn't be accounted for by Dov Zacheim as Payroll keeper at Pentagon... He called it a "Hot handle...." and laughed.
Chertoff,dual Israeli American, deported the Dancing Israelis who later were found to be Mossad agents who failed 7 lie detector tests, and Covered up Bush's financial ties to the Bin Laden family, and actually let a financier of Bin Laden walk. Contributed to writing the Patriot Act, the worst assault on the Bill of Rights ever, married to Julie L.Myers. She was made head of Immigration And Customs Enforcement Bureau at the Department of Homeland Security. She's Chertoff's wife. Nice . She is also the niece of former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers. Now Bush is talking about building an Israeli fence on the border. Why not alligators rounded up from Florida, sent on Flooded New Orleans busses and dumped into the Rio Grande. A Border plan with teeth!
Now the National Guard will be sent to the border, but not to Guard, detain, or arrest illegals, but to answer phones, without ammunition.
Chertoff not aware citizens were dying at the Convention Center in New Orleans , even though CNN was broadcasting it, sends Blackwater killer mercenaries to New Orleans.
Several people were warned not to fly 911, only three Israeli citizens died at the WTC not the hundred forty plus Bush claimed in the State of the Union, thanks to Odigo, And top WTC VIPS were invited to a bash in Colorado that day by Warren Buffet, place where Bush was finally taken... from the school photo op.
Larry Silverstein who admitted pulling WTC 7, forty seven story WTC 7, 2 years later on a documentary, wins insurance on WTC but wants two payments because there were two planes, Everything there was pulverized to dust but not Atta's visa, cancer killing dust for which hero WTC rescuer James Zagruda's daughter still is not collecting his full pension, nor were his medical bills paid for.
Halliburton wins no bid contract in Iraq, and the contract to build concentration camps in America.
Bush family admits criminal behavior: What part of "if the American people had ever known the truth of what we Bush's have done to this nation, we would be chased down the streets and lynched" don't you understand?
Of course, would anyone, Mr. Snow, dare comment about Mr. Ex President Bush's statement Famous Quote of George Bush Senior:" You can fool some of the people all the time, and these are the ones you want to concentrate on" I also remember he said "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."
George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with Sarah McClendon in December 1992
Because they in the oath of Skull and Bones swear allegiance to the world's elite getting richer, at any cost.
Including allowing a porous border for 5 years after 911, which the final 911 investigation team recommended immediately sealed, the first pick Bush made, Henry Kissinger not being acceptable. Yes Bush's first pick to head an investigation, same one wanted for war crimes by international court, same who said:
"It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true." -- Henry Kissinger
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." Henry Kissinger, quoted by Bob Woodward in The Final Days, 1976
"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."
-- Henry Kissinger, from his grand finale address at the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, 21 May 1992
WAR PROFITEERING http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/252716.shtml
The President of VICE
Throw the Globalists Out !
Bush o'kayed CIA leak, Part 2
Bush o'kayed CIA leak?
Iran is Not a Threat to the U.S. nor Israel
The Term New World Order Now Changed into Global
Endless War profiteering!
snip FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH
O'Neill: Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11 In new book, ex-Treasury secretary criticizes administration Wednesday, January 14, 2004 Posted: 2:12 AM EST (0712 GMT)
Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill served nearly two years in Bush's Cabinet.
01.23.2007 Lizzie Cheney - The Pride of Lockheed Martin - Speaketh (63 comments ) READ MORE: Elizabeth Cheney, Lockheed Martin, Iraq, Iran, Washington, Syria, Dick Cheney, Frank Lautenberg, United States, Chuck Hagel, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama Something is troubling Elizabeth Cheney, the other daughter of the Lockheed-Halliburton syndicate. Although the problem troubling our dear Lizzie is not her conscience, because that would require first that she have a conscience. No, what is troubling Lizzie is the lack of courage and an interest in losing she ascribes to those who are opposed to her daddy's war.
