US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Hidden with code "Other"
()
News :: Race
A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
This is an long but worthwhile article that specifies the link between white supremacist hate groups in the United States, human trafficking and a series of unsolved murders. I hope someone uses this information usefully. I hope this shuts these morons up for good. We all deserve to live in peace without any white supremacists causing any more problems for anyone.
Frank Marzitelli, Human Trafficker and Killer

(Note: Attached is the book I reference in this piece written by this white supremacist. To find any of the content I reference in this text, please use the "find" option in your browser or word processor and search for a passage or key word using this feature. This will allow you to parse through it without having to read all of it. I must warn you it is full of hate speech of all sorts content which may trigger any survivors of rape or abuse)

Introduction and Background Information

Before you begin reading this document, you need to understand the basic assumptions behind this document. I encountered a person who engages in human trafficking, or modern day slavery. For women, human trafficking frequently means being broken down to be an unpaid and abused prostitute. For men, human trafficking usually means having someone use or profit from the free labor of a person who is owned as a slave.

In the cases of women enslaved in the sex trade, the traffickers entrap women through offering economic opportunity, entry to the United States for refuges and immigrants, marriage, or other ruses to entrap women against their will into slavery.

Immigrants are frequently targets of these schemes but human trafficking does not just happen to immigrants. American citizens who are female are just as frequently victimized as immigrants. Traffickers who seek out American women will use gang rape, severe trauma or entrapment to break down a woman to where she can be controlled.

Regardless of how a victim is entrapped, usually the victim is targeted for not other reason than they can be and this is done to economically benefit the criminal who controls these victims.

It is never a matter of a victims willingness in these instances. Traffickers use deception, violent, extreme abuse or any other method which will work to make the trafficker a profit.

Human trafficking is a worsening problem. Maybe it gets ignored because people assume it only happens in foreign country, or that human trafficking merely refers to bringing people across national boundaries.

Maybe a better term to use is modern day slavery. No matter what you call it, it is the same thing- people who use whatever means they can to get a human being to work for nothing so that the "owner" of this person can get money and power.

The man who attempted to coerce me into slavery, brags in a document he wrote that owning slaves elevates "one's social status," though the reason for why this person would say this seems unclear.

Even United States citizens are at risk for getting trafficked. When it is accounted for how extreme violence is used against victims to break their will, you could argue that many people are not immune to this exploitation.

I think it is important for people to be aware of this problem. This helps in terms of deterring crime and protecting people from exploitation.

Lack of awareness creates the perfect medium for this crime to persist.

I had the misfortune to have human traffickers who knew of both my economic situation and of my being disabled, isolated and disenfranchised from autoimmune disease. I, unfortunately, in an effort to survive, spoke with women in my same predicament at the homeless shelter about our predicament when human traffickers were present.

At the time I had no idea that what I was doing was dangerous because I was completely unfamiliar with the problem of human trafficking. Even with the man who attacked and stalked me, I knew something was wrong with his intent, but I could make no sense of what the actual problem was.

I made the mistake of being overconfident in thinking that if there was danger I could outwit and survive this person. I had no idea as to the extent of the danger I was in. Namely, my perception of this individual with criminal aspirations was that he was just some hobo.

I had no idea this person had huge social and political sway in this area. So my miscalculations in regards to him cost me dearly. Still, I legitimately had a right to have some confidence in myself. I actually did come from a dangerous city myself and had survival strategies which had worked sufficiently in the area which I hailed from.

However, all the abilities I had and "street smarts" I possessed were from an area which didn't have a huge human trafficking problem. Given that this problem was alien to me, I made numerous mistakes in how I handled myself there in St. Paul.

Post facto, when it was too late, I understood that to survive human traffickers involves keeping any fact about you which makes you vulnerable, private. Silence is golden when it comes to combating human traffickers.

I also failed to recognize just how organized and well backed these criminals who human traffick can be. I had acquaintances when the events I describe occurred who knew this reality better than I did. One person actually admitted in a vague sense that to come out and fight those people out in the open was a recipe for failure.

Unfortunately for me, this person knew exactly what was going on, but was unwilling to confront the offenders directly. Also he failed to call it human trafficking outright. I still don't know the purpose his vague descriptions of the problem. I can't tell whether he supposed I was familiar enough with human trafficking to interpret his subtle hints about it accurately or if he was afraid he'd get in trouble if he called it this outright.

Either way, three weeks before I fled that shelter for my life, this person, Greg, did give me enough of a clue about it all for me to guess the problem. Still, by then it was too late for me to be able to act to protect myself.

So, yes, I did figure out after the fact it was human traffickers who were manipulating me and the other women at that homeless shelter.

Autoimmune disease
Autoimmune disease primarily effects women. Due to biases which are sort of sexist in the medical profession women will frequently not get the treatment for these conditions. The outdated attitudes about women not being able to tolerate pain and being overly emotional still exist today, and unfortunately have bearing on our access to pain control.

I'd moved up to Minnesota with the goal of getting superior medical care here. I have received just this, but this did not come without putting me into a situation to which I may never fully escape from.


It has become of utmost importance to me to research fully the extent of my trafficker's activities in both trafficking and other areas. I hope that this work will help other people.

I know I am dealing with a wholly evil and sick man. After my nightmarish experience with him, nothing I have since learned about him and his possible activities really surprises me all that much.

Human traffickers use techniques to control their victims. Human traffickers use physical violence, threats to harm or murder family members, rape and gang rape to traumatize women and men to the point they are broken. Once such a level of traumatization sets in, people lose their sense of who they are.

Trauma lends people to emotionally shut down. Emotions are what motivate human beings, more than thought. If you cannot feel anger, you cannot mount a defense in your own behalf. If you cannot feel love or trust, your bonds to other people also suffer. Emotions are just as much a part of what makes us human, as thought, reasoning, or intelligence.

Also, the ability to feel fear and manage it suffers at the hands of severe trauma and fear does serve to keep us away from danger. Never mind that fear sometimes appears over situations which don't merit it, but usually only after trauma does this become an issue.

When trauma occurs, I don't care who you are, the event seems unreal and separate from reality. Our emotions bind us to reality. Human traffickers know this so what they seek to do is shell shock their victims quickly and violently.

Maybe I actually fared better because I'm good at keeping a clear head in crisis and translating my fear into action. Still, I almost got taken, got disappeared. Worse, my adversaries haven't given up. I wonder if they ever will.

A human trafficker also tries to learn all they can about their victims to control them or will transport them around the U.S. and even into foreign countries so their victims become separated from support networks.

Human traffickers frequently seek out women who are new to a particular city or of whom are away from home on vacation. It is easier to find a woman who lacks social support and other necessary resources.

Also, it is easier for the human trafficker to talk about their victims when a woman lacks people who can vouch for her.

These facts certainly played a role in what happened to me. Due to the circumstances I detail below, a human trafficker posed as a friend to me, showed me around a city I had just arrived in and tried to learn all he could about me for nefarious purposes.

It seems that my willingness to assist a sexual assault victim at a shelter me and the victim stayed at, made me the focus of this effort to harm and control me.


I will describe now the circumstances where I offered assistance to that sexual assault victim at that shelter, since this seems to be what made me a target.

When I first came here to the Twin Cities, I met a man named Frank Marzitelli. He offered to show me a bike co-op he supposedly did volunteer work for.

I wasn't really interested in going down there with him. He seemed a charlatan, and carried himself like a salesman. That put me off of the idea of checking out the bike co-op with him. I repeatedly said "no" to the offer and went about my business.

That was until things started getting weird at the shelter. A friend of mine Jennifer was sexually assaulted at the shelter by a man named Thomas Cloud. She told us, her friends which consisted of me, two men who ran a bible study and Pat, a woman with fibromyalgia, her daughter, Joanna who had fibromyalgia and another woman, Pat who had chronic fatigue syndrome and Sjogren's syndrome, all of the above being autoimmune diseases.

The two men from bible study were older. One was Greg, who actually was aware of the strangeness going on at that shelter, and for the most part generally helpful.

The other was some odd guy who never bathed, name Tim. When Jennifer was assaulted, we all tried to help her. We told staff but they didn't call the police, nor did they kick the perpetrator out of the shelter. We kept pressing to have something done. I suggested calling the police.

They were called out but the perp wasn't arrested though he was a registered sex-offender. The police said they needed one of our phone numbers and they would call back. I had my phone going for 3 days, but I had a crappy AT&T pay as you go plan because there were no Cricket stores in the Twin Cities. Jennifer's phone wasn't working then either, so the call was missed. We all said she ought to get a protection order against Tim.

After we called the police, the shelter finally kicked the man out but it was only for 2 days. It started becoming apparent nothing would happen. Since really no one was helping and Greg had to take up the slack. I got in the center of it all since I expected justice to be pretty straightforward. Not like it ever is in Minnesota, I just didn't know that then.

Now the Pat with fibromyalgia started hanging out with that strange guy Tim. Greg knew something strange was going on there.

Greg eyed Tim's behavior suspiciously, likely for good reason. It turned out that Tim was friends with Frank later on. Tim was pursuing some sort of sexual funny business with Pat, which involved taking advantage of her untreated fibromyalgia by getting her pain pills.

Also, Jennifer, Greg and I began to question Tim's fantastic story in regards to his wife's death. I looked him up online, during the thick of all those events. I found an article about his wife's death. Tim said he and his wife he claimed had a suicide pact, and took a bunch of pain pills, but he somehow lived. I showed it to Jennifer, Greg and Joanna but not Pat. She was in Tim's thrall.

Even the story told by Tim of his wife's death in the paper didn't seem plausible to readers of the story online when the incident occurred. Tim said he took 90 Vicodin pills and still lived. Greg kept saying no one takes that many pills and lives. The readers of the story weren't buying it either.

About this point, things got really weird. Tim prior to this posed as a friend to me too, but had actually interfered with me getting into a room I wanted to rent by stealing a business card I had with the contact number for the building manager of the building.

After I dredged up that article online regarding his wife's death, Tim kept following me around, staring at me and otherwise trying to intiimidate me. This is also when Frank shows up in a big way. Frank offered to help out with the mess and it turns out he was friend's with Tim.

It was as if they were playing "good cop, bad cop" with me and when Frank pretended to help me and Jennifer, he actually showed up to protect his buddies and monkeywrench us getting Tim and Tom in trouble. Greg observed, without getting down to specific details, "They are playing divide and conquer with the women."

Greg never accounted for who he meant by "they" but he had the sense to back off at this point. I think he got these individuals and what their business was and knew enough not to openly challenge these people. That was sense I didn't have.

During all of this, Joanna tried to help Pat. At around the point I had to flee the shelter because of Frank and the threat he posed, I heard the last time I spoke to Joanna that someone had offered Pat a place to live outside the shelter, but that person came to demand she pay rent with sex. Joanna said that drove Pat to try to kill herself and when I was there that day, Pat was still at the hospital recuperating. She did manage to seriously harm herself.

I feel bad because I had to walk away from friends to save my self. I've been told I did the smartest thing I could have done and still I don't like that I did that. I don't cower, I certainly don't abandon friends. I know it was too dangerous. At that point Frank had already harmed me and nothing short of saving a life could drive me back up in harms way. Still it makes me mad because it was all their strategy in the first place. I was played. We all were.

In hindsight, I very much had the impression that something was really, really rotten with that shelter. In unprecedented fashion, it did not kick out a resident who'd sexually assaulted a woman. Later, that other women I knew down there was invited by someone at the shelter to move in with them. Then it came to pass, the man who'd invited her in to stay for free was demanding sexual favors in return for the rent. This woman was kind and intelligent and this situation drove her to literally trying to kill her self. I've since heard that shelters are places human traffickers here gravitate to. My experience indeed shows this to be the case.

Frank's tendency to talk about very, very odd things. One example was how he talked about how he was ¼ black. Frank is obsessed about this and this isn't too strong of a word. Frank is seemingly not proud of being black.

He criticizes African Americans frequently. Yet if you confront him about how what he's saying is racist, then he will claim that he can't be because he is ¼ black. Such absurdities can lead you to think of him as just a really confused individual. This was a mistake for me to assume this. It's a mistake for anyone to assume this about him. Until you know the truth, and how twisted his truth really is, then his odd rants have a direct tie to reality; a reality he's eager to confuse people about and for good reason.

Frank is an individual you have to do your homework on as a result of his dishonesty. Pieces of this puzzle have tended to get solved by relying upon sources other than Frank's own words. For example, someone told me that a year before I knew him, in 2010, he was a skinhead.

This piece of the puzzle was enlightening. Franks strange anomalies like wearing suspenders under his clothes, which he called, "workman's suspenders" began to make sense finally. I was able to do something with this information, once I had it. I figured he was a racist skinhead, but I knew next to nothing about the specifics on how he was able to be a racist skinhead and part black. I figured his usefulness maybe outweighed his background.

If you knew nothing about skinheads, the idea of a part black skinhead is preposterous. However, when you learn that there is a group of skinheads in Chicago called, "The Chicago Mafia Skinheads," and according to an email antiracists exposed online and that they allow someone who is ¼ black even though they are racists, the mystery disappears.

Truth is funny in that the greater your knowledge base, the easier it is to find truth.

I find myself in an ongoing project to figure this man out in order to maintain my freedom- literally. I had problems to contend with like harassment from other people than just him. I had to learn why this was. I had to learn how he became so skillful at psychological warfare through email. I had to learn how he learned to construct those emails that got me nowhere when I showed them to police. I had to learn why a diverse crowd in St. Paul was willing to do his bidding. I had to learn what made him so mind numbingly cocky that he felt he could describe his activities (albeit loosely) in a book.

I'm still seeking out these answers and there is no choice for me about this. Unless you can explain clearly why something is happening you will get no help in solving the problem. So I had to do my homework and read about human trafficking. Initially I didn't know what that was, nor did I understand the implications of the problem I was facing. All I can say is that it may have saved my life to put the time into this that I did.

I knew Frank had help; that he wasn't working alone. I had no idea who was helping him or why. Gangs seemed the only possibility. However, I knew nothing of gangs. My city thankfully doesn't have much of a problem with them. I had little to go on as to whom he could be working with. Aside from some tattoos and geographical locations he took me to on our bikes I had nothing to go on.

I knew there were two gangs in the metro St. Paul area; one was called, "the East Side Boys," and the other the "Selby Siders." The problem was that he took me on bike trails in both easterly and westerly directions in St. Paul. One day while I was riding along a trail on the east side of St. Paul I saw a sight that bothered me. It was a gang type man riding a bike along with a female, who was younger than him and pretty. She also looked scared and the man overly confident. Regardless, if it was just innocent or not, I became very, very attuned to my surroundings in this area. This was further along that trail than Frank ever took me. I also noticed some graffiti along the trail, although this portion of it was in an area that was clearly suburban.

I took a good look at some of it and then went home and went online to see if I could identify the gang in charge of the area based upon graffiti alone. This I thought would help in other ways too, like knowing what areas to avoid. This turned into a project in and of itself. There is not a lot of information about regional St. Paul graffiti out there.

One day by typing "images of Selby Sider" graffiti into a search engine I found myself led toa different website than one providing information about gangs. This website pertained to a problem of unsolved murders in which the victims were found drowned in various areas. I happened to be looking at a discussion which was in mid flight about the disappearance of a local man named Dan Zamlen. This page mentioned the Ford Street Bridge. I already knew that place. A bike trail dips right under it. Frank took me riding along that bike trail one day. Frank also camps out at night along the river in various spots going west from St. Paul into Minneapolis. I rode that trail once on my own after dumping Frank and was scared I'd run into him the entire way. I was particularly wary of the Ford Street bridge because I was mindful of Frank using that River Road trail and on that day I saw a gang member type walking down its steps when I was alone there and the visibility sucks along the trail there.

Honestly, I didn't expect much to come from reading that. The trouble is that the link to the image was strangely absent. This turned into a futile search for graffiti links, but nonetheless I learned that these pretty residential areas that Frank took me too do indeed have a side to them that is not nice. I never thought of these areas like around the bike trail as nice, ever, because of Frank. In that way I had the advantage of being a traumatized outsider, in that I've learned not to accept anything at face value in the Twin Cities.

I read more about the Dan Zamlen case and then what started as gang homework turned into me becoming stunned at how this man just disappeared one night out of the blue. I read discussion of dropped phone calls, futile searches and the chilling discovery of his ultimate fate. I kept thinking, "its got to be a gang—whoever did that did graffiti and what sort of ordinary person, even a serial killer, keeps spray paint on hand?"
I kept reading and when I got past the point they were talking about Dan I started back at the beginning of the comments section at page one. Right on page one I saw someone making a crazy statement I heard Frank make numerous times to me verbally and in his damned book—that "being ¼ black makes you black in society's eyes."

Except this particular Frank-sounding statement was online in a long discussion about a number of drowning deaths that in my mind were simply too suspicious for at least me to buy the line that they reasonably could be accidents. Frank always bemoaned that his barely black lineage mattered in some substantial way to the world around him. He doesn't even look black, so I never got what the big deal was for him about this.

I figure like so much about him, there is a specific reason behind it, namely that he is from Chicago, was a skinhead, still is a racist and there is a racist skinhead group in Chicago that although they posture at being anti-racist local antiracists have much to bring to the table to say otherwise. This isn't stuff a normal person can even hope to guess at. I could not guess at it either and it is even stranger that that I learned of the Chicago Mafia Skinheads from that blog on the drowning murders. I do have friends inantiracists groups and have been an activist so I was able to do more with knowing what tools and resources are out there. I found an article about the liberated diary of a Chicago Mafia Skinhead named Scott Erik Kriske. In this document, there is a part where Kriske is explaining the rules for membership in the Chicago Mafia Skinheads. This document on its second page said the requirement to join their racist group is to be at least 75% white.

Activists and members of South Side Chicago Anti-Racist Action have unearthed conclusive information that the Chicago Mafia Skins are racist, sexist and violent. Just like Frank, white supremacists try to pretend that they are just peaceful people and not violent. Maybe the idea is that if you are something so blatantly evil, you need to twist and sugarcoat your activities so people do not take action to stop your activities. Genuinely peaceful people do not need to launch public relations-type damage control measures such as trolling the internet to interfere with people drawing their own logical conclusions. With dangerous groups or people, it is entirely another matter. I think I should stress that white supremacist groups frequently engage in trolling one left leaning forums and discussion groups.

This being the case, I wasn't surprised to article I read about John Haley, a Chicago Mafia Skinhead who drowned an Asian fisherman and given the nominal charge of manslaughter for this simply because he was intoxicated when he did it. This man had a history of racial violence and had attacked an Asian fisherman before, so this sentence was pretty light.


The man who tried to break me down to traffick me also made many threats about what would happen if I helped this other girl. Also, he and others did other things to play "divide and conquer" with the women there as one acquaintance explained it.

Later this acquaintance who warned me about this also mentioned Frank had "taken me out (on a bike ride) to exercise me." Knowing nothing about human trafficking at the time, this sounded like a very strange thing for anyone to say. This is maybe why I think it is so important to become educated on this issue.

Human trafficking profitable, so human trafficking is a rapidly expanding problem. Right now, ordinary street gangs are abandoning the drug trade and participating more and more in this crime. Presently, already established street gangs, like Crips, Bloods and Vice Lords, have been apprehended and arrested for human trafficking activity. This activity is quickly replacing drug trafficking activity among ordinary street gangs since easier to get away with than drug trafficking.

This is because there is an established police presence curtailing the ability of street gangs to get away with drug trafficking. Yet, beating and raping women into silence and submission for a 100% profit to the traffickers is strangely easier for them. There are very few police departments focused specifically on stopping human trafficking and most state and federal laws offer little punishment of this crime. Also, human trafficking is a highly profitable activity. A human trafficker and earn upwards of a couple thousand dollars a day on any victim hostage. If the trafficker becomes afraid he is arousing suspicion from local police, he will just move his victims to another location and start fresh there.

These factors can be attributed to the rapid escalation of the problem in recent years.

Human traffickers target women who are American citizens and women abroad.

As for overseas victims, these women usually come from poor countries. The victims often will be lured to the United States by men on the Internet offering job opportunities, relationships or just amnesty from their own nation for opportunity to stay in the United States.

Once the victim comes to the United States, it is too late for her to turn back. The trafficker will often seize her passport, green card or other identity papers which make her lose all ability to function independently. Also, with more and more frequency, illegal immigrants from Mexico, both male and female are becoming victims of human traffickers.

There was a news story about traffickers obtaining a house in a Texas suburb, boarding up the windows and using it to house male illegal immigrants. One video shows the traffickers walking around with firearms pointed at illegal immigrants who are starving and bleeding to keep them in line.
People in this neighborhood didn't have any idea anything criminal is happening in there.

Oftentimes, the people holding these immigrants against their will are also engaging in extortion of the victim's family back in Mexico, usually for supposed "coyote fees."

Often, women from Mexico who are forced to work as sex slaves, are so ashamed of what they did, despite it being against their will, if they escape and return home they don't tell their families about. This means too, that these victims are less likely to call home and plea for help from family.

If the woman is an illegal immigrant, their abusers can use their illegal status as leverage to control their victims with. This also makes it less likely for the victim to call the police. This probably explains why there is presently more and more exploitation of illegal immigrants from Mexico being documented. Unfortunately, violence is used to control slaves regardless of where the victims originate. Just like in the 1800's often sadistic violence or torture is used as a means to render human beings into plaint profit machines for sick, greedy individuals.

This is the reality in America right now in 2012: there are more people in slavery today than any other time in history. The problem of slavery is not one for the history books; it is a modern day problem.

Frank Marzitelli

When I first came here to the Twin Cities, I met a man named Frank Marzitelli. He offered to show me a bike co-op he supposedly did volunteer work for.

I wasn't really interested in going down there with him. He seemed a charlatan, and carried himself like a salesman. That put me off of the idea of checking out the bike co-op with him. I repeatedly said "no" to the offer and went about my business.

That was until things started getting weird at the shelter. A friend of mine Jennifer was sexually assaulted at the shelter by a man named Thomas Cloud. She told us, her friends which consisted of me, two men who ran a bible study and Pat, a woman with fibromyalgia, her daughter, Joanna who had fibromyalgia and another woman, Pat who had chronic fatigue syndrome and Sjogren's syndrome, all of the above being autoimmune diseases.

The two men from Bible study were older. One was Greg, who actually was aware of the strangeness going on at that shelter, and for the most part generally helpful.

The other was some odd guy who never bathed, name Tim. When Jennifer was assaulted, we all tried to help her. We told staff but they didn't call the police, nor did they kick the perpetrator out of the shelter. We kept pressing to have something done. I suggested calling the police.

They were called out but the perpetrator wasn't arrested though he was a registered sex-offender. The police said they needed one of our phone numbers and they would call back. I had my phone going for 3 days, but I had a crappy AT&T pay as you go plan because there were no Cricket stores in the Twin Cities. Jennifer's phone wasn't working then either, so the call was missed. We all said she ought to get a protection order against Tim.

After we called the police, the shelter finally kicked the man out but it was only for 2 days. It started becoming apparent nothing would happen. Since really no one who worked at the shelter was helping, Greg, I and other friends of Jennifer had to take up the slack. I got in the center of it all since I expected justice to be pretty straightforward. Not like it ever is in Minnesota, I just didn't know that then.

Now the Pat with fibromyalgia started hanging out with that strange guy Tim. Greg knew something strange was going on there.

Greg eyed Tim's behavior suspiciously, likely for good reason. It turned out that Tim was friends with Frank later on. Tim was pursuing some sort of sexual funny business with Pat, which involved taking advantage of her untreated fibromyalgia by getting her pain pills.

About the time Tim was acting suspicious, Frank invited me to go the bicycle co-op and I went. I was getting tired of all the stressful events at the shelter. I decided it was too much and that I needed to work on getting out of the shelter and acquainted with normal people in the normal world.

Going to that bike co-op sounded exactly like what I felt I needed to be doing. So I accepted Frank's offer to go there, pushing to the back of my mind that Frank seemed superficial, fake and overbearing.

He took me to the bike co-op and there he assisted in teaching me about the resources then. I needed to get the bicycle I had fixed. The tensioner on the chain was broken and not working. Once I got this repaired at the co-op I was able to go bike riding.

Frank offered to help me show where places were to ride there. So far I had zero familiarity with St. Paul and Minneapolis. I thought that I could benefit from getting familiar with St. Paul.

I must stress just how draining and disturbing life at the shelter was getting. I actually heard someone joke about how life in the shelter felt like living in a bubble, separate from the real world, with its own bizarre rules and problems.

The person was right. I felt myself acclimating to the bizarre situation in that shelter, where life proceeded like some sort of nightmare rather than everyday reality.

It was a situation where most all the people had some drug or alcohol problem. The population of residents would thin out after the first of the month, when the residents had money and would stay in hotels and or drink or drug to their hearts content and then return to the shelter.

It was hard finding people there who had higher aspirations or were homeless and staying there because of hard luck alone. I met one inspiring African American kid who was going to college and doing his homework at the shelter. Given the daily chaos of that dysfunctional place, it was a small miracle this youth managed to do this.

It helped me muster the determination to transcend the situation and get out in the world. The tragedy, for me, is that my own plan to get to back to the real world, so to speak, was used and exploited by sabotaging, manipulative Frank.
I also look at the larger tragedy here, which is at this shelter women were actively targeted by a resident population of human traffickers. I am guessing that this funny business was enabled by peope there. Personally I don't care for the idea that the minute something goes to where a woman winds up homeless in that area that immediately that women becomes a target for the most sick form of predators.

Which is not to say that due to how ubiquitous human trafficking is in the Twin Cities, that a woman need be homeless to encounter these criminals. Actually, my initial contact in the human trafficking task force I assisted in St. Cloud, MN, who was solidly middle class and helping law enforcement had her own daughter targeted by human traffickers.

So to cast it as a problem only affecting the poor or disadvantaged, is incorrect. It does mean that being homeless, even as briefly as I was, ups your chances of being targeted some 150%. There needs to be direct intervention with women who are homeless in the Twin Cities, to where women in the most danger of these predators, need to be warned of the problem and given strategies to avoid counting themselves as victims.

It actually has bothered me for years, that Pat, the women who the traffickers drove to attempt suicide, said she had a real job and made $35,000 a year before she came down sick with fibromyalgia. What happened with her disturbs me to this day. I finally had met someone smart enough not to judge me as defective over sleep deprivation.

That is because she had been through as much as it as I had. In fact, she educated me on some things that were symptoms, like having seizures from it. I had a seizure from sleep loss back in 2002. She not only supported me over getting sleep deprived from being awoken from physical pain from autoimmune disease, she had walked in my shoes.

It meant something meeting people in the same boat as me. Yet, all our talk and efforts to overcome our mutual situations only served to alert human traffickers we had a vulnerability they could exploit.


As for the shelter, and the surreal feel of life in that place, the nature of it is more akin to what you see in ghettos, where life is unfair, unpredictable, and where normal rules go out the window. I felt my expectations of life and people lower as each incident occurred and no real justice was ever meted out.

Also, Jennifer, Greg and I began to question Tim's fantastic story in regards to his wife's death. I looked him up online, during the thick of all those events. I found an article about his wife's death. Tim said he and his wife he claimed had a suicide pact, and took a bunch of pain pills, but he somehow lived. I showed it to Jennifer, Greg and Joanna but not Pat. She was in Tim's thrall.

Even the story told by Tim of his wife's death in the paper didn't seem plausible to readers of the story online when the incident occurred. Tim said he took 90 Vicodin pills and still lived. Greg kept saying no one takes that many pills and lives. The readers of the story weren't buying it either.

About this point, things got really weird. Tim prior to this posed as a friend to me too, but had actually interfered with me getting into a room I wanted to rent by stealing a business card I had with the contact number for the building manager of the building.

