US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Net censorship
09 Apr 2001
An innocent man

Cypherpunk's Free Speech Defense
by Declan McCullagh (declan (at)
2:00 a.m. Apr. 9, 2001 PDT

TACOMA, Washington -- Jim Bell took the witness stand in federal court
on Friday to argue he was attempting to document illegal behavior, not
stalk government agents.

Bell described his electronic research last year -- which the Justice
Department says led federal agents to fear for their safety -- as
entirely lawful and said he never intended to hurt or threaten anyone.

The 43-year-old chemist and entrepreneur freely admitted he bought
motor vehicle databases and did Internet searches on the names of
Treasury Department agents as part of his effort to uncover illegal
surveillance by the U.S. government. Bell is charged with five federal
counts of interstate stalking, and the jury trial began last Tuesday.

A key part of the government's case against Bell is a political essay
he wrote titled "Assassination Politics," a thought experiment which
advocates a method to slaughter miscreant federal officials using
anonymous remailers, digital cash, and the Internet.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robb London said that since Bell has refused
to renounce his beliefs incorporated into that essay, he should be
viewed as a menace to society. London said Bell's research into
personal information about agents was an "obsessive campaign by an
individual to harass them."

"Mr. Bell was posting things publicly on the Internet," London said.
"You can't go out there and do this stuff and think there's no chance
your victims will find out."

This case raises the question of what actions are protected by the
First Amendment's guarantees of free expression and what crosses the
line and becomes illegal harassment.
more at
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.