Writing a Washington Post opinion that no one asked for and no one wants, especially from this family, Lizzie attacks those that threaten future war profits:
The Skull and Bones President Bush is a product of his father, "New World Order". They will do everything they can to make it happen. This explains why our borders go unprotected and why Bush refuses to pardon the two Border agents entering jail for over a decade today, for shooting at an illegal drug dealer who got immunity.
Bush & MKULTRA Satanic killer who Bush pardoned while Governor, BOTH in same cult in '80s
book chapter: Drug Running Bush Family and their Fake War on Drugs: Police as drug pushers
ZIOCON/GOP = another name for MAFIA MONEY; Abramoff scandal ties to 9-11 Atta drugrunning! http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/326565.shtml http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/339728.shtml
Our real enemies have already confessed who they are: "If the American people had known what we Bush's have done to this nation, they'd chase us down the streets and lynch us. George Bush senior talking to Sarah McClendon .
This is crucial information which shows the link between the Bush > family and the Jesuits. If you Google Prescott Bush+Stonyhurst you > will find several sources which confirm that he was Jesuit-trained at > Stonyhurst for five years from 1908-1913. Prescott S. Bush. Then went > on to Yale where he kissed the slippered toe of the Pope and bowed > before Don Quixote who is really Ignatius Loyola (Cervantes based his > character on his contemporary Loyola who he studied with at the > University of Salamanca) and dubbed a Knight of Eulogia in the tomb of > Skull and Bones-the Brotherhood of Death who tap individuals from > certain backgrounds and lineage to initiate them into the Jesuits' > Illuminati. > http://prescottbush.quickseek.com/ > > Prescott's father-in-law George Herbert Walker was trained at > Stonyhurst as well. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Herbert_Walker > > This is a fact but the specifics of what they studied and what went on > is unknown except that Prescott designed the golf course for the boys. > Were George HW Bush's father and grandfather Jesuits of the short > robe? Could be. It would make so much sense when you consider the fact > that Prescott acted as an advisor to President Eisenhower, was a > Connecticut Senator, a Nazi financier, and mentored Richard Nixon. He > had so much access to power. What do you think? >
Look at who is saying Bush has a secret plan for solving the Iraq mess:
Mr. war crimes: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/31/AR200701 3102017_pf.html
NEWS | OPINIONS | SPORTS | ARTS & LIVING | Discussions | Photos & Video | City Guide | CLASSIFIEDS | JOBS | CARS | REAL ESTATE
Wherever a Senator's Question Leads, Kissinger Gamely Follows
By Dana Milbank Thursday, February 1, 2007; A02
So now it can be told: President Bush has a secret plan to end the war in Iraq.
Henry Kissinger, who as Richard Nixon's secretary of state learned something about secret plans, went before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday to argue that Bush, too, has such a proposal.
"I am convinced, but I cannot base it on any necessary evidence right now," Kissinger told the senators, "that the president will want to move toward a bipartisan consensus" to stabilize Iraq through diplomacy.
Bush uses secret army, Blackwater, to promote Republican leadership goals:
What do you think of Bush's mercenary Army? Who do you think they take orders from? Such power in the hands of one company, run by a bankroller of the president, embodies the "military-industrial complex" president Dwight Eisenhower warned against in 1961.
Blogs | Speak Out | Readers Letters | Polls | Corrections
TheStar.com - opinion - Bush's mercenaries thrive in Iraq Bush's mercenaries thrive in Iraq President relies on thousands of private soldiers with little oversight, a troubling example of outsourcing of U.S. military
Jan 29, 2007 04:30 AM Jeremy Scahill
As U.S. President George W. Bush took the podium to deliver his State of the Union address last Tuesday, five American families received news that has become all too common: Their loved ones had been killed in Iraq.
But in this case, the slain were neither "civilians," as the news reports proclaimed, nor were they U.S. soldiers. They were highly trained mercenaries deployed to Iraq by a secretive private military company based in North Carolina – Blackwater USA.
From Iraq and Afghanistan to the hurricane-ravaged streets of New Orleans to meetings with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger about responding to disasters in California, Blackwater envisions itself as the FedEx of defence and homeland security operations.
Such power in the hands of one company, run by a bankroller of the president, embodies the "military-industrial complex" president Dwight Eisenhower warned against in 1961.
Further privatizing America's war machine – or inventing new back doors for military expansion with fancy names like the Civilian Reserve Corps – would represent a devastating blow to the future of American democracy.
Bush's "Private Military Contractors" Fight and Die Unchecked in Iraq: The Blackwater Story Submitted by BuzzFlash on Mon, 01/29/2007 - 4:48pm. Alerts A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
The Bush Administration is employing private armies to fight in Iraq. These "private military contractors," that is, mercenaries, are often ex-U.S. special forces soldiers with additional paramilitary training operating below the radar. Their legal status in Iraq falls under neither civilian nor military jurisdiction, and they earn far more money than American troops.
This may sound crazy, but it's all true. Not all "contractors" are civilian truck drivers or mechanics.
The five Americans killed in the helicopter incident last week were employed by the largest military contractor company and war-profiteer, Blackwater, just like the contractors killed and mutilated on the Fallujah bridge in 2004. In his movie "Iraq for Sale," Robert Greenwald exposes the shady dealings between Blackwater and the government. The company was founded by Erik Prince, a former Navy SEAL and heir to a billion-dollar fortune, and who also happens to be an ultra-Christian Republican campaign donor. Blackwater is still operating under a $300 million State Department no-bid contract to guard administrator L. Paul Bremer in Iraq, among other contracts.
The problem is that there is zero transparency with such private companies since their actions, costs, and casualties are not reported like military information is. Often their work takes place under multiple layers of sub-contracting. According to Jeremy Scahill of the Nation Institute, there are about 100,000 contractors in Iraq, of which 48,000 work as private soldiers. The Myrtle Beach Sun-News reported on 12/26/06 that as of last October, a whopping 646 U.S.-financed contractors had been killed in Iraq, a relatively high percentage of troop deaths. Further, every private contractor is insured by the U.S. taxpayers because of two WWII-era laws.
But it's not just about the money; it's about what these mercenaries are doing when nobody is watching. On 1/11/07 the Virginian-Pilot reported that a Blackwater contractor shot and killed an Iraqi security officer, but that no charges were ever filed. In fact, no private contractor has ever been charged for any illegal conduct in Iraq, in part because of "a legal gray area, in which it's uncertain whether they're subject to civilian law, military law or neither."
How does anyone know that those who dressed up as Americans and killed Americans in Iraq, were not hired Americans, or Mossad....
The war profitterers Cheney and Bush want to keep on rolling toward Iran, and if they were able to carry off 9/11,to get the US to fight in the Middle East, they're capable of anything evil.
And the disinformation commeth:
Choice for No. 2 at State Dept. Defends Bush's Stance on Iran
E-Mail Print Reprints Save Share Digg Facebook Newsvine Permalink
By HELENE COOPER Published: January 31, 2007 WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 -- John D. Negroponte, nominated as deputy secretary of state, defended the Bush administration's more confrontational policy with Iran in a Senate confirmation hearing that was peppered with demands from both sides of the aisle that the United States show restraint in dealing with Tehran.
Iran May Have Trained Attackers That Killed 5 American Soldiers, U.S. and Iraqis Say
E-Mail Print Reprints Save Share Digg Facebook Newsvine Permalink
By JAMES GLANZ and MARK MAZZETTI Published: January 31, 2007 BAGHDAD, Jan. 30 -- Investigators say they believe that attackers who used American-style uniforms and weapons to infiltrate a secure compound and kill five American soldiers in Karbala on Jan. 20 may have been trained and financed by Iranian agents, according to American and Iraqi officials knowledgeable about the inquiry.