After I dredged up that article online regarding his wife's death, Tim kept following me around, staring at me and otherwise trying to intimidate me. This is also when Frank shows up in a big way. Frank offered to help out with the mess and it turns out he was friend's with Tim.

It was as if they were playing "good cop, bad cop" with me and when Frank pretended to help me and Jennifer, he actually showed up to protect his buddies and monkey-wrench us getting Tim and Tom in trouble. Greg observed, without getting down to specific details, "They are playing divide and conquer with the women."

Frank used my desperate attempt to get help with this unraveling situation. He offers to play the friend and the hero by helping out in what actually wasn't a helpful way. He'd drag me along on bicycle rides.

I only trusted going on these bike rides because people at the bicycle co-op for some damned reason thought he was great. Later, when I found out he wasn't just a human trafficker but a murderer of epic proportions I lost complete faith in the judgment of people at the bicycle co-op.

Greg never accounted for who he meant by "they" but he had the sense to back off at this point. I think he got these individuals and what their business was and knew enough not to openly challenge these people. That was sense I didn't have.

During all of this, Joanna tried to help Pat. At around the point I had to flee the shelter because of Frank and the threat he posed, I heard the last time I spoke to Joanna that someone had offered Pat a place to live outside the shelter, but that person came to demand she pay rent with sex. Joanna said that drove Pat to try to kill herself and when I was there that day, Pat was still at the hospital recuperating. She did manage to seriously harm herself.



I feel bad because I had to walk away from all those people to save myself from Frank. I've been told I did the smartest thing I could have done and still I don't like that I did that. It was too dangerous. At that point Frank had already harmed me and nothing short of saving a life could drive me back up in harms way. Still it makes me mad because it was all their strategy in the first place.

In hindsight, I very much had the impression that something was really, really rotten with that shelter. In unprecedented fashion, it did not kick out a resident who'd sexually assaulted a woman. Later, that other women I knew down there was invited by someone at the shelter to move in with them.

Then it came to pass, the man who'd invited her in to stay for free was demanding sexual favors in return for the rent. This woman was kind and intelligent and this situation drove her to literally trying to kill her self. I've since heard that shelters are places human traffickers here gravitate to. My experience indeed shows this to be the case.

Frank's tendency to talk about very, very odd things. One example was how he talked about how he was ¼ black. Frank is obsessed about this and this isn't too strong of a word. Frank is seemingly not proud of being black.

He criticizes African Americans frequently. Yet if you confront him about how what he's saying is racist, then he will claim that he can't be because he is ¼ black. Such absurdities can lead you to think of him as just a really confused individual. This was a mistake for me to assume this. It's a mistake for anyone to assume this about him. Until you know the truth, and how twisted his truth really is, then his odd rants have a direct tie to reality; a reality he's eager to confuse people about and for good reason.

Frank is an individual you have to do your homework on as a result of his dishonesty. Pieces of this puzzle have tended to get solved by relying upon sources other than Frank's own words. For example, someone told me that a year before I knew him, in 2010, he was a skinhead.

This piece of the puzzle was enlightening. Franks strange anomalies like wearing suspenders under his clothes, which he called, "workman's suspenders" began to make sense finally. I was able to do something with this information, once I had it. I figured he was a racist skinhead, but I knew next to nothing about the specifics on how he was able to be a racist skinhead and part black. I figured his usefulness maybe outweighed his background.

If you knew nothing about skinheads, the idea of a part black skinhead is preposterous. However, when you learn that there is a group of skinheads in Chicago called, "The Chicago Mafia Skinheads," and according to an email anti racists exposed online and that they allow someone who is ¼ black even though they are racists, the mystery disappears.

Truth is funny in that the greater your knowledge base, the easier it is to find truth.

I find myself in an ongoing project to figure this man out in order to maintain my freedom- literally. I had problems to contend with like harassment from other people than just him. I had to learn why this was. I had to learn how he became so skillful at psychological warfare through email. I had to learn how he learned to construct those emails that got me nowhere when I showed them to police. I had to learn why a diverse crowd in St. Paul was willing to do his bidding. I had to learn what made him so arrogant that he felt he could describe his activities openly (albeit vaguely) in a book.

I'm still seeking out these answers and there is no choice for me about this. Unless you can explain clearly why something is happening you will get no help in solving the problem. So I had to do my homework and read about human trafficking. Initially I didn't know what that was, nor did I understand the implications of the problem I was facing. All I can say is that it may have saved my life to put the time into this that I did.

I knew Frank had help; that he wasn't working alone. I had no idea who was helping him or why. Gangs seemed the only possibility. However, I knew nothing of gangs. My city thankfully doesn't have much of a problem with them. I had little to go on as to whom he could be working with. Aside from some tattoos and geographical locations he took me to on our bikes I had nothing to go on.

I knew there were two gangs in the metro St. Paul area; one was called, "the East Side Boys," and the other the "Selby Siders." The problem was that he took me on bike trails in both easterly and westerly directions in St. Paul. One day while I was riding along a trail on the east side of St. Paul I saw a sight that bothered me.

It was a 20-something year old black guy riding a bike along with a female, who looked about age 14 and pretty. She also looked scared and the man overly confident. Initially, I thought maybe my imagination was running wild, but later when I would learn of how widespread the problem was up there, I don't think this was wild speculation on my part.

Regardless, if it was just innocent or not, I became very, very attuned to my surroundings in this area. This was further along that trail than Frank ever took me. I also noticed some graffiti along the trail, although this portion of it was in an area that was clearly suburban.

I took a good look at some of it and then went home and went online to see if I could identify the gang in charge of the area based upon graffiti alone. This I thought would help in other ways too, like knowing what areas to avoid. This turned into a project in and of itself. There is not a lot of information about regional St. Paul graffiti out there.

One day by typing "images of Selby Sider" graffiti into a search engine I found myself led to a different website than one providing information about gangs. This website pertained to a problem of unsolved murders in which the victims were found drowned in various areas. I happened to be looking at a discussion which was in mid flight about the disappearance of a local man named Dan Zamlen. This page mentioned the Ford Street Bridge.

I already knew that place. A bike trail dips right under it. Frank took me riding along that bike trail one day. Frank also camps out at night along the river in various spots going west from St. Paul into Minneapolis. I rode that trail once on my own after dumping Frank and was scared I'd run into him the entire way. I was particularly wary of the Ford Street bridge because I was mindful of Frank using that River Road trail and on that day I saw a gang member type walking down its steps when I was alone there and the visibility sucks along the trail there.

Honestly, I didn't expect much to come from reading that. The trouble is that the link to the image was strangely absent. This turned into a futile search for graffiti links, but nonetheless I learned that these pretty residential areas that Frank took me too do indeed have a side to them that is not nice. I never thought of these areas like around the bike trail as nice, ever, because of Frank. In that way I had the advantage of being a traumatized outsider, in that I've learned not to accept anything at face value in the Twin Cities.

I read more about the Dan Zamlen case and then what started as gang homework turned into me becoming stunned at how this man just disappeared one night out of the blue. I read discussion of dropped phone calls, futile searches and the chilling discovery of his ultimate fate. I kept thinking, "its got to be a gang—whoever did that did graffiti and what sort of ordinary person, even a serial killer, keeps spray paint on hand?"

I kept reading and when I got past the point they were talking about Dan I started back at the beginning of the comments section at page one. This was where I about dropped the phone I was reading from on the floor. Right on page one I saw someone making a crazy statement I heard Frank make numerous times to me verbally and in his damned book—that "being ¼ black makes you black in society's eyes."

Except this particular Frank-sounding statement was online in a long discussion about a number of drowning deaths that in my mind were simply too suspicious for at least me to buy the line that they reasonably could be accidents. Frank always bemoaned that his barely black lineage mattered in some substantial way to the world around him. He doesn't even look black, so I never got what the big deal was for him about this.

I figure like so much about him, there is a specific reason behind it, namely that he is from Chicago, was a skinhead, still is a racist and there is a racist skinhead group in Chicago that although they posture at being anti-racist local anti-racists have much to bring to the table to say otherwise.

This isn't stuff a normal person can even hope to guess at. I could not guess at it either and it is even stranger that that I learned of the Chicago Mafia Skinheads from that blog on the drowning murders. I do have friends in anti-racist groups and have been an activist so I was able to do more with knowing what tools and resources are out there. I found an article about the liberated diary of a Chicago Mafia Skinhead named Scott Erik Kriske. In this document, there is a part where Kriske is explaining the rules for membership in the Chicago Mafia Skinheads. This document on its second page said the requirement to join their racist group is to be at least 75% white.

Activists and members of South Side Chicago Anti-Racist Action have unearthed conclusive information that the Chicago Mafia Skins are racist, sexist and violent. Just like Frank, white supremacists try to pretend that they are just peaceful people and not violent. Maybe the idea is that if you are something so blatantly evil, you need to twist and sugarcoat your activities so people do not take action to stop your activities.

Genuinely peaceful people do not need to launch public relations-type damage control measures such as trolling the internet to interfere with people drawing their own logical conclusions. With dangerous groups or people, it is entirely another matter. I think I should stress that white supremacist groups frequently engage in trolling one left leaning forums and discussion groups.

This being the case, I wasn't surprised to article I read about John Haley, a Chicago Mafia Skinhead who drowned an Asian fisherman and given the nominal charge of manslaughter for this simply because he was intoxicated when he did it. This man had a history of racial violence and had attacked an Asian fisherman before, so this sentence was pretty light.

I don't think its coincidence that I learned of the Chicago Mafia Skinheads on the drowning mystery blog, and Frank's involvement with them would not be hard to prove. It's unlikely that the Chicago Mafia Skinheads came up a rule like that unless they wanted to include a particular person in their club of thugs and this person was only ¼ black, Hispanic or something else.

I also know that it is common practice for anti-racist groups to pressure Nazi skinheads out of towns where they set up and bully people. At least for me, things like his lamenting about not being able to live in Chicago anymore and how crazy that sounded began to make poetic sense.

Which is not to say that could be the only reason to leave town.

The pattern that I was able to see with Frank is what seem at first absurdities only appear absurd because he twists things in ways that serve his purposes. There are so many seemingly conflicting statements that you almost dismiss them all as the quirks of one very confused individual. I also noticed after it was clear people had recurring issues with a troll on the drowning mystery website who is probably Frank that other people respond the same way to him as I did.

People thought the troll honestly thought that priests were really behind the drowning murders and pitied him. I pitied Frank. I just didn't get how this could be anything but some sort of confusion or identity crisis. Sometimes the evil in him just doesn't appear initially to be an evil issue. I thought the marriage thing was just like that too—that he didn't know yet that proposing at the get go is something most people don't do. Even though I had no intention of ever taking him up on the idea, I could not know that my assumptions were wrong. My assumptions could have been fatally wrong if I didn't get away from him when I did. I don't think I would have lasted that long under his control with my health.



Frank's Book and clues to his activities

Frank frequently discusses the themes of drowning, rape and murder in his book. The bulk of the book consists of him throwing around human trafficking related terms like "indentured servitude. It seems he twists and distorts the context of those human trafficking terminology, so that he doesn't get identified as a participant in these crimes.

Yet, like the proverbial criminal who is compelled to return to the scene of his crime, Frank seems to be revisiting his exploits as a human trafficker by using human trafficking related words in a book.

To demonstrate how involved this individual with human trafficking, it is actually his own words. Frank has an all-out obsession with human trafficking terms and demonstrates this in a lengthy book, which he created for unclear reasons. I think he thought he could get away with this if he uses the terms as some sort of literary device where he states that because he works driving a truck and has to apply for low-end trade jobs like welding, that he is an "indentured servant."

He smugly forwarded me his book in an email, but never gave me time to read it, as was hounding me continuously. Much less did I even know then where the libraries were in the area. I didn't have a computer, nor did I know where I could go to use a computer. He showed me where libraries were and where other places were with free internet access. When he dragged me to the library, he'd never come in—he'd just sit outside and wait for me. I found this very odd. I find it very suspicious and suspect it had something to do with avoiding getting caught.

I just used what he had taught me about local resources and accessed them without his knowing. However, at the Metropolitan State University library, his friends sexually harassed me when I came in. I complained to the staff in the place and they were less than helpful. The staff at Metro state seemed afraid of these bums that would hang out there. I didn't get it then. I thought they were just wimps. Those people maybe had a better handle on how futile it was to contend with them.

Frank always managed to get his way, by either lying, manipulating or using violence. He has an interest in gaining and abusing power. He has too many connections, both to high-up politicians in the area and various gangs, both white and black. I don't know if he's deceived members of these gangs to enable him to play both sides. I imagine he has but I could not, nor would not speculate what he's lied about. Knowing him, I imagine he has lied. Either this or he has something to offer which makes people not care as to what he's about.

Frank has many, many allusions to human trafficking in his book
In Frank's book there are words which are associated with human trafficking on every page of his book. Indentured servitude, slavery, rape, even the word "exercised" appears repeatedly in his book he wrote.

This shows someone who obsessed with human trafficking. I don't think any of his claims that working a normal job makes him a "domestic servant," "slave" or "indentured servant" holds any weight whatsoever. I do think that the repeated mention of these terms reflect his own interests, and think he enjoys writing these terms over and over. He may even get pleasure in writing these terms.

What I also see in his mention of these terms, is a person who has spent much time reviewing the subject of human trafficking, particularly from a legal standpoint. One thing which helps clarify where his mind is in regard to the subject is when he makes mention of how if the Bill of Rights isn't enforced, it doesn't exist.

This is how he expresses this idea in his book;

"If one doesn't have the right to be protected from enslavement outlawed by the United States Constitution, how is it possible to purchase themselves from it legally, especially when according to licensed attorneys in the state and officials like David (who refused to offer a last name) from the department of Human Services in downtown Saint Paul Minnesota; the state's capital, 'The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution pertains to only certain restrictions to certain government offices. It doesn't apply to the rights of a public. If you have any problems call the police and make a report.'

Three separate Minnesota attorneys (licensed) later confirmed this mentality: Mr. Patrick Marzitelli, Ms. Laura Melnick and Mr. Michael Davey. What was meant by calling the police was to establish an official record of incident (if the local police decide to handle the matter), so that things could be handled by the local authorities deemed necessary. It sounds more like people who are in the position of having to make these kinds of reports, may also end up in the position of being arrested or penalized for doing so---according to local authorities. What this suggests, is state wide fascism that legally shouldn't exist, does exist. Absence of the public rights guaranteed in the United States Constitution, establishes in this fashion a multitude of local dictatorships, outlining fascism throughout a state and even nationally, which should concern everyone. What is going on here? "

Why would anyone think like this? What I see here is someone who has spent a lot of time figuring out how to get around the laws which prohibit slavery and labor done for free like domestic servitude. The only logical explanation for this would be that Frank is very, very interested in the art of how to keep people as slaves and make money from their entrapment.

I think he may be also using these terms over and over because this titillates him. He also writes sexually explicit things in the book and seems to have a need to do this. Combine this with Frank's penchant for pretending he's the victim of the exact things he perpetrates and the book becomes a window into his own mind and actions.

Here are some examples of how Frank does this:

"The tickets and punitive damages serve as the indenture here, revealing a contract; labor agreement. The drivers dependency on the company owner/boss to handle the situation appropriately outlines the servitude. Factoring in the attempt to make the driver operate without a driver's log suggests a motive to hide what was really happening; indentured servitude/ slavery."

When I had time online, since I was always playing catch up for lost time I never bothered to read the email he sent. I skipped over the part of the email that was part of the forwarded message. The book he sent me was in an attachment.

He made sure to tell me it was a secured attachment because he planned to publish it. I not only lacked the means to read it read anyway. He's just bragging about having the local news interview him for being a bum at a shelter. I didn't honestly find reading about his bum status worth my time, especially my limited time when I'm out of town and emailing people back home. Now I really wish I had read it, at least enough to learn he was feeble minded and a pervert.

I doubt sincerely I could have made any sense of the human trafficking terminology in it, but I don't think it would have mattered.

The problem is that this absurd passage directly refers to something in reality. The problem is that this "freak," Frank actually fought to have the librarians at the downtown St. Paul library restricted from policing what library patrons view on the internet terminals there. This was something he told me about. He bragged about how he managed to get the librarians restricted from being able to make sure patrons obeyed library policy. Given how library policies regarding internet activity usually are about disallowing patrons to view pornography, it is no wonder someone like Frank would not like this.

Frank gloated about the new security guy they hired to do the librarians former job of making sure library patrons hold to library policy about viewing websites such as porn sites. Frank is such a skilled liar and manipulator, he managed to do this somehow.

Most all the havoc he wreaks on people comes from his ability to manipulate and scare people. This also shows the danger of Frank; he is skilled in getting his way in almost all situations and not just ones involving human trafficking victims.

His manipulative abilities give him much power. This is not a man who can be trusted with this power. His testimony enough to what goes on in this man's mind. Statements in it indicate Frank is a pervert, racist and misogynist. If this man can change the policy of the downtown St. Paul public library on a lark, then in what other institutions and businesses can he impose is will?

Having a person who dedicates paragraphs of his book to describing pornography should not be the same person who decides library policy. Children and families go into that library. If what they see are people looking at pornography when they come in because of what Frank did, then maybe it is time to question allowing someone like him to continue to exert power through lying and manipulation.
Frank had done this in other situations, but I don't know all the detail. One day he tried to convince me the female staff at a shelter he hangs at sexually harassed him. I didn't believe this and when I pressed the issue his mask came off and he was ranting about "those feminist bitches" (at Listening house) using a lot of expletives. I pressed the issue because I didn't buy the idea that the women down there would sexually harass a male, particularly since a few of the female staff there were less than interested in Frank the bum who came in and out of there.

Frank in his book also claims that the way another shelter is run is akin to rape. He calls welfare a "militant" scheme ran by black people. The man is a racist, and *former* skinhead too who avoids attention for this because he is "one quarter black." Frank seems to be a closet racist and I know from experience that when he's confronted about his racist statements, he uses the fact that he's black to assist him in lying about being a racist.

When I confronted him, he repeatedly denied he was a racist. When I confronted him about anything he would both lie or attempt to manipulate me. If you stood your ground despite his attempts at such games he would use violence and threats. He threatened to lie to my friends about me. Actually he did this anyway, so it was a moot point. If I tried to avoid him he'd find me. Then he would pretend to be very helpful and be a fake good samaritan. Really, the last part is exactly how he was able to shoe his way in between the friendships those of us at the shelter had formed. If he wasn't lying to me, he was lying to Jennifer. I gather he lied to Pat, although Tim seemed to be "managing" her at the time.

Later he would be so much more threatening and manipulative. I called the police on him one day. He had time alone with them, while I tried to get a woman who offered to play witness to his harassment of me on the street that day. The police came but the woman changes her mind about telling them what he did when they showed up. He had 4 minutes alone with them. After this, the police ignored what I said although I'm the one who called them. He got away with lying to the police. That was terrifying.

As for how it was that I didn't read his book until I was safe and not living in the shelter anymore, when I had time online, since I was always playing catch up for lost time I never bothered to read the email he sent. I glanced at the first page. It didn't seem worth reading based on this.. He sent the book in an attachment. He made sure to tell me it was a secured attachment because he planned to publish it.

I told him I didn't have time to read it each time, and the first page of it made me feel that this was something I wasn't interested in reading.

In the first part he's just bragging about having the local news interview him for being a bum at a shelter. I didn't honestly find reading about his bum status worth my time, especially my limited time when I'm out of town and emailing people back home. Now I really wish I had read it, at least enough to learn who I was dealing with.

I doubt sincerely I could have made any sense of the human trafficking terminology in it, but I don't think it would have mattered.

Frank, from what I've seen, probably copes with his inner moral corruption by projecting his issues onto the world at large. In this book are pages about how he is a victim of human trafficking because he got tickets for driving without insurance while working as a trucker, or because he has to go to job training, or that the librarians at a public library are victimizing him by "leering" at his computer screen.

Normally, this would be worth just ignoring and writing him off as a freak.

The problem is that this absurd passage directly refers to something in reality. The problem is that this "freak," Frank actually fought to have the librarians at the downtown St. Paul library restricted from policing what library patrons view on the internet there.

This was something he told me about. He bragged he got them restricted and gloated about the new security guy they hired to do the librarians former job of making sure library patrons hold to library policy about viewing websites such as porn sites. Frank is such a skilled liar and manipulator, he achieved what otherwise would seem an impossible task.

Also the new security guy was a friend to Frank and all the homeless people who use the computers at the library. He seemed smug and was not helpful. He even followed me around one day when I was browsing the library shelves. For me it felt like the he was the proverbial fox guarding the hen house.

Please understand that after I had made the mistake of telling people at that shelter, including him how "vulnerable" my situation with IC made me, it was like it was announced to the human trafficking community there at large what they could do to me and get away with.

So I was sexually harassed openly at the library and received no help from staff. It's sick what people do but I found that even bystanders won't help people out and protect them from these sick sexual predators.

Specifics on how Human Traffickers Manipulate
When I see Frank and other members of hi

This work is in the public domain

Comments

Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
Specifics on how Human Traffickers Manipulate
When I see Frank and other members of his human trafficking ring in action I think back to an article by MSCO, a human trafficking prevention organization in Oregon. The information that follows is from this anti-slavery organization and I will share all of it, since human trafficker tactics are very, very pertinent to all the issues I'm discussing:

"How does trafficking work?
From 'vulnerable' to V-I-C-T-I-M
The premeditated methods used by human traffickers to master control over their victims closely mirror those used in domestic violence situations and prisoner of war camps.

Validation
Once a suitably vulnerable prey has been identified, whether it's an unskilled worker in Eastern Europe desperate for a job, or a runaway youth on the streets of Portland looking for a friend, a savvy trafficker will likely begin a relationship by validating their victim's unappreciated attributes (beauty, intelligence) and posing as their long-awaited benefactor ready to make their dreams come true.
Intimidation
Once a victim has been lured into joining the trafficker on an adventure toward a new life, they are thrown into a 'seasoning process' lasting days or weeks during which time they may be beaten, starved, raped, and/or confined until they finally relent to go to work in the sex trade, drug trade, or at legitimate jobs where they must turn over all their earnings.
Control
Traffickers exercise strict control over their victims by constantly monitoring their movements, confiscating all identity papers and money, controlling food and shelter, and enforcing a non-negotiable set of rules that result in violence if broken, such as falling short of daily earning quotas, attempting escape, or talking to the wrong person.

Threats
Traffickers maintain their control by endlessly threatening to brutalize their victims, or turn them in to police or immigration officials, or shame them by exposing their circumstances to friends and family, or to kill their family members if they try to escape. Such threats keep victims in a constant state of fear and unwillingness to leave.

Isolation
Traffickers eliminate interference from their victim's family, friends and ethnic communities by cutting off all communications. They further reduce the chances of detection by authorities by moving their victims from house to house, state to state, or country to country. Alone, disoriented, penniless and afraid, victims become completely dependant upon their traffickers for survival and have few opportunities to develop trusting relationships with outsiders who they might ask for help.

Manipulation
Traffickers brainwash their victims with a barrage of false and emotionally confusing messages. Foreign national victims, for instance, who may be unfamiliar with American freedoms, are often told the police are their enemies, and that the traffickers abusing them are, ironically, the only ones who can keep them safe. American pimps will likewise offer their victims a warped form of protection by faithfully promising to free them from jail if and when they are arrested for the prostitution they are being forced to commit. Some pimps insist that their label actually stands for 'Power In Manipulating People.' "

Disclaimer: I recommend viewing any Smiley related websites with a browser which hides your ip address like the free open source Tor Browser or the free ip address concealer Surf Anonymous Free.
The links I provide here go to websites where dangerous people happen to be very active and some instances involved in technical matters concerning these websites. Therefore you may wish to hide your ip address, since in some cases it may be visible to people who may not have good intentions. Even if this seems a strange way to start out this discussion, please heed this request, even if you have to humor it for now until you are versed enough in this topic to understand the reasoning behind it.

If you use the Tor Browser, you will need to copy and paste the links into the Tor browser If you are using Surf Anonymous Free, your IP is hidden by default regardless of which browser you are using, so you can use IE and Firefox, etc. in the typical manner. You will still need to copy and paste the links into your web browser anyway. I listed hyperlinks according to how references to internet websites are supposed to be cited in MLA format. Thus, the links won't work directly from a word processing program because they are bracketed will only work if copy and paste them. You should only copy and paste the link itself which is in between these two symbols:

Part 2: Smiley Face Murders; Introduction
"Smiley Face Murders" is a term a journalist gave to a series of murders involving homicides committed where the victim is drowned as opposed to being stabbed, shot or whatever else. It was given this name by a journalist and people I have met who have made it their focus to seriously address the issue of drowning homicide have decried how the journalist placed such a silly sounding name on such a serious issue.

So what are the Smiley Face Murders? This name refers to a series of what some say total 300 people who were found dead in a river, almost always after being separated from their friends at a bar a party.

The deaths occur disproportionately during the winter, so the idea that these are just recreational accidents doesn't hold.

At the site of where the victim is found, there is also found to be a spray-painted smiley face, usually placed on a tree, as well as other graffiti, which part of it isn't being released to the public.

That's how the name "Smiley Face Murders" became attributed to the subject. You can google the name and be linked to a number of blogs and forums specific to the issue. These are likely better sources for information, however, use caution when visiting a couple of these blogs. The reason is that the blogs seemed to get riddled with people who aspire to dumb down this issue and make it sound more stupid than it really is.

The drowning cases I discussed before are referred to as the "Smiley Face Killers" (SFK for short). This is because smiley face graffiti was found spray-painted in places where drowning murder victims were recovered. Most of these incidents are simply ruled accidents by police.

There seem to be a number of reasons as to why cases involving drowning don't get scrutinized for any foul play. The first reason is the coroner will usually only be able to know that the cause of death was from water filling the lungs. This makes it difficult to detect foul play. The second reason pertains to the demographic which the victims consist of. There is a prejudice that young males in their 20's are prone to have accidents and do dangerous things.

The third reason is that the victims usually were out drinking or at a party before they drowned. Yes, it could be accidental if someone is drunk. Yet the bulk of these drowning incidents happen during winter. Also, the last place the victim was seen usually is nowhere near a river. This means he'd have to walk a distance to get there.

I'd like to argue the point that I never knew any drunk friends who ever would chose to go and play around in a river in the dead of winter. I never met anyone who got a hankering to swim in a river from being drunk during the summer either.

Much less would any of those people find something like that so compelling and tempting as to walk blocks to get to the river. Where I lived in another city, strangely, we don't have people regularly show up dead in our river. In Minneapolis/St. Paul there were 5 people who wound in the Mississippi over a span of six months. One of the victims during that time was Dan Zamlen, who was a young college age male who disappeared after a night of drinking after he was separated from friends. He was likely
targeted by the group that spray paints smiley faces and other odd things near the sites the bodies of victims.

The police have tended to be dismissive in many cases because the victims were at a bar the night they disappeared. The presumption these people did something stupid to bring about their death persisted even though many of these victims in reality had a very low blood alcohol level.

Also, most victims were witnessed by friends as not drinking even enough to get drunk.

There police are also prone to suggest suicide, although friends and family of many victims have thought there was no chance their son was suicidal. In one case, a victim just got his dream job and was found dead. In another, the victim had fallen in love and was very happy.

Surely family and friends are more aware of the emotional state of their son than the police. Suicides usually have some early indications. The victim seems depressed and unhappy. No one kills themselves when they are happy and most of the victims were doing well in their lives and seemed happy.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
Autopsies on many of the victims turned up the date rape drug GHB. These victims fit the same profile as attractive, college age men who were high achievers. GHB, a date rape drug, is most likely to render a person unconscious if that person has alcohol in his or her system. If the person is sober, it will impair them but not as severely and the victim can still function. I know this first hand because one of
Frank's friends in his trafficking ring dosed me when I was sober. I functioned well enough to leave where I was and go to a public place. It's lucky I was still cogent enough to do that. Had I had alcohol in my system I would have not been able to do this.

