Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this article |
The Worldwide Ruling Class - Worker Bee Model, Still Going Strong In The 21st Century
by Clint Clark
Email: clint (nospam) artdsm.com
21 Dec 2004
Old Testament religions are setup to preserve the Ruling Class - Worker Bee model, which began about 8,500 years ago. Old Testament religions are about legitimizing land ownership, taxes, the exploitation of natural resources, social stratification, and wealth generation; not about spirituality. Civilization is the domestication of humans by other humans.
An excerpt from the book, The Gospel Writers, at www.thegospelwriters.com
Civilization is the domestication of humans by other humans. In fact, we are the only indigenous life on our planet who tries to domesticate each other, along with other animals. This domestication can range from a mild form, which helps us to adapt to close-quarters living in population centers, or the more severe form which uses ghosts, gods, spooks, and spirits as a tool for domestication. The earliest domestication of significance is the form developed by walled city-states in Mesopotamia c.6.500 BCE. At this time, democratic assemblies were being replaced by kingships; and as we know kingships eventually were replaced by hereditary monarchies.
From those who have not read the book, The Gospel Writers, I often get the question, "How do you know for sure that there is no god?" I answer them in this way, "There is only one way to prove to you that a god does not exist; and that is, to prove to you why one does."
If you were a young member of the Ruling Class, not to be confused with the Upper Class wealthiest minority, and you asked me to teach you the secret studies known only to the Ruling Class, the Ruling Class Figure Heads (kings, queens, etc.), and the Priests, I would reveal to you, the following:
I would start by saying that it is all about "legitimizing ownership." That's the key. When a potter makes a pot, he has the right to do with it what he wants, including charging you for using it. When a basket weaver makes a basket, he has the right to do with it what he wants, including charging you for using it. When a god makes a planet, he has the right to do with it what he wants, including charging you for using it.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number I
To own something that was never yours to own in the first place, requires that some kind of "original owner" exist, and that this "original owner" (at a minimum) "gave" it to you.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number II
When the original owner cannot be found, such as the "original owner" of the land, invent one. Tell the people on the land that the "original owner" is an all powerful god, and that you have spoken with this god, and that this god has given you all of the land as a gift for being a good and just person; and because that god knows that you will make sure that all of the people on the land will worship that god. Why a fictitious god, you ask? Because at this time in history, a god (like a Supreme Court) would be the highest "Legal Authority" in the land and therefore any laws and contracts (rulings) handed down by a god could not at this time, be nullified or overturned. Clever legal loophole, wouldn't you say? Make sure you call it a lord (top authority) god; a lower ranking god will not work.
And, do not be naive and think that your army alone will keep the people submissive to your will. They must believe that you have the legal right by divine authority to take control of the land; otherwise you will spend much of your time and money trying to put down rebellions that will spring up from time to time.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number III
You do not need to brainwash them extensively with religion. Because, what they worship is generally unimportant, as long as you maintain ownership of the land by (fictitious) divine authority, which will allow you to control the people on the land. The people know, that for anyone banished from the land, it will mean agonizing loneliness (because they do not speak the languages of the people in other lands) and eventually death. You can always threaten someone with banishment, if they try to rebel and make any statement that refutes your fictitious legal right.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number IV
Once you have told the lie, you can never admit to anyone that the "original owner," (the maker of the land -- a god) never existed. You must silence or kill anyone who tries to say that the "original owner" never existed, or that the whole thing was a hoax to steal the land from the people on the land.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number V
There is an alternative to silencing or killing the people who do not support the "original owner" hoax or idea. Buy their loyalty; but buy it with something that costs you nothing to give away. Tell them that the "original owner" will grant them "immortality" in exchange for worship and belief in him, as the "original owner." In addition, tell them that this immortality will be spent in a place of great beauty and love, where they can be reunited with loved ones who have already died.
And they will be gullible enough to believe you. Why?
Because everything comes back to life after dearth, such as the Sun each day, the Trees each spring, and even you by way of your first-born son; who looks like you.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number VI
To get the people to work the land that you have now stolen from them, using Lessons 1-4 previously discussed, so that they will generate wealth for you and other Ruling Class members, tell the people that it is the "original owner's" wish that they toil and suffer, so that when they get to that place of great beauty and love, they will appreciate it more. And, that they will never have to work again, once they get there. Plus, they will always be loved and never abandoned by the "original owner."
Ruling Class - Lesson Number VII
Tell the people that the "original owner" is invisible and cannot be seen or described. And, that the "original owner," has no name; in other words, he is not like anyone the people might have heard of before or might run across later.
