US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Race : Radical Culture : Social Welfare
Common Thread Of Cruelty By Ted Cruz In His Supreme Court Cases
16 Oct 2018
In his cases before the Supreme Court Ted Cruz always defended Texecution. He worked to nail prisoners to a cruz (cross).
Beto O'Rourke is running against Texas senator Ted Cruz. A campaign ad says Cruz won
all the cases he argued before the Supreme Court.
He won 2, had partial or total losses in the rest.

Ted Cruz cases before the Supreme Court have a common thread of unusual cruelty and lack of compassion for the poor. He argued for the execution of the mentally challenged, the mentally ill, a citizen of another country not allowed to contact his embassy.

He argued that rape should be a capital crime, wanted to keep a man in prison 14 years past what the sentencing law designated, for stealing a calculator from WalMart. He defended the Texas government decision to withhold Medicaid from poor children, and defended Texas' racist gerrymandering which disenfranchises Latinos, blacks, Democrats.

Jose Medellin a Mexican citizen was not allowed by Texas to contact the Mexican embassy though it was his right under the Geneva Convention. Cruz argued against the right of a citizen of another country to contact his own embassy.

Scott Panetti who was mentally ill was sentenced to death in Texas. Cruz argued that Texas should be able to murder the mentally ill. The Supreme Court disagreed.

In Smith v. Texas, Cruz argued that the Texas government had the right to murder a man adjudged to have an IQ of 78. Whatever one thinks of the cultural bias and many other errors of alleged intelligence testing, Cruz was arguing for the execution of LeRoyce Smith who was mentally challenged. He lost the case.

In the Patrick Kennedy case, Texas supported a Louisiana death sentence for rape. The court which since Rehnquist was Chief Justice had reinstituted prisoner murder nevertheless ruled that death sentences should be for murder only, not rape.

In Frew v. Hawkins, Ted Cruz argued that Texas need not provide Medicaid for poor children.

Dretke v. Haley: Michael Haley, sentenced to 16 years for a misdemeanor with a maximum 2 year sentence On behalf of the state, Cruz cruelly argued that Haley had waited too long to contest the error. SCOTUS sent case back to lower court which released him.

In League Of United Latin American Citizens V Perry,
Cruz defended the racist gerrymandering of Texas district lines, a condition which exists to this day.

As a private lawyer, Cruz won a patent dispute re a deep fat fryer for his client.

(Texas has denied the Geneva Convention rights of citizens of Germany, Mexico and Canada, executing them all.)


http://tcadp.org
http://amnesty.org
http://deathpenatyinfo.org
See also:
http://tcadp.org
http://deathpenaltyinfo.org

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.