Another fact that makes the case that these are murders it the victim's aren't just attractive but often resemble each other in terms of specific physical features. All the drowning victims in one state all had bushy eyebrows.

Does this means the killers have a fetish for people who look a certain way? I don't know. Does picking victims who resemble each other enable the killers to fulfill some pattern they wish to establish? I don't know.

Victims also are predominantly Catholic or are at least Christian. Many victims were found with signs of trauma, and torture. One early victim named Patrick McNeil, whose death was initially ruled an accident was found to have burn marks on his upper body by a subsequent investigation. Also, in these drowning deaths which fit the pattern, victims get separated from their friends by being kicked out of bars the night they vanish. In a many cases, the victims weren't acting unruly when a bouncer targeted them to get kicked out. In other cases a stranger picks a fight with the victim and it is the victim that kicks out.

There is clearly something amiss. In an alarmingly large number, the drowned college kids were kicked out of bars belonging to a chain of bars under the same owner. The name of the bars in this chain are called, Brothers. The owners of this chain, Marc and Eric Fortney, also own bars under a name different than "Brothers" and victims were bounced out onto the streets and then wound up mysteriously drowned at these bars, too. The Brother's Bar chain is also frequently gets complaints about racist behavior towards customers by employees. In Kristi Piehl's blog, in the comments section, this is discussed.

Brother's Bar and its recurrence Smiley Face Killer Cases
This may be nothing related to the SFK problem. However, with the SFK problem, there is a bar chain called "Brother's Bar and Grill," associated with the deaths of young men. Bars in this franchise or other bars owned by "Brothers" owners, Marc and Eric Fortney are often the last places SFK victims have been seen alive. For what it's worth, I wonder whether the owners of this franchise aren't running their own "mom and pop" operation of sorts. However, in this case it may be related to trafficking young men instead of women.

Here is one excerpt from the Drowning Mystery blog from when people there first discovered a connection between the Brothers's Bar chain and SFK disappearances.

From page 73, Link: < http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=73#comments>

Faith
May 27th, 2009 at 21:22 | #31
Reply | Quote
@Kristi Piehl
"Matt Kruziki was on Sinsinawa Ave in East Dubuque, Illinois and on that street there's a bar called My Brother's Place but don't know if he was in there, we do know he was at the River Queen."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Zorro's Pal
May 27th, 2009 at 22:21 | #46
Reply | Quote
Zorro's Pal :
"Are the Brothers bars owned by the same people, a chain, or in any way related to each other?"
Dee :
"It appears Brother's Bars are a chain and wow... look at the map of where they are located (does anything stand out to you?): < http://www.brothersbar.com/>."
Zorro's Pal :
"HOLY SH**! THIS IS IT! THIS IS THE LINK! WHOEVER THE IS GOING AROUND DOING THIS PROBABLY OWNS THESE BARS or is driving around delivering to them. IT IS ALL THE F-'ING CITIES!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
leisure
May 27th, 2009
22:55 | #4

Zorro's Pal: "Are the Brothers bars
owned by the same people, a chain, or in any way
related to each other?"

leisure: "It appears Brother's Bars are a chain and wow... look at the
map of where they are located (does anything stand out to
you?):< http://www.brothersbar.com/>"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From page 74: Link: http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=74#comments

Zorro's Pal
May 27th, 2009
23:01 | #6

"BROTHERS BARS - SAYS it was founded in LaCrosse in 1990. So —
theoretically- maybe one of the founding people ?? Then it moved
on to 17 cities in the midwestern states. Aimed at the 21-35 year
old demographic. What year did the Lacrosse killings begin???"

Well maybe something like that but it sure would be bad for business.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Zorro's Pal
May 27th, 2009 at 23:01 | #6

BROTHERS BARS - SAYS it was founded in LaCrosse in 1990. So —
Theoretically- maybe one of the founding people?? Then it moved
on to 17 cities in the Midwestern states. Aimed at the 21-35 year
old demographic. What year did the Lacrosse killings begin???
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

monique777
May 27th, 2009 at 23:02 | #7

"@Zorro's Pal-- You are as freaked out by it as I am. I think of it as Bingo. The
locations are perfect. Brother's Bar! I just couldn't believe it when I saw the link posted by Dee."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

monique777
May 27th, 2009
23:05 | #8

"There are so many of them located right along the I-94 corridor.
Wish I could superimpose I-94 over the map."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Zorro's Pal
May 27th, 2009
23:10 | #10
"There IS a map right on the Brothers Bar website! It shows all the
dots."

Victims also turn up disproportionately in certain cities.

No other logical explanation accounts for these correlations. Statistically, it is highly improbable these are accidents. Accidents happen to everyone, equally. No data exists to show that blonde men in Wisconsin have more accidents than anyone else.

A few members of law enforcement who initially began working with the parents of some of these victims have made solving these cases their vocation. One of whom I have met and his name is Douglas Gilbertson, who heads the criminology department at St. Cloud State University and assists local police departments, Kevin Gannon, a retired NYPD detective, and Anthony Duarte, another retired member of the NYPD.

In 2013 I met Douglas Gilbertson, who is a criminologist who teaches and assists the St. Paul police, wrote a book along retired NYPD detectives Kevin Gannon and Anthony Duarte to demonstrate through through the use of statistics how all these drowned college kids were homicides.

Most of the information in this document was written in 2012. Long story short, I submitted this information to people who focused on the cases discussed in this book. What I wrote must have been passed on to Douglas Gilbertson, who contacted me in early 2013.

Douglas Gilbertson, Kevin Gannon and Anthony Duarte have just written a book on forensics and drowning.

It is a large book and I've not read it yet. It should go into detail about much of what I discuss in this paper.

I think the simplest way to understand these incidents are unlikely to be accidents is to just look at the faces of these victims. The resemblance between them is far too extreme to attribute it to chance. There is also a similarity in how these kids vanished. Seemingly, each victim goes out drinking with friends, most usually during the coldest months of winter, gets separated from his friends and winds up dead in a river.

In most all the cases, the victim wasn't suicidal before their disappearance and death. In many cases, the parents weren't buying it and pressed the police to not jump to the conclusion it was an accident or suicide.

Parents usually know their own children well. Also, it makes no sense, no matter how drunk someone is, to want to go swimming in or hang out by a river during the dead of winter. Since most of these cases are centered around the upper midwest, from Minnesota to New York State, it was usually frigid outside when the victim went in to the water.

Other patterns have been found linking these victims to one another. These cases have gotten the moniker, Smiley Face Murders, because in places where victims were found in the water, a smiley face was found spray painted near the site, that showed up the week the victim drowned.

In a number of the drowning cases, some were re-ruled as homicides later on. The parents of Chris Jenkins received a tip from a man in prison that helped them get what they needed to prove their son's death was a homicide. Jan Jenkins says she has reason to think her son was tortured before he went into the water.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
There is much to explain to show that there is solid thinking behind the argument these are homicides.
One thing which may help someone new to this topic understand that it isn't all that radical to think people kill by drowning people is a song, written by a famous musician from St. Paul, Minnesota about someone getting murdered by being forcibly pushed under water in a river.
That musician is Bob Mould, who performed in the band Husker Du. He was in the band "Sugar" after the break-up of Husker Du. These are the lyrics to the song, "Good Idea" by the band, Sugar:
Sugar - A Good Idea Lyrics
Artist: Sugar
Album: Copper Blue

They went down to the river
On a warm summer night
The air was thick with the
Smell of temptation

Then he said, "Why don't we lay in the water
Let the water run over me"
And she grinned and she said
Now she said, now she said

"Now that's a good idea", she said, she said
"Now that's a good idea", she said, she said
"Now that's a good idea", she said, she said
"Now that's a good idea", she said, she said

He held her head high in his hands
He held her down deep in the stream
He saw the bubbles and matted hair
Mixed in with seaweed she started to scream

Was it something I said
Was it something I said
And she said, and she said
And she said, she said

"Now that's a good idea", she said she said
To be alone with you she said she said
I've been waiting for years
And I'd rather be dead

That's a good idea he said he said
He held her down in the river
He held her down in the water
Another river of mud wash away those tears

He said and he said, "Now that's a good idea"
He said, "Now that's a good idea"
He said, "Now that's a good idea"
He said, "Now that's a good idea"

I saw them from the ocean
She didn't seem to mind
Didn't fight at all
She didn't fight it at all

Some things are best left alone
Sometimes I'm best left alone
And sometimes I see you in the water
At night at night at night at night

"That's a good idea", she said, she said
I wanna feel you in the water
With your hands on my head
Push you down into the water

She said, she said
"Now that's a good idea", she said, she said
Now that's a good idea, that's a good idea"
She said, she said

Now she said, now she said
"That's a good idea that's a good idea"
"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"I want to feel you in the water
With your hands on my head
Push you down into the water"
She said, she said

"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said

"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea", she said, she said

"That's a good idea", she said, she said
"That's a good idea"

In a May 2008 article in the blog "Confessions of an American PI" written by Brian Blackwell, the following profile is given to victims of Smiley Face Killer victims:

"Denver-based private investigator Brian Blackwell began investigating in May 2007 the strange drowning deaths of young male college students that have been occurring in the Midwest and around the country for over a decade.

Commonalities:

1. Victims were academically astute, athletic; each victim nearly had the same physical build.
2. Victims were last seen out drinking with friends or at a party.
3. Were under the influence of alcohol.
4. Oddly became separated from friends.
5. Disappeared between the hours of 10 p.m. and 4 a.m.
6. (they) went missing in September to December and February to April.
7. The drowning deaths occurred along the Interstate 90 and Interstate 94 corridors, two links that connect Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois/Iowa border, Indiana and Michigan.
8. Victims were given an accidental or undetermined cause of death.
9. Smiley face symbols were found at drowning deaths in Wisconsin, Illinois/Iowa border and Indiana.

"The areas that the deaths took place in and the strange circumstances surrounding the victims' disappearance make drowning suspicious.

"Since the victims were in college towns in the Midwest, they easily fit the profile (young, physically fit, high-achieving white males). And since college students are known for their binge drinking, it makes sense that they were drinking with friends between 10 p.m. and 4 a.m. during the school semester months (September through April)."

One point which supports the idea there is foul play involved in these cases is how not only are the victims attractive- the victims also resemble each other. What can logically explain this? Victims of the SFK all have a certain body type and appearance; the only difference was that in Midwest SFK cases the victims were blonde haired and blue eyed and in SFK cases in the East, victims were brown haired and brown eyed, according to someone who commented on Piehl's blog.

This person pointed out how Midwest victims all had blond hair and blue eyes, as well as an athletic build. This person also observed that victims in the Northeast have the same build. In one cluster of SFK cases the victims all had the trait of bushy eyebrows.

Other experts on the SFK issue have stressed that it would be impossible for one or two serial killers to have committed all these murders. The only other explanation I can think of for theses matches in appearance I can think of is that the killers advertise the opportunity to rape young males who are say, blonde, blue eyed, muscular and medium build.

In Kristi Piehl's blog, the poster, "Zorro's Pal says "victims (are) mostly: White men, (with) brown or brownish hair, not too tall, not too short- 5 foot 8 (inches) to six feet tall. (They have) an athletic or healthy build. (and are) not thin, not fat, college educated, intelligent (and) well liked."
Frank's book has content which correlates with aspects of Smiley Face Murders
Frank starts out his book with the following passage:

In it he says:

"To maintain the mummified remains of a once vibrant economy (like soaking a dead extinct lab animal in a jar of formaldehyde for future use) submerged and drowned is the old family oriented style of business management to a practiced alchemy of welfare solicitation, infectiously threatening the American apple pie, bread and butter values that once defined our country."

This passage evokes images more fitting to Smiley Face Murders than a long book about having to work jobs while being a bum. This statement would stand out anywhere, since there just isn't association with mummification, submerging and drowning and preserving animals in a jar in most people's minds. The passage becomes almost horrifying when some facts about SFK cases are brought to light. A Minneapolis victim of the Smiley Face Killers (Chris Jenkins) was found dead in the water with his arms crossed like a mummy. Frank said he once lived in Minneapolis and worked there. I don't know when but it would be interesting to know this, given Frank's possible involvement in the homicide.

There happened to be another Minneapolis drowning victim, a man who worked as a bicycle courier before he died or was killed. Frank goes to bicycle co-ops, so there's a chance he met this victim also.

This statement is out of context as the opening statement in a book. Frank likely is mentioning this because of some significance as opposed to anything to do with reality.

"Respiration: 1. The act of inhaling and exhaling air in order to exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide. Synonymous with breathing and ventilation. 2. The cellular metabolic process by which oxygen is taken in, substances are oxidized, energy is released and carbon dioxide and oxidized products are given off. Economies are similar to living organisms in that both consist of subjects engaging in some form of respiration involving breathing, ventilation and/or an essential biological exchange needed for survival."

This seems like a strange way to start off a book. Not that his piece is a typical book by any means. Still, even in this context I can't see the value in telling people the definition of respiration. Most people already know what respiration is. Also, what person bothers looking up the definition of respiration and submits it as the first paragraph of a book? I think there is something else behind his intent in placing the definition of respiration first.

Frank uses the word "submerged" in his book:

" because submerged into that hole once known as our economy... "

"Submerged" is usually used in reference to water.
Like I did at first, most people who listen to Frank or hear him speak merely think he's some sort of confused person. The problem is that Frank isn't confused; he's dangerous. .

These are just not quirky interests. Frank's penchants for weird analogies reflect something more disturbing: Frank is using projection onto his victims of his own actions, deeds and words. Frank is a victimizer who ironically accuses all his victims of doing what he does. He knows how to get away with that too, as I learned the hard way when I had to deal with him.

The bottom line is that Frank isn't some crafty user of interesting allegories; he just makes comparisons about economies and breathing because he is a sick man who is likely drowning people.

The things he says in his book are very strange. He proclaims he's a human trafficking victim because he got speeding tickets while working a job driving a truck in his book. That makes no sense. It begs the question, "why is he really making these illogical connections." Is it a literary device, a creative way of telling a story or something else entirely.

If you read the book you can tell this isn't creativity or skillful writing. It is my believe he writes these things for other, far more questionable reasons. I will get into discussing that later.

I think that Frank might have an obsession with respiration in the same way he has an obsession about human trafficking terminology; he needs to talk about crimes he commits, so he does it by talking about it but confusing the situation by pretending he's a victim of what he perpetrates.

Here is one example of how Frank does this:

"While returning to Texarkana, a company of trucks driving over the road in convoy was pulled over by local law enforcement and issued the same tickets as before, in particular driving without insurance and one expired vehicle registration. If the company owner/boss exercised the degree of care suggested last month in Victoria Texas, how is it possible to get a second ticket for the same offence--- in particular driving without insurance?

Had the driver stopped behind the vehicle pulled over in front of him, the same tickets would have been issued for a second time due in part to employer apathy prolonging a slave status in Texarkana. An ensuing court date; a legal order to appear in front of a judge in a courtroom of the American Criminal Justice System to address the matter would guarantee an exploitive employer another employee, by making departure from the employment difficult. This provides motive to apathy. When warrants are issued they go to the driver not the company owner/boss and likewise any punitive damages awarded a drivers license.

The tickets and punitive damages serve as the indenture here, revealing a contract; labor agreement. The drivers dependency on the company owner/boss to handle the situation appropriately outlines the servitude. Factoring in the attempt to make the driver operate without a driver's log suggests a motive to hide what was really happening; indentured servitude/ slavery."

t was sad to find that creep harassing and misleading good people interested in whether foul play was and is involved in the death of so many young college students who all resembled each other. Again, if you familiarize yourself with all of those cases, it becomes very visible that foul play is most likely involved in a high percentage of those cases.

Like what Douglas Gilbertson has maintained, it is not statistically possible for so many victims of unexplained river deaths to fit such a narrow profile, for these cases not to be homicide. This profile consists of successful, high-achieving college/university students, who have certain majors, generally resemble each other, and are attractive for the most part.

Other facts similar in all these cases, similar to the point that coincidence is ruled out include:
In most all the cases, the victim disappears for a time, and then is found in a river. Sometimes, even after a stretch of river is searched, the victim shows up in it later.

The victim is usually at a party, almost always drinking and gets separated from friends.

The cases appear more during winter as opposed to summer, eliminating the possibility these cases are typical mishaps involving swimming or water.

The victims all seem to have a series of college majors identical to each other. Or else, the students had similar military careers choices, such as aviation or engineering.

When Gannon and Duarte were interviewed on CNN, they said the graffiti was likely put up to taunt law enforcement.

I presently am on the run from a person who has involvement in these drownings and human trafficking. In the context of human trafficking, this man, Frank has taunted me and the police. There are strong parallels between how Frank conducts himself in terms of manipulating and lying to entrap people into sexual slavery and the ways people involved in the drowning cases have lied and manipulated.

Kevin Gannon said in the CNN interview that he suspected jealousy being a motive behind some of these killings. That would fit in very neatly with Frank. Not only has his success in the normal world of college and work seem truncated, but he has had career focuses identical to some of the smiley victims. The only difference is the victim was successful and Frank wasn't.

I think it is possible he compensates for not being successful in life and being accepted by peers and parents by taking it out on innocent victims leawho are everything he is not. I think he kills and human trafficks to avenge innocent people who remind him of his failures.

Part Three

Reasons I have for thinking Frank Marzitelli is involved in "Smiley Face Killer" murders:
My Discovery about Frank's Book
I also know it is him from a book he forwarded me in a *secured* email message and its uncanny mentions of drowning and serial murder in them. I know it is he most importantly because I know this man is capable of vile, sick, twisted and disgusting acts. I know it is he because the same lack of a conscience would enable him to perpetrate these acts.

To prove this man is a trafficker to the outside world, the best thing I have is his own words, in his own book. Frank has an all-out obsession with human trafficking terms and demonstrates this in a lengthy book, which he created for unclear reasons. I think he thought he could get away with this if he uses the terms as some sort of literary device where he states that because he works driving a truck and has to apply for low-end trade jobs like welding, that he is an "indentured servant."

He smugly forwarded me his book in an email, but never gave me time to read it, as he'd visit every day and I had no time left over to go across town to just use a library computer for a meager hour. At the time I was around him, I didn't have a computer, nor did I know where I could go to use a computer. He showed me where libraries were and where other places were with free internet access. When he showed me where the library was, —he'd just sat outside and waited for me. It was odd as if he knew he was going to do something rotten and illegal to me, (this was before the rape) so he was cautious about where he was seen with me.

Here is the first example out of many where things in Frank's book have direct correlation to content on the Smiley Face Killer blog generated by what is in internet-speak a "troll" or someone who is online to disrupt normal activity in internet forums, chatrooms, etc.

Frank says in his book:

"He is told in a competition that he knows nothing however about to be forced into, "since you have one drop of black blood in you... that makes you black... if anything is afforded you.. that's how it gets done in the black community, here , not in front of news cameras as something else. He thinks about it for a moment (pauses pensively) and asks with a smirk of humor meant to be playfully sarcastic--- to help ease the awkwardness created by what has just unfolded--- (which was ill taken in retrospect) 'Does that also mean, that I'm like... one third animal?"

This compares to a comment on Kristi Piehl's blog where a "troll" using the name "FRENEMIES" says:

"That is correct, Matt Aradondo. He is ¼ black and ¾ white, so in societies eyes he is black. He is 25 and I get real bad vibes from the guy while viewing his Facebook and MySpace pages. Seems to have had a troubled life already, at 25. I hope the investigators pulled his and Ermin's (Matt's friend) call records that night to see if they in fact called Jelani's phone after he went missing. If they didn't call his phone, he didn't disappear. Point blank. As far as the distance from the house to the shoes to the golf course, to the bar, it is all in a straight line if you travel by the railroad tracks."
Link: http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=1

The Troll

The troll Jake ("Leisure" who is another good commentator on the board calls him, "jake the snake") accuses Monique777 of all manner of lies, so no one listens to her. He accuses her of being a killer,of using sock puppets and everything else people have accused the Jake, the troll, of doing. Jake is most likely Frank who uses other aliases including Bradley 2.0, Anonymous Coward, Jo jo potatoes, Harry and Fidlee. The other writer in the comments forum said "Fidlee" was a name "Fiddle Dee Dee" which probably referred to the troll's efforts in harassing and attacking a serious poster with good observations named "Dee."
Zorro's Pal here gets attacked by Jake for adroitly confronting Jake on his behavior.

On page 105, Jake accuses Zorro's Pal of doing exactly what he is doing:
Jake:
July 10th, 2009 | #11
"I don't know how many different aliases ZorrosPal & his gang really has. I think if the killer were going to post on this site, he would so with several different aliases to throw people off, & try to make it look like other people (with completely different personalities than himself — albeit different personalities manufactured by the killer to throw people off) were also in agreement with him, when he debunks the valid theories & sends people on wild goose chases after the bogus ones.
It seems like Odette could be another one of those debunker aliases. Why would she attack me for posting evidence of a theory?"

Zorro's Pal has a weak theory about Middle Eastern Terrorists being behind the smiley murders and Jake is attempting to use this to get people to ignore Zorro's Pal. Zorro's Pal is made by Jake to look stupid. On the face of it, Zorro's Pal's idea seems stupid. It isn't. Zorro's Pal came up with the idea based on an important, significant fact: smiley murders occur in disproportionately high numbers in areas which boast an unusually high number of Somali immigrants in the United States.
It also helps to know that people from Somalia are also prone to engage in human trafficking. The human trafficking ring arrested in St. Paul, Minnesota consisted entirely of Somalians. I met the police detective who busted this ring. Her name is Heather Weyker. I also would tend to think that for Frank to argue happily about and show me the high rise occupied by entirely Somali immigrants meant he must have frequented the place.
Zorro's Pal is actually wrong about Middle Eastern terrorists alone making up the smiley gang. One thing which he was smart to notice is that there are incidentally many Somali immigrants in smiley hotspots like Columbus, Ohio, Seattle, Washington, Nashville, Tennessee, and the Twin Cities. The largest population of Somalis is in the Twin Cities.
The Somali human trafficking ring in St. Paul, was said to have transported victims to Columbus, Ohio, and Nashville, Tennessee among other places. So with this you have transport of people between some of the worst cites for Smiley activity.
Conversely, smiley murders occur where there are no populations of Somali immigrants. That means Zorro's Pal's core premise is wrong.
A number of Somalis seem to have minimal qualms about participating in human trafficking; they have a long history of enslaving members of the Bantu tribe in Africa. The Bantu tribe is the largest tribe in Africa, I believe their native language is Swahili, but I could be wrong. All the same, this tribe spans over Kenya, Nigeria, Ethiopia and most of the African continent. This is the main African tribe, greater in number than all other in Africa.
When I see Somalis now I avoid them. I;m not in the position to be taking chances. They could potentially create trouble for me. As to whether they participate in the smiley gang, my guess is that some Somalis could be constitute this group but I have no first hand experiences to prove this.
More aptly, I think just like any other gang, the gang is otherwise called the Smiley Face Killers, is peopled by individuals in the Twin Cities area who already have dealings with one another. Just like how any social groups forms from whoever happens to currently live in a certain neighborhood, gangs like the smiley gang could recruit from whoever happens to be in the area. Since some Somalis are in the same trade Frank is in, human trafficking, he has likely related with them, and perhaps drawn some of them into his other activities.
More to the point, the Twin Cities seem to be a main hub for both human trafficking and smiley murders, making it the last place anyone should live if he or she doesn't like either activity.
Zorro's Pal is also conservative in jumping to the conclusion that every case is a murder. Jake twists things here so that new people disregard Zorro's Pal.
Jake :
July 10th, 2009 | #12 "Who in the world has the greatest incentive to post on this blog? Maybe the families & friends of the deceased who would like to see justice. & maybe the killers, who would like to prevent an arrest of themselves.
Most of the readers of this blog probably just read & may never post.
If someone posts a possible theory or seeks information, that seems legitimate.
If someone is engaged in debunking the theories, & discreditting evidence, & insinuating that a particular young man just probably fell in the water due to drunkenness, or attacking or belittling another person for posting a particular theory that seems questionable & suspicious. What incentive would that debunker have to do that, unless he/she/they are really the killers or covering for the killers"
That statement from Jake is of course Frank at his most typical.
Smiley Murder Victims Get Isolated from Friends and Entrapped Afterwards; Much Like Female Human Trafficking victims

The Smileys seem to they lay in wait for when the victim goes to a bar or party. They wait until the drinker has imbibed just enough to have their death credited to alcohol. Then what happens is the SFK gang member sends someone in to start a fight with the victim, ensuring the victim is kicked out of the bar and separated from their friends.

Victims seem to be manipulated or pushed into certain circumstances which benefit the killer, usually being separated from friends. Zorro's Pal, one of the better posters on Kristi Piehl's blog describes it as "Often, circumstances (occur) with (the victims) being asked to leave or are kicked out of a place or leaving in anger, etc. Some of these seem to be contrived situations.

This idea that the Smileys are working to divide and conquer their victims is shown here. Once separated by friends, Smileys can gain unfettered access to them. To isolate their victims, Monique777 on Kristi Piehl's blog, proposed the idea that the Smiley killers starting fights to get victims kicked out of bars.

She said that once they were kicked out of the bars, the victims would be isolated from their friends. When a new person to the blog inquired about how SFK murders seem to involve a particular bar chain called Brother's Bar and Grill, Est. 1967, Monique referred the new person to the thread entitled, "One Bar, Two Deaths," which where discussion of the involvement of the bar chain was dealt with in full.

This is where you can find the link to section in blog where this discussion takes place:

The discussion then naturally progressed to another mystery, which is why so often Smiley Victims spent their last night before disappearing at Brother's Bar.. Monique777, then said she was looking at the comments page of the Brother's Bar website. She notices one comment where a customer complains of stranger approaches him in a Brother's Bar location and accuses the customer of stealing his chair., and sitting where this stranger insisted he had a right to sit.

The problem is that the customer hadn't stolen anyone's seat. The customer who had this accusation hurled at him had been sitting at this location for over a half hour. No one else had been sitting there. This customer brought the issue to the attention of the bar staff; however, they took the side of the stranger who was there to start a fight.

Then, the bar staff call on a bouncer to remove the innocent customer from the premises. This could indicate Brother's bar itself may be contriving these situations to get innocent people put out on the street, at night, and cut off from their friends who had not been kicked out of the bar.

Moniuqe777 then finds another similar complaint on the Brother's Bar website, which leads her to think these instances could have conceivably factored into the drowning deaths of so many of the college students in Smiley cases. Nearly all the SFK victims are separated from friends while out drinking. It is when they are separated that something happens to them.

I revisit how Greg tried to warn me saying, "The are playing divide and conquer on the women."

Divide and conquer does indeed seem to be what the SFK perpetrators seem to be doing; they attack victims only when they are alone. This was the pattern Frank held to rigorously. He always would work to whittle away the number of people I had assisting me. Until he had me isolated he never showed himself. Only when he was sure I was isolated and or no one would catch him carrying out violence he moved on this. Does this mean he is a coward? This might be the case, but I really think his biggest priority is not getting caught in the act of any crime. This fits the profile of a person who spends most of his waking hours attempting to stupify about the reality of series of murders by Smiley Killers. If he has played a role in the trolling must be motivated by a terror of getting caught. Even his tantrums when people start learning he is playing games, have the feel of a cornered animal resorting to biting and clawing in desperation. Just like an animal that doesn't want to be captured, Frank does pretty much what animals do.

