US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Announcement :: Politics
Election Experts Issue Orange Alert for Massachusetts Special Election
18 Jan 2010
Modified: 06:26:00 PM
Representatives of nonpartisan election watchdog groups around the nation issued a last-minute 'orange alert,' warning that tomorrow's Massachusetts special election to elect a successor to the late Senator Ted Kennedy is ripe for manipulation.
For Immediate Release: January 18, 2010

Contact:
Sheila Parks, Ed.D., Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots, Belmont, MA 617-512-5529
Sally Castleman, Election Defense Alliance (781) 454-8700

Election Experts Issue Orange Alert for Massachusetts Special Election
Groups Urge Secretary of State Galvin to Take Action to Detect Election Tampering

Belmont, MA
Representatives of nonpartisan election watchdog groups around the nation issued a last-minute 'orange alert,' warning that tomorrow's Massachusetts special election to elect a successor to the late Senator Ted Kennedy is ripe for manipulation. The groups call on Secretary of State Galvin to take immediate extra security precautions for the Senate race, which has become a high-stakes national contest. Critical national initiatives such as health care reform and financial reform will be influenced by the results of this election.

Unprecedented amounts of out-of-state money has funded a media blitz, and recent seesawing polls —some highly questionable—show Republican Scott Brown and Democrat Martha Coakley now reported to be in a virtual toss-up.

Experts are concerned that with the electronic election system in use, its lack of transparency and ease of manipulation, the public has no basis for trust in the accuracy and integrity of the election results. Confidence in election outcome should be based on objective verification rather than government reassurance, particularly when voting systems with so many known vulnerabilities and so little ability for oversight are employed.

"Now is the time for Massachusetts state election officials to act. Now is the time for all citizens to act," said Sally Castleman, Massachusetts voter and co-founder of Election Defense Alliance.

Members of election integrity organizations nationwide urge Secretary of State Galvin to take immediate steps to increase transparency for this electronically tabulated election. Parks stated, “It is way past time for we the people to own our elections.”

Massachusetts elections are programmed and serviced by New England Diebold affiliate LHS Associates, a private company, located in Methuen , MA , which alone controls the trade secret software and memory cards holding all ballot and voting data. This data must be secured and held by Massachusetts election officials, experts say.

Secretary of State Galvin must immediately institute a policy and practice to ensure that public election officials and not LHS Associates maintain chain of custody over all ballots, voting machines, database files, and memory cards. Only through public possession and scrutiny of all election data can we ensure the integrity of election results.

Alert citizens can help defend against election shenanigans by volunteering as polling center watchdogs.

Election Integrity expert Brad Friedman has warned that the outcome will rely on the accuracy of votes tallied by the easily-hacked electronic Diebold/Premier optical scan voting machines, featured in the film Hacking Democracy.

Friedman, writing in the Gouverneur Times says, “The electronic voting systems used in Massachusetts are notoriously plagued with problems and vulnerabilities, and are in violation of federal voting system standards. Moreover, they are sold, programmed, and maintained by a company with a disturbing criminal background.”

Friedman notes with concern, “The machines and cards are often accessed by both election officials and the private vendors who program and maintain them."

The candidates are urged not to concede the election or declare victory until election results can be verified and any bona fide election challenges resolved.

The organizations issuing the alert include:
Americans United for Democracy, Integrity, and Transparency in Elections, AZ http://audit-az.blogspot.com/

Abbe Waldman-Delozier – Consultant www.RecallVotingMachines.com

Bev Harris, BlackBoxVoting.org, a national nonpartisan nonprofit elections

Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots, Belmont, MA www.handcountedpaperballots.org

Coalition for Visible Ballots http://coalition4visibleballots.homestead.com/

Florida Fair Elections www.floridafairelections.org/board.htm

NH Fair Elections Committee www.democracyfornewhampshire.com

Massachusetts Citizens for Voting Integrity www.handcountedpaperballots.org

PDA Board Chair Mimi Kennedy www.pdamerica.org

Prof. Mark Crispin Miller, election integrity author/journalist, professor
of media studies, NYU

Velvet Revolution www.velvetrevolution.us

Where’s the Paper www.wheresthepaper.org
###
See also:
http://www.handcountedpaperballots.org/
http://www.velvetrevolution.us/

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.