Tell them also, that the "original owner" can see into their hearts and minds, twenty-four hours a day, ever day of the year. And that, the "original owner" will know, by looking into their hearts and minds, if they do not love him in return or are thinking of abandoning him, (even though he would never think to stop loving them or of abandoning them). This will make them feel very fearful from being under a watchful and invisible eye every moment of their life, with absolutely no privacy anywhere on the planet, and feel very guilty for not loving and staying with someone who loves them. In other words, someone who would never abandon them or become disloyal. This fear and guilt will help them to remain loyal.
Ruling Class - Lesson Number VIII
Remember to tell the people that the Earth was made by the "original owner" in 6,500 BCE; so they do not go looking for the "democratic" non-kingship model, prior to that time. You do not want the Ruling Class - Worker Bee model to be discovered, as the hoax it is; or you will have an expensive and time consuming rebellion on your hands.
The Math and the Perception of Time
The Hoax Version
a. - 6,500 BCE + 2,003 CE = 8,503 years since the hoax for stealing land has been going on.
b. - 6,500 BCE + 2,003 CE = 8,503 years since the Jewish god created the Earth and all the life forms on the planet.
c. - 8,503 divided by 8,503 = 1.00 or 100% of the time, civilization has been going on the way we want them to believe it has. Therefore, it is perfectly normal to live life the way they currently are and there was no other type, ever.
The Truthful Version
a. - 6,500 BCE + 2,003 CE = 8,503 years since the hoax for stealing land has been going on.
b. - 150,000 - 120,000 years since our species has been on Earth (anatomically modern Late Pleistocene humans - from Mitochondrial Eve - White et al. 2003).
c. - 8,503 divided by 135,000 (arithmetic mean) = 6.3 percent of the time.
The hoax for stealing land has been going on for less than 10% of the time since we, anatomically modern Late Pleistocene humans, have been on Earth. Or, about 472 generations of your ancestors out of about 7,500 generations of your ancestors. In other words, an extremely brief time; and not a very long time as Old Testament religions and the Ruling Class need the Worker Bees to believe. Conceal this at all costs forever or we, the Ruling Class, Old Testament religions, and Figure Heads, are all doomed.
And, even though Turkey was the real "Cradle of Civilization," tell them that Mesopotamia was instead. We don't want them to know about Turkey either.
Next week, we will teach you how to keep this newly stolen land wealth in your family, through the use of a new invention called "Hereditary Monarchies." It's a more advanced version of the hoax you are currently using for your kingships, and it will keep democratic assemblies from forming once again (such as those prior to 6,500 BCE), after your death. End of Lessons.
As I mentioned early, I would answer them in this way, "There is only one way to prove to you that a god does not exist; and that is, to prove to you why one does," which was for the purpose of land ownership and taxes.
Whether it was the LORD of the gods, Yahweh (Jewish god of the Hebrews), during the time of Moses, or the LORD of the gods, Marduk, during the time of King Cyrus of Persia (see Cyrus Cylinder -- The British Museum in London), LORD gods were legal and social domestication tools for the Ruling Class and their Figure Heads and nothing more.
a. - Ownership of the land.
b. - Ownership of everything on the surface of the land, including water.
c. - Ownership of everything below the surface of the land, such as gold, diamonds, granite, limestone, etc.
d. - Ownership of everything living or dead on top off or below the surface of the land.
Including the taxes collected on the land of our planet, how many billions upon billions upon billions of dollars would you expect the dollar amount that this land-and-tax hoax represents, which also included all mineral rights, lumber, animals for food and trade goods, water rights, etc.?
Do you think some minority Ruling Class group, might lie to keep an aggressive hold on this wealth? How about a religious organization, the ones who legitimized the taking of the land in the first place? Do you think they might lie to keep a firm and continuous hold on this wealth? If you were to suddenly become the inheritor of the same massive chunk of land that King Cyrus of Persia claimed legal ownership of, what would you be willing to do to keep it? And at the same time, what would you be willing to do to keep all the people on that land from rebelling due to your illegal ownership of that land?
Manipulating our ancestors into believing that Old Testament religions were about spirituality, immortality, ethics, and morality, was a ruse to keep them, and now us, focused on something that sounded very important to pay attention to; and simultaneously, away from figuring out the real function of religion.
So are we a modern civilization? Hardly. A very small group of people (wolves) still claim ownership of all of the land and its resources on our planet, which legally belongs to all indigenous flora and fauna on our planet. They acquired ownership, first by fictitious LORD gods, and now they maintain ownership by armies in addition to Old Testament religions. I would expect that when we are tried of being the sheep on our planet, that we will actually move on to become a modern civilization and cage the wolves instead. The first step in doing this will be to completely eliminate Old Testament religions, along with taking back our land and eliminating this Roman property tax nightmare that we are all still living in.
