US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Environment
Reefer Madness II: Send Comment to FDA
07 Jul 2009
The war on tobacco is a fake crusade designed to protect the cigarette industry. It's not about "smoking" but about covering up for some pretty mind-blowing crimes from the cigarette cartel.
The public has until Sept. 29 to submit Public Comments on the FDA's "tobacco regulation" law.


Also: Go here to comment...and to click on an icon to see the whole law: You have to see it for yourself to believe it.

There is plenty to comment about:

* The law wrongly says nicotine is "harmful"---but even the FDA itself finds it safe in other products.
* Law says that tobacco kills---but the term "tobacco" is unqualified. No studies have been brought forward about Plain UnContaminated tobacco killing anyone. It may have---but who knows until the studies are done? Highly-Contaminated smoking concoctions cannot help but cause harm, but that is quite different from just tobacco.
* The FDA can reduce nicotine to all but nothing---a tactic long used by cigarette makers to prompt more smoking, sales, and "sin taxes". But this also causes deeper inhaling and more exposures to harmful cigarette contaminants. This point makes this law effectively a new Prohibition.
[The FDA cannot remove all nicotine because---well, then they'd have no "drug" to "regulate".]
* The FDA is forbidden to address or regulate easily the most toxic, cancer-causing, and child-harming parts of typical cigarettes...the many tobacco pesticides and their residues, many of them being chlorine chemicals that produce dioxin---an industrial substance that is especially harmful to children, fetuses, and pregnant mothers. You'd think the FDA never heard of Agent Orange or Love Canal, etc.
* The FDA is forbidden to address or regulate another farm component---radiation-contaminated phosphate tobacco fertilizers which have been found to cause over 90% of upper respiratory "smoking related" cancers. The cancers are more accurately Radiation Related or Fertilizer Related. To say "smoking related" is to blame the unwitting, unprotected victims---the ones doing this smoking...the ones who thought they were protected from such things by our sworn and paid public officials.
* The FDA, by applying huge costs to proving a cigarette has "reduced risk" (even if that reduced risk is just implied), makes it virtually impossible for an alternative cigarette maker to make and accurately label a cigarette as "organic" or "pesticide free" or "dioxin free" or "burn accelerant free" or "natural" or "additive free".
* The FDA bans Cigarette Makers from being on the regulatory board---but it says nothing about representatives from tobacco pesticide manufacturers, pharmaceuticals that make tobacco pesticides and/or non-tobacco cigarette additives, fertilizer interests, agricultural firms that supply many non-tobacco ingredients, chlorine interests that hope to keep the chlorine-dioxin topic Off The Table because of implications on their businesses, pharmaceuticals that are competitors to tobacco for various medical purposes, or any of their insurers and investors. Even health insurers that invest billions in cigarette manufacturing are not prohibited from the regulatory committees.
* The FDA law ignores many US Patents for Fake Tobacco products (made from all sorts of waste cellulose materials) that are designed to "simulate tobacco"---or, to lie by appearances. Products are given measured shots of nicotine to complete the deception. Any number of low-end cigarettes may contain no tobacco at all. If such products are not tobacco, and cannot emit tobacco smoke, and have not been studied for health effects, they must be exempt from the law---but nothing states this or even mentions the topic.
* The law threatens and even admits that it will cause Prohibition-style crimes in illicit trade and smuggling---even trade that will support "terrorists". Escalation of crime is a threat to the public interest.
* The FDA, by not barring cigarette makers from passing "user fee" costs for the regulation onto customers in price hikes, increases the value of cigarettes for smugglers, illicit traders, and "terrorists".
* The FDA has no words about banning use of added burn-accelerants in typical cigarettes though they are complicit in thousands of fires, injuries and deaths each year.
* The US EPA has acknowledged that chlorine is man-made/industry made, and is "not likely in nature"...such as from tobacco plants. The EPA also acknowledged that there is dioxin in smoke from (typical) cigarettes. The USA has classified dioxin as a Known Human Carcinogen, the worst level. And, the USA has signed the Stockholm Convention to phase out dioxin and 11 other worst industrial pollutants from the earth. Many, if not most, diseases said to be "smoking related" (hardly a medical/scientific term) are known effects of dioxin exposures, and many if not most are not possible effects of exposure to smoke from any plant. Further, the worst possible exposure route for dioxin is through inhalation because of the high efficiency of the lungs. Beyond that, dioxins cause "the Promoter Effect" ---accelerating cell-damage from other this case, such as the radiation from the fertilizers, and other non-tobacco cigarette components that are carcinogenic or become so when burned.
This FDA law utterly ignores all of that. It says nothing about chlorine-bleached cigarette paper, chlorine tobacco pesticide residues, and more pesticide residues from non-tobacco agricultural crop additives.