This is always how it ends up with Frank. When he is busy employing deception and manipulating people he maintains a fake, plastic niceness. Like with me, he was trying to play at being St. Frank and helping me do all these things I needed help with. When Frank was busy doing all these fake-nice things for me, he carried himself like a martyr.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
In his book he plays the martyr too. In his book he is whining about being "the job's hamster,," "ole Hammy" , "good ole Frank", or "ole witchie poo."

I don't think he likes being fake-nice and if he had his way and no risk of getting caught he would act out cruelly and violently with people all the time. He is at first a closet sadist, working to position people where he wants them. Once he has them there, and those people have been isolated enough for him to feel safe from capture and censure, he has no qualms being violent.

I imagine this is how he conducts himself in targeting young, attractive college men. He waits until he has them sequestered away from their friends at the bar. The fact the victims have been bounced out of the bar, with no way to get back in, this is when he and other Smileys move in. They never just seem to pounce on victims with public violence they may get caught for. These people wait in the wings, get the victim where he is defenseless and then move in for the kill. My guess is that all of the killers in this group really don't want to get caught.

However, when I wised up to the deception, when he was only busy just "grooming" me to be human trafficked, and confronted him, the plastic niceness melted away. Then he turned into a monster. He raped me. He abused me. He was violent.

He seems to have the ability to coast on a false presentation of himself, which seems nice, but is contriving. People always seem to reach a point when realize he is playing games with them. People confront him because it is human nature to confront a liar. The moment someone confronts him is when the true cruel monster he really is comes out. Then he yells, screams, threatens and bullies. He will do this until the person backs off. He seems accustomed to having his way, and cannot manage being thwarted. This is Frank.

What is really, really interesting, is that right after Monique777 presents this idea on the blog, one troll named Jake launches into pages of character assassination of Monique777. Like both Frank and other section of the blog where the troll is active, the troll attacks the person who comes up with a relevant fact or a good idea. The troll also throws out accusations at the person making the post, accusing them of doing what they are doing- trolling and confusing people. The troll also then tries to accuse the poster of being the killer and all sorts of other things. Often these are the exact things the troll has been exposed as doing earlier in the thread/discussion.

I have found that when the troll is most active on the board, someone has usually brought up a really good idea, or has solved part of the mystery about the murders. Then the troll launches into vigorous ad hominem attacks. The troll even creates more sock puppets on the blog; sock puppets who all happen to be brand new to the forum/blog and decide to back the troll out of the clear blue. These observations come from other people on the blog. The only idea I contribute to this is deciding the troll's activity in response to good and accurate ideas.

No where is this more apparent than when the troll, using the moniker "Jake" attacks Monique777 and her idea that the killer's are instigating fights when the victim is as the bar he is last seen at. "Jake" strangely uses a technique Frank uses, which is to just throw out accusations of fake things towards whoever says something he doesn't like or brings up an issue he doesn't want discussed.

Here is her idea in her own words on page < http//sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=103>:

monique777
July 8th, 2009 at 23:56 | #35
Reply | Quote

"Two things: I was reading comments under Brothers Bar by patrons doing reviews and found two odd comments. Both were men that said they were confronted by a guy in the bar. One guy said someone came up to him and said he stole his seat. The guy had been sitting there a half hour. Then the people who worked there sided with the guy who accused him of stealing his seat. He said it was not longer after the bouncer (an off duty cop) came over and just told him to leave. The other incident was very similar. So it's as if someone inside is trying to instigate fights in that bar on purpose.
Second, the last time Matt Kruziki was seen according to my friend who use to be a reporter in the Tristate region, was when he was sitting under a bridge smoking a cigarette. It was after he was told to leave the River Queen without his coat. A cop approached him and asked what he was doing. He told the cop he was smoking a cigarette. My friend said she may have written about it but didn't think she had put it in the paper because it had come from one of her sources."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This following idea makes Jake uneasy. Here he is quoted:

Jake
July 9th, 2009 at 10:20 | #17
Reply | Quote
monique777 :Two things:
"I was reading comments under Brothers Bar by patrons doing reviews and found two odd comments. Both were men that said they were confronted by a guy in the bar. One guy said someone came up to him and said he stole his seat. The guy had been sitting there a half hour. Then the people who worked there sided with the guy who accused him of stealing his seat. He said it was not longer after the bouncer (an off duty cop) came over and just told him to leave. The other incident was very similar. So it's as if someone inside is trying to instigate fights in that bar on purpose.
Second, the last time Matt Kruziki was seen according to my friend who use to be a reporter in the Tristate region, was when he was sitting under a bridge smoking a cigarette. It was after he was told to leave the River Queen without his coat. A cop approached him and asked what he was doing. He told the cop he was smoking a cigarette. My friend said she may have written about it but didn't think she had put it in the paper because it had come from one of her sources."
"It's possible that the emoloyees/bouncer of the bar may have sided with the other customer, because they knew him a little better, than the guy who wrote the complaining post."
(from page < http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=103>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In this next excerpt of the dialog between Monique777 and Jake, we see Jake acting uneasy about Monique's theory which she shared just before:

monique777 : "So the bar workers instigate a fight with a man (perhaps recently drugged) to get him thrown out (so he will be alone) and vulnerable to being a victim. The men are chosen while in the bar."
Jake (July 9th, 2009) "My oh my — that is really jumping to conclusions. Talk about conspiracy theories.In bars, where people are drinking, people sometimes say stuff to other customers. If it gets heated, bouncers will boot out whichever one they decide to boot. If one customer had had something slipped in his drink by a passerby, his behavior would probably be worse, so he probably is the one to get booted. Once he is outside, separated from his friends, alone, he is easy prey. I don't know why you think that bar employees all over the midwest are in on this."

< http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=103>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In this next snippet of the dialogue between Monique and Jake, Jake attempts to derail the discussion from going in the direction which it is headed:

Faith (July 9th, 2009:): "Matt Kruziki was last at the River Queen Lounge 12/23/05 in East Dubuque,IL. The River Queen Lounge is located at 31 Sinsinawa Avenue. This is actually very close to the water and a bridge.< link to www.mapquest.com
monique777(July 9th, 2009:): "I lived near there for years & I know the water is close but you have to go behind buildings, over railroad tracks and through trees to get to the rivers edge, if your lucky you may find a path but everything is overgrown. East Dubuque really starts there parting at midnight to 3:ooam trust me we never have any drowning from kids parting on Sinsinawa, once in a while you hear of someone that commits suicide by jumping of the bridge but not walking to the Mississippi from the bars to go swimming, the channel there is very deep! I doubt Matt figured out how to get to the water unless he walked way down the street from the river queen to the place they put boats in under the bridge, again you would have to know where you were going. On a very cold night without a coat I very much doubt he decided to go for a swim or walk to the river. Someone who knew the area had to have took him there or Matt decided to walk across the river to his Hotel ( which you can see the neon lights from E.D) and accidentally fell through the ice but I doubt it! A bloodhound traced him in a different area where you needed a car to get there! East Dubuque, Dubuque, and Wisconsin are all surrounded by the Mississippi, if you want to go swimming yes it's very easy water is every where, but Matt wasn't from here and didn't know his way around and he sounds smarter than that to go to the water by himself on a super cold night! I believe someone offered him a ride and for some reason did him in, very sad! No more arguing about Matt this discussion is about Bryan! If you want to continue talking about Matt we can at GLP!
Jake (July 9th, 2009:): "I agree— we shouldn't allow the discussion about Bryan to be side-tracked."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After Jake's initial effort to divert attention away from this topic fails, he resorts to leveling bogus accusations towards people. Again, as we have seen before so often with Frank /the troll, these bogus accusations make Monique777, and the others appear to be doing what Jake is doing.
This may work if a reader happens to start reading at this juncture. It won't work, if the reader has read most of the previous discussions here to know Jake is a troll.
Jake's seems to be trying to stymie the people here who have just made a significant finding and connection in relation the entire pattern evident in Smiley cases. .Already before in this discussion, the troll (Jake) gets reprimanded by the others in the discussion for diverting the topic of conversation away from the topic at hand.
What triggered the troll to attempt to divert the conversation earlier, was another person posting that she found Parliament cigarette butts behind a wall near where a victim in St. Paul was last at. What she said was the area behind this wall would have been the perfect place to spy on the victim. This means that near a Smiley crime scene a local in St. Paul did their own detective work and found something very interesting. This area was not on a thoroughfare and in an isolated location so chances are that finding the Parliament cigarette butts had relevance to the disappearance and drowning death of one Smiley victim. Jake tries this and seems to hope he will get away with it if he makes people to afraid of the people presenting the finding.
He keeps using this same ploy again and again. This would be considered "appeal to fear" in the study of critical thinking, and propaganda techniques. In critical thinking, this is considered also an example of an ad hominem attack. The purveyor of the attack on people in the forum can't discredit the argument, so he resorts to attacking the person making the argument.
Critical thinking teaches students to only value an argument on it's own merits and its basis in fact. That's because a sound argument can come from the lips of anyone, regardless of who they are. Someone who is a C student still can have an idea that changes the world. Jake hopes people out there realize this, and decide to ignore the good ideas getting presented here. He makes a desperate attempt to silence ideas here which could lead to the killers being caught. Maybe he accuses the people who bring up these important ideas of the worst thing he can think of because Jake/the troll needs people to ignore these particular facts above all else. This means that Monique777 is getting warm, and getting closer to a line of thinking that solves the case.
Jake (July 9th, 2009): "My fear is that, if someone from the killer's group is on this blog regularly, he/she/they could easily try to steer the discussion away from the real killings & real theories toward bogus ones.
A serial killer or group of some sort probably killed some of the missing & dead young men, and a few might have been legitimate accidents, and maybe even an occasional suicide (but you would think LE would have found some evidence to indicate that), & some could even be copy cats.
Sometimes I wonder if some of these deaths in really far away places are even at all related. I wonder if some people get off track by accident, or on purpose."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Monique is distressed by Jake's accusations. Jake is projecting his own motives on other people who post here as you will see if you read this discussion. Monique responds to his attacks through saying:

Monique777 (July 10th, 2009): "Jake, I asked you here because people are tired and complaining of the arguing as it is distracting as people want to talk about facts and theories. And it is self-indulgent with the lengths of our posts too so I will tell you some things here so you understand some facts. Also if enough people complain, we can get kicked off as others have been kicked off the site.
"I can see you are getting upset because I believe you are starting to understand what happened to the evidence from the scent dogs at the Abbey. Finally someone may be getting why I was so upset a while back when Sarah made her claim. No one else on the board seemed very upset. Maybe they were but didn't speak up or see how it all related back to the Abbey. No one believing in the priest theory said much of anything to my surprise.
"I came to SFK and heard about these scent dogs finding both Josh and Chris scent at the Abbey. I wondered why is the Abbey not being searched? Why is nothing being done? Isn't that enough for probable cause to get a warrant and get in there and search? I didn't understand why absolutely nothing was happening as a result of this finding.
"Jan Jenkins gets on and explains the police dismissed it because they claimed the handlers led the dogs. She is pretty upset by this obviously. That is when she posted how dogs don't have political agendas and if these were animals drowning they'd get more concern than men drowning.
"I did not understand exactly what she meant by a scent dog being led by a handler. It didn't make sense. I couldn't understand why Jan would say this evidence wasn't be used because the dog was led. Also, I wondered why it wasn't posted at Foot Prints .I couldn't believe such a huge oversight would occur there.
"I spent the next few weeks reading all about scent dogs and read several blogs where the owners of these dogs were extremely upset by a few handlers who misrepresent their dogs and now are ruining it for everyone. These expert handlers and trainers are furious at handlers who have never even properly trained their dog and then they make huge claims about them. The good handlers know their dogs are highly trained, yet are not taken as seriously as they should be. The untrained dog gets to the site and screws up, wants his treat and the police can't get information from the untrained dog. This causes skepticism among the police about all scent dogs. The police don't know the dog wasn't properly trained. They are looking for answers and the dog doesn't do much of anything to help. After a few of these experiences they begin to not believe in the dogs IN GENERAL. ALL scent dog's ability comes into question.
So, some handlers are ruining the credibility of handlers in general and this is a sore spot for me because these dogs are amazing and valuable when they are trained. The "bad" handlers take this away by telling lies or bragging about what is not true .So, I realized this may have been why the police were so easily able to discredit the findings at the Abbey.
"Then Kristi posted about Sarah saying her dog followed Dan into the water. I too, thought it was a matter of semantics and posted this thought. Felt the paper misquoted her or misunderstood her. Kristi followed up by calling it to my attention it was on a podcast. And there on the pod cast was Sarah saying her dog followed Dan "INTO the water, the first night". That changes things quite a bit. She didn't say to the water, by the water but INTO the water.
"I looked in Sarah's background and she runs a good training program for dogs and helps animals at the Humane Society so I thought, how could this be? I was involved in the search for Dan and was told the dog went to St. Claire, not INTO the water. Dan's father Dale still said at this point that Dan was not in the water. The police and him believed Dan had gotten into a car at the intersection of St. Claire. I couldn't believe Sarah had said that and thought she was lying and called her a liar on this blog. But then I thought, I don't know for a fact she is lying and it's horrible to think that in the first place. So I took it back. This was after I emailed her asking if her dog followed Dan's scent to the water or down the bluff and INTO the water. She never replied back.
"But, if Sarah lied about her dog then she can be grouped with the "bad" handlers that are spoiling the entire credibility of all scent dogs. And this is horrible. This relates directly to the Abbey where a scent dog that found the only really big piece of evidence in this entire SFK theory was discredited.
Many years ago they never would have discredited a scent dog as they were seen as being highly valuable. Now because of a few bad handlers, and handlers telling lies perhaps, the police can easily discredit them.
"There is no way the scent dogs were mistaken or led at the Abbey. They found both scents of the victims. While Jan Jenkins can better explain it, she is not here right now but ask her if she comes back. Or ask Kristi about it. These dogs were discredited according to Jan Jenkins because the police claimed the dog was "led". So, now instead of having good, solid evidence, the papers say the dog was led at the Abbey. People reading the news then assume it isn't true. The general public are oblivious to Jan's story and to the SFK in general. And nothing happens at the Abbey and the public never questions this as to them there is nothing to question.
"So when handlers tell lies, even if they think a little bragging won't hurt, IT DOES HURT, it indirectly lets criminals get away with their crimes. A prime example is one mentioned a lot on this blog (don't want to get sued.)
No one believing in the priest theory seemed the least bit upset or even phased by Sarah's statement and I couldn't understand why. I mean people must know if a dog handler lies, it can only lead to discrediting scent dogs.
There is no question in anyone's mind here that both victims' scents were found. No one has ever debated this, at least since I came here. It is the truth, both victims scents were found. And it is the truth that the police dismissed this due to the credibility of the search dog.
I don't really care about all the stuff you accuse me of because you are suspicious of what and me not, but it does bother me when I am accused of trying to bury the entire story I just told you because this still burns me today. I am still very upset Sarah never emailed back to clarify what she said. All she would have had to have said is I must have meant to the water, but instead I am left to wonder if she is a handler that could make something like that at the Abbey happen."

Source < http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=104>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jake is very concerned about stopping Monique777 from carrying her idea further.. He ignores what Monique777 just said and says this:
Jake
July 10th, 2009 at 03:56 | #42
Reply | Quote
"It seems like some people (& maybe along with their alternative aliases on this blog) are trying to send bloggers on wild goose chases, suspecting companies that the supply the bar ????? what is that ? WalMart? Come on people. That makes no sense.
It's very possible for the killer to use a certain type of bar (college hang outs) to find his next victim, but I doubt that that has anything to do who owns the bar or supplies the bar.
& mentioning cases that are clearly unrelated — 20 years ago, where many witnesses saw a guy accidentally fall into the water, and the recent case where the victim lived, when his 2 "friends" threw him off a bridge, & witnesses saw that too —- what is the point in bringing up these types of cases that are clearly unrelated to the serial killer theory ———- OTHER THAN TO TRY TO CAST DOUBT ON THE ENTIRE THEORY That there is some type of serial killer doing many of these killings.

Post on page < http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=104>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Jake" attacks Monique777 verbally after she posts this idea. He levels accusations towards her immediately after she posts her theory that people working in tandem with the killers instigated fights with Smiley victims in order to get the bouncers to kick the victim out of the bar.

Starting at around page 103 and continuing to page 108, Jake goes on a rampage accusing almost everyone who posts on the blog of being the killers and more things. Here are examples of how Jake attacks Zorro's Pal, Monique and others:

Jake
July 8th, 2009 at 17:47 | #19
Reply | Quote
monique777 : "This has been passed on to me to post for Zorro's Pal as I was told he will no longer be posting here:It is more about Bryan, the man who was found in the Milwaukee River. It's too bad we have lost a great mind who provided tons of information on this blog. < link to www.fox11online.com
Jake
"So Zorro's Pal emails information to Monique on the side —- what a surprise !!!! —- NOT !
Zorro's Pal seemed like a very inteligent well-educated person, BUT HE PROVIDED DIS-INFORMATION.
Wouldn't it be something if Monique & ZP were really one & same all along, just acting like different personalities. The one thing that they both had in common — COMPLETELY — is their opposition to anyone posting anything about priests. That seems so odd."
Source < http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=104>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Zorro's Pal
July 8th, 2009 at 19:54 | #24
Reply | Quote
monique777 :
"This has been passed on to me to post for Zorro's Pal as I was told he will no longer be posting here:It is more about Bryan, the man who was found in the Milwaukee River. It's too bad we have lost a great mind who provided tons of information on this blog.
link to www.fox11online.com
Jake :
"So Zorro's Pal emails information to Monique on the side —- what a surprise !!!! —- NOT !
Zorro's Pal seemed like a very inteligent well-educated person, BUT HE PROVIDED DIS-INFORMATION.
Wouldn't it be something if Monique & ZP were really one & same all along, just acting like different personalities. The one thing that they both had in common — COMPLETELY — is their opposition to anyone posting anything about priests. That seems so odd."

Zorro's Pal
"Popping in to post just to say this- "Jake," you are biggest A-hole on here. And you are worse than that."
source< http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=104>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The troll uses this ploy when he posts on all the Smiley related websites which allow people post their ideas on the subject.

People just really do get tired of mudslinging. However, the mudslinging works must work enough for the troll and others like him to persist with it. Political attack advertisements use appeal to fear almost as much as Jake/the Troll/Frank. He attacks all good ideas on all the various Smiley case solving websites that will allow him to do this. If he gets banned for the behavior he just comes back under a new name and does the same thing again.

His disruptive attempts to prevent solving Smiley cases also include posting ridiculous sounding theories which are false. He posts wacky ideas all the time to likely create the impression to new readers that people who take the Smiley cases seriously are gullible, stupid and prone to believing absurd things.

I also think his post about Catholic monks and priests being the serial killers come from how the troll doesn't like priests or monks. The killers seem to blatantly target Christians and Catholics, so this fits with the agenda of the killers.

This is so much like Frank. Jake is trying to get people afraid of and unwilling to believe, listen to and unwilling to assist his victims, that no one will help them and come to their rescue. I've already lived this in real life with Frank. My heart goes out to anyone else who is the subject of this ploy of his. It makes it easier for the killer he can get people convinced his victims are instead the perpetrators. Maybe this twisting of the truth reflects the killers own attempt to convince himself he is right to abuse, kill and maim his victims.

What is even more sad, is he posts his own tactics plain as day on the board, as if he's trying to mock everyone reading it as too incompetent to discern what is happening. So he says, "Vilify, nullify and destroy" to get with it. His description here is more complicated that what I learned is called appeal to fear. Wherever Jake obtained this formula, it is a more complex and more specific description of a strategy, which I have been calling "appeal to fear." I haven't even this described in articles about propaganda.

Still, I have learned there are actual books on how to manipulate people that human traffickers pass around among themselves. What I experienced when I had to deal with Frank trying to hurt, attack and isolate me is that he used strategies I had never heard of nor seen, and had no defense against. I even went to college and there was scarcely nothing I knew which helped me mount a defense against Frank's games.

I would love to see whatever guide he seems to be getting these games from, because if I had it and I put it out publicly, all these games he plays would be set up for failure.
Obtaining his source for these games would also greatly assist people trying to stop human trafficking, It would also be of great help in order to advise and prepare victims of human trafficking to fight off their traffickers by disarming their ploys.

It works for Jake frequently, not all the time, but enough to damage things. I'll bet Frank thinks when finds a pretty girl he hopes to force into unpaid prostitution against their will, "All I have to do is vilify her; if say scary things about her everyone will ignore her, dismiss her and she's ready to make a profit from. I just have to make sure I say all that before anyone figures out that I'm the liar and she's the one telling the truth. If they get to know her I've lost so I will make up the scariest lies possible, she's trapped. It will work if people don't have enough information about a person to accurately judge a situation."

He tried it with me, and it worked. I barely got out alive. He gets caught but he succeeds too. Otherwise, he'd have no reason to keep doing this to people.

Again, this is a way human traffickers and the smiley gang get unfettered access to their intended victims. If prevention is the best medicine, then understanding the objectives of traffickers and Smiley gang members, and how they achieve them matters.

Just look at how the troll accuses people like Monique777, Zorro's Pal and others of doing exactly what was doing in these online conversations, I have had some thoughts.

Frank always accuses first, even if he has to make stuff up and point of his tactic is that once anyone is accused of anything, it is natural for people to fear a person, whether the accusation is true or not.

Still, while focusing on this, I missed something important. He is doesn't just accuse people of random things so much as he accuses other people of doing exactly what he is doing. Speculations about the reasons why don't matter. What matters is that this is an established pattern, he repeats enough to count the pattern itself as valid way of obtaining information. From the data you could obtain from the pattern, you can both get an accurate record of things Frank has done and also a means to predict his future behavior.
Using the logic he used in the email, all people who own knives are serial killers. You don't need to take critical thinking to understand that argument is absurd. If I were to take the multiple times Frank has said other people do to him what he is doing to them, both online, here in Smiley crime solving forums and his book, and apply it to this statement, what this constitutes is an admission; yes, I, Frank Marzitelli am a serial killer. I am accusing you of being what I am.
It isn't enough to arrest him, but this is enough to point out that it is highly likely he has murdered numerous people. He didn't say "killer" he said "serial killer." Thus far, it seems clear he is involved in killing or being present at the killing of one person. He has a vested interest in preventing people from asking questions about drowning deaths which involve such a narrow segment of the population that it is statistically impossible these are random accidents.
Still, this, alone doesn't tell me exactly how many people he has killed. I don't know. I know he is involved in all of this in a big way. That isn't anything conclusive to indicate the number of lives he has taken. If he is following his pattern, and I believe he is, he is in effect admitting to serial murder.
He has likely taken multiple lives. I think a total of 300 plus Smiley Cases have occurred; this means that any portion of 300 murders trace back to Frank.

Also, if you take how he accuses other people of what he had done, take it as a pattern, or even a form of code talk, and went over not just Kristi Piehls blog but other smiley blogs, combed the comments section and back-engineered everything the troll has accused other people of, you would get a detailed, accurate and lengthy picture of every crime the troll has engaged in.
The same theory works on Frank in his book. This would be a very, very interesting project. This would be one way to get enough data about his activities to know where to look for real, tangible evidence which could theoretically lead to his arrest.
Now, all that is in the book of his and in that forum was said by police to be just circumstantial evidence and not enough evidence to charge Frank with any crime.
At the time the email seemed absurd and I figured he was not happy with me owning a knife, because if he came to get me I could hurt him with it. He'd already raped me, already gave me enough hell to where he knew he was in for a fight if he came to abduct me. He wasn't happy about that.
When that failed, he next day threatened to sue me if I didn't meet him in person in 72 hours just because he said someone I knew spoke to him. He didn't even say who it was. You can't sue people for that. I think there is a term for threatening lawsuits which are used to harass or compel someone to do something he or she is better off not doing , like getting abducted by a rapist or rapists, given he is a human trafficker who is part of a ring. I don't recall it offhand. It would be good to remember, in case any readers of this have had similar threats made by human traffickers to them to scare that victim into doing things against their will.
The reason I am thinking about this is I recalled how Frank doesn't just troll Footprints at the River's Edge and Kristi Piehl's blog, but a larger, more general forum called AboveTopSecret.com. There are threads on that forum which also discuss Smiley murders and I know other people on Kristi's blog mentioned seeing the troll active on this forum as well.
I recently went to their website and was sort of taken aback by what I saw on the splash page for people wishing to use the forum for the first time. There was a long list of banned activities which I know full well the troll or trolls (Batman, too) on Kristi Piehl's site had engaged in.
This is all a list of the typically sophisticated machinations Frank has engaged in, multiple times.
• You Contractually Agree that you are at least 18 years of age and that you are accessing this website for personal use only.
• You Contractually Agree that you wish to join as a member to this private establishment and that any communication taking place here is considered private communication between members and is not publicly disseminated information.
• You are responsible for all activity that occurs under your IP Address and device on this website, including your conduct and any User Content you provide or that you allow others to provide under your IP Address and device.
• You will not use this website to harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate another person, government, or legal entity.
• You will not use this website to promote, recruit for, or organize any real life group, political or otherwise.
• You will not provide, submit or otherwise make available any content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, or otherwise illegal.
• You will not provide, submit or otherwise make available any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," "affiliate links" or any other form of solicitation.
• You will not violate any local laws in your jurisdiction (including, but not limited to, intellectual property laws).
• You will not use our Site for any illegal or unauthorized purpose.
• You will not access, "hack," alter or otherwise use any part of the Site in any unauthorized manner.
• You will not utilize any software bugs, robots, web spiders, or other such technological device to automaticly access, extract or archive any data or information contained on the Site.
• You understand and agree that your membership to this private establishment can be revoked by this website's staff at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
• You Contractually Agree to abide by and be bound by the additional terms of service, disclaimer, and copyright agreement found in the footer of this website.

What strikes me here is the usage of the word "tortious." I think it relates to a legal term used in regards to lawsuits. I am not sure exactly but heard the word used in the term tortious claims. It might mean frivolous lawsuits, I am not sure. Regardless, there seems to be policy here that is geared towards some pretty hideous abuses of the website.

As far as what violations abovetopsecret.com lists here that the troll on Kristi Piehl's blog has partaken in, would include content that is "unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, or otherwise illegal."

The next rule that relates to things I've seen happen on Kristi Piehl's blog applies also:

"You will not use this website to harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate another person, government, or legal entity.

The troll/Frank on Kristi's Piehl's blog has on multiple occasions posed as other writers on the blog, a private detective, and probably taken up other false identities. The one time I recall most is when the troll poses as a private detective and is outed by a real private detective.

This matters in relation to Smiley crimes due to how sometimes real private detectives have been hired to look into these cases in the face of lackluster interest by the local police on a particular case. Posing as a private detective could be damaging in that innocent people would trust the troll, the killer himself with details about the cases which could compromise the ability to catch and arrest the killer.

I suppose it is the killer's effort to stay out of jail, by stealing information he has no right to. I can only imagine if this has happened the killer has posed as other authorities possibly. Again, I can't know the reason for the policy on abovetopsecret.com.

Still I recommend viewing any Smiley related websites with a browser which hides your ip address like the free open source Tor Browser or the free ip address concealer Surf Anonymous Free because the deceptive techniques used by trolls on these blogs is extensive. Also, Frank and his obvious sock puppets aren't the only trolls present.

I had my suspicions about "jbrown" on Kristi's blog. When I conveyed my mistrust of him to the authorities helping me, they said it was justified. He happens to be the moderator on Kristi's blog. This means that when you sign up to post on her blog he will get your ip address.

Frank seems to want me dead just for figuring out as much as I had in 2012. He is a psychopath and extremely dangerous. You wouldn't want a serial killer to know where you live. If you allow your ip address to show up on a website that can lead to someone finding out where you happen to be getting online.