Son George Bush "I'll obey the Pope"
Bush appointed this man to Head the Justice system:
Gonzales: ‘There Is No Express Grant of Habeas Corpus In The Constitution'
There will be no justice with G.W. Bush and VICE President Cheney. Impeach both NOW!
Impeach Cheney and Bush for Treason: Arming the enemey in Plaestine, BUSH and Olmert commit treason against their own countries. They aid and arm terrorists who say the weapons will be used against Israelies and possibly American GIs in Iraq.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU 'American weapons to be used on Jews' U.S. providing arms to bolster Abbas in conflict with rival Hamas factions
Only Impeachment Can Prevent More War author: By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS (reposted) Bush is correct that it will work--indeed, the surge is working. We have to be clear about how the plan works. It does not mean that 21,500 more US troops will bring order and stability to Iraq. The surge is working, because it is deflecting attention from the Bush Regime's real game plan.
The real game plan is to orchestrate a war with Iran and to initiate wider conflict in the Middle East before public and military pressure forces the Bush Regime to withdraw US troops from Iraq. Everyone knows that Bush's Iraq "surge" will not work. Even the authors of the plan, neoconservatives Frederick Kagan and Jack Keane, have emphasized that the plan cannot work with any less than an addition of 50,000 US troops committed to another three years of combat. Bush is only adding 40% of that number of troops, and Defense Secretary Gates speaks of the operation being over by summer's end.
On January 18 a panel of retired generals testifying on Capitol Hill slammed Bush's surge plan as "a fool's errand." Even the easily bamboozled American public knows the plan will not work. Newsweek's latest poll released January 20 shows that only 23% of the public support sending more troops to Iraq and that twice as many Americans trust the Democrats in Congress than trust Bush.
A majority of Americans (54%) believe Bush to be neither honest nor ethical, and 57% believe that Bush lacks "strong leadership qualities."
Nevertheless, Bush defended his surge plan, telling a group of TV stations last week, "I believe it will work."
Bush is correct that it will work--indeed, the surge is working. We have to be clear about how the plan works. It does not mean that 21,500 more US troops will bring order and stability to Iraq. The surge is working, because it is deflecting attention from the Bush Regime's real game plan.
The real game plan is to orchestrate a war with Iran and to initiate wider conflict in the Middle East before public and military pressure forces the Bush Regime to withdraw US troops from Iraq.
Two US carrier attack groups have been deployed to the Persian Gulf. US missile systems are being sent to oil producing countries to counter any incoming missiles from Iran should any survive the US attack. Israeli pilots have been training for an attack on Iran. US war doctrine has been changed to permit pre-emptive nuclear attack on non-nuclear countries. US attack aircraft have been deployed at bases in Turkey. A neocon admiral who attends AIPAC events has been made commander in chief of US forces in the Middle East. Obviously, the ground war in Iraq and Afghanistan are not the focus of the Bush Regime's new military deployments. The Bush Regime is focused on attacking Iran.
In CounterPunch (January 16) Col. Sam Gardiner reports that the Bush Regime has put into operation a group led by National Security Council staff whose mission is to create and foment outrage against Iran. Col. Gardiner details various signs of the Bush Regime's escalation and indicates some of the final deployments that will signal an imminent strike on Iran, such as "USAF tankers moved to unusual places, like Bulgaria" in order to position them for refueling B-2 bombers on their way to Iran.
Both Michel Chossudovsky (ICH Jan. 17) and Jorge Hirsch (CounterPunch Jan. 20) have recently documented evidence that the Bush Regime is orchestrating a crisis with Iran that can lead to the use of nuclear weapons to attack Iran.
Civil libertarians who have observed the Bush Regime's concentration of dictatorial powers in the presidency expect that war with Iran, especially if fearful nuclear weapons are used, will be accompanied by Bush's declaration of a state of emergency. The Bush Regime will use the state of emergency to grab more arbitrary and dictatorial powers in the name of protecting "national security interests" and American citizens from "terrorism."
As the Regime's crimes against the US Constitution and humanity will be monstrous, dissent will be throttled in ways that will make Americans afraid to speak, or even to think, the truth. By stifling dissent, the Bush Regime will escape accountability for launching wars on the basis of blatant lies. It will complete its destruction of the civil liberties that protect free speech, dissent, and Americans from arbitrary arrest and indefinite detention without charges or access to attorneys.
Congress is wasting precious time with non-binding resolutions and debates over cutting off war funding. The Bush Regime is rushing the country into a war and a domestic police state. Writing in Slate, Dahlia Lithwick reports that one of the main goals of the so-called "war on terror" (essentially a propagandistic hoax) is to achieve a massive expansion in unaccountable executive power. This is a long-time goal of VP Cheney and his chief of staff, David Addington. It is also the main goal of the "conservative" Federalist Society, an organization of Republican lawyers from whose membership Republican judicial nominees are drawn.
American public opinion is being manipulated. In the name of protecting "American freedom and democracy," the Bush regime rides roughshod over both as it ignores both the public and Congress and proceeds with a catastrophic policy supported by no one but the Bush Regime and a cabal of power-mad neoconservatives.
Nothing can stop the Regime except the immediate impeachment of Bush and Cheney. This is America's last chance.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts (at) yahoo.com
Eisenhower's warning: The growth of the military industrial complex, (mega corporations) may lead to dictatorship.
"Surge" or "Involuntary" Military Conscription: The Neo-Conservative Architects of Military Escalation
by Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, January 26, 2007 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...&articleId=4599
Was it a coincidence? The Bill to restore the Draft (Universal National Service Act of 2007 (HR.393)) was introduced in the House of Representatives on exactly the same day as President Bush's announcement regarding the "Surge", in which he confirmed, in a nationally televised address, that he was going to send more than 20,000 additional troops to Iraq.
The "surge" in US forces in Iraq has been presented by the Bush administration as a short term necessity to confront "the terrorists":
"So America will change our strategy to help the Iraqis carry out their campaign to put down sectarian violence and bring security to the people of Baghdad. This will require increasing American force levels. So I've committed more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq." (President Bush's TV address to the Nation, 10 January 2007)
Within days of Bush's announcement, Congress responded by formally rebuffing the White House's proposal to send more troops:
"The defiant White House stance comes as both the House and Senate, now controlled by Democrats, prepare to vote on resolutions that oppose additional U.S. troops in Iraq. Cheney said those nonbinding votes would not affect Bush's ability to carry out his policies" (AP, Jan 14, 2007)
While differences have emerged between the presidency and the US Congress regarding troop deployments, real opposition to Bush's "surge" largely emanates from the broader American public, which is putting pressure on its (elected) members of Congress.
US troops in Iraq are facing fierce and organized armed resistance.
Occupation forces no longer exercise control over part of Iraqi territory.
The "Green Zone" is threatened. The more than 20,000 troops are, according to the White House, to be deployed in Baghdad, with a view to securing the "Green Zone" enclave.
Despite these developments, the decision to substantially increase US forces in Iraq is not a makeshift initiative, which emerged in response to the evolving crisis in Iraq. It is part of a carefully formulated NeoCon agenda to increase the size of US forces and reinstate "involuntary" forms of military conscription.
Some analysts have suggested that the "surge" is intended in relation to a planned war on Iran.
After all Congress can call in US military generals and question them about the war. Why doesn't Congress call in the head of Blackwater and ask him who gives him the orders? Cheney, Pentagon chiefs, There is after all a lot of overpayment going on to the mercenaries, and to the Republican party from the head of Blackwater. So what are their true alligencies?
Here's one guy's vision of where Blackwater is taking us:
Aftermath: Day 2 of the War With Iran Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic 2TUFF Posted: Feb 1 2007, 04:06 AM
Group: Admin Posts: 23,272 Member No.: 1 Joined: 10-September 05
Aftermath: Day 2 of the War With Iran
by Douglas Herman Exclusive to STR January 31, 2007 http://www.strike-the-root.com/71/herman/herman2.html
In the first fierce day of war, when coordinated air strikes on Iranian targets destroyed most of the Iranian air force and navy, the US military appeared invincible again. Wrecking a second-rate military power does that for an imperial war machine.
By the second day of the war, however, most American and Iranian citizens wished for peace. Unfortunately, wars are always easier to get into than out of. While the war planners in the Pentagon and Israel had devised a workable plan to force Iran into war, using a fake attack on US warships by Iranian gunboats (as the faked Tonkin Gulf attack initiated the Vietnam War), the US Navy fared far worse than the planners wished.
The first to fall, surprisingly, was Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Imams, wielding real power in Iran, disapproved of the increasingly bellicose stance of Ahmadinejad and the destruction of the war, forcing his resignation.
Later in the week, calls for the impeachment of George Bush forced a brokered peace deal and a hurried vote by the House of Representatives passing articles of impeachment by an overwhelming majority.
The US Senate, under as much fire as the troops in Iraq, dragged their feet but the words "High Crimes" began to filter into their brains by the end of the first week of the war.
The second week of the war promised many more surprises. See Encore: Iran - A Bridge Too Far
The American people elected a Democratic majority to restore checks and balances, the rule of law, and our reputation as a law-abiding country in the world community. These cannot be accomplished unless President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are impeached. Their impeachable offenses dwarf those that led to proceedings against President Clinton and President Andrew Jonson, and the threatened proceeding against President Richard Nixon combined. The offenses below are already supported with evidence in the public record, including admissions of guilt. It is likely that investigations prior to impeachment would turn up even more.
IMPEACH BUSH & CHENEY FOR:
Lying to the American people, Congress, and the world about the threat from Iraq & need for war.
War of aggression against Iraq, which posed no threat to US.
Death of over 600,000 Iraqis and nearly 3,000 S troops in unnecessary war.
Exploiting 9/11 for political gain and for war to benefit oil companies and other cronies.
Canceling Iraq's oil contracts with foreign companies and giving them to American corporations and restructuring Iraq's oil industry to their specification in violation of the Hague and Geneva Conventions.
Awarding no-bid contracts to cronies for rebuilding and oil exploitation in Iraq.
Inciting animosity toward the US by attacking Iraq and falsely claiming it was part of "War on Terror."
Authorizing the use of torture in violation of the Geneva Convention and US law and against the advice of the uniformed military.
Participating in the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Haiti and attempting to do so in Venezuela.
Failure to fully cooperate with 9/11 Commission and joint congressional inquiry, and refusal to comply with Freedom of Information Act in other areas as well.
Warrantless wiretapping of American citizens.
Issuing signing statements that contradict the plain meaning of legislation, including on issues of torture.
Denying Americans and others habeas corpus rights even after Supreme Court ruled against it.
Coercing government employees to lie to Congress and the American people about the cost of Medicare drug benefit, global warning, and toxic hazard of NYC after 9/11.
Failure to provide timely aid to Hurricane Katrina victims and appointing someone with no experience to run FEMA.
Barring Americans who disagree with the president from public events paid for with taxpayer money, and forcibly removing some with private security posing as Secret Service agents.
Listen to the American people so we can be confident we have a democracy again.
ANTHRAX CAME FOR U.S. MILITARY BASE
CHAPTER 19--THE ANTHRAX LETTERS ANTI-ARAB
FRAME UP ATTEMPT
AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM by: Dr. Albert D. Pastore Phd.
On October 3, 2001, an Egyptian-American scientist named Dr. Ayaad Assaad sat terrified in a vault-like interrogation room at an FBI office in Washington D.C. It was not yet known that a pair of letters containing deadly anthrax had been mailed to NBC Newsman Tom Brokaw and US Senator Tom Daschle. Five people would die as a result of the anthrax mailings which had been mailed from New Jersey. Billions of pieces of mail were delayed, costing the US Post Office to suffer huge losses. The news media ran nothing but anthrax stories night and day. Politicians and commentators speculated that Osama Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein were behind the letters. Why was the FBI questioning Assaad?
