US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Human Rights
Court Ruling Halts Restrictive NYPD Practices in Anticipation of RNC
20 Jul 2004
Court Ruling Halts Restrictive NYPD Practices in Anticipation of RNC
from's center column...

please forward widely!!! a major victory!!! (unfortunately, pens are still being used).

New York Civil Liberties Union
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

For Immediate Release
Contact: Sheila Stainback, 212-344-30005, ext. 244 or 917-573-7880
Maggie Gram, 212-344-3005, ext. 265

Court Ruling Halts Restrictive NYPD Practices in Anticipation of RNC

In a case brought by the New York Civil Liberties Union, a Manhattan Federal Court today released an order blocking the NYPD from using certain tactics at large demonstrations expected to take place at the Republican National Convention.

In a 78-page decision, District Court Judge Robert Sweet ruled that the NYPD cannot close streets and sidewalks leading to demonstration sites without informing the public about alternate ways to get to the demonstrations. Judge Sweet also ruled the NYPD cannot use “pens” made of interlocking metal barricades at demonstrations without assuring that demonstrators can reasonably get in and out of them. And the judge’s decision said the NYPD cannot conduct generalized searches of the bags of people seeking to enter demonstration sites.

NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said, “With this victory, the NYCLU and other groups now will be able to hold lawful demonstrations without fear of overly restrictive police practices. Judge Sweet has struck a reasonable balance between the First Amendment and concerns about safety, and we believe his ruling will lead to better and safer demonstrations in New York City.”

“In the context of the tumult over demonstrations at the Republican National Convention, this is an historic victory for the right to protest,” said NYCLU Associate Legal Director Christopher Dunn, who tried the case. “This ruling blocks practices that have severely restricted the right to protest lawfully while leaving intact NYPD actions that we recognize are appropriate to preserve safety and public order. Judge Sweet’s decision is good for the First Amendment and good for New York City.”

Judge Sweet’s ruling came after a hearing in June when numerous protesters and protest groups testified about problems caused by the NYPD use of barricades to limit access to demonstrations, use of “pens” to confine crowds at demonstrations, searches of the bags of people seeking to attend demonstrations, and use of mounted officers to disperse crowds. (On this last point, the judge ruled that for technical reasons, the NYCLU could not pursue its challenge to the Mounted Unit.)

NYPD Chief of Department Joseph Esposito testified at the hearing that the relief sought by the plaintiffs about the restrictions on access, use of pens, and use of the Mounted Unit would not undermine the City’s law-enforcement or terrorism concerns.

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.