US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Afghanistan Returns to Pre-Taliban Anarchy
22 Nov 2001
Modified: 09:47:26 AM
Afghanistan has returned to a state of anarchy and lawlessness that existed there between the fall of the Communist Regime in 1992 and the emergence of the Taliban in 1994.
21 November 2001 : Afghanistan Returns to Pre-Taliban Anarchy

Afghanistan has returned to a state of anarchy and lawlessness that existed there between the fall of the Communist Regime in 1992 and the emergence of the Taliban in 1994. Different warlords now control different provinces and there has been widespread rape, looting, murder and theft from areas now controlled by these warlords, such as in Mazar-i-Sharif, which is controlled by the forces of the Communist, General Dostum, who has a history of human rights abuses. It is said that once Dostum had one of his officer's legs pulled apart by tanks over a minor disobedience. These are the people now controlling Afghanistan with the help of American and British allies. A news report from Jalalabad below further underscores this.

JALALABAD, Afghanistan: Ordinary Afghans in Jalalabad and the surrounding eastern province of Nangarhar feel insecure under the new post-Taliban government of the area, and most businesses are closed because of fear of looting by the new local commanders.

"We are not willing to continue our business and trade in such an insecure atmosphere. I have shifted all my vehicles to my house," a showroom owner in the main Jalalabad bazaar, Muhammad Aslam, told reporters. "We fear that the commanders will loot our property. Most commanders now included in the government have stolen vehicles from relief agencies that were working in the area," he said, adding that many guards refused to work at night in the bazaar.

"The Taliban provided incredible security to the people but that is now history," said a security guard who pleaded not to be named. "Since the situation has deteriorated so much, why should we continue our job when we are unable to provide security to people's property?"

Although the Taliban were criticised by the international community for their harsh attitude towards women, their withdrawal from Jalalabad and other eastern areas has had very little impact on women.

Most women seen in the bazaar are still wearing the burqa, the head-to-toe veil which has only a small opening for the eyes. However, a few women were in the markets wearing only shawls.

"People feel insecure for various reasons. They believe that the newly established government may face differences among its members. This fear is based on concrete grounds and past experience," said a source close to a former Afghan commander Halim Shah.

Haleem Shah and his brother Sohrab have been denied any post in the new government. They had controlled telecommunications and intelligence in Nangarhar province before the arrival of the Taliban. Locals feel that the two brothers are angry and they may create serious problems for the new government.

According to one source, Haleem Shah has threatened the Shura (council) to seize a position for himself and his brother by force.

Some government sources admitted that the new government was relying on inexperienced intelligence personnel. About 40 per cent of personnel are under the age of 17.

Meanwhile, some locals said that a sizable number of Arab fighters were still hiding in the nearby mountains. Six of them were recently killed. Some locals have asked the new government not to take any action against these Arabs as they are guests in the area.
See also:
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


22 Nov 2001
I understand what you are trying to say, but the use of the word "anarchy" to me, is not justified. You use the word anarchy to describe the situation in Afghanistan as a bad situation. While I don't contend that Afghanistan is in a state of colapse I do have a problem with calling "it" anarchy for a number of reasons. I think that mutual aid, community, and voluntary cooperation are the basic elements that make up an egalitarian (anarchist) society. I certainly do not think that murder, theft and the other grim pictures that you paint are illistrative of anarchism whatsoever.