The Smiley Face Killer blog troll, what his goals are and his frequent use of projection as a way to get people to doubt the people who are being honest
The one thing I seem most frequently with the troll on the SFK blogs is how he projects his own actions and motivations directly on people who are good, intelligent and able to formulate real theories and ideas which move people closer to solving the case. The troll relies on his ability to confuse people coming on new to the discussion and milks their ignorance for all its worth. Again and again, when people start doing good work on in these forums in solving the Smiley Face Murders, the troll tries to interfere in any way that he can.
The crazy thing is that he almost always accuses others of doing what he is doing. I don't think he really believes other's are doing it, so it's a bit different from how the term "projection" is used in psychology.
For some reason the troll, and for that matter, Frank seems to think projecting their own motivations onto the innocent is an effective way to block people from learning the truth. He does it probably from thinking that if he says others do what he does, then they will experience the isolation and hatred he feels he deserves himself.
Either this or he's somewhat limited in creativity, so he just twists things around backwards. It is no small irony that the biggest revealer of the tactics used by this internet persona, this troll, is himself.
I believe too he's working from a formula in his efforts to stall discussion about the smiley cases. I am certain that this post here from "Harry" who likely is the troll is laying out more specifically Frank's tactics. People who work in the law enforcement community on Smiley cases I've met would corroborate some of the following activities are partaken in by Smileys.

harry
November 30th, 2009 at 03:43 | #21
Reply | Quote
"... Groups also attack targets of convenience. These people are selected because they are convenient targets, and not for any other reason. These include loners who tend to be more vulnerable to their harassment tactics than those with family and friends around them. Targets of convenience are used for practice."
Their M.O. is :
1.Identify
2 Villify
3 Nullify
4 Destroy
"The leaders ... are starting to balk at exposing their members to arrest for activities which amount to little gain for the movement. THEY SAY THAT ANYONE WHO IS A TARGET SHOULD BE KILLED, and not just harassed for years."/b>"
Harry
November 30th, 2009 at 03:48 | #22
Reply | Quote
"Cyber-Stalking is a related group of harassing behavior occurring via
internet/online. Cyber-Stalking includes, but is not limited to;
Computer Hacking, "Trolling", Spamming (Often including "Porn
Deluges"), Verbal Assaults, Character Assassination, and
Impersonations of the victim."
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
The most common response people have to this troll is to sincerely think he is a very confused man, obsessed with weird things like priests who molest children, satanic cults, monks who make porn, etc. You think he's just got weird obsessions and ignore him. People like Monique have suggested that maybe he was abused by a priest and contributing these long posts about molester priests because of his own unresolved issues.
I thought something like that myself until I saw a post similar to Frank. The irony in all of this is that the reaction of thinking this guy is a freak who just has weird obsessions was my initial reaction to Frank! Hell, I pitied him until he started showing aberrant behavior. Absolutely none of what Frank concerns himself with is a real obsession from what I know. Frank instead is picking and choosing ideas to bring up to cultivate confusion in a way he sees fit.

In the following section, there is a statement made by Jake. Jake seems bothered by some points which other people are bringing up. I don't have in front of me the entire dialogue here. I don't know what was said about Walmart. All I know is that this is bothering the troll.
I find it intriguing to see that Walmart, in particular is part of someone's theory. I find it even stranger that "Jake" seems distressed at the mention of it. The reason why is that Frank told me he bought a watch at Walmart.
He had some weird sort of pathological reverence for the watch. In his book he uses the watch as a metaphor for a female which he controls and dominates sexually. Normal people don't associate watches with sex. Nor do normal people objectify the imagined female, the watch represents.
I also get the impression that there is some sort of hidden meaning beyond this in the watch. Again, I have no idea how Walmart factors into the equation. I will start with what I do know. Frank likes Walmart. Frank likes globalization. He rubbed this in my face years ago when he was moving in to make me a slave.
The only logical reason which I can think of for him liking globalization and Walmart stems back to human trafficking. Human traffickers transport victims over national boundaries in the American continent. I know that the truck company his cousin works for has permission to transport goods to Mexico and Canada. This truck company is in the south, which is where Frank said he went back and forth from during his trucking job.
His cousin is reasonably high up in the company. Frank is a manipulative person. I haven't seen it personally but I have a hunch that he uses money to bribe people to do work for him. To explain my line of reasoning, I will have to go back to the book about Cabrini Green by Sudhir Venkatesh.
The only reason I read this book is because Frank mentions Cabrini Green in his book. The gist of Venkatesh's book, is that when he was a sociology student, Venkatesh is sent by his professor to go collect information about the poor in public housing in Chicago.
What happens next is that when Venkatesh brings his survey form to Cabrini Green he catches the attention of some gang members patrolling a hallway in the Cabrini Green projects

The case of Dan Zamlen
In this part I will look more closely at the case of Dan Zamlen. I mentioned it before, but I will focus on details in this section.

I was living in St. Paul in 2011. I just had fled with great fervor from Frank Marzitelli. I still had problems with other people although I avoided with great care any location I knew Frank might happen to be at. I was getting harassed by a number of people all the same, most all of it was sexual harassment.

Like for example, once I relocated to the suburbs, someone drew a penis on my windshield of my car with soap, and wrote "bitch" in gangsta script.

I had concerns for my safety, naturally, so when it was evident I was in danger I began to make a concerted effort to understand crime in the Twin Cities area in Minnesota.

It so happened that I found someone using words I had heard Frank use in a forum which addresses a series of likely murders of successful, bright, attractive college males who tend to resemble one another. The role Frank seemed to be playing in this forum dedicated to solving murders was that of someone who endeavored to create confusion on the issue of whether these drownings were murders or accidents, and confusion about who was helpful and legitimate on the forum.

The section of the discussion about these drowning murders I first read about involved the drowning death of a St. Paul college student named Dan Zamlen. Dan attended a party at someone's house in St. Paul. The online discussion said the last phone call Dan made was to a friend at around 2:30 am.

Dan said he was walking near River Road in St. Paul. That was the last anyone heard from him. Scent dogs were used once Dan was found missing. Dan was missing for over a week. Later his body was found in the water near the Ford plant's hydroelectric dam.

Dan's parents said that they didn't think their son was suicidal. His parents weren't sure what happened but were very suspicious. They didn't trust the statements some of the witnesses to Dan's last night at that party made to police. They felt those people knew more than they were telling.

His parents were skeptical Dan would be stupid enough to walk down to the Mississippi River on a night when it was cold and snowing and then accidentally fall in. Unable to get any sort of justice or serious inquiry into the matter from St. Paul police, his parents focused on how at this party for mostly 18 and 19 year olds like Dan, how the parents of the kid hosting the party allowed liquor to be served.

Other facts worth noting about Dan Zamlen's case is that he and other people thought that the
liquor being served at the party tasted funny. Dan's parents also doubted Dan was as drunk as what his so-called friends at the party claimed. Dan happened to have a crush on a girl there who made contradictory, and likely false statements to police. This is one point where his family is cynical that the whole story as to Dan's disappearance and drowning is either false or missing pieces.

Dan's parents were also very disappointed in how the local coroner in St. Paul didn't conduct a full array of tests on Dan, including a proper assessment of his blood alcohol level and for GHB, a date rape drug.

Dan's body was in the water for days and apparently, this can skew results for both these tests. His parents were so disappointed with the lack of effort by the local coroner, they asked a coroner in Duluth, Minnesota to perform his own tests on Dan, which he did. Two attendee's at the party Dan said the beer in the keg tasted funny and that they became sick and vomited after drinking it.

GHB occurs naturally in the body. It either increases or decreases when a body decomposes. Dan was in the water for over a week. Blood alcohol level also increases with decomposition, making it hard to determine exactly how much Dan actually drank his last night alive.

Human traffickers use date rape drug. It probably was used on me. I drank tea from a pitcher which tasted funny, and I felt dizzy. Another girl where I was came over dizzy the same time I did and drank from the same thing.

Frank when he found me at an apartment I rented in Minneapolis, had other members of his human trafficking ring threaten me and harass me there. During that time, one of those people, a skinhead named Jamison from Detroit, bragged about using date rape drug.

I think that human traffickers not only use this drug to force compliance in prostitution, but in the cases of a few of Frank's friends, those people may have been also getting high off one date rape drug called ketamine.

Ketamine is not only a date rape drug, but is abused on the street because it generates a "high." Essentially, the majority of the people I saw involved in the human trafficking entailed poor street people who had drug problems and other substance abuse issues. It makes sense, because addicted people are emotionally numb and therefore able to hurt people with more ease than the general public.

Regardless of how they used date rape drugs for recreation, the only thing I am certain of is that Frank's human trafficking ring used it on people they wanted to exploit. Using the proverb, "where there's smoke, there's fire," undoubtedly those people could use it for other reasons beyond trafficking sex slaves.

I was online looking for graffiti pictures, but as I looked for one image on a drowning murder blog, I wound up reading about Dan Zamlen. I was intrigued by it most of all because I went with Frank right past the locations where Dan was thought to be the night he disappeared and where he went into the water.

Frank had this obsessive thing going about hanging out along the river. Naturally, I was all ears when it came to any story regarding possible murder where Frank ironically hung out. I joked that Dan must have sounded scared his last night alive because he had just seen Frank.

On a more serious note, I think I really was suspicious there was a connection between that incident with Dan Zamlen and the criminal misfits who hung out at the Dorothy Day center. Other facts that caught my notice about details of the case. One such fact included how a smiley face had been spray-painted along the Mississippi where Dan likely was placed in the water, and how the word "boo" was spray painted all over the area where Dan vanished made me think a street gang had a role in Dan's disappearance and murder. The hunch was right.

So, I am engrossed in reading this discussion online. Except that one day near the end of October 2011, I stumbled up something in that same discussion which nearly knocked me out of my chair. I will describe this in the next section.

Frank Marzitelli and the Smiley Face Killer Blog "Troll" Share the Same Unique, Bizarre Interests

One day when I was standing in line at the Dorothy Day Center for lunch, Frank came up to me in line and started talking to me. He was talking about what seemed like nonsense . He was trying to insist that the mural at the Dorothy Day Center in the main area on the first floor, near the ceiling, had sexual innuendo in it.

As it appears, the mural, is an image with homeless people sitting on benches and whatnot, with a figure of Jesus in the center. Yet, the the various images in the mural were interpreted by Frank to have hidden sexual innuendo in it. For example, he said that a picture where two people are laughing, and one person is bent forward, while laughing, depicts oral sex.

Mostly, I ignored what he said, and the only conclusion I drew is that he was screwed up. Apparently he thought me and everyone in the lunch line needed to hear this. I failed to see the point of why he felt the need to tell us about this. In yet another seeming coincidence the troll on Kristi Piehl's blog, using the name "Bradley 2.0" in a post made on May 7th, 2009, said:

"This is interesting (referring to a link), its about Catholic art showing and promoting sexual perversity. < http://www.rapeofthesoul.com/chair.html>.

I think the point the troll "Bradley 2.0" is trying to drive home with this is that priests and or monks are the Smiley Faced Killers.
Other people on the blog get very tired of this troll and his unrelenting attempts to make people believe priests are the killers. He posts under other names posing the same idea; some of those names include, "anonymous coward, AC, Boy in the Machine, Jo Jo potatoes and more. You can tell by writing style and by the insistence on certain ideas like killer priests that these are all different names used by the same person.

So, what Bradley 2.0 says this in post #10 and #12 about the satanic art monk is the effort by the troll to promote ideas which in all seriousness are just red herrings. I think when Bradley 2.0 tells us about the satanic porn monk, what he's attempting to do is divert people into chasing really stupid dead end ideas. Again, the troll has eagerness to point people in the wrong direction. Worse, when he starts prattling about serial killer priests, Satanists and the like, it makes the issue of these bizarre drowning deaths seem to be just a conspiracy theory. There actually is good data supporting the idea these are murders, but if you go to a blog like this and see ideas about killer priests and Satanists, it makes the issue of the all the drowning deaths of young men seem like a conspiracy theory and little else.

He says on page 9 of the comments section: link: http://sfkillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=9

bradley2.0
May 7th, 2009 at 18:37 | #12
Reply | Quote
"- The Shocking Embed Art of "Satanic Porn Monk" Br. Steve Erspamer
"Working with the Oregon Catholic Press as well as on his own, Br. Steve Erspamer, a former Marianist Brother, has been supplying the world with numerous deformed and blasphemous satanic and sexual religious artworks for many years.
"In this chapter, many of Erspamer's devastating artworks outside of the Oregon Catholic Press are deciphered in plain sight by use of motion graphic extractions. These shocking images were distributed throughout the world, appearing in liturgical materials and church bulletins. The Result: "Satanic Porn Monk" Steve Erspamer was shuffled out of the Marianist Order in St. Louis, and into St. Meinrad's Benedictine Monastery of Indiana, on temporary probation.
"In typical assailant fashion, he not only changed location & religious order, but Erspamer also altered his physical appearance, and even changed his name to an alias, "Martin" Erspamer.
"He continues to be the "Go to Guy" for embed art of the Conciliar Church's satanic pornography machine, adding to his hundreds of works of blasphemy, sex and horror, while the Church makes no effort to expel Erspamer, but instead protects him, his works, and the highly sensitive information that he knows.
http://www.rapeofthesoul.com/chapters.html"

I also think Bradley 2.0 is Frank because of what he says in his book which is a near exact match to information Bradley 2.0 shares with us:

"The work is huge and colorful (yellow), dominating an entire room and its occupants, dwarfing the mural size portrait of modest Ms. Dorothy Day herself; disdained, located on the other side of the room, thus removed. Depicted in the middle of the mural mirroring the facility, painted gold from head to toe like the Golden Calf of Aaron described in The Bible (in the position of most prominence in the piece), is an African-American man with greater stature then Jesus the son of God himself (also depicted in the work). The African-American male staring at Christ appears to be affording a condescending smile toward "Jesus," when factoring in what is going on in the rest of the work. Jesus, (placed outside of the work in the lower front shadows, as if in front of a projector screen displaying the mural behind him) appears exiting the ordeal in disgust toward the right, displeased in demeanor. In front of Jesus in the back-round staring at him, is what appears to be a Mexican-American or Asian-American man smoking a cigarette, while urinating in front of or on the feet of Christ. In the area toward the left of the work, is a cross gender Caucasian male walking with a Caucasian happy hippie type, who is flashing what appears to be the peace sign with his hand or hands, to the near right of (what vaguely appears to be) a male and female couple necking. To the lower left of the cross gender Caucasian male and the happy hippie type, larger in proportion by comparison, thus appearing closer to the viewer is another African-American male, only he is wearing an apron, walking toward the viewer with a staff radio outside of the apron in the area of his crotch. From a distance---in this area of his crotch---the staff radio forms a square hole in the apron, where viewed is this gentleman's genitalia exposed, with highlights included (to more accurately define the shape of his penis for the public to see).

"When someone enters the establishment from the front doors of the atrium area, this image is viewed directly in front of them from across the room as if on a painted stage, with the viewer's eyes placed at crotch level--- factoring in distance. To the right of the center of the work on the "Let Peace Reign On Earth" post, viewed are two people having sex with their clothes on in an alley fashion, with the female appearing Latino or African-American and the male appearing either as the African-American male with the staff radio or any other hippie type. The hair is the giveaway here. It has a curly Rick James like characteristic.

"Viewing the illicit activity taking place on the "Let Peace Reign on Earth" post is a group of haggardly Caucasian females sitting on a bench (waiting to participate) forming a line, with an older female at the very end of the bench wearing an American flag draped across her shoulders grinning strangely like the rest of them, suggesting more is implied other then the obvious; she appears to be masturbating or to have just masturbated with a stick she keeps close between her legs. To the right of this sex-train scene in the corner of the work, is an attractive Caucasian female staff member in appearance, giving an inviting look and pointing in the opposite direction, as a way of condoning the activity; providing privacy, yet inviting the viewer into it. The overall appearance of most of the people in the work is that of drunk, high, or drug addicts.

"How long has something this obscene been placed on the wall at The Dorothy Day Center of Saint Paul Minnesota; a state's capitol? Considering the snide, confident, condescending demeanor displayed by the average African-American male directed toward the public at The Dorothy Day Center and other establishments openly acknowledging daily their institutionalized worshipped status as among the funding cow elite of Aaron's Golden Calf Club, probably for quite some time. Some of their highly vocalized cries of peril expressed when they don't get what they want acknowledge this. Affirmative acclamations of "We are royalty!" "We are kings!" "We are kings of kings!" "We are gold!" "We are golden!" suggesting, "We set the rules or hold the standard; the gold standard," "We are D.D.C." The mural has been on the wall since 2001. A little shocking? From an artistic perspective it does an excellent job of illustrating something noticed that is very real to life in a particular environment. From this standpoint it is phenomenal artwork. The question is does the location where it is displayed publicly suggest appropriate use? If so, what purpose is... "

Bradley 2.0 posting the same weird stuff over and over annoys other people on Piehl's blog. Monique777 says in post #15,

"Brad, please! Not all Catholics are perverted and promote perversion. Not all Catholic priests have molested children. Why do you focus on so much on the Catholics? Aside from the Abbey (where scent dogs found one victim's scent at an abbey in Collegeville, MN), and the Christian necklaces (which were found missing from some SFK victims), why is your mind caught in this rut? We all know there is some bad stuff that used to go on and maybe still is, but how is that relevant information? You made your point but (you) keep restating it over and over. Why?"

Bradley ignores Monique777 and then makes two more posts about this monk in posts 21, and 23.

Who is "Bradley 2.0?"

Frank Marzitelli is a troll on Kristi's blog who uses different "sock puppets" to harass, waste time of or misinform people. What the term "sockpuppet" means is that he writes under a series of made up names supposedly belonging to different people. People usually create sockpuppets only when they are engaged in nefarious activity online and most forums immediately ban people who use sockpuppets. The troll in Kristi Piehl's forum uses sock puppets frequently.
The name "Bradley 2.0" at first sounded to me like someone referring to computer software and the name Bradley. I thought the name was just someone trying to be stupid until I looked up the name in an effort to learn if other forums are out there that got trolled.
I find that Bradley 2.0 happens to be the name of a tank used by the U.S. Army, the M-2 Bradley:
Link: < http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/Bradley-2-0-10-21-2009.asp>
"Bradley 2.0"
by James Dunnigan
October 21, 2009
"The U.S. Army plans to keep its M-2 (Bradley) IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) for another twenty years. To do that, it wants to upgrade thousands of them to "Block II" status. There are already 600 "Block 1.5" (BUSK) upgrades. These are the M-2s modified for urban warfare, based on Iraq experience.
The M-2 BUSK (Bradley Urban Survival Kit) upgrades were applied in two batches over the last few years (the program ended in 2008). The first included a more powerful (at 3 million candlepower, four times brighter) spotlight."
The use of this name by the troll is further confirmation that the troll is likely Frank Marzitelli. Frank, as his book shows, is really into tanks. He was in the Army during the 1980's and served in Germany according to the resume of his that he forgot he left with me. It said he drove tanks in the Army.
I'm sure for a white supremacist, joining the military and serving in Germany fits him.
He says in his book that he rode an M1 Abrams tank. Considering the Bradley 2.0 is Army equipment, which dates back to the 1980's—when Frank was serving in the army—my doubts about his role in the Smiley murders diminish almost completely. This is information posted on Wikipedia about the tank:
"Since entering service with the U.S. Army in 1981, a total of 4,641 M2s have been produced."
Frank says in his book:
"What has just happened, is all this negative E.M.P generated around a single issue that doesn't involve our jobs hamster, has just taken away his nest of earned veteran benefits acquired from years of service protecting the constitutional rights of everyone (including these factions), as if our jobs hamster somehow ran himself over with his own M1 Abrams Army Tank back in Germany years ago, without knowing it." mmar

The Bradley 2.0 tank was apparently in use during the same time period that Frank was likely in the army which was during the 1980s.
It is at least clear that the person posting as Bradley 2.0 was in the U.S. Army and tank driver familiar with both M2 Bradley's and M1 Abrams tanks. Frank is familiar with the latter.

Examining the murder case of Jelani Brinson as a Hate crime

These are just some of a long list of reasons that clearly, there is more to all of this than people dying from "unfortunate accidents." There is a killer, maybe even a couple killers. Tragically, it has taken the friends and family to press for justice for their deceased children. This pressure has been successful in some cases. One such case that was finally ruled a homicide involved a person in the Minneapolis area named Jelani Brinson.

Jelani was black. Jelani Brinson was married to a white woman and just had young daughter by her. Jelani loved his daughter and his wife. He was Christian, and worked in a cell phone store. Then one night Jelani left a friend's house at around 10 pm and was never heard from again. Jelani disappeared around the night of April 21st. A few days later he was found dead in a golf course pond. To this day his cause of death has yet to be determined.

Jelani was did not drink anything the night he disappeared. He just left a house for no apparent reason. He was found in a pond on a golf course a few miles away. He did not have his shoes on when he was recovered from the pond. His shoes were found strewn in different places in the neighborhood. To this day his killers have not been caught.

Many people on one blog thought Jelani might be victim of a hate crime. Part of this had to do with how he disappeared around the time of Hitler's Birthday which is on April 20th.

When I was reading about Jelani's case I discovered the following comment, which leads me to think that Jelani's death is indeed a hate crime and that Frank Marzitelli either knew the killers or participated directly in his murder.

Frank says in his book:

"He is told in a competition that he knows nothing however about to be forced into, "since you have one drop of black blood in you... that makes you black... if anything is afforded you.. that's how it gets done in the black community, here , not in front of news cameras as something else. He thinks about it for a moment (pauses pensively) and asks with a smirk of humor meant to be playfully sarcastic--- to help ease the awkwardness created by what has just unfolded--- (which was ill taken in retrospect) 'Does that also mean, that I'm like... one third animal?"

"FRENEMIES" says:

"That is correct, Matt Aradondo. He is ¼ black and ¾ white, so in societies eyes he is black. He is 25 and I get real bad vibes from the guy while viewing his Facebook and MySpace pages. Seems to have had a troubled life already, at 25. I hope the investigators pulled his and Ermin's (Matt's friend) call records that night to see if they in fact called Jelani's phone after he went missing. If they didn't call his phone, he didn't disappear. Point blank. As far as the distance from the house to the shoes to the golf course, to the bar, it is all in a straight line if you travel by the railroad tracks."

Clearly Frank doesn't think highly of black people. A racist such as him is prone to detest interracial couples. Frank showed me various places around town, usually sites which mattered to him and not normal people. I had no interest in seeing sites related to St. Paul history. Still it was an excuse for me to get out of the shelter and survey the area. Sitting passively around Tim and Thomas Cloud was not high on my list of things I enjoy. It required too much thought to watch my back at the shelter continuously. I wanted to get out in the world of normal people more than anything. It was hard because I was ashamed for staying at a shelter. This made me more afraid to socialize. You fear getting dismissed over this. I made a real stupid mistake by compromising and hanging out with Frank, a shelter person who couldn't judge me being in the same boat.

In this fashion of dragging me to places that bored me to tears, Frank shows me an apartment complex which he said housed immigrants from Somalia. He said it was a testimony to the success of keeping people of a certain ethnicity and religion separate from the community. He claimed they had more freedom to practice their religion (Islam) in that building. To me, it sounds like whitewashing what was essentially a racist idea.

To a racist like Frank, Jelani Brinson's planned marriage to a white woman and mixed raced child by her would be something taboo. Maybe Frank was more focused on the mixed race child. Frank is mixed race and is tore up about that. Maybe his parents were mean to him, so he's taking out rage about his origins out on other innocent people. I'd love to know what his family history is. There has to be much there to explain Frank's behavior. Maybe Frank saw his own parents in Jelani. His mom was half black and his dad was white. Surely there's something to this idea.

Frank's "Trolling" has Parallels to Manipulations Used by Human Traffickers
Whatever the topic at hand, a seeming troll using various fake online personae had his two cents to share on it. Also, when people working to solve these cases had an epiphany or break-through about how a particular college student was killed, this, troll would show up to discredit both the idea and the person who presented it.

I, personally had already had familiarity with the methods used to cause confusion in this forum from these methods or tactics being used on me by Frank Marzitelli.

Normally it is hard to enslave people in the 21st century if it not were for the manipulative games human traffickers use to break down victims and escape capture by the police. In fact, it would indeed make it hard for human traffickers if more people were aware of the methodology they use to ply their dark trade.

It was actually liberating to see Frank doing these manipulative games in the context of the forums on drowning deaths, because before this I was getting nowhere in staying safe from Frank because all those manipulative games he was playing were very, very successful in making sure he got away with exploiting women and his attempting to exploit me.

He never got me out onto the streets as a sexual slave, but he sure tried. After I got out of the shelter and out of St. Paul, I was still dealing harassment from people however and it was sexual harassment and I was getting depressed and listless over it. I felt I had no defense against those people. Justice was nowhere to be found. Those people were so good at getting away with their behavior and getting others either too afraid or too deceived to be any help. I didn't have any defense to these sort of actions. At this point it really was my word against his and I was not winning this war. I was failing. I was miserable. I felt defeated. Then I caught him attempting to manipulate people in the forums smiley killer forums, in the exact same way he manipulated people who should have helped me.

Seeing Frank's form of warfare unfold online, in print, in front of other people, most of whom were suspicious of him was a turning point for me. For the first time, I could demonstrate what games he played and how he played them. I could also see him relate to other people. It really wasn't far off from what I had already experienced myself. He would mercilessly attack and try to discredit the people who were smart enough to figure him out. If someone refused to buy his deception, he would have a meltdown, in print. He did the same thing in real life.

I could see the pattern, finally. When it was in print, it was much easier to look at and study. I also no longer felt alone in being railroaded by his games and his attacks. Other people were also suffering at his hands. Maybe those people were suffering from his games as much as or more than I was at the time. Frank is online in the forum delivering "veiled threats" to the family members of kids who had been murdered. I'm sure after losing a child and getting practically no justice for it hurts unimaginably. Then imagine what it must be like for those people to find some little devious mouthpiece online doing all he can to smear your child's name and misrepresent the circumstances in his life.

Frank in his online persona is constantly accusing victims of the smiley drowning murders of being suicidal when they weren't. He is also accusing good people like Jelani Brinson of abusing drugs. He posts what should be victim Brian Shaffer's personal diary online and cutting that smiley drowing murder victim to shred with what was in that diary.

Frank mercilessly tears apart anyone who stands in the way of his agenda. There is nothing to rotten for him to do. He has no regard for other human beings. He mocks people in their tragedy. He mocked the family members of victims, the victims.

He accuses one smiley drowning murder victim of being gay. Then the victims parents post a reply to his post stating they knew full well their son wasn't gay, saying their son was very visibly in love with a woman.

Haven't all these people been through enough? It isn't easy to lose a loved one, let alone your own child. These college students had their whole life ahead of them. They had already worked hard and had done so much. Then they get killed right when they should be out launching themselves into the adventure of their lives.

Since when does some 52 year old, balding, hideous looking serial killer and his agenda matter more than the lives of people who actually stood to contribute something to humanity, probably more than other people their own age. Again, it the best and the brightest who these killers go after. I always think that it is a tragedy to waste human life through murder.

The person may just be a face on the news but you don't know if that person could have come up with the cure to cancer. Murder exemplifies wasting human potential. The only good news is that such destructiveness invariably goes full circle and harms the perpetrators eventually. You never know who is going to help you in the future or who's contributions will benefit you. If a person is dead they can never help anyone. The problem seems to be that people who do harm to others are never far sighted. People of that mindset require immediate gratification and don't think far into the future.

One look at Frank or his book will show you he has never delayed gratification a day in his life.

