US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Announcement :: Politics
Talk and Video about Bush Stealing the Election and 9/11 Cover-up
13 Jun 2005
Talk and Video about Bush Stealing the Election and 9/11 Cover-up
First Parish Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington
630 Massachusetts Ave., Arlington, Massachusetts
Friday, June 17 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Admission: Free
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Talk and Video about Bush Stealing the Election and 9/11 Cover-up
First Parish Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington
630 Massachusetts Ave., Arlington, Massachusetts
Friday, June 17 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Admission: Free
Attorney Joseph Lopisi (member of the Coalition against Election Fraud and webmaster of www.bushstole04.com) and Jonathan Simon (downloaded raw exit poll data on election night) co-host a talk on two separate but connected topics: how Bush stole the election by computer fraud and the Bush administration's involvement in the 9/11 attacks. The mainstream media is not willing to speak about either of these topics nor is the general populace willing to listen to the truth about the two issues.
1. Bush Stole the Election by Computer Fraud
In the presidential 2004 election there was a dramatic, unexplained and unprecedented discrepancy between the exit polling results and the final vote tallies. This discrepancy favored Bush in 10 or 11 battleground states, notably Ohio (6.7%), Pennsylvania (6.5%) and Florida (4.9%). The national exit polls showed Kerry winning 51 to 48 percent. The odds of this being due to random errors are almost 100 million to one. Such vote manipulation was possible because 80% of the votes were tabulated on electronic equipment, counted by machines.
How George Bush used computer fraud to steal the election
1. No Paper Trail
2. Conservative Republican Owned Voting Machine Companies
3. No Recounts Possible
4. Diebold Voting Machines Can Be Hacked.
5. According to an analysis of the 2004 Presidential election by Dr. Steven Freeman of the University of Pennsylvania
"…In ten of eleven consensus battleground states, the tallied margin differed from the predicted (exit poll) margin, and in every one, the shift favored Bush.” (See: “The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy” in “Scholarly Analyses” at shadowbox.i8.com/stolen.htm). The discrepancy favored Bush in Ohio (6.7%), Pennsylvania (6.5%) and Florida (4.9%), and, according to Dr. Freeman, the odds of this being due to random errors are 250 million-to-one.
6. No Government Oversight of Voting Machine Industry
7. None or Criminally Negligent Government Oversight of Voting Machines

8. Criminal Records of Diebold’s Senior Executives
9. How Easy It Is to Change the Vote
On the other hand, the Central Vote Tabulation systems are a very inviting target – by simply compromising one Windows desktop, you could potentially influence tens or hundreds of thousands of votes, with only one attack to execute and only one attack to erase your tracks after.
10. Conclusion

The above are some of the lines that connect the dots of the Bush Conspiracy to steal this election. As Fox News’ "fair and balanced" Bill O'Reilly says repeatedly "we report, you decide".

2. Bush Administration Was Involved in the Orchestration and the Cover-up of 9/11
A mass movement and a mountain of disturbing evidence has been growing beneath the radar of U.S. media. The U.S. media (including alternative media) has done an extraordinarily superhuman job of "hearing" "seeing" and "speaking no evil." However, almost immediately after 9-11-2001's horrendous attacks on New York and Washington D.C., many researchers, ordinary citizens, and journalists [who've been given precious little print in U.S. papers or TV] began to smell something rotten . . . not in Denmark . . . but rather, right here in the good ol' US of A.

This movement's early roots began when many people scratched their heads in wonder at "how 4 commercial jet liners could fly hijacked for nearly an hour and a half the morning of 9-11, without any Air Force fighter interceptor jets turning a wheel until it was too late," as stated by acclaimed Canadian TV journalist, Barry Zwicker. Zwicker's powerful documentary "The Great Deception," which suggests top Bush Admin. officials were likely complicit in the 9-11 attacks, aired on Canada 's Vision TV network which is viewed by millions of Canadians.
Unfortunately Americans in the U.S. have been "protected" from viewing this critical documentary.
A critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report by Professor Griffin (author of The New Pearl Harbor) shows that "omissions and distortions" in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC.
Attorney Lopisi is a member of the Massachusetts and Florida Bars. He is a member of the political action group called Coalition against Election Fraud (www.caef.us). CAEF was formed in Cambridge, Mass. soon after the Presidential Election of 2004 for the purpose of persuading United States Senators and Congressman to object, on January 6, 2005, to certifying the Electoral College vote for the states of Ohio, Florida and New Mexico, based upon massive voter suppression and computer fraud. As a result of CAEF’S efforts and many other concerned citizens' efforts across the country, Senator Barbara Boxer joined Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones in objecting to the certification of the electors from the State of Ohio. These objections forced both the Senate and the House of Representatives to separately debate for two hours each whether to certify the Electoral College vote for the State of Ohio. As a result of this objection to the certification of these electors and the following two hour debate, 33 Congresspeople joined Senator Boxer in objecting to the certification of the electors from the State of Ohio.

Jonathan Simon is a graduate of Harvard College, New York University School of Law, and New York Chiropractic College. He is a member of the Bar of Massachusetts and also directs a health clinic in Cambridge. As a result of his prior experience as a political survey research analyst for Peter D. Hart Research Associates in Washington, Dr. Simon became an early advocate for an exit poll-based "burglar alarm" system, independent of media and corporate control, to detect computerized vote shifting in Election 2004. Forced to rely instead on "official" exit polling, Dr. Simon was able to capture critical data briefly posted on the web prior to its election-night disappearance, data which served as a primary basis for analysis of the accuracy of the 2004 vote count. Dr. Simon is a member of Alliance for Democracy and We Do Not Concede, and has worked closely with the National Ballot Integrity Project and CAEF. He is also at work on a book to be entitled While America Slept: The Theft of Election 2004 and the Death of American Democracy. Dr. Simon is deeply skeptical about the impact of current federal legislative electoral reform proposals, and believes that a restoration of fair and honorable elections will depend primarily on continuing analysis of voting systems now in place, coupled with the introduction of working paper ballot-based alternative models at the state and local levels.
Interview Contact: Attorney Joseph A. Lopisi
Web site: http://www.bushstole04.com

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.