This work is in the public domain
Re: The Worldwide Ruling Class - Worker Bee Model, Still Going Strong In The 21st Century
(No verified email address)
22 Dec 2004
I agree with your premise (that religion is the tool of social control)
however you have grossly over simplified the Jewish writings, which are very complex and not subject to such over simplification as though somehow they represented some monolithic construct deviously created by scheming elites
the story of the creation of the documents spans many centuries, but only goes back to about 1000 BCE (not this other date of 6500 BCE, if you are referring to the Bible and not perhaps some other religions). Furthermore, according to the book of Samuel and the Book of judges, people were living in 'anarchist' communities without the existence of states much later than 6500 BCE.
The book of Micah has as one of its principle themes land reform and the overthrow an oligarchy that controlled all the land
according to Jeremiah documents such as Leviticus and Numbers were forgeries cooked up by the priests
according to the prophet Hosea both the book of Judges and the book of Kings promoted an ideology that was a religious forgery
the old testament is complex and not the simple thing you make it out to be, and the ideology you condemn was controversial even thousands of years ago since in a strange way (which makes the Bible 'contradictory') the protests are preserved in the text next to the documents the protestations condemn (which is why the Bible is 'contradictory')
some discussion of this complexity can be found in a zip file bible commentary i have posted on my site
it is interesting to note however that Jeremiah does agree with your analysis of the political purpose of the Torah laws...there are hundreds of such regulations in the Bible and stories which concern land ownership being assigned by a God, even if it means killing everyone already there, such things being found in the Torah
according to Jeremiah, in the eight chapter, the Torah laws were forged by what he called 'the lying pen of the scribes' which had then made the Torah 'into a lie'. It is interesting to note that he then goes on to suggest that the land would be taken away, since he says that the point of these regulations was to promote the stealing of 'ill gotten gain' and the practice of 'abominations', with the biggest crime in the Torah being the theft of land which, as in Micah, would now be taken away from those who had accumulated this land.
so your analysis of the purpose of the Torah is correct, and this ideology also informs such documents as judges and kings, but your criticism of the prophets in this regard is not valid and you have oversimplified what is actually a much more complex set of documents than your broad and sweeping condemnation would suggest is the case...
your position on he existence of God being 'disproven' because the old testament contained crap is hardly valid either, as is your suggestion that people did not believe in a diety before 6500...this argument is invalid and far to braod and sweeping as such arguments always seem to be
it is interesting to note that both the belief in God and the belief in no God are equally ridiculous, and the suggestion is often made that somehow the belief in no God makes more sense, is more rational, when actually either position is absurd, making any argument based on so called reason nonsensicial
for example we could say that universe suddenly appeared spontaneously from nothing about ten billion years ago...
or we could suggest that universe just always existed eternally, being uncreated, with no beginning and no end
if we ask 'where did God come from' or 'how could God be eternal with no beginning or end' it is equally incomprehensible to ask 'how could the universe have no beginning and no end'
it is also absurd to suggest that the universe had a beginning, which leaves us to wonder what existed in the endless eternity before this beginning, which would be nothing one must suppose, and then somehow something came from nothing, which is also absurd, just as it is incomprehensible to imagine either God or the universe being eternal with no beginning or no end
so then it is the case that really nothing should exist, and the fact that there is existence is absurd, no matter how you look at it, and the claim that somehow it makes more sense to believe in something absurd with no God than it does to believe in the exact same absurdity with a God is nonsense, and reveals nothing more than a strong ideological bias against the belief in God, which is also absurd in a different sort of way, since it suggests a strange hatred of justice, since the belief in God is typically tied in with a belief in justice (so for example we find that those who are being murdered by oppressors at the last moment of their existence place their last hopes in God just before they are destroyed, while those who slaughter and destroy them do so with the confidence that they are destroying life forever and ever sending their victims into the eternal blackness...
so then those who argue vehemently for the nonexistence of God, which is an emotional argument, and not rational, since as I pointed out above, such an argument can never be rational or make any sense whatsoever no matter how you frame it, it turns out to be the case that the vehement opposition to the existence of God is something that is shared by both oppressors and those who argue vehemently for emotional reasons in favor of the nonexistence of God, typically always claiming to have proved this beyond doubt, which is not true, since that cannot be done, but nevertheless, due to some deep seated emotional hostility such people attempt to destroy faith, while upholding the belief system of evil oppressors, destroying justice and the last hope of the oppressed in the process...why anyone would dream of a world with no God is a mystery to me...it is more emotionally sane to say 'I hope there is a God' than to long for no God, which is to long for the victory of wickedness and cruelty, with the evil being triumphant, destroying their victims completely
the point of the above paragraph is just to point out the emotionally disturbed and rather twisted nature of the hope for no God and the attempts to destroy all faith, which always strikes me as being monstrous and must be happening for emotional, and not intellectural reasons, since there is no common sense of rational way to comprehend the imcomprehensible and the absurdity of the universe, which means that adamant arguments against the existence of God are emotionally driven for some mysterious reason (enlighten me as to what the actual emotional motives for such a dark hope might be)