US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Commentary :: Environment
Nader turns from green to brown - It's the Earth, stupid!
07 Oct 2004
But Nader and Camejo seem oblivious to this critical aspect of the dire circumstances we now face. They're saying there's no difference between TweedleDee and TweedleDum, when there really is, at least as far as the planet is concerned.
thoreau.jpg
Not surprisingly, the "E" word has yet to come up in either the so-called presidential or vice-presidential "debates". One might think that the affairs of humanity do not take place on planet Earth for the lack of reference to the source of our very existence. This is not only true for the recreant Repugnicans & Dems, but for some of the "3rd party" candidates as well.

Of course, we expect that kind of omission, lack of awareness and respect for the Earth from King George and his gang of planet raping thugs and greedheads; after all, most of them supposedly have their gaze raised toward Heaven where the Earth is of little consequence, right?. However, given that the Dems actually HAVE a better record on the environment, you could not be faulted for wondering just why the fuck they hardly mention that!

It's not like high-profile Dems and liberals haven't made major statements on the Bush regime's sorry-ass record on the environment. JFK,Jr.'s "Crimes Against Nature" makes it crystal clear just how very dangerous King George and his corporate boosters really are for the future of the planet and all who live upon it. Can you get much more Democratic than a Kennedy? But checkout the paltry nod given to the planet in the Democratic platform. Maybe that's why John Kerry actually used the word "Kyoto" as he wiped up the floor with Bush during their first encounter. But, a mention is hardly much of a statement for what is the most long-reaching issue to face any of us anywhere on the face of the Earth. Stay tuned tomorrow night to see where the Dem Machine goes with this.

It gets worse though. Given that the Bush regime has THE worst environmental record of ANY administration in the history of the United States, and that at least the Dems have a track record (albeit rather corporate-friendly) of protecting the Earth, why won't the allegedly green Nader candidates mention that? Nader's running mate, Peter Camejo, was just heard on Democracy Now! saying that any difference between the Repugs and the Dems is a "complete illusion" and that there's "nothing that Bush has done that the Democrats didn't support". Sounds like spin to these ears! What's this guy thinking: that he can scrounge a few more votes by lying through his teeth just like the other guys?? There goes my asshole meter! Camejo buried the needle.

True confessions time: this observer actively worked for the Green Party and Ralph Nader during the 2000 campaign doing street theater ("The Marriage of Gush & Bore"). At the time, I foolishly thought that if Bush actually DID win (which he didn't), then the people might become galvanized, turn-off the television, get up off their comfort creature butts, and actually get into the streets. When the illegal invasion of Iraq went down, they really did that, but in the meantime the enemies of the Earth wrecked havoc all around them. I knew Gore's enviro record was way better than Bush, but I blew that off. My very own "miscalculation". Sorry, Mother Earth, I knew not what I did.

Shall we make the same mistake twice?.......not on your life. But Nader and Camejo seem oblivious to this critical aspect of the dire circumstances we now face. They're saying there's no difference between TweedleDee and TweedleDum, when there really is, at least as far as the planet is concerned. That omission is bullshit and, frankly, there's enough bullshit flying around already. Why are Nader and Camejo playing the very game they bash the duopoly for playing? Aren't we supposed to expect more from them? Apparently not. Save the planet, hold your nose and vote Dem, then get in the Dems' collective face in 2005.


This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: Nader turns from green to brown - It's the Earth, stupid!
07 Oct 2004
There's only a hairsbreadth difference between tweedle dee and tweedle dum when it comes to war and killing people and that difference is only about how they go about the killing. That is enough for me to give up on both. At some point we have to break the cycle, see through the good cop bad cop game they play.
Can you say?
07 Oct 2004
Move on – Soros- civil society-I’m a status quo liberal Democrat –sure you can
Nader busted you sellouts a new one in his interview with Amy Goodman
‘The Sorry State of the US Left’
http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/28971

Thanks to the ‘Democrats’ you don’t even have the choice of voting for Nader in Massachusetts! So who are you calling brown?
I'm Ousting Bush. But...
07 Oct 2004
Nader is right. If there's going to be a level playing field? Have ALL the canidates debate. Not the two major jerkoffs.
Kerry wants to carry on this occupation for what? So more caskets can come home? So more mothers can cry themselves to death? So Halliburton can steal more billions?
I'm biting the bullet. To vote for Kerry. ONLY because I HATE the Bush-ites and their stupidity!
Kerry will be a one termer.