|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
News :: Human Rights |
|
2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
|
by Boston Mad Man
Email: whereRwe (nospam) usa.net (unverified!) |
22 Nov 2005
Modified: 10:25:58 PM |
|
2100 soldiers dead in Iraq. As of today. November 22, 2005. |
Appalling is the start of this senseless fiasco. Two thousand one hundred. And counting.
On the human side? Over 200,000 dead. For BP, Texaco, Shell, etc. And don't forget Halliburton (KBR), Carlyle Group, Raytheon, Colt and many others profiting from death.
All of us, that have any sense of morality? Should be ashamed, appalled and enraged. (I've felt this way from day one of the oil war.)
Time to speak out the truth. Time to end this fiasco.
Happy Thanksgiving... |
This work is in the public domain |
Please Don't Feed the Trolls
Wikipedia defines an Internet Troll as: "An Internet troll is either a person who sends messages on the Internet hoping to entice other users into angry or fruitless responses, or a message sent by such a person." Boston IMC strives to provide both a grassroots media resource as well as a forum for people to contribute to a meaningful discussion about local issues. Please, when posting comments, be respectful of others and ignore those trying to interrupt or discourage meaningful discourse. Thank you.
-- Boston Indymedia volunteers
Due to on going anti spam work quick comments are currently broken please use the full comment form. We do hope to have quick comments back on line soon.
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For Israel. |
by more like it
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
|
Dont you think |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by Veteran
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
Appalled at the oil war? That is priceless!
Happy T-Day! |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by I served as well
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
|
We would all love to end this fiasco but more good is being done than bad. |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by Accountant
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
Actually I think it's more like:
2100 U.S. soldiers dead for:
Iraqi population control [223]
Oil [420]
American Corporate hegemony [140]
Promoting fascism at home [40]
Saving Saudi and Jordanian Royalty [135]
Preserving Pakistani dictatorship [129]
Helping Israeli right-wing F*** things up for Israelis and Palestinians [200]
Arming Turkey [122]
Perpetuating 9-11 myth [119]
Breeding terrorists [251]
That doesn't add up to 2100, but that's becuase we still don't know what the F*** some of these folks died for. We'll update the figures as that information becomes available... |
|
We would all love to end this fiasco but more good is being done than bad. |
by Brad
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
|
Hardly, it is bad and getting worse. The best thing we could have done is listen to the left when they said it would be a mistake and cause unrest in the mid east. The best thing to do now is to again listen to the left when they say we need to get out of there ASAP. |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by W
(No verified email address) |
23 Nov 2005
|
|
Brad, you just don't understand the forward strategy of freedom. Alienating the people we intend to free by bombing killing torturing and spreading feces on them, and then imposing a government of kleptocrats that can only hold its grip on power by being more brutal than Saddam was, is a brilliant plan devised by our crack team of freedom fighters. If you didn't hate America so much, you might understand how these strategies are going to make the world a more beautioful place for everyone. |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by Boston Mad Man
(No verified email address) |
24 Nov 2005
|
Think about it. We stay? More die. We leave? Civil War. Either way? Iraq will disinigrate into smaller states. And there will be nothing stopping these people. It's their country. Not ours. (Just like Nam...)
Let it go.
BRING OUR TROOPS HOME! |
|
Re: 2100 U.S. Soldiers Dead. For PNAC. |
by Veteran
(No verified email address) |
24 Nov 2005
|
|
Some twisted views on here. |
