US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Hidden with code "Other"
()
Commentary :: Politics
Why Boston? Decoding the Marathon Bombing
19 Apr 2013
Modified: 12:35:34 PM
From the outside view, it is difficult to stop laughing over the silly gestures of the American politicians. Is there any place in the world where these cleaning up behind the American killer robots would complain about the choice of target rather than the choice of arms? Would an attack on a crowd busy with itself have been morally different in any way had it appeared on the West coast instead of the East coast? Does the revelation, that in the American imagination whoever seems to have chosen Boston as a target appears to have done so in the same fashion as someone choosing to push the button with the letter ´B´ on a computer keyboard, allow an insight into local conflicts bearing answers to the question of why Boston?
It might be the political rhetoric itself which could provide a clue to the social conception behind the attack. Were the Obama to be taken by its words, it would have to persecute itself, because the profile of the attack, which killed random individuals for nothing but their collective associations, like a robot attack, reflects the basic pattern of the notorious false flag terrorism of the so-called intelligence agencies. But in that case the Washington regime would already be harming itself. This is undeniably plausible in the context of the misguided austerity policy which sacrifices every other cost factor to the greed of the military and police state. Yet it could also be a more indirect blowback such as in the Trade Towers case where quitters of the national security regime retaliated against it. However, the common denominator of all possible explanations is that this is a proxy attack with an assumed subtext.

It is even possible that it is not an attack against America – just like it is not an attack against China – and that the nation is just a prop in an attack against someone else, while the babble over the choice of Boston is only meant to distract from that. A city that is actually a multitude of different cities running in the same space certainly allows an asymmetric encoding of violence, which would let only the targeted community know that this is specifically against them when the entire multitude is being attacked instead. Maybe someone is trying to extort money from a local restaurant and favours a kind of pressure that makes it difficult for the target to launch a specific complaint without putting itself into an unfavourable focus of attention. In the same way, the American nation could be the bystander in front of someone else´s house which has been attacked. That would, in contrast to all other assumptions, explain why not even the most over financed oppression machine in the world can come up with an inspirational bogeyman.

So which Boston was it that received such a double shot across the bow? Which were the international developments related to that location in the eve of the attack? Have they surfaced in the American media at all? Who could be attacked by taking America as a prop that is unlikely to consent in what is being done to it? It could be that the proxy target is one of the Catholic Cardinals Pseudopope Francis 0. appointed into his parallel “Group of the Eight” two days before, Boston Bishop Sean O´Malley. This blatant preparation for hostile takeover of the ailing Church by the world´s worst state-run business conglomerate seems to have been highlighted by leaving the Americans with the Boston conundrum.

Could the bombs have been intended to stop that from happening, including the undreamed consequences it might have for the mortality rate of a billion Catholics? Or was the attack meant to put pressure on the Bishop of Rome to comply with the G8? Like in all instances of false flag terrorism, it is reasonable to assume that the different individuals and officials involved in one way or another have differing intentions. In any case, the credibility of his anticapitalist rhetoric and theatrics is among the victims of Boston. In other words, the big cat went for the parsonage and did not care about the colour of the mice.

The origins of the current restructuring of the Catholic Church go back to the same event which also triggered the resignation of the last Pope. Early July 2012, Ideological Conformity Office (no it´s not Kim Jong-Un) chairperson William Levada, an American Bishop from the West coast, was exchanged with German Gerhard Müller, who had been implicated in the abuse scandals, parallel to the replacement of the head of the VS Org by the Berlin regime, which suggests Ratzinger´s ensuing retreat to have as well taken place due to blackmail by its secret police. Now, as the Pseudopope attempts to install another North American in a decisive position, even though this time only as a member of a group representing the gateway to the commercial penetration of the Christian mother organisation, that persons home district immediately becomes a false flag target.

In order to cope with this religious vulnerability it is necessary to understand the dysfunctional nature of the secret police state. Within its hierarchies, any terror plan made on the base of information the public is not aware of, or of which it is not aware that it has been looted from private savings, once it is useful to promise outmatching a competing state agency, will find some supporters somewhere, be it even such ones who make it appear professionally unprofessional. It bears the question which right to exist an “Ideological Conformity Office” of the Catholic Church does have when it is a dozy watchdog against this collective suicide of the so-called intelligence agencies of the nations. There was no such entity the last time after a Bishop of Rome resigned.

This work licensed under a
Creative Commons license