The Troll is Persistent
If you comments in smiley drowning murder blogs, you will see Frank posting all these things with almost an obsessive persistence. Zorro's Pal once said that he checked the time stamps on all of Anonymous Coward's (a troll name Frank used) posts and he figured that Anonymous coward was online almost all his waking hours, 7 days a week. That isn't just someone interested in giving their 2 cents on a topic, that is someone with an agenda.

Until then, I had encountered novel strategies he used to discredit me and others. He'd email a threat and then accuse me of a crime so that if I told police that he was making death threats, the police would not get him in trouble, as they would be too busy doubting and scrutinizing me.

I sent the threats to the police to no avail. Then it was as if he proved he was virtually unstoppable. He really seems to enjoy the power play of terrorizing people and giving them no hope.

It was terrifying.

People on Kristi Piehl's Blog have had Good Reason to Think the Person Disrupting the Blog is actually the Killer
Many people on various SFK blogs, including the blog ran by journalist Kristi Piehl, entitled, "The Drowning Mystery," suspect that is a SFK killer is not only reading the blogs, but it behind the trolling disruption occurring there as well. A person on the blog using the name "Zorro's Pal" in a post on July 13th, 2009, expresses his concerns about the troll:

Zorro's Pal : "To Nick, Stephanie: Please be very careful posting on this blog. I believe that there are a few very dangerous people on this blog. I actually believe that there is a killer on this blog who is asking lots of questions now about the arrangement of the clothing, any signs of a struggle, and wanting to know precisely what you saw. Be so careful. This poster now knows where you all work or at least the close proximity of it.
A person may seem "concerned" until you see what else they have posted here and elsewhere and how they really are, and how this person begins to harass and manipulate others — not just on this blog but elsewhere, too. Three words: caution, caution, caution. This is the way that killers like to enmesh themselves into the search or investigation - a way of reliving the act, feeling important, having others repeat details back to him — getting off on the drama and the reminiscing of it all. This is very common serial killer behavior and I believe we are witnessing it and participating in it with this poster on this site."

Soon after Zorro's Pal warns the newcomers to the blog to be careful about what they share, the troll using the name "Jake" this time attempts to undermine Zorro's Pal caveat to viewers of the blog:
Jake: "Notice how ZorrosPal is actually trying to scare Nick & Stephanie (& anyone else) from posting on the blog, suggesting that the killer will be able to track them to their neighborhoods.
Also notice how ZP is trying to suggest that someone other than him is the killer. He figures if he can say it first, then it will muddy the waters more so, if & when somebody else subsequently says it about him — that he is the killer, or is covering for the killer. Notice how ZP tries to discredit what Nick saw, by suggesting that 50-75 yards away is just simply too far to see anything clearly. What garbage that is! That's not far at all."

The thing that intrigues me the most is that I've experienced the sort of manipulation "Jake" is engaging in first hand with Frank and his friends. I've noticed how Frank manipulates people away from helping his victims. Frank uses a strategy based in accusing people of scary things to confuse people who aren't wise enough to know which party is being honest. In this context, he's targeting newer users on the blog specifically, knowing these users will lack the information to ascertain who is lying. Scary accusations seem to be part of his regular strategy to get me isolated from outside help so he could make me a slave and get away with it.

It is one thing for me to claim he has done this to me, but in his troll persona, he directly describes this technique outright:

"Jake" says, "He figures if he can say it first, then it will muddy the waters more,"

Ironically, the troll here seems to be giving a perfect description in his own words, of "anchoring bias" and how this crowd manipulates people based upon anchoring. "Jake's" using a lot of material here, accusing Zorro's Pal of using anchoring bias, when it is Jake using anchoring bias to push his fake ideas.

Of course, I had to learn about how these people misuse anchoring bias to isolate victims and hinder truth, the hard way, first hand. I hadn't even heard the term at the time, and after repeated failures to get help when I was in immediate serious danger, I eventually figured what these people were doing. Especially when one of those people actually resorted to running to an office so they could tell their version of the story first.

Frank Misleading People about Smiley Cases by Providing Red Herrings
I think what Frank and his friends are doing by eagerly accusing other people to create patsies for their crimes. What they are doing is actively "muddying" the issue to assure they don't get caught. When you go back and look at what "FRENEMIES' said, you see that the person trolling the blog has the objective of "muddying" the heck out of the issue of the murder of Jelani Brinson. Give that Jelani's case was one of two cases in Minneapolis which were re-ruled homicides, the discussion of his case on Piehl's blog is very important. "FRENEMIES" says" (link: http://smiley killerillers.com/?attachment_id=521&cpage=1 )

"That is correct, Matt Aradondo. He is ¼ black and ¾ white, so in societies eyes he is black. He is 25 and I get real bad vibes from the guy while viewing his Facebook and MySpace pages. Seems to have had a troubled life already, at 25. I hope the investigators pulled his and Ermin's (Matt's friend) call records that night to see if they in fact called Jelani's phone after he went missing. If they didn't call his phone, he didn't disappear. Point blank. As far as the distance from the house to the shoes to the golf course, to the bar, it is all in a straight line if you travel by the railroad tracks."

The troll spends his time interfering with people who spend time online figuring out who is making young men wind up dead in rivers. This troll employs certain tactics to do this. The troll feels the need to accuse other people of using specific manipulative games which the troll himself uses regularly. If you haven't read enough of the discussion online, you might miss the fact the troll is lying.

Yet, if you have read most of the discussion, (usually the one on sfkillers.com) you know the troll is lying. I wasn't the only person to notice it. Worse, the troll ultimately fails by describing the exact means he uses to misinform people and disrupt dedicated efforts to solving the crime. The troll is only as successful in cases where people are either too stupid or too uneducated about the problem of drowning murders.

This troll does exactly what Frank did to me in real life. The people who end up helping him usually are either lacking in knowledge or who are gullible. Frank even disparages them, calling them, "useful idiots." Another midwest Nnazi skinhead, Wade Michael Page, used that term, "useful idiots." He wrote a song about them. Since the massacre of Sikh's at their temple by Page happened the month Frank happened to learn I found out he was involved in smiley killings, I began to wonder if it was possible those two knew each other.

Let's face it, Chicago is only an hour from Milwaukee. Both Frank and Wade Michael Page are apparently lacking in intelligence in some areas. Page mistook Sikhs for Muslims. Sure, Frank manipulates and plays people well, but beyond this he is an underachiever. His troll persona doesn't even spell half his words right. This makes it really easy to identify the troll's writing style and ferret out his deception. He uses maybe 20 different names there because he kept getting exposed for trolling under each name. The trolls almost always get caught and outed in the discussion. However, the troll always reappears using a different name to conduct the exact same activity.

Maybe he thinks persistence pays. Still, the bottom line is that even Frank at his most anonymous, while he is online, has limitations. Again, informed people can't be deceived so easily; it means there is hope to end human trafficking by outing what strategies perpetrators use to control victims.

As scary as it was for me, I am not in this only because my survival is on the line. Even if Frank forgot about me and I was free to move about like a normal person with no fear, knowing other people could get as bad or worse by him affects me even deeper. He must be stopped. It is not okay to keep women as slaves for rape. It is not okay to take human life.

You see too that the trolls on Kristi Piehl's blog just don't accuse other people on the blogs who are legitimate of doing exactly what they do. Eventually, it becomes clear that what is happening is a persistent effort to disrupt and mislead people. The reason why is pretty obvious on the face of it: the killers are disrupting the discussion to ensure that they don't get caught.
Other Names the Troll Uses When He posts on the Blog
I still have more of Frank's sock puppet names to lookup online. I just learned "jo jo potatoes" is a actually the name for a potato recipe, for example. I
The troll uses names from 1980's TV shows like "Cagney" or "Lacy" frequently. I think the use of 1980's TV shows for sock puppet names indicate the troll is old. Most people don't remember that stuff and I was a kid then so I recognize that method the troll uses to generate names.
I think the troll's sockpuppet name "boy in the machine" is based not so much on self-pity but has to do with maybe a boy getting stuck in a washing machine. I found too many hits on Google, which discuss a recent case of a boy getting stuck in a running washing machine, and surviving, yet I can't find any stories which date at the time Frank posted on the blog in 2009. I think it could be this and not Franks self pity, although it fits Frank and his feelings about society. In the book he wrote, he is a hamster in a cage and on a wheel because he's working poor. I do know the troll by using revolting names or names which have to do with water like "Brooke," and "Trout."
Honestly I think the names he chooses are designed to serve the purpose sickly taunting people working to solve SFK crimes. A prime example of the troll being outright sick and disrespectful is when he used the sockpuppet with the name "fleeandseembony." Zorro's Pal just had suggested that the killer maybe commits the crime and then actually comes back to observe the searches that ensue when an SFK victim initially turns up missing and to watch the recovery of the body from the water.
Zorro's Pal really gets the troll angry when he says that the troll's many posts about sexually abusive priests being the murderers were posted because the troll gets titillated by repeatedly posting that information. The troll then tries to twist the accusation made by Zorro's Pal, saying that because Zorro's Pal 's use of the word sex and his description of the troll getting titillated by his own posts is breaking the rules by posting sexually explicit information. Never mind the troll has been the one obsessed with sex in his posts, and has used far more inflammatory words like "penis" back when he's sharing us information on the monk who makes artwork with hidden explicit sexual images.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
Here's Zorro's Pal's response to the annoying troll, using the sock puppet 'anontreeshoe'" and Jake:
Zorro's Pal
June 29th, 2009 at 13:40 | #39
Reply | Quote
@jake
"Jake, I think it is possible. However, anonshoetree keeps posting the same thing over and over and under different names. We get it. The abbey is a place where priests are sent who have had sexual incidents. A dog might have smelled the scent of a victim there. We have heard it ten thousand times.
"But also, 90% of what anonshoetree writes is misplaced misinformation, and a lot of it is very hateful. Most of it is defamatory to a particular person and should not even be printed here.
"Once you have read these nearly identical postings a few dozen times, you realize this is a person who was probably assaulted by a Catholic priest, or IS a Catholic priest who does assaults, or is a person who gets his or her sexual enjoyment out of talking about assaults by Catholic priests. And actually, think it is the latter. I think this is a person that uses this as form of pornography — writing over and over these lurid, concocted tales of priests and monks attacking young acolytes. Just as with the man that flashes his privates on the bus, this is a person who gets no pleasure UNLESS we are forced to notice and acknowledge it. Anonshoetree wants us all to read and discuss this act over and over — this is Anonshoetree being aggressively pornographic and trying to force us to participate in his or her kink.
"Have you never heard of people that read True Crime magazines? These are magazines with pictures of women in bondage and then dead or mutilated. The readers gasp and act disturbed - but really, it is their form of titillation. It is the same with Anonshoetree — over and over "gasping" about strange rituals with the priests, etc. This is Anon's sexual obsession — and we are supposed to acomodate it. I can see it for what it is, find it boring and annoying and assaultive to the readership here.
From post #41 on page

*Note: Anontreeshoe is a really tasteless name. A few posts back, Monique777 said she found someone had nailed 2 muddy tennis shoes to a tree, about 12 feet up the ground, on the anniversary of an SFK victim's death (either Dan Zamlen or Joey Kaiser; either way it was a St. Paul victim. What scares me even more is Frank and his penchant for tree climbing. Seriously, when he took me to that Mound Park- that overlook park with the Indian burial mounds in it, Frank would climb one of two small trees there and sit there watch the world.

Now, this is an example of how Jake/Anontreeshoe try and twist Zorro's Pal's words in post 50 on page 100: :

jake
June 30th, 2009 at 13:58 | #50
Reply | Quote
I must say that ZorroPal's comments make me believe that he is the one who is obsessed with sex. Additionally, it is ZorroPal who is continually & regularly attacking anyone who posts a theory regarding priests/monks. He jumps all over such postings. Why is so interested in negating that particular theory??? He has his theory about the Hmong (I believe), & many people have disagreed with that theory, but the other posters have not attacked ZP in the vile way that he attacks or belittles anyone who posts a theory concerning priests. ZP has posted what essentially amounts to pornography. Perhaps he is the one who gets titilated by that scene. Frankly, I am bored, disgusted & quite suspicious of his attacks.

Zorro's Pal, Leisure, Tenneguy and Monique777 are some of the best thinkers on the blog. They are suspicious about what the troll is doing on the blog, and, most importantly, why he's doing it. They don't trust him and have said more than a few times that he likely the killer. Zorro's Pal has fun with the troll in this post on page 100, post #40:

Zorro's Pal
June 29th, 2009 at 13:44 | #40
Reply | Quote
clark :
Are any of the regulars here worried about someone finding out your identity? You all leave a lot of clues about yourselves in your posts.
Yes Clark, we are concerned. But we all carry concealed weapons and we will blow holes in you if you try anything. And we are meeting Wednesday night/ Thursday morning at midnight under the Hennepin Bridge or a discussion group on this topic. Be there or be square.

SFK Victims happen to have similar interests and backgrounds to Frank Marzitelli

I don't understand exactly why but it seems many of the Smiley Face Killer victims have things in common with Frank. Frank is bipolar and two SFK victims in the Twin Cities area were bipolar. One victim was Vincent "Buddy" Rogers in Minneapolis and the other was Joey Kaiser in St. Paul. Also, in the comments section for the "Contact Us", "Graffiti you Saw," and the Victims List on old versions of Kristi Piehl's blog http://sfkillers.com , which can be accessed at Internet Archive http://archive.org show someone describing the killer and this description matches Frank.

On this section of the comments, a person posting as "Dan in Detroit" boasting about how he thinks the killer is bipolar (Frank is), bisexual (Frank is) and many more traits which are indeed unique to Frank. "Dan in Detroit" also describes how the killer does sex acts with the victims, holds onto the bodies.

However, a connection between Frank and the Smiley Face Killer cases goes beyond things found in his book or the comments sections of various blogs and forums. The more I research this, the more I find tangible connections. Given the scope of the material I have to review, it may take a while to find more connections. What is obvious is that I'm finding connections between Frank and the killers at an alarming rate.

Here are the more simple and specious connections between Frank and the SFK cases. However, I'm finding much more concrete connections between Frank and the killings. I will start with the more simple, less specific connections. For example, one glance at the categories the Footprints the Rivers Edge website displays on it's left margin categories which pertain to what many SFK victims had in common.

For example, many of the SFK victims were in the military, like Frank; many have had bikes with them and Frank rides a bike; many of the victims were engineers or engineering majors as well as engineering specialists in the military; Frank is drawn to jobs which relate to engineering and was in the Army. Furthermore his brother was in an engineering unit in the 82nd Airborne division at Ft. Bragg.

"Eagle" is another common theme with SFK victims. Frank is obsessed with birds as you can see in his book. He also has an eagle tattoo on his shoulder.

For what its worth, there are lots of elements in many Smiley Face Murder cases which reference birds. SFK victims such as Jeff Geesey, Marlon Blue, Adam Falcon, Chris Olberding and Justin Hayduk had elements in their names indicating birds. Frank has many bird references in his book and goes on a very telling diatribe about ducks and decoys.

I will reiterate Frank's diatribe about decoys here:

"The productive never see it coming, while the leisurely have all the time in the world to execute, leaving the productive figuratively sitting on a cold, autumn placid lake in the middle of duck hunting season, like a live duck among decoys, (just waiting to be shot at) with the hunter eyeing the fall majestic scenery (slipping back and forth from moments of slumber) hoping to seize that moment. If one sits real still, maybe he or she will not be seen while peeking behind a small forest of floating decoys... placid, murky, cold employment pool, comprising Americans many lakes of uncertain death, harboring todays modern jobs market."

Here is the same text again with words and phrases pertaining to SFK killings in bold:

"The productive never see it coming, while the leisurely have all the time in the world to execute, leaving the productive figuratively sitting on a cold, autumn placid lake in the middle of duck hunting season, like a live duck among decoys, (just waiting to be shot at) with the hunter eyeing the fall majestic scenery (slipping back and forth from moments of slumber) hoping to seize that moment. If one sits real still, maybe he or she will not be seen while peeking behind a small forest of floating decoys... placid, murky, cold employment pool, comprising Americans many lakes of uncertain death, harboring todays modern jobs market."

What I see here is Frank expressing things that pertain to SFK murders by posing the article as if it pertained only to job hunting. I surmise the objectives Frank has in writing about his exploits is bragging, gloating and titillating himself. I also see how he hides his near admission of participating of human trafficking and maybe murder under a veneer of a very long article about jobs.

As I've said time and again, Frank isn't simply making analogies. Frank is bragging about his criminal exploits under the guise of analogies. Everything I've seen about human trafficking in his document demonstrates this to me. Just the same, I think it is not simply happenstance that he uses phrases pertinent to SFK murders in this book

Frank makes an analogy using water in other parts of his book, also:

"Sparking the class warfare that has blown our workforce---time and time--- clear off the level economically secure pond of global success, lost into that national turmoil forest of recession with one social class literally enslaving another.

Frank loves water analogies; he almost uses them as much as he does slavery and human trafficking terms. I know Frank is an asshole who thinks he can hide under some kind of ruse his own malevolent intent. No one just throws in legal terms pertaining to modern day slavery as a literary device. No one should even think of the terms unless there is some reason tying the words to human trafficking. I also know that any victim of human trafficking wouldn't use the terms describing their misery as some form of literary device. Such words trigger victims like me into remembering the violence.

Only a perpetrator would indulge in repeating human trafficking terminology over and over again; especially in a book that is supposed to be about the topic of job hunting.

I could also say there is no reason that someone who is writing about job hunting should use words repeatedly mentioning bodies of water, rotting corpses, or stalking people as a literary device. This makes no sense. I think there is something very, very wrong here.

I feel scared because Frank unfortunately has learned a few things like I've connected him to these killings and still pursues me, as if hurting or silencing me is going to save him. Especially considering the rumor's he was trying to spread about me being suicidal would set him up to drown me and have it appear as something other than homicide.

Personally, I'm sick of his crap, dumbfounded that people get suckered by him, and believe him, and that people don't care about the incomprehensible tragedy of so many not just innocent, but exceptional young men who've gone to their deaths from a bum, even be he a well connected one. There is no excuse. I've found people in the Twin Cities have an incredible lack of capacity to deal with this reality, but my goal is to forward this document to every police force in every area these tragedies have occurred in.

I was targeted for being easy prey as a new resident to this area. I will let his poor choice in victims and behavior come back on him in using the resources and culture of my own home to the end of solving these crimes. This is more than a serial killing; the numbers of victims would reframe this not so much as a serial killing as mass murder!

If this is mass murder, then it stands to reason, this is everyone's business and maybe elsewhere it will not be so easily ignored.

Another thing I'm gleaning from all this is that the killers may be targeting people who remind them of themselves. This means Frank is also targeting people like himself. I think the main reason this is happening might be from jealousy or a competitive streak in the killers. Or else, what is happening is that Frank is doing what many abuse victims do, which is projecting parts of themselves onto innocent people whom they make into scapegoats for their own inequities.

He is at any rate a psychopath and as I learned first hand, a very, very dangerous person.

Russell Plummer, an SFK victim who resided right over the Wisconsin border, a couple miles from St. Paul, MN, took a class in artillery/small arms repair while he was in the Army; so did Frank. Frank took the same course in small arms repair at a Labette Community College, according to his resume.

One victim named Russell Plummer was in the Army. Many SFK victims had military backgrounds, according to http://footprintsattheriversedge.blogspot.com. This website has a specific category for victims who were in the military or were wearing military type costumes the night of their disappearance.

Plummer was a recent graduate of army who specialized in artillery weapons repair, or small arms repair as it is also called. According to Frank's resume, he took a course on small arms repair around the time he was in the army at LaBette Community College.

There was evidence of Russell Plummer having been a victim of some kind of sexual assault:
It is worth mentioning this victim was found dead very close to the Twin Cities in a Bloomer, Wisconsin; with his pants around his knees and with some signs he had been in a struggle. The family of Russell Plummer was not satisfied with the Ramsey County medical examiner's report about their son and contest the idea his abrasions matched that of someone who just rolled down a hill.

Plummer's autopsy was performed by the Ramsey County Medical Examiner; Plummer was not tested for GHB or other date rape drugs by the medical examiner.

The Plummers know their son was an avid outdoorsman, strong and healthy and doubt a roll down a hill killed him. The authorities had no answers for why the key was in the ignition of his truck up the hill from where he died and how the battery got drained on the truck. The family of the victim also know Plummer traveled through this part of the forest frequently and was unlikely to make stupid mistakes about getting around there.

Frank has an Obsession with Birds and Birds are Part of the Smiley Face Killer Pattern
There were two SFK victims in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. White Bear Lake is a suburb of the Twin Cities. White Bear Lake is also a location that Frank has worked at according to his resume. Also, Frank has relatives in White Bear Lake. These relatives are John and Maria Marzitelli. John and Maria had a son Patrick who died mysteriously from inhaling jet fuel fumes while on the job. Maria Marzitelli is a respiratory specialist. The last anyone heard from deceased Patrick Marzitelli was in the form of two text messages. One said he had been sprayed with jet fuel, but he was all right. A St. Paul, MN SFK victim named Peter Aguilar, sent a text message out the night he was found dead to his girlfriend saying to meet him at the Wabasha Bridge over the Mississippi or else she would never see him again. Text messages can be written by anyone, for what its worth. A witness heard someone shouting for help in the river near the Robert Street bridge about the time Aguilar was last heard from.

Sorry to bombard you with facts, but these facts matter in a big way. The bar that one White Bear Lake victim Nathan Edberg disappeared from was called "Decoys Bar and Grill." There was another SFK victim in that small community of White Bear Lake named Nick Rossini. Rossini's home happened to be right near Decoys Bar and Grill. I really start to ponder the statement, "there are no coincidences" when I weigh these facts against the book Frank created. Frank has an entire paragraph devoted to the subject of decoys. In a strong predatory tone, but still casting himself as a victim rather than perpetrator, Frank says:

"We need to understand, wage affordability is far more possible for someone who is an exploiter rather than an employer, especially during financially difficult times. This flourishes a field of employment predation for survival on a commercial level, where job candidates become prime choice targets for national consumption; economic cannibalization. The productive never see it coming, while the leisurely have all the time in the world to execute, leaving the productive figuratively sitting on a cold autumn placid lake in the middle of duck hunting season, like a live duck among decoys (just waiting to be shot at), with the hunter eyeing the fall majestic scenery (slipping back and forth from brief moments of slumber) hoping to seize that moment.
If one sits real still, maybe he or she will not be seen while peeking behind a small forest of floating decoys, eyeing the situation with silent, anxious, wide eyed, terror ridden, incapacitated, anticipation. Sooner or later you have to eat and so does he. Is it possible to sneak away undetected? What can the productive do when so vicariously suspended among an evitable fate of floating decoys; the leisurely?

Sometimes it is good to do absolutely nothing at all but wait, but for how long? One could try and figure out what class he or she fits into, in effort to prepare for what could happen on that placid murky cold employment pool, comprising America's many lakes of uncertain death, harboring today's modern jobs market."

I don't know what Frank is getting at by decoys since his perspective is obscured behind him playing like he's society's victim, and the predatory tone which shows he more identifies with the hunter. Again, in his mind because he has to work a job, he's a victim or at least that is what he says. Maybe this book is an experiment to see if he can write about the predatory actions and feelings within him and come away with people feeling sorry for him as if he were the victim.

The last statement is utterly chilling if you know much about Smiley Face Killer victims. He says "Placid, murky cold employment pool" and what comes to mind is Jelani Brinson lying dead in a golf pond. "Lakes of uncertain death" remind me of all the victims which disappeared in lakes, especially the two White Bear Lake SFK victims. "Harboring" could just be an accidental choice in language or another way of titillating himself; Many SFK victims in Chicago, Seattle and Boston have been found in harbors.

Are all the facts I present here just coincidence? Can any coincidence be so exact? It seems the more I learn, the more the puzzle pieces fit together on this. The thing that concerns me is why is this happening. Surely, it is not possible for one person to have partaken in all these killings. The list of SFK victims was topping 300 people in 2009. I don't know the death toll is from this, but one thing is very clear—this is mass murder on an unprecedented scale. The authorities tend to write off all the deaths and disappearances associated with people who are likely SFK victims.
So is this Frank?
The presence Frank Marzitelli in forums and blog discussion forums was an unexpected discovery for me in October 2011. I had gotten away from him, and fled to a room rental in the suburbs of St. Paul, MN, when I was in a big hurry to flee that creep. I sold an expensive bike frame I brought with me as insurance financially if anything went wrong.

Well, everything went wrong. I sold it to afford a deposit on rental with two students. The problem for me was that whenever I went out on my bike to the urban part of St. Paul, or even near urban parts of the area, I was getting harassed. The main bulk of the harassment was sexual harassment. To my horror, just like with my friend Jennifer after she was sexually assaulted, justice seemed creepily out of reach.

I'm never a person to just roll over and let the worst happen. Maybe because I'm not from Minnesota, I'm used to injustice when it occurs and instead of panicking, I move to create a plan B. I didn't understand what human trafficking was then. I figured it was probably it. Yet, the shock and horror to learn this is a real modern day problem had to pass before I allow myself to consider that is what all this harassment was about.

There is nothing more terrifying to have many, many people harass you and get away with it. Yet, rather than get resigned, I was determined to get a way to overcome my adversaries.

I went to the library in South St. Paul/Inver Grove Heights where I lived. I initially thought this organization of harassment indicated a street gang was behind this harassment. My objective was to stay out of range of all these people. If justice was failing, as it seemed after Frank successfully lied to the police when I called them when he was harassing me, I needed to just stay the heck away from him and his cohorts.

I figured to do this I needed to identify what specific street gang he was a member of and where those people went. I stayed mindful and observant about what graffiti existed in areas where those people harassing me were active.

I found it distressing to notice gang graffiti was everywhere, including the suburbs. I know Frank was favoring the east side of St. Paul and showing blatant wariness when he traveled to the bike co-op on the near west side of St. Paul. He had a compass bike bell on his bike. He encouraged me to get one like it, probably so he could lie and claim my bicycle as his so he could deprive me of it and decrease my mobility.

I saw a weird "tag" on one of those east side bicycle trails that had a compass in it. I had already learned at this point that there was a dangerous gang called "The East Side Boys" in St. Paul. Also, having royally failed to heed intuition and wind up almost entrapped by Frank, I decided to trust my gut in future.

Working from that angle in summer 2011, I had an enormously bad gut feeling while cycling under the Ford Street bridge, when I was using the river side bike path to access Minneapolis. I looked around and noticed it was covered in graffiti. I also saw a strange man walking down the stair access from the deck of the bridge to the street/ bike lane level where I was.

I didn't pause, I just sprinted under the bridge and didn't look back. Only, later I'd learn that Kevin Gannon and Anton Duarte speculated this site, under the Ford bridge is where Dan Zamlen and another victim were dumped in the Mississippi River.

Meanwhile, I was fed up with being on the run from those people and wanted the upper hand. I did my homework on St. Paul crime. I looked up every last thing I could on local street gangs and street gangs in general.

This ultimately led to me look online for what the various local street gang graffiti looked like. I never expected to get good luck and actually find Franks double online. Naturally, it is him online talking trash to get people stymied and confused as to the fact most of the drownings there are homicides.

Frank's Book and clues to his activities

Frank frequently discusses drowning, rape and murder in his book. The theme of the book seems to be him throwing around human trafficking terms. It seems he twists and distorts the context of those human trafficking terminology, but distorting the context of these terms so that he cannot be pinned down as a participant in these crimes.

To demonstrate how involved this individual with human trafficking, it is actually his own words. Frank has an all-out obsession with human trafficking terms and demonstrates this in a lengthy book, which he created for unclear reasons. I think he thought he could get away with this if he uses the terms as some sort of literary device where he states that because he works driving a truck and has to apply for low-end trade jobs like welding, that he is an "indentured servant."

He smugly forwarded me his book in an email, but never gave me time to read it, as was hounding me continuously. Much less did I even know then where the libraries were in the area. I didn't have a computer, nor did I know where I could go to use a computer. He showed me where libraries were and where other places were with free internet access. When he dragged me to the library, he'd never come in—he'd just sit outside and wait for me. I found this very odd. I find it very suspicious and suspect it had something to do with avoiding getting caught.

I just used what he had taught me about local resources and accessed them without his knowing. However, at the Metropolitan State University library, his friends sexually harassed me when I came in. I complained to the staff in the place and they were less than helpful. The staff at Metro state seemed afraid of these bums that would hang out there. I didn't get it then. I thought they were just wimps. Those people maybe had a better handle on how futile it was to contend with them.

Frank always managed to get his way, by either lying, manipulating or using violence. He has an interest in gaining and abusing power. He has too many connections, both to high-up politicians in the area and various gangs, both white and black. I don't know if he's deceived members of these gangs to enable him to play both sides. I imagine he has but I could not, nor would not speculate what he's lied about. Knowing him, I imagine he has lied. Either this or he has something to offer which makes people not care as to what he's about.

Frank's Games
Frank likes accusing people of bad things. Even if those things make no logical sense to anyone, he knows if he sticks to telling lies time and again, even logical people will question what they know, see and hear. When he is confronted about lies he will tantrum and become violent because, beyond this, he has no power. His power is structured upon lies, not truth. Truth has power. For people who have done wrong must circumvent the power of truth, violence is the only way left to force their will on people. Frank is no exception.

All this isn't really rocket science; it is what any abuser will do, it's just that Frank's doing a more sophisticated version of what is already done by wife batterers, and most all other types of criminals. Eventually, with people who lie, their violence is their last defense. Still, most of the time lies get him far enough.

Usually he tends to stick with accusing people of the very things the he engages in on the blog, and will even accuse those people of being killers. Again, this is something very comparable to the very real experience I had with Frank. He relied upon accusing me various made up things to ensure I would be deprived of the help I'd need to escape him.

Frank will accuse his victims of everything under the sun to make sure people fear rather than support the victim. For such a simple tactic, the efficacy of it is very, very powerful. People naturally do what Frank wants him to once he starts saying mostly made up lies about smiley face killer victims, family members of these victims, people in law enforcement who recognize the problem and people on all the smiley killer blogs with really good ideas.

I think often he accuses his victims of doing what he does simply because he wants his victim to be his scapegoat and get the punishment he feels he deserves. Or again, he thinks if everyone is too busy scrutinizing those who stand a chance of getting him caught committing crimes, he will stay out jail. Given that one murder usually equals a life sentence or the death penalty his motivation is pretty high to engage in deception. It seems the people who fare better against his attacks online, like Tenneguy, tend to just stick to the facts and uninteresting details.

As to why he is particular to accusing others of doing exactly what he does is harder to ascertain. One idea that helps explain this came from a book I read about the problem of human evil, entitled, People of the Lie, by M. Scott Peck . Peck stated in this book that it's common for evil people be unable to "own" the reality of their own evil, so they project it upon the people around them. This particularly is thought to explain why evil people abuse other people. Evil people refuse to experience themselves as evil, according to Peck. However, the denial among the evil of their evil nature doesn't take away its reality. Therefore, evil people will find other people to stand in their place for the punishment for the evil. This is the proverbial "kicking the dog" where self hate is displaced on vulnerable people.
The question is then, "is it really a surprise to me that Frank thought he was so smart that he could talk about what he did and what he planned to do still not get caught?

Maybe that is why he feels he can walk around black people in downtown St. Paul and say in front of them without any retribution, "I'm on fourth black, so that means I'm one fourth animal, right?" He was just as bad with misogyny. He could say whatever he wanted, no matter how obvious an affront it was to people and no one did a darn thing about it. It felt so surreal, I wondered if I was just making too much about nothing. In other cities if anyone said any of that in front of a pack of brothers, they would be murdered. No one would miss them either. Frank had so much latitude it was unbelievable. Eventually I concluded, wrongly, maybe he's just nuts, so the locals don't waste their time bothering to avenge the stuff that came out of his mouth.

I had a good basis for that theory. I could not see at all how anyone could get sexual imagery out of that mural on the wall at the Dorothy Day center. I mean, no matter how twisted you are, a hobo leaning forward on a bench is not performing oral sex, on another figure clearly in the background. I thought that if he could see this in that mural then he must think about oral sex whenever he sees someone sitting on a bench.

I'd say after seeing hearing him speak that he translates everything he sees into imaginary sexual stuff. His book attests to this. I doubt the librarians he describes had perverted motives for making sure he didn't break library policy. I think he projected his own inner filth onto them and that like he does so often with his victims. I really regretted not reading it, because I was blindsided by Frank from remaining ignorant.

All his distortions and screwed up psychology, pressed into the written word, would have helped me figure it all out.

The crux of this is that he is disturbed; he is disturbed and has a cadre of equally disturbed sex offenders working in tandem to make a profit off of the misery of women and children, judging from what I learned of his friends.

He lied to me about a situation involving him at the Listening House homeless shelter he spends much of his time at.

He was trying to convince me that female staff there had sexually harassed him. When I came out and said I did not believe him, then his façade broke. Immediately he started ranting calling the women who work their "feminist bitches."

He also slanders these people in his book. Here is what he says about Listening House staff in his book:
"it is time to rethink direction, especially with Listening House, after producing another community "consumered" transient, has engineered another image scam, by publicly posting a "word for the day" and awarding another staff member an award; The Rose Award for Street Works, with 2010's recipient not even possessing enough skin pigment to withstand getting a tan from that sun... this didn't stop our staff member from getting her award in an almost vampire like fashion (during the dark of night or shadow of day), nor did it stop our community "consumered" transient from getting his comparatively much darker tan on those now harsher streets of American life, comprising the many neighborhoods of public afforded exploitation mercilessly expended; another form of a perpetual motion machine, only far more social-bureaucratic and seemingly fascist; natured cold, calculative and impersonal, in method not much different from a single ongoing perpetuated act of rape, performed by a serial rapist primed---ready and seasoned---for the attack again and again and again (cloaked)!"

It isn't so much him playing a martyr for staff at Listening House getting an award, which caught my eye here. The last statement is what got my attention. Here he is using the analogy of a serial rapist. Using the formula where you know who he has harmed by who he maligns, I'm guessing that he is the serial rapist.
Strangely, he writes about the perverted, cruel intentions of Listening House staff, in the active tense, more typical of people describing their own actions. Being a victim is about being forced to be passive while someone over powers you. And he uses the same exact language he uses to describe his own sexual fantasies or exploits in other places in the book. I therefore have even less reason to suspect anyone who worked at Listening House of ever hurting him.
Chances are he got in trouble with the people who work there and writing this accusation is his revenge for this. He likely did something questionable at Listening House, given his tendencies.

A Rape in Downtown Minneapolis which has Parallels to Smiley Cases

The following story was shared in Kristi Piehl's blog. The story shared here does indeed seem to match facets of SFK cases. It also involves a rapist who slipped GHB or date rape drug to a woman in Minneapolis and then raped her after abducting her and taking her to his apartment. This story describes the rapist removing the cell phone battery from the phone of his rape victim so she couldn't call for help. The removal of the cell phone battery has parallels to Smiley Face Killer cases where the victims phones go dead or cease to work shortly after they are abducted. One victim was found to have his cell phone destroyed and another victim had his phone tampered with.
jbrown
March 3rd, 2011 at 10:17 | #5
Reply | Quote
"Maksud Mahbub is on trial for stalking and raping a woman at a MN bar. He removed her battery from her phone and put her in his car while she was drunk or blacked out. She escaped from his home. The article says the police found different pairs of underwear in his possession. I still wonder if there is information on the internet connecting Mahbub with a group who is raping American women and killing American men. Here is the article:
"The 24-year-old woman was out drinking with a female friend. They ended up at Sneaky Pete's in downtown Minneapolis, where the friend disappeared, the woman said. She sent a text message to a co-worker, who agreed to come to the bar from Cottage Grove and give her a ride home. "That's the last I remember," the woman testified Wednesday at the trial of Maksud Mahbub, 36, a Shoreview man charged with six counts of criminal sexual conduct.
"The next thing she knew, she was in a stranger's car, she said. "I started freaking out," the woman said. "I was scared."
"Testimony in Mahbub's trial began Tuesday in Ramsey County District Court in St. Paul. Prosecutor Yasmin Mullings said Mahbub prowled Minneapolis bars "to find the most vulnerable (intoxicated) women," take them back to his Shoreview town house and grope or rape them.
"It was early September 2009 when the first alleged victim found herself in Mahbub's car, she told the jury. The Pioneer Press generally does not identify alleged victims of sexual assault. From about 9 to 11:30 p.m., the woman drank five beers and six shots of a drink called a water moccasin, she said.
"After arranging for her ride, she must have blacked out, she said. She woke up in a car with the man she later learned was Mahbub. When she tried to use her cell phone, she said, "Nothing was coming up on my screen." The man told her she could use the phone at his house, she said. But when they got there, he didn't give her one.
"I was very angry and upset, and started tearing through the house looking for a phone," she testified. "I was trying to make commotion so maybe a neighbor would hear me and come over. I tried to set his mail on fire, and I was banging on the wall."
"The man said he would drive her home but claimed to be unable to find it, the woman testified. At one point, he yelled at her, she said, saying, he'd been "looking for your house for four hours."
She said she couldn't help because she didn't know where she was. At one point, they stopped in a parking lot or a park, she said, and she fled from the car, screaming, hoping someone would hear her. But no one around. She returned to the car, and they drove back to Mahbub's home, the woman testified.
"I just remember lying down," she said. "I had a long pink dress on. I woke up to him trying to climb on top of me."
She was naked, she said, and he was pinning her hands down by her head. And then he raped her, she testified.
Mahbub called her a cab, and she went back to her boyfriend's father's home. In a search of Mahbub's home, Ramsey County sheriff's investigator Julie Urban found four pairs of women's underwear, a bra and women's jewelry in an Abercrombie & Fitch bag in the defendant's closet. She also found seven cell phones. One pair of the underwear belonged to the victim who testified Wednesday, she said.
After she reached home, the woman said, she found her cell phone battery in her purse. It had been removed from her phone. She did not know how."
jbrown
March 3rd, 2011 at 10:29 | #6
Reply | Quote
"this article says he would park his car near the bar and wait for young women who were alone or separated from their friends. He removed cell phone batteries from phones and sexually assault them. He has at least 5 female victims. One of the bars he was at was Brother's bar in Minneapolis (a common bar that our victims were last seen at). For me, there are too many similarities about this MO to our men victims to go unnoticed!"
http://www.muscala.com/chemicalhealthpredator.htm

Frank is not at all the Oppressed "Working Class" Lackey he Claims to be
I've mentioned how certain things trigger the troll to go beyond his usual daily fare of making posts attributing the murders to priests.

Most commonly, the troll will launch ad hominem attacks on the person posting the idea. This means that he will accuse the person who expresses a particularly intelligent assessment or idea of everything rotten false thing under the sun.

He already did that with me. He used email to send me threats and then would make up fake crimes I committed so that if I ran to the police to complain about getting threatened with violence, instead the police would ignore the complaint or focus on me as being the criminal and not him.

I think this is the basis for much of what Frank does. He in his book recasts minorities as threatening, powerful menaces. African Americans on welfare get twisted in his book as being the most powerful force in the country. I'm sure they wish they were on better footing but still his attempts to cast them as the powerful elite goes nowhere.

Frank on the other hand comes from family with clear wealth and demonstrable power. Frank is the nephew of Minneapolis mayor Sharon Sayles Belton, the grandson of a former St. Paul city council member, Frank D. Marzitelli, his brother is a prosecutor for the city of Minneapolis, Patrick Marzitelli, and the majority of his family either owns a business, or else is upper crust and not part of the poor whom he is posing to be part of in his book.

In his book he gets busy trying to play off riding to the capitol building. I think he is worried about people up where he lives questioning some of his obvious lies and contradictions. I don't know who this is directed at. Given the things he will say out in the open on the streets, like the times I recall he would go on his diatribe about racist stuff and the whole part black thing, right in front of the Dorothy Day Center, I am not all that surprised there are people out there who don't trust the man and have serious questions about him. I'd guess this next quote of his is addressing people smart enough to not believe him.

Here is how it reads:
"It isn't uncommon for someone on a bicycle to become suspect as a member or supporter of an opposing faction due to perceived relationship anywhere, like when riding past the governor's office when taking care of matters for work. In retrospect it isn't uncommon for the same person on his bike when riding by the governor's office for example, to be considered (by the governor's office) a community criminal associated with the liberal welfare activist groups, because of the side of town the bicyclist originated from when taking care of matters associated with work, keeping in mind the liberal welfare activists in the area, who also advocate for the rights of convicted felons, who also associate with all the local community criminals in proximity think of the same person on the bike as some kind of law enforcement officer; informant or "narc," because of the perceived fishy activities between the governor's office and general locations in questioned, while all the police officers throughout the area think of the guy as some kind of criminal civil rights activist, because of his proximity to the minority activist groups associated with convicted felons and liberal welfare activists, who happen to advocate against police brutality at some of the facilities, who happen to think of the individual as some kind of race hate group member, because of his false association with some of the police involved on duty at the facilities, especially with a few officers shaving their heads bald in effort to maintain a youthful appearance when dealing with the public, while all the race hate groups in retrospect, antithetically think of the guy as a minority rights supporter, because of his false association with the welfare activist group members, with the minority rights supporter activists antithetically thinking of him as some kind of member of a gay hate group, because of his perceived recluse political behavior exercised toward all the activist groups in general, with the gay hate groups in retrospect; antithetically associating this gentlemen as some kind of gender rights group supporter for the same reason, while the feminist rights groups, because of their antithetical association in retrospect to all men in general, think of him as some kind of misogynist, taking place during a time when this person totally oblivious to the entire local political landscape; our jobs hamster; our new American working class hero, unaware of what is going on around him; "not bunkered" from all this political E.M.P or G.M.P, due to his extreme unknown political minority status radiating from behind deep dark government curtains, has to call the Veteran's Administration to schedule a mandatory hearing test, finding the woman who is suppose to receive his call can't seem to get past her voice mail box and neither can he."

So he's not any of these things. Then what the heck is he? I think he's attempting to cover up what he is about.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
What I've been told he is first hand by people I've met who know far more than I do, is that Frank is a member of the Process Church. Smiley Face activity traces back to them. Charles Manson was also a member of this cult called the Process Church. The Process Church branched off from Scientology. It's a cult and a dangerous one.

As for Frank and his dichotomy about the issue of race, it helps to have background information Charles Manson promoted the idea he called, "Helter Skelter." Helter Skelter, a name Manson stole from a Beetles song, refers to Manson's vision of inciting or creating a war between the poor blacks and the poor whites. Manson aspired to create the war, allow each side to decimate their respective numbers so that the rich could step in and take power.

Manson said he'd let the blacks win, but they'd be few in number and then he said he would "pat them on their black fuzzy heads," and keep them like pets. Whether or not this is a sane idea at all is less an issue than there really are people out there who think this disturbing stuff and intend to act on it. My guess is that Frank is a disturbed person who wants to take up Manson's cause himself and that his playing both sides with white and African American gangs would be something akin to realizing Manson's vision of Helter Skelter.

Let me be clear here that the goal Manson had with Helter Skelter is inherently racist. What Frank seems to be doing is manipulating African American street gang members to do his bidding. Which is not to say that just by being a gang member, any brother is doing the bidding of rich powerful racists.

Just like the Native Americans and alcohol, gang members work to get primarily poor African American people hooked on drugs which run as much as $300 dollars per day. When you are already poor and can't elevate your position in life as it is, tell me how introducing crack addiction will fix that.

If that isn't enough, there is what people have called "the hidden holocaust" happening in the United States where young African American males are killing each other en mass for petty territory disputes. I am not saying that if you are poor the money gang life offers is tempting. I ask you to not just look at the short term pay-off but the long term price all this carnage really is.

Just like how alcohol was pushed onto the Native Americans to facilitate white land grabs, your destiny if you follow the gang path will be only to exist in small number as a conquered nation. Maybe after this you really will have Manson proteges like Frank treating blacks like trivial little pets after the paid execution force of the ruling elite, gang members execute and addict so many of their own people that black power becomes nothing more than a joke.

I need also mention that these ideas are not my ideas. I am only repeating what other activists have said about the issues of gang membership and the destruction of African American people.

Jello Biafra said in one of his spoken word albums that the poor "are kept in their kennels called cities where they don't get educated, don't learn to read or write and only learn to shoot drugs and shoot each other and are kept in their cages by a massively out of control police state. Gee I wonder who planned that"?

I think then when you add Frank to the equation and learn what his actual goals are, combined with his rich and politically powerful lineage, you see what is at stake here.

He pretends to be some overburdened working class nobody, yet he can call pretty much anyone in his family for help, since he's the nephew of a Minneapolis mayor, the grandson of a famous St. Paul city council member and the brother of a Minneapolis city prosecutor .

Patrick Marzitelli, Frank's brother seems to have political motivation in attacking Occupy Wall Street. This article from Occupy Homes MN, describes how Frank's brother Patrick Marzitelli "singled out OWS members with previous political arrests for harsher treatment"

Here are some quotes from the article. I include this information because it shows that overall, people Frank himself admits to getting advice from in his own book, (Patrick Marzitelli) appear to have an agenda to shut down a movement that seeks to take back power from the rich, corrupt 1% and restore it to the majority of people.

"The Occupy movement in Minneapolis reached an important milestone on Monday, July 30, 2012 with the resolution of a case brought against four protesters arrested at a peaceful demonstration on October 20, 2011. Judge Daniel Moreno denied the prosecutor's attempt to add three additional charges to the original complaint less than two weeks before trial, and prevented the prosecutor from singling out individuals with previous political arrests for harsher treatment.

This case and recent arrests of dozens of OccupyHomes MN activists defending the Cruz home in South Minneapolis show that the City of Minneapolis, through the Minneapolis Police Department and City Attorney's office are attempting to intimidate activists and shut down the Occupy movement with tough tactics and unreasonable charges. The resolution of this case shows that Mayor R.T. Rybak's efforts to suppress dissent can be defeated with the help of a strong legal defense and solidarity from all who seek to create a more just society.

Background on the case: On October 20, 2011, about a hundred people participated in a demonstration in front of U.S. Bank in downtown Minneapolis to draw attention to the fact that in 2010 alone, over 25,000 Minnesotans lost their homes to foreclosure. Meanwhile, U.S. Bank CEO Richard Davis saw his salary more than double to $18.8 million this year, and U.S. Bancorp reported record profits of $1.3 billion in the 3rd quarter of 2011. Tired of seeing banks refuse to negotiate with homeowners while making record profits, protesters moved into the intersection of 2nd Ave and 6th St. Police blocked and re-routed traffic, which allowed the demonstration to continue.
Eventually, seven people were arrested and charged with violating Minneapolis City Ordinance 385.65 which prohibits "interfering with pedestrian and vehicular traffic." At the first court appearance in November, the prosecutor, Patrick Marzitelli, offered some defendants the opportunity to plead guilty to a petty misdemeanor, but insisted on charging Misty Rowan and Katrina Plotz with criminal misdemeanors, even though all seven defendants engaged in the same activity on the same day in the same place. The decision to treat some people differently based on past civil disobedience activities was clearly an attempt to silence, intimidate, and deter all citizens from engaging in political dissent.At subsequent court appearances, the prosecutor and his supervisor, Assistant City Attorney Mary Ellen Heng again refused to offer everyone the same deal. Rowan and Plotz, along with Ben Egerman and Peter Leeman declined to accept these terms, and were scheduled to go to trial July 30.
Defense attorneys Jordan Kushner and Andrea Palumbo filed a motion to dismiss the initial charge on the grounds that the city ordinance in question was unconstitutional. In response, Marzitelli added three new misdemeanor charges to the original complaint (unlawful assembly, creating a public nuisance, and disobeying a peace officer).
On July 30, Judge Moreno denied the motion to dismiss the original charge. Kushner then argued that the addition of three new charges was untimely and not based on any new facts in the case. When Kushner asserted that the extra charges seemed designed to punish the defendants for refusing to take previous "deals," Marzitelli objected, saying, "There is no evidence to suggest that the amended complaint is retaliatory in nature." His objection was overruled.
Judge Moreno ultimately granted the defense's request to eliminate the additional charges. He then took the unusual step of allowing Rowan and Plotz the option of a "straight plea." Under this arrangement, they could each plead guilty to a misdemeanor, but as the judge, he would sentence them to a petty misdemeanor and it would be recorded as such, essentially bypassing the prosecutor's insistence that they should each be stuck with a misdemeanor. Rowan and Plotz both chose this option. Leeman and Egerman pled guilty to a petty misdemeanor as well."
Here is a portion of Frank's book where he discusses the advice his brother Patrick gave him about how if the police chose to not do their job and carry out justice how the Bill of Rights ceases to matter. Frank strangely discusses it as a way to introduce slavery. While I will not waste time arguing how Frank, a healthy adult male, who passes as white and is also son of rich well-heeled elites is somehow at all at risk for slavery, I will share the quote:

"To understand the entrapping nature of indentured servitude, one has to go no further then the plantation mentality housed locally with in communities; transitional housing shelters and drop-in-centers. They hold the population of America's new poor; casualties of economic difficulty. Slavery has never been about race. It has always been about destitution. Social groups of destitution have a long history of selling themselves into servitude to survive. Destitution is the primary factor making indentured servitude entrapping. In order to escape the servitude, one must make it out of the poverty that perpetuates it. This means acquiring steady financial income, which can be hard. This is difficult to do during economically recessed times. Freedom from slavery has a history of rarely being awarded or fought for. It has a greater history of being purchased by the servant, which was the original purpose of the indenture. It established not only the price for one's freedom, but more importantly the method of payment over a period of time, usually seven years.
This suggests freedom has always carried with it a price. With today's economy what is stressed isn't just the means of purchasing what is needed for survival, even if it is freedom, but sometimes to retain the legal right to do so. According to the 13th Amendment slavery shouldn't exist. What has been witnessed at many public shelters around welfare politics and with the Minnesota State Department of Human Services just a few blocks from The Dorothy Day Center, which receives reports of these kinds of civil issues, this isn't the case. If one doesn't have the right to be protected from enslavement outlawed by the United States Constitution, how is it possible to purchase themselves from it legally, especially when according to licensed attorneys in the state and officials like David (who refused to offer a last name) from the department of Human Services in downtown Saint Paul Minnesota; the state's capital, "The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution pertains to only certain restrictions to certain government offices. It doesn't apply to the rights of a public. If you have any problems call the police and make a report."
Three separate Minnesota attorneys (licensed) later confirmed this mentality: Mr. Patrick Marzitelli, Ms. Laura Melnick and Mr. Michael Davey. What was meant by calling the police was to establish an official record of incident (if the local police decide to handle the matter), so that things could be handled by the local authorities deemed necessary. It sounds more like people who are in the position of having to make these kinds of reports, may also end up in the position of being arrested or penalized for doing so---according to local authorities. What this suggests, is state wide fascism that legally shouldn't exist, does exist. Absence of the public rights guaranteed in the United States Constitution, establishes in this fashion a multitude of local dictatorships, outlining fascism throughout a state and even nationally, which should concern everyone. What is going on here? Is this really about the local politics of destitution housed in public offices according to licensed or appointed officials, or is something deeper involved?
Source: http://www.occupyhomesmn.org/citizens_right_to_protest_foreclosures

So here we have a clear white supremacist, misogynist and child of rich parents who thinks African Americans on welfare rule the country telling us all the means the state can use to make a joke out of our legal institutions.

We all have seen so much police brutality and corruption, so much so that now it is everywhere. Frank is more than just an elitist and fascist; he is sadist, a human trafficker. It disturbs me to see someone from his position detail in print how to carry out implementing a fascist state.

What disturbs me most is that what he describes is happening. Are the police being fair and doing their jobs anymore? No. Which is not to say I think every police officer is evil. What is fact is that disproportionately, members of white power/ fascist groups join the police and the military. I mean if you are like Frank and an out of sorts victimizer who needs to abuse and scapegoat those without power, like members of most minority groups you are going to love jobs which allow you to carry a gun and abuse power.

I mean who runs this country. Sure there is likely what is a minority in establishments like government and the police who are still good. They are too few in number it seems to count. So what this lends itself to is the early stages of introduction of a fascist state.

I think that Frank's book might explain exactly how fascists and racists intend to carry out their assault on the poor and vulnerable in this country. The more the big banks and the billionaires siphon off money from all of us, we are all at risk for being broke, poor and to use a word he likes, "vulnerable."

Then what are you going to do if you lose your home and wind up staying at a homeless shelter crawling with human traffickers like him and others who would exploit your poverty? This is why this matters.

If you have a person with ties to the elite exploiting homeless females and likely homeless males too, what you have is those who have the money and power not just taking more money but harming people in disgusting, unconscionable ways such as making those people unpaid sex slaves.

It is bad enough to lose your home in a recession, but do you want to be placed at risk to be a forced unpaid prostitute, as surely would be the case in the Twin Cities in Minnesota and other major cities?

I think the answer is "no." If you have interest of sparing not just others but yourself this fate, maybe taking the time to actually question Frank's claims would be a good idea. If you are tired of racism, sexism, fascism, and believe in those causes, reading his book and fact checking all of this, is worth your while.

What I am saying is that I only have drawn so many connections here from three years of work. I know there is likely more damning information about him and smiley murders in his book and in his trolling adventures online.

I can't do all the work. Therefore I call out to all people who want fascists, racists, sexists, elitists, corrupt police behavior to do their own research on all of these things.

What Smiley cases represents is creative mass murder by white supremacist gangs and other groups. Therefore it is tantamount that this information be passed around and improved on the same manner as open source software.

I also suggest getting familiar with how this fascist writes and misspells words. One thing I am sure of is that he may seriously need his parents money to survive on because he can't spell anything right and is too prone to temper tantrums to likely make it on any job.

Actual people who work for a living and don't make much don't need some sniveling sadist rich kid who didn't hold a job for longer than a month since the early 1990's and who can fake being a homeboy because his rich parents sent him to a school on Cabrini Green dictating their lives.

If this gets trolled and I am oh so sure it will, I will post his resume online for all to see. Genealogy websites and libraries like there like the LDS genealogy libraries confirm all that I am saying about who Frank is descended from.

I always questioned how it was no one found it in themselves to beat the crap out of Frank for spewing race hatred in that shelter. Mind you, most all of the people in there are black. Maybe they were too afraid of him. He's a cunning, evil, manipulative person.

I am guessing he has been lying to very many people in order to carry out his own agenda. I am sure he also has actual converts out there as well. It is hard to say really but it goes far to trust your gut feeling about people, situations and information.

Again, sometimes truth and logic gets buried by types like him. This happens pretty often these days. Any activist has to sift through so much information. My advice is to trust your gut and to never jump to conclusions prematurely. Finding truth takes work. If you get lazy about that these days you will never find it. As you can see, the corrupt maintain power when people lack accurate information.

That is why it is a problem for five corporations to control the media. I have too many things to discuss here so if you are a progressive or whatever else, you already know this. If you aren't aware of all these things I suggest reading some Noam Chomsky for starters.

Frank really has a strange mix of people assisting him. Blacks, white supremacists, hobos, Somali's and more. His social connections are also those of other Smileys. The pattern is undeniable and it is primarily not me discovering these things.

