US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Commentary :: DNC : Human Rights : Organizing : Politics : Social Welfare
KARL ROVES BILLIONAIRE CABAL'S MISSION ACCOMPLISHED LAST ELECTION WITH THE BUYING OF CERTAIN U.S. CONGRESSIONAL SEATS WITH TARP BAILOUT $$$ INTO SECRET 501C4 SLU$H ....
22 Jan 2011
* BILLIONAIRE NIXON~KARL ROVE STYLE CABAL THAT PLOTTED OUR COUNTRIES DESTINY FOR U.S. little voting Americans *
** IS IT STEALING AMERICAN ELECTION'S WHEN THESE WEALTHY ELITE FROM AROUND THE WORLD CAN NOW USE THEIR UNLIMITED CORPORATIONAL $$ TO BUY OUR AMERICAN NATIONAL & STATE ELECTION$ WITH THESE SECRET 501C4 KARL ROVE STYLE SLU$H... U.S. SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS **

** RICK PERRY & HIS TEXAS CABAL BEGIN THE FUTURE BREAK~UP OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT TODAY **

WE NOW HAVE THIS INHUMANE TEXAS GOVERNOR RICK PERRY CALLING FOR TEXAS STATE RIGHTS OVER FEDERAL LAWS, SO SHOULD IT SURPRISE ANYONE IN AMERICA IF CERTAIN CONSERVATIVE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES DECIDE TO THOW IN WITH BIG BUSINESS IN EXCHANGE OF BEING ABLE TO OVERTURN ABORTION & SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN THE NEAR FUTURE ???

SADLY ARE AMERICAN ELECTIONS ARE STILL WON & LOST ON HOW MUCH $$ IS USED TO MASSAGE THE PUBLIC MENTALITY ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

YES, THE KARL ROVE ELITE BILLIONAIRE CABAL, THE 5 CONSERVATIVE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES & THE 3 REPUBLICAN FEC MEMBERS TURNED ON THE REST OF AMERICA IN THEIR OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE OUR LAST & FUTURE U.S. ELECTIONS WITH THESE SECRET 501C4 ELECTION SLU$H FUND$.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 Supreme Court judges had conflict of interest in campaign finance case, group says
WATCHDOG GROUP COMMON CAUSE SAYS SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ANTONIN SCALIA AND CLARENCE THOMAS HAD A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CASE, WHICH PERMITTED CORPORATIONS TO DIRECTLY FUND CAMPAIGN ADS. IT SAYS IF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FINDS A CONFLICT, IT SHOULD ASK THE COURT TO RECONSIDER ITS RULING IN THE LANDMARK CASE.


By Tom Hamburger, Washington Bureau
January 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — A government watchdog group alleges that two of the Supreme Court's most conservative members had a conflict of interest when they considered a controversial case last year that permitted corporate funds to be used directly in political campaigns.

Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas are the subject of an unusual letter delivered Wednesday by Common Cause asking the U.S. Justice Department to look into whether the jurists should have disqualified themselves from hearing the campaign finance case if they had attended a private meeting sponsored by Charles and David Koch, billionaire philanthropists who fund conservatives causes. A Supreme Court spokesperson said late Thursday that the two justices did not participate in the Koch brothers' private meetings, though Thomas "dropped by."

If it believes there is a conflict, the Justice Department, as a party to the case, should ask the court to reconsider its decision, Common Cause said.

The landmark case, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, was decided a year ago this week. It permitted corporate and union funds to be spent directly on election advertising, a practice that had previously been restricted. The Kochs have been significant donors to independent-expenditure campaigns, which increased dramatically after the Citizens United decision.

The letter is based in part on references to Scalia and Thomas made in an invitation to an upcoming meeting this month of elite conservative leaders sponsored by the Kochs. The invitation, first obtained by the liberal blog Think Progress, names the two justices among luminaries who have attended the closed Koch meetings at unspecified dates in the past.

Representatives of the Kochs declined repeated requests for comment. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Decisions about recusal from individual cases are up to each individual justice.

Some legal scholars dismiss the complaint as unlikely to succeed. But others said raising the issue could engender useful public scrutiny and debate about judicial independence.

Steven Gillers, a legal ethics specialist at New York University, said the Koch brothers' use of Scalia and Thomas' name for their upcoming meeting was "troubling."

"I believe the nation has a right to know exactly what role if any the Justices played in the Koch gatherings, including the content of any remarks they made and whether Citizens United was a subject of any gathering they attended," Gillers said. "The answers can help determine whether they were able to sit in the case and, if not, whether the result should be overturned.

In the invitation letter to a meeting later this month in Palm Springs, Calif., sent on Koch Industries stationary, Charles G. Koch encourages attendance, saying that "twice a year our network meets to review strategies for combating the multitude of public policies that threaten to destroy America as we know it."

Supreme Court spokesperson Kathy Arberg said that Justices Thomas and Scalia had traveled to Indian Wells, California to address a Federalist Society dinner sponsored by Charles and Elizabeth Koch but did not actively participate in the separate Koch strategy and policy meetings. Justice Scalia spoke about international law at the January 2007 meeting of the quasi-academic Federalist Society and did not attend the separate political and strategy meeting hosted by the Kochs, she said. Justice Thomas spoke to the Federalists at the same location in January 2008 about his recently published book. Thomas then dropped by one of the separate Koch meeting sessions. "It was a brief drop by," Arberg said. "He was not a participant."

It is common for members of the federal judiciary to attend events where legal and political issues are discussed. But the law prohibits them from taking part in cases where their impartiality might reasonable be questioned. In their letter to Holder, Common Cause executives say that such a conflict appears to exist.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS A INDEPENDENT VOLUNTEER WWW LOBBY THAT SINGS OUT FOR OUR AMERICAN MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER AMERICANS LIVING IN OUR WEALTHY ELITE'S COUNTRY.

* WE CAN BE FOUND WITH ANY WEB SEARCH ENGINE BY OUR NAME,TELEPHONE NUMBER OR E MAIL ADDRESS.

** GOOGLE,YAHOO,AOL,MSN,BING..ETC..ALL CARRY OUR PREVIOUS WRITTEN COMMENTARY IN VARIOUS DIFFERENT LISTINGS.

*** WE ENJOY BRINGING all our fellow little Americans THE GOOD LIFE OVER THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIES WORLD OF THE WEB.

lawyersforporoeramericans (at) gmail.com

424-247-2013

BRITIAN, CANADA, ENGLAND, FEDERAL RESERVE, FRANCE, GERMANY, GREAT BRITIAN, HOLY SEE, NORWAY, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, U.S.CONGRESS, VATICAN, WORLD BANK

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.