Just before the anthrax murders were committed, someone had sent the FBI an anonymous letter accusing Dr. Assaad of being a bio-terrorist with a grudge against the United States. (1)The letter was sent on September 25th - before the first anthrax case was even diagnosed. The FBI agents soon were convinced that the anonymous letter was a hoax and a frame up attempt. Assaad was cleared of suspicion and released. Assaad later told The Hartford Courant of Connecticut:
'I was so angry when I read the letter, I broke out in tears. Whoever this person is knew in advance what was going to happen and created a suitable, well-fitted scapegoat for this action. You do not need to be a Nobel Laureate to put two and two together." (2) (emphasis added)
If we find out who would have wanted to frame Dr. Assaad in particular, and Arabs in general, we will likely find out who was behind the anthrax murders. That the wording of the anthrax letters was contrived in such a manner as to frame Arabs/Muslims is so self evident that even a mentally retarded child could see through it. Here is the wording of the Daschle letter:
"You cannot stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (3). and the Brokaw letter:
"This is next. Take Penacilin now. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (4)
Give me a break!!!!!!!!! Ask yourself. Who would want to frame Arabs? Who would want to link the interests of the US and the interests of Israel in the obvious way these ridiculous letters attempt to? Remember the Lavon Affair? Remember the USS Liberty? Remember the dancing Israelis? Remember Netanyahu saying 9-11 was good for US-Israeli relations?
A good place to start searching for the culprit is the US bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick, MD. The Ames strain of anthrax has in fact been traced to Fort Detrick, where Assaad once worked until he was laid off in 1997. After he was let go from Fort Detrick, Assaad filed a federal discrimination suit based upon the brutal abuse and harassment that he had endured from some highly suspicious co-workers. In 1991, Assaad found an 8 page poem in his mailbox which became a courtroom exhibit. The poem had 235 lines, many of them lewd and sexually explicit, mocking Assaad. Along with the poem, the perpetrators left Assaad a rubber camel with a large penis attached to it. (5) This was an obvious attempt to mock Assaad's Arab ethnicity. Assaad said that when he brought the poem to the attention of his supervisor, Col. David Franz, Franz kicked him out of his office! (6) Now these weren't immature college kids doing this. This outrageous emotional abuse was carried out by highly trained scientists who obviously wanted to force Assaad out.
The scientist who was the ring-leader in these horrible attacks on Dr. Assaad was Dr. Lt. Col. Philip Zack. Philip Zack was to "voluntarily" leave Fort Detrick shortly after Assaad brought Zack's poem and camel to the attention of his supervisors. (7) Strike one on Dr. Zack!
In an unrelated matter, another Fort Detrick researcher, Dr. Mary Beth Downs told army investigators that on several occasions in January and February of 1992, she had come to work several times to discover that someone had been conducting anthrax research after hours. (8)
Who could that have been? Documents from that 1992 inquiry confirm that an unauthorized person was observed on a surveillance camera being let into the lab at 8:40 PM on January 23, 1992. Who was this unauthorized person caught sneaking into the bio-weapons lab, during the same time period that anthrax research was being done after hours? It turned out to be Lt. Col. Philip Zack! (9) The same Zack who was forced to resign a year earlier because of his horrible abuse of Dr. Assaad. Strike two on Dr. Zack!
Why would Dr. Zack and others have such an animosity towards Dr. Assaad? What would motivate him to help write a 235 line hate poem? What motive would he have to frame Arabs for the deadly anthrax murders? Well, some research into the name "Zack" reveals that it is a fairly common jewish surname, derived from the Old Testament "Zacharias". Dr. Zack is Jewish, and given his obvious, fanatical hatred of Arabs - we can safely deduce that he is a hard core Zionist. Strike three on Dr. Zack!
All of the above is public information. Assaad's 1990's legal proceedings, Dr. Down's testimony, the surveillance video of Zack sneaking into Fort Detrick one year after he had "resigned"- it's all there. The Hartford Courant exposed all of these facts (10) as did the Toronto Globe and Mail, (11) the Seattle Times, (12) and other publications. Just the facts contained in Hartford Courant story alone should be enough to at least indict Philip Zack. So why didn't we see Dr. Zack's face on our TV screens? Why hasn't Dr. Zack been given a lie detector test? What forces in the media and the government are protecting Zack from being exposed as the logical prime suspect?
The plot thickens (and sickens) even more. It is not my intent to smear, defame, or offend jewish people here. But to not mention the ethnicity of certain players in this fantastic drama would be like writing an expose on the Italian Mafia without mentioning that it's major players are Italians. Remember, some of the Zionistsf harshest critics are themselves jewish.
Dr. Assaad had been cleared and Dr. Zack was coming under a small amount of media and FBI suspicion. Enter, from stage left, one Barbara Rosenberg, a jewish environmentalist professor and political activist with no expertise in bio-warfare. (13) Rosenberg suddenly went public with the claim that she knew who the anthrax killer was. (14) She was supported in this effort by another Zionist New York Times journalist named Nicholas D. Kristof, who openly called for the arrest of the innocent American scientist named Dr. Stephen Hatfill. (15)
Quietly and behind the scenes, Rosenberg began directing investigators towards Dr. Hatfill (and therefore away from Dr. Zack). The Washington Post confirmed that it was Rosenberg who helped put authorities on the trail of the innocent Dr. Hatfill. (16)
The name of Hatfill trickled forth from the news media. In a matter of weeks, the trickle became a media flood. Dr. Hatfill became a household name. Hatfill called a news conference to protest his innocence. There was never even a shred of evidence against him and he even passed an FBI lie detector test. (17) But the Zionist controlled media lynch mob, led by the evil Rosenberg and the yellow journalist Kristoff, continued to pursue and harass Hatfill. Dr.Hatfill will never be imprisoned, but his life and career have been destroyed by these false allegations and the media hype. Lt. Col. Zack is off the hook.
What these mad Zionist scientists and their media brethren have done to Dr. Assaad and Dr. Hatfill is monstrous beyond belief. It is clear that these anthrax letters were first intended to be an anti-Arab frame up with Assaad meant to take the blame. When that didn't work, these fanatical Zionists (who always stick together like glue!) put the media and the FBI on poor Dr. Hatfill's back, and wrecked his career and reputation in the process. Why hasn't Dr. Zack been given an FBI lie detector test???? Ask FBI boss and ADL "partner" ; Robert Mueller!
THE ANTHRAX LETTERS: AN OBVIOUS ANTI-ARAB FRAME UP, it was only sent to Democrats and media enemies
1. The Hartford Courant. Turmoil in a Perilous Place. Angry Scientists Allege Racism at Bio-warfare Lab. By Lynee Tuohy & Jack Dolan. December 19, 2001. Google users enter: courant assaad zack anthrax
3. FBI. www.fbi.gov Google users enter: anthrax letters
5. The Hartford Courant. Turmoil in a Perilous Place. Angry Scientists Allege Racism at Biowarfare Lab. By Lynee Tuohy & Jack Dolan. December 19, 2001. Google users enter: courant turmoil perilous place And also anthrax downs zack
8. Hartford Courant. Anthrax Missing from Army Lab. By Jack Dolan & Dave Altimari. January 20, 2001.Google users enter: courant anthrax missing army lab
10. See footnotes 165 and 166.
11. Globe and Mail. (Canada). On the Trail of an Anthrax Killer. By Paul Koring. March 6, 2001.Google users enter: globe mail trail anthrax killer
12. Seattle Times. Deadly specimens disappeared from Army research lab in '90s. Reprinted from Hartford Courant. January 21, 2002 Google users enter: seattle times
This work is in the public domain