It's either fear or maybe he is such a good excuse fabricator and or so good at playing his enemies, that no one has been able to mount successful opposition to him. I think that most people are too confused as to what he is really about. I sure was. There are too many contradictions, to the point he seems crazy. The problem is that the contradictions exist not as the result of insanity, but as the result of whatever game he happens to be playing at any given point.

Who would ever believe that librarians were predators, yearning to "leer" at his computer screen, or that people on welfare ran the country. If they ran the country, would they need or want to live on welfare? Unless it isn't "one dollar per vote," but instead "one foodstamp per vote," then maybe he'd be on to something.

He certainly played games with me and it nearly cost me my life and my freedom.

This being said, it is helpful to know some background on this. As far as the Process Church, I know very little, but this is not a Christian church, it is quite the opposite. Those people have bizarre ideas like fusing together Christ, Satan and Lucifer, and they are very likely engaged in activity involving ritual abuse. This would also entail all the horrific activities typically associated with ritual abuse including rape, pedophilia, murder and torture.

If I get too much into this topic I will diverge into religious and or spiritual discussion which is beyond the scope of this writing. What I will say is that I don't write this off as just the absurd ideas of a lunatic, but instead things that pose an immediate threat to many people.

In this day and age when there are people who are hold the bulk of the wealth who really do seek to keep the poor "divided and conquered," to secure themselves in power, any Helter Skelter schemes take on a different meaning.

Or more to the point, I am writing and sharing about how Frank has effectively committed crimes against me and others and has a working plan as to how to not get caught. Any methods he has used against me to isolate and control me can be used against anyone.

If you are tempted to disregard how someone skilled at manipulating people can be a threat, you miss the point as to how human trafficking, modern day slavery, is not only happening but on the rise. Much of what Frank does as far as manipulating people is covered under the list of propaganda techniques used by governments during World War I and World War II.

Beyond this, the rest of what Frank has done as far as manipulating me and others entails using what are called, "cognitive biases." A cognitive bias is in essence an error in human thinking usually precipitated by how our emotions interfere with true logical decision making. For example one of the many cognitive biases is "anchoring bias," and in anchoring bias you stick to the first piece of information when making a choice.

Group think is listed as one of the cognitive biases. Group think involves members of a group being biased against ideas which come from outside the group. It also entails group members seeking approval from other group members by supporting the bad ideas of other group members. Eventually, members of the group become so myopic in their thinking and the ideas of the outside world seem such a threat that the group starts making bad decisions.

I recommend studying these things because knowledge is power and people out there with ill will like Frank, especially other human traffickers would fail to maintain slaves in a modern world if people were versed enough in these matters to no longer be deceived.

It is also an advantage for people in normal, everyday life to know these things, because then the tricks advertisers play when they try to sell you things won't work on you any more.

So it isn't just in terms of some woman's efforts to stay free from slavery which bring to the fore the importance of being educated on these things. Freedom of choice in a more general sense depends on accurate assessments about all the information you receive. Questionable statements made in political campaign advertisements would stand out to you after studying this topic, even when you didn't happen to know the truth of the statement or untruth of it.

If you can identify all the games played when people pose arguments, like appealing to your fear, (called, "appeal to fear") or pointing out all the flaws of a person with a particular idea as opposed to flaws in the idea (called an "ad hominem attack").

I think because I was educated, and able to understand some of this on a rudimentary level, I avoided being human trafficked. This, in my opinion, makes me most grateful for my education. It saved my life.

Frank's Personal History and it's Context in Smiley Cases

What I learned about him after pursuing helping law enforcement and myself by researching him based on things I heard and read, is that Frank was spent his elementary school years in a remedial program for emotionally disturbed youth.

What's more telling, is that back in the 1960's his mother, according to The Hyde Park Times, a local Chicago paper, was active in promoting that school and was focused on how those students were ostracized by most normal people.

Based upon this, I am guessing he felt cast out, and not part of society so his crimes against people are his envisioned revenge. The sad part is I seriously doubt the clearly good people like Chris Jenkins, or Josh Szostak who were killed by him or his cohorts would be the types to reject, bully and hurt people. The smiley victims disproportionately are involved in volunteer work and causes, many of them are Christian and these people don't fit the profile of "bully."

Also, in these articles, it is evident Frank's mother puts herself in the public eye over the issue of emotionally disturbed youth. If she has the same unusual last name as Frank, this is in, effect announcing his situation.
The again, it is also possible he was violent and out of control from an early age, and this behavior is an extension. Personally, while I think bullying is wrong, and that Frank may have started out a victim, my concern about this is minimal given his violent abuse of innocent people.

From statements he made, it seemed he expected women to hurt him. This might explain the rape and human trafficking. In this way he forces women into sex and punishes them. Maybe he believes that the only way he can get sex is rape. His manifesto is riddled with misogynist hatred. The question I had is how a person like this comes to be? His family likely played a role, but as to what I can only speculate.

Still, it is worth mentioning that school for emotionally disturbed youth he attended in Chicago originally was located in a space in the Cabrini Green Housing projects in Chicago. He mentions Cabrini Green in his book.

This HUD development in Chicago was so infamous for violent crime, gangs and murder, that numerous articles have been written about the place. The existence and rise of some of Chicago's worst street gangs have been attributed to the place.

There is a book by sociologist Sudhir Venkatesh, called Gang Leader for a Day, describing life in Cabrini Green. This book became the basis for the book Freakenomics. This book mostly describes the poverty, gangs and social organization and lack thereof present at these projects. It doesn't include the horror stories, which include people being so regularly tossed off the roof there that special fencing had to be put in place to prevent the problem.

There was also a violent rape their of a 10 year old African-American girl, where she was poisoned, raped and as a result of all that wound up severely brain damaged. The place was such an example of failed policy in regards to the HUD program, that a U.S. President showed up to the location.

Cabrini Green is not a pleasant place. It was also a bulwark of the crime scene in Chicago. When I was living in Minneapolis, it seemed that there was such a tie to this place and people coming from the projects in Chicago to live in the Twin Cities, that a Minneapolis based charity called itself "Cabrini Green."

Since Minnesota believes giving welfare benefits with little or no requirements like working or having children to obtain benefits, people are relocating from Chicago to the Twin Cities, in droves. Thus, any discussion of the Twin Cities invariably includes Chicago.

Frank lived in both places. I wonder if his gang involvement began as a result of his experience attending school in Cabrini Green. He once rubbed in my face how I should "learn about Chicago politics," and seemed smug about this. From reading Venkatesh's book, and understanding how the gang the author studied served as the defacto provider of resources, protection, and opportunity for project residents to get rich (on crime) in the face of apathy from city, state and local officials, Frank would witness how to run a criminal organization or enterprise and succeed.
Re: A Link between White Surpemacists, Human Trafficking and a Series of Unsolved Murders
01 Jul 2015
I am guessing that whatever he saw or became involved with there at Cabrini Green, even despite the irony he had rich parents living in the pricey Hyde Park area of Chicago, influenced him. I would guess that his involvement in a human trafficking operation must have come from a lifetime of proximity or participation in gang life.

It's said in articles on the gang problem I have read that the street gangs tend to recruit insecure young people who lack family support or normal social group involvement. What the experts say about people who get wooed into street gang life want most of all a family or a social group to be a part of. Frank probably fits that profile.

Human Traffickers also entrap Males into Slavery; Frank Might also Target Males for Human Trafficking
I know now the reason young men have been murdered by Smiley killers is not to briefly human traffick them. Still, there really is a tie between the same people who human traffick and people who are drowning students.
Frank is an opportunist who can get his way in many situations, using a variety of means. I heard on NPR the story of a youth in Minneapolis who was a run away from an abusive family, and went into prostitution because he was homeless, and living in a dumpster, freezing to death in the dead of winter there.
He described how he and other young men sold their bodies just to survive in Minneapolis.
This segment from an article entitled, "Why Human Trafficking is a Men's issue" lets readers know that human traffickers do target men . The article explains how the trafficking of males is also on the rise:

"However, forced labor is not the only facet of human trafficking in which males become trapped. Another group at risk for exploitation is homosexual young men. Many gay youth are at an increased risk of becoming homeless by being kicked out of their homes or running away to escape abuse and harassment. Multiple studies have indicated that homeless and runaway youth are among pimps' easiest targets. One pimp in an interview conducted by the DePaul College of Law confirms their ability to pick out frightened, hungry people: "You can smell the desperation." These young men, forced to engage in "survival sex", often are swept up into sex trafficking - and there's not much said or done about it.
"Straight males are also sexually exploited. Customers who pay to rape men do it for the same reason that they pay to rape women and children: according to Julian Heng, manager of a support project for men in prostitution, it's about power and control, not pleasure or orientation. Paying for this transaction is simply another form of exercising power and control over the victim. (Kloer) Like female victims, males are forced to participate in sex acts against their will, controlled through brutality, psychological manipulation, and routine drug use and addiction.
"Men and boys who are sexually exploited must come to terms with not only the physical and emotional trauma of repeated rape and abuse, but their own conflicted sexuality and masculinity afterwards. Amanda Kloer, anti-trafficking activist, writes that this added stigma prevents them from coming forward and seeking assistance, which further compounds the problem of a lack of information regarding the exploitation of men. Unfortunately, they also have an even more significant hurdle to clear: a general lack of knowledge and resources for their rehabilitation."

It's worth noting that during this edit of the document, after getting helped by Gilbertson, some of the ideas I had were correct, some weren't. I think the motive of Smilies is not obtaining male victims for slavery, but instead these victims are killed for the reasons law enforcement have stated. The important thing to recognize here is that because the same set of people, the same power addicted criminals are involved in both activities, there are the same techniques used in each instance to overpower others.

Since the same group is doing both activity, parallels exist. It is actually more significant to understand the group and their agenda as opposed to analyzing individual crimes and assuming each must happen towards the same end. What I've been told and assume myself is the unifying feature between both human trafficking and drowning murders is that the group doing both is highly corrupt and deviant, both in terms of sexual activity and outright horrific violence.

Frank has an Obsession with Birds and Birds are Part of the Smiley Face Killer Pattern

After I discovered Frank was the troll on Kristi Piehl's blog, I took it upon myself to do research on him. I wanted to find tangible proof he had killed people. I decided to check if it was true that he was related to a St. Paul mayor. I have members of my own family who enjoy doing genealogy. I knew I could use Ancestry.com in order to verify or discount what Frank alleged about his family. While I'm sure he told this to me to intimidate me, it hasn't worked in his favor to have told me this.

I not only checked that fact, but I then had a theory. I'll call it my "couch surfing theory," for lack of a better term. It works. Anyhow, you have a man who is living at a homeless shelter, although I suspect he stays there for access to vulnerable women he can traffick.

I still don't know the details on why he stays at that shelter. In 2012, after discovering his presence on and disruption o f Smiley killer websites, I had an idea. I wondered how it was you have a bum, who sleeps at a shelter, and still manages to travel to United States to a greater or lesser degree to kill people.

I know he worked as a trucker but I knew nothing about trucking and how truckers sleep in their trucks. I thought, if he travels, he has to stay somewhere. His hotel bills would be astronomical. He could camp, but since most of these cases I knew to occur during winter, camping would be a nightmare during winter.

When I went to ancestry.com to verify if he was related to a mayor, I noticed immediately Frank just happened to have relatives in the exact locations some Smiley murders have occurred. These areas were not major cities, where it could be coincidence. These were specific small towns. My line of reasoning was that maybe he is staying with family when he travels around killing people.

That led to me looking further into his family, or initially, just where his family lived. I would compare the entire list of Smiley killer cases and cross reference it with locations where he had family. I hit pay dirt. This is pattern is too established to be coincidence.

That isn't all I found out from this research.

The HVAC Connection

Frank has relatives who run HVAC companies. One amateur researcher posting on SFK related forums under the name Tenneguy found significant overlap in locations where there are Trane HVAC company training sites and Smiley Face Killer victims that he drafted the well known "Trane Theory" in regards to the Smiley Face Killer theory.

Tenneguy found that one victim, Jessiah Jameson in Clarksville, Tennessee, was attending training seminars at Trane. He also found that Trane often has contracts with Universities. I don't have a copy of his entire theory because he had it on a blog he since has removed, but I have read a summary of it.

Frank has a relative john who runs an HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) company called Optimum Mechanical Systems. Frank describes in his book taking a test to become a welder. If he has family who presides over an HVAC company, it is likely he may have tried to get tested or certified to work in the field.

This part of his family in lives in White Bear Lake, Minnesota.

There were two Smiley victims in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. White Bear Lake is a suburb of the Twin Cities. White Bear Lake is also a location that Frank has worked at according to his resume. Also, Frank has relatives in White Bear Lake.

The bar that one White Bear Lake victim Nathan Edberg disappeared from was called "Decoys Bar and Grill." There was another SFK victim in that small community of White Bear Lake named Nick Rossini. Rossini's home happened to be right near Decoys Bar and Grill. I really start to ponder the statement, "there are no coincidences" when I weigh these facts against the book Frank created. Frank has an entire paragraph devoted to the subject of decoys. In a strong predatory tone, but still casting himself as a victim rather than perpetrator, Frank says:

"We need to understand, wage affordability is far more possible for someone who is an exploiter rather than an employer, especially during financially difficult times. This flourishes a field of employment predation for survival on a commercial level, where job candidates become prime choice targets for national consumption; economic cannibalization. The productive never see it coming, while the leisurely have all the time in the world to execute, leaving the productive figuratively sitting on a cold autumn placid lake in the middle of duck hunting season, like a live duck among decoys (just waiting to be shot at), with the hunter eyeing the fall majestic scenery (slipping back and forth from brief moments of slumber) hoping to seize that moment.
If one sits real still, maybe he or she will not be seen while peeking behind a small forest of floating decoys, eyeing the situation with silent, anxious, wide eyed, terror ridden, incapacitated, anticipation. Sooner or later you have to eat and so does he. Is it possible to sneak away undetected? What can the productive do when so vicariously suspended among an evitable fate of floating decoys; the leisurely?

Sometimes it is good to do absolutely nothing at all but wait, but for how long? One could try and figure out what class he or she fits into, in effort to prepare for what could happen on that placid murky cold employment pool, comprising America's many lakes of uncertain death, harboring today's modern jobs market."

The last statement is utterly chilling if you know much about Smiley Face Killer victims. He says "Placid, murky cold employment pool" and what comes to mind is Jelani Brinson lying dead in a golf pond. "Lakes of uncertain death" remind me of all the victims which disappeared in lakes, especially the two White Bear Lake Smiley victims. "Harboring" could just be an accidental choice in language or another example of the way he power trips just by using words related to illegal activities he had participated in. Many Smiley victims in Chicago, Seattle and Boston have been found in harbors.

Frank's job as a trucker and how it could facilitate his participation in Human Trafficking Activities

Human traffickers operate over the Mexican and Canadian borders
An article on the FBI website describes how a gang which involved itself in the smuggling of illegal immigrants over the Mexico/U.S. border also was engaging in human trafficking activity. The article is called, "Justice Served in the Case of the Texas Sex Slaves" http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2004/february/slave_021304

This article discusses the case of a couple Central American women paid to have a gang smuggle them to the U.S. Once these women were smuggled here, the people who smuggled them in demanded more money. Since the women didn't have the money to pay, the gang made slaves. By day they worked as unpaid domestic servants and at night they served as the gangs' sex slaves. The article then says not only were these women victimized in this way; the gang also extorted the women's family for more money.

Immigrant Smugglers who participate in Human Trafficking
An article called, "Human Trafficking: a Growing Criminal Market," by James O. Finckenauer and Jennifer Schrock at the International Center for Justice, mention how human trafficking "shares certain dynamics with alien smuggling." Finckenauer and Schrock also say that human trafficking differs with alien smuggling because human trafficking has the "additional elements of coercion and or exploitation."

Human traffickers tie into the problem of illegal immigration, mainly because illegal immigrants are good targets for traffickers. The reason for this is that these immigrants can't call the police without being caught without a green card. Furthermore, many traffickers use places like Mexico and Canada as conduits to the United States, since it is easier to smuggle in overseas immigrants into Mexico or Canada and then into the U.S.

Human traffickers also work as "coyotes;" that is people who smuggle illegal aliens from Mexico into the United States. They use the smuggling debt of the illegal immigrant and the immigrant's lack of legal status to manipulate and coerce the victim in slavery.

What Frank states in his book parallels the reality of coyote activity. Frank wrote:

"The first class represented those who chose to bind themselves to labor for a definite time to pay for their passage to America. The best known of these were Germans, but many English and Scottish men and women came in the same way. The second class, those who came to escape poverty or were forcibly brought to the colonies, was large because of the scarcity of labor in America. Their services were profitably sold to plantation owners or farmers, who indentured them for a period of years. The third class, convicts, were sentenced to deportation and on arrival in America were indentured unless they had personal funds to maintain themselves. Seven years was a common term of such service."

In the first pages of his book, Frank admits to running from police while working at his trucking job.

Frank writes in his book about how highway patrol began pulling over his truck convoy. He said he sped up and fled because his he didn't have insurance on his vehicle.

Frank told me verbally he did work trucking in the South and he mentions it in the email he sent me along with the book he sent me. I don't know where he worked, I just know he did trucking work in the south

Frank in the email he forwarded to me which had that book of his stored in attachment to the email:

"David, you and I were driving over the road down south for a brief time. When shelters start to fill like refugee camps and feel just as overcrowded; alienation, it's pleasurable to find a sense of home driving over the road, even if momentary. Well David "This is It," no; not another Michael Jackson tour, but the story I've been working on "forever" it seems, like a literary birth; a long arduous, painful process that really can't be rushed, minus the crows and bees. Read it and tell me what you think about my baby. She has that all American Muscle Machine design, where reading you should feel the motor (deep down) rev hard enough to notice the pulse of the engine through the tip of the stick shift---with sprinkles and icing included, enjoy (please) and thank-you for all the patients and consideration offered (that's what makes a man a man)."

Human Traffickers, like Smiley Killers, favor certain interstate corridors
The reason why is that human traffickers will pimp their victims at truck stops, and send their victims to massage parlors and other front businesses for the sex trade. Most of the locations of these businesses can be found down various interstate corridors with I-10 coming in first as the route chosen by human traffickers. Furthermore, human traffickers must move their victims constantly to disorient the victim and not get caught.
Source: http://www.mcso.us/public/human_trafficking/what_is.html

The I-94 corridor is another route highly favored by human traffickers as well is the I-35 corridor which runs north to south and ultimately to Mexico:

"Human trafficking and forced labor are theme for Spring Arbor University's 2012 FOCUS series" by Lauren Gentile

"Many people do not think human trafficking happens here," Mary Darling, associate professor of communication said. "But from Detroit to Chicago on I-94 there is high numbers of trafficking at the Asian spas and truck stops."

link to www.mlive.com

One person responds to an article about human trafficking in Toledo, Ohio with the following information about routes picked by human traffickers in that area:

"It is a well known fact that Toledo, OH is a hub for human trafficking. I-75 and I-94 are thoroughfares, and Michigan's vicinity to Canada is an ideal geographic locale for moving and holding trafficked victims.

Soroptomists Clubs around the world are raising awareness of this awful epidemic. Follow this link to learn more: http://www.soroptimist.org/stoptrafficking.html

Human trafficking is the second largest growing industry here in the USA. It is important that we are aware of how it works and that anyone can be a victim."
http://www.toledoblade.com/State/2012/06/15/Kasich-lauds-rescuers-of-2-t

In an article about the attempts of some women in Menomonie, Wisconsin to start a safe house in that city we again see the significance of I-94 to human traffickers. An article entitled, "Human trafficking victims benefit from a local group's scarf sales" in the Chippewa Valley Leader-Telegram says:

"Fierce Beauty co-founders Jenny Almquist, at right, and Tammy Berend, center, are working to with Cheryl Voyles, a survivor of sex trafficking, to start a non-profit organization Fierce Freedom. The goal is to start a safe house for victims of human trafficking... "

"'The facility is needed, given the few available locations for human trafficking victims to stay,' Berend said, and Menomonie's location along Interstate 94 - often used to transport victims between Chicago and Minneapolis - makes it a good spot for a safe house, a place victims can escape to."
link to www.leadertelegram.com

The following information is from data presented by program created to end human trafficking, particularly child human trafficking, in the state of Oklahoma. The name of the project is "Project Innocence Initiative." Here are some statistics about human trafficking in Oklahoma from the project:

"The crossroads of two major Interstate systems, I-40 and I-35, makes Oklahoma a hub for human trafficking.

The state human trafficking law requires proof of force used in the commission, even when the victim is a minor. The law imposes heightened penalties when the victim is under 18 years of age—the crime is punishable by 10 years to life imprisonment and/or a fine up to $20,000, sentences comparable to those under federal law."

Source: http://www.sharedhope.org/portals/0/documents/oklahomafacts.pdf

The I-94 Corridor and Smiley Face Murders
I will start on this topic by sharing a series of brief pieces of articles about how the Smiley Face Killers have been targeting not just young men, but young men who are specifically in locations along the I-94 corridor. The reason for I-94 being significant is, again, about how I believe it is individuals who work as human traffickers are behind these murders. The following article is one of the better ones I've seen on the Smiley Killer subject. The article mentions key points in Smiley Killer-type disappearances. These points help cement the idea that human traffickers are perpetrators behind the disappearances:

A series of deaths along Interstates 94 and 90 have led an SCSU professor to investigate the cases."
Marli Stewart,4/16/09

"If you are a white male between the ages of 17 and 27, attending a major college or university, have a GPA above 3.0, are athletic, clean cut and good looking, some people think you may be a target.

There are hundreds of college-age men who have mysteriously disappeared since 1997. They vanish from a bar, their friends lose track of them and they end up in a river nearby a few days, weeks or months later.

These accidents all happen close to Interstate 94 and Interstate 90, with Minnesota and Wisconsin having the most victims. Most of these cases have been ruled by police as accidental drowning - case closed.

But when Chris Jenkins went missing and his body was found in the Mississippi river in Minneapolis, the investigation took a new turn. Jenkins' death was ruled as a homicide. He was abducted, driven around in a cargo van and tortured, then placed in the Mississippi river.

Retired New York detectives, Kevin Gannon and Anthony Duarte, have been investigating the cases and believe they are connected. They have teamed up with SCSU professor Lee Gilbertson to find answers to the many questions that the families of the victims are left with.

Gilbertson did an exhaustive examination of the cases after SCSU student Scot Radel went missing in 2005. He looks at time and space, as well as crime mapping to find connections between the victims and patterns in the data.

Two of Gilbertson's students, Amanda Pressenger and Jessica Claeys, found many mysterious similarities between the victims and the cases themselves, leading Gilbertson to believe that these were coordinated attacks on precise, set and prescribed dates -- attacks on victims that fit a distinct profile.

"Because of the way the dates fall out, we believe that these cases are involved with a group of 200 or so individuals who have the same ideology and are planning these 'murders,'" said Gilberston.

Currently, Gannon, Duarte, Gilbertson and Carlson (a former SCSU graduate student) are working on this investigation.

Why are the police not getting involved? The cases spread across 10 of the northern United States. Local police departments do not have the jurisdiction to investigate murders outside their local area.

"With a local police perspective, there's really nothing within our jurisdiction that has our level of suspicion, there's different facts online and some people believe that this wasn't just an accident. I think that any story like this is going to get some media attention, and people are going to wonder," said Sergeant Martin Fayre, public information officer.

Gannon, Duarte and Gilbertson are the only investigators who have gone to all the crime scenes and looked at the big picture. There are two rational explanations for what is happening to these college students. The first is that these men are drinking too much and end up, accidently, in the river. The second is that they drink too much and someone abducts them.

"We want to get the word out and warn people," said Gilbertson.

The chilling evidence that leads Gilbertson to believe that these were murders is a map of where the evidence is found compared to the path the victim actually took and the destination the victim was headed for. In many cases, the victim was going home or to another party or bar.

"The evidence is not leading in the same direction that the body was found and often times, the path of where the victim was supposed to be heading hardly matches up with the path the body was found in," said Gilbertson.

The professor can also predict when the next victim will go missing with pretty good accuracy and he can generally get the region that it's going to happen in, but he can't predict the city. Most the cases happen during the school year, in-between the months of August and May, during peak drinking hours on weekends between Thursday night and Sunday night.

He also has made a chronological map of the cities that these accidents happen in, which shows a pattern that repeats itself twice along I-94. "It's frustrating because I know someone is going to die and there's nothing I can do about it," Gilbertson said.

After a body is found in the river, investigators try to find out where the body entered the river. In most cases, where the body entered the river is where Gannon and Duarte have found graffiti, the most common symbol -- smiley faces. "The ideology is coming from the graffiti, which are symbols that most people wouldn't recognize; it's that unique and that bizarre. It's not gang graffiti," Gilbertson said

For now, the investigators are working to prove the cases were homicide, then look at the murders and look at patterns in the data.

So far they have 12 solid cases with all the evidence and autopsies but the murders are still in clusters, and they have to go back and investigate those clusters to find out what it is about the victims that this group is going after.

There are still many gaps in their investigation that the detectives and professor Gilbertson are trying to work through, but they lack the man power and funds to be able to work diligently on this case. They have requested the help from the FBI but were told that there was not enough evidence to prove foul play.

"Scot's case was ruled as an accident because there was nothing to lead the police to believe that it was nothing more than a tragic accident," Fayre said.

"We deal with quite a few incidents where people end up in the river. We rewarded cops a few months ago for someone that wandered into the river, they went in there with a life vest and a rope and that person would have died also. In that case we knew the circumstances, because the person survived. And it involved alcohol; the person was having suicidal thoughts."

When a body ends up in the river there is always an autopsy done. The problem is that the body is found in the water, the current and water temperature determines where the body is going to end up and erases most of the evidence. With ice it's even more difficult.

The police department did not have any comment on the national investigation that Gannon, Gilbertson and Duarte are working on.

There are many websites that offer information about these cases.

Gannon, Duarte and Gilbertson's website is: www.nationwideinvestigations.us, where you can blog or contact the investigators and see videos of the detectives and Gilbertson in the media. "
Source: link to web.archive.org

In yet another article, we see yet again that the I-94 corridor is as central to so-called "Smiley Face Killers" just as it is to human traffickers. Again, after learning so much about these cases, I don't think by any means is this just a coincidence. I am in no way an expert in both the subjects of Smiley Face Killers and human traffickers, but the more I learn about each, the more I find to tie the two problems together.

"Could student drownings be work of serial killer?" By Todd Richmond, Chippewa Herald

"Rumors have persisted for years that a serial killer is prowling Interstate 94, hunting young men in college bars and plunging them underwater. Investigators, though, say there's no evidence of foul play. They say the victims were so drunk they fell in the river and died."

Source:
http://chippewa.com/news/article_86b50056-7173-58bd-a0cf-8b18ef0106e2.ht

I-35 and Smiley Face Murders

One forum on Smiley Face Killer cases mentions the killers using the I-35 corridor as well as the I-94 corridor. As of late, no one has found any good reason for the killer to select victims down certain interstate corridors. However, in the context of human traffickers maybe being participants in these murders, the usage of these interstate corridors would actually be expected.

Recent disappearances along I-35:
1/17/10 Sylvester McCurry, 18, Superior, WI
1/19/10 Eric Peterson, 24, Lakeville, MN
1/22/10 Jon Lacina, 21, Ames, IA
Source: http://www.topix.com/forum/state/wi/T6806IAL4V2G07C7G

I looked up where I-35 was on a map. I-35 goes all the way to the Mexican Border. It goes through major cities in Texas, the worst state in the U.S. for human trafficking. Those cities are: Austin, TX, Dallas, TX, Waco, TX. Plano, TX and its last U.S. stop before he goes into Mexico is in Larado, Texas.