Whether one likes smoking or not...or even if one hates smokers and hopes they die...this law affects everyone. It is a product of Corporate "science" at its worst. It is a virtual re-play of Reefer Madness that gave us 62 years of the horrific war on cannabis, and it lets chlorine and other chemical interests off the hook for easilyone of the industry's worst and most extensive and most costly crimes. Those homicidal industries affect all of our foods, our drugs, many household products, and our air and water. What they have done to smokers is what they do to everyone---except in less obviously visible ways. If one is getting ones dioxin and pesticide doses from a cigarette, or from household pesticides and cleansers and non-organic foods and emissions from plastics and the rest...the results are the same---cancers, immune problems, fetal damages, cardio-vascular problems, learning disabilities, pregnancy disruption, sperm loss, endocrine disruption---and on and on. If one is sickened by all that, and if one happens to smoke---guess what will be blamed.
Of course, smokers get it the worst because of the delivery path---direct inhalation. Smokers are the canaries in our coal mines. This FDA law is an attempt to strangle the canaries, the evidence agaisnt Industrial Chemicals. It is not to protect anyone's health.
See also:

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


Nicotine is Not Harmless
07 Jul 2009
Nicotine is Not Harmless
July 7, 2009 by Anonymous, 4 hours 41 min ago
Comment id: 3634 The Nicolaitans of Revelations 2 were killing people with Nicotine long before people started smoking it. The issue is that inhaling or ingesting nicotine is a lot more harmful than smoking it. Here is my Nicotine Madness Forum Topix post of June 2007:

From NY FT: Nicotine Madness: In response to commercials portraying amputations attributed to smoking: New York Anti-smoking Poster "Boy", Skip Legault said that his parents made him eat a pack of cigarettes when he was a kid. 3 cigarettes is probably a fatal dose. Nicotine is one of the most toxic substances there is. If he did eat them, that is probably what messed him up more than smoking! You always hear about babies dropping dead from nibbling on cigarette butts that they've seen in their parents mouth. It is no bull! Tobacco is of the Deadly Nightshade family. What in God's name ails this medical profession to make like smoking did this to Legault? Check and see, and I bet his troubles started when he was forced to eat cigarettes. 1/15 Since Bush Daddy said that the Bush Nazis have been using nicotine as a means of chemical assault (nicotine is in insecticides), I researched the matter. Nicotine can be absorbed from guts, lungs, and skin. Ingestion of small amounts of nicotine, a bitter-tasting compound, causes vomiting, nausea, headaches, salivation, abdominal cramps, stomach pains, agitation, a rapid weak pulse, and bowel and bladder evacuation. Larger amounts cause convulsions, extreme weakness, confusion, paralysis, coma, respiratory arrest, and death. Even though it says that ingestion of nicotine causes the blood vessels to collapse, they say that they still haven't linked it to peripheral vascular disease. Duh! The fatal dose is listed as 40 milligrams per kilogram. I bet that Skip Legault has always had peripheral vascular disease since his parents made him eat those smokes. Smoking is a big deal with these Bush Nazis probably because they are trying to justify Bush Daddy dumping his buddies in the Pacific, saying that he smelled smoke in the cockpit after telling his buddies that he didn't mind if they smoked. "The curse of an evil deed is that it will always continue to engender evil" Schiller. So it goes as Nicotine Madness replaces the Reefer Madness of yesterday. "Behold they are less than nothing.." (Is. 41:23-24) Although Bush Daddy says that Nazi death doctor Nicky Exarchou has boxcars full of nicotine etc. to dump on you, don't get shook! I can probably save you or at least you will probably die laughing. bobbymeade (at)
See also: