Comment on this article |
Email this article |
9.11: The Great Deception Pt 3
by Vision TV
07 Feb 2002
Ahmed writes that bin Laden is merely a piece in a chess game. The stakes of the game are the last of the world’s oil reserves and “…the Bush administration’s “(consolidation of power) to pursue a drastic unlimited militarization of foreign policy on a massive and unprecedented scale required by long-standing elite planning, while crushing domestic dissent and criminalizing legitimate protest.”
This Canadian TV station is the only television media outlet asking the 9.11 questions many of us are asking, but which are being totally ignored by the mass media. Hopefully at some point they will be made available to purchase on video.
I like this quote by Patrick Martin when he says "the least likely explanation of September 11 is the official one: that dozens of Islamic fundamentalists, many with known ties to Osama bin Laden, were able to carry out a wide-ranging conspiracy on three continents, targeting the most prominent symbols of American power, without any US intelligence agency having the slightest idea of what they were doing."
Please visit my nonprofit website exposing the cancer indu$try
Please Click Here
Thank you. Gavin.
Vision TV Insight Media File
The Great Deception"
Part 3 of a multi-part series 3
Transcript of Mon.,Feb 4, 2002 Broadcast
What really happened on Sept. 11th? “9/11 -- Part 3.”
Osama bin Laden is not an easy subject. Characterizations of
him vary wildly. The most common, because it’s the official
narrative of cardboard cutout simplicity, is that he’s the world’s
number one villain, the diabolical mastermind behind the events
of September 11th. Another view: Osama is “… the conscience
Well, globally, Osama is like a Rorschach ink blot. His character
and role morph into what various publics project upon him,
based on what they’re led to believe.
Take books. There’s an adage “You can’t tell a book by its
cover” Maybe so, but you can tell it by its index. “Bin Laden, the
Man Who Declared War on America” is by Yossef Bodansky,
former senior consultant to the Pentagon and U.S. state
department. “Bodansky explains (a) vast global conspiracy…” it
says in the foreword.
The index entries on bin Laden in this 440-page book run almost
two pages. But there are just four references to the CIA, mostly
brief and reveal nothing. Yet the decades-long
eight-billion-dollar CIA covert operation in Afghanistan was also
its largest ever, according to numerous sources, including
journalist John Cooley in his book Unholy Wars: Afghanistan,
America and International Terrorism.
Contrast the Bodansky book with this one, “Taliban,” by Ahmed
Rashid. He’s a Pakistani journalist who’s covered Afghanistan
for 21 years. In his index are eight entries about bin Laden and
11 about the CIA.
Now, back to bin Laden. What do most sources agree on? We
know bin Laden is born in Saudi Arabia in 1957. Okay we’re not
sure about the year. His father becomes a close friend of the
king, and “fabulously wealthy.” Bin Laden Corporation becomes
one of the largest construction companies in the Middle East.
In this business you’re dealing with the Pakistani
intelligence—the ISI, Saudi intelligence, the CIA. With his family’s
blessing Osama becomes closely associated with the CIA in the
Afghan war against the Soviets. Bin Laden Corp built major
training camps for the CIA. “In 1986 he helped build the Khost
tunnel complex, which the CIA was funding as a major arms
stoage depot, training facility and medical centre for the
mujaheddin…” At this point bin Laden’s story, like Stephen
Leacock’s horse, “rides madly off in all directions.”
My questions: Did he turn against the CIA? Maintain ties while
making anti-American statements? Was he manipulated?
“Former associates describe him as deeply impressionable,
always in need of mentors,” Rashid writes.
You’re forced to turn to a larger canvas. As in the final draft of
this to-be-published book “The War on Freedom, Causes and
Consequences of 9-11” by Nafeez Ahmed, executive director
of the Institute for Policy Research & Development in Brighton,
England. He’s an Oxfam campaigner who specializes in writing
international reports on human rights. News of his reports have
been carried by Reuters, Associated Press, The Guardian, The
Independent, the Jewish Chronicle and the London Jewish
Ahmed writes that bin Laden is merely a piece in a chess game.
The stakes of the game are the last of the world’s oil reserves
and “…the Bush administration’s “(consolidation of power) to
pursue a drastic unlimited militarization of foreign policy on a
massive and unprecedented scale required by long-standing
elite planning, while crushing domestic dissent and criminalizing
I believe that if we shrink from testing Ahmed’s overview and
accept only the headlines of the day we will fail to see the
forest for the trees.
The USA helped recruit, train and equip thousands of killer
mujahideen in the anti-Soviet war. Ahmed’s book and other
evidence shows the recruiting and training terrorists, including
those in al-Qaeda, has continued for years. The White House
“went underground” with this aid.
This is detailed in the 1993 book “The Outlaw Bank, A Wild Ride
Into the Secret Heart of BCCI.” BCCI stands for Bank of Credit
and Commerce International. It collapsed after exposure of its
massive fraud and corruption. The book’s authors are Jonathan
Beaty and S. C. Gwynne. Beaty was an investigative reporter
and senior correspondent for Time magazine; Gwynne Time’s
economics editor and author of “Selling Money.”
The book reveals the BCCI’s connections with the CIA and “a
Washington coverup that …protected the BCCI….” The BCCI’s
‘Black Network’ operating in Afghanistan and other countries
dealt in “drug deals and terrorism.” The authors describe what
they found as “a disturbing criminal conspiracy.”
Further evidence of the long and deep involvement of the CIA in
terrorism is found in the 1987 book The Crimes of Patriots, A
True Tale of Dope, Dirty Money, and the CIA, by Jonathan
Kwitny. Kwitny at the time had been a Wall Street Journal
reporter for 16 years.
He wrote that neither the director of the CIA nor the deputy
director “had, in his career, shown any reluctance to shed
American or foreign blood in covert military operations as a
means to carrying out their assignments.” The book details
“how some of the biggest names in American defense and
intelligence were involved in an operation that promoted the
dope trade, tax evasion, and gun running…”
Michael Springmann is a Washington lawyer. He worked for the
US State Department’s foreign service for 20 years. He spent
two years as chief of the visa section at the U.S. Consulate in
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. His superiors repeatedly ordered him to
issue visas to unqualified applicants. It was illegal. He
He’s just written this article in the reputable Covert Action
Quarterly of Washington, D.C. and was interviewed by the CBC
radio program Dispatches. “I had not been protesting fraud.
What I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits,
rounded up by [the Agency and] Osama bin Laden, to the U.S.
for terrorist training by the CIA.” He details numerous cases.
“The State Department did not run the Consulate in Jeddah. The
CIA did. Of the roughly 20 Washington-dispatched staff there, I
know for a certainty that only three people (including myself)
had no ties, either professional or familial, to any of the U.S.
What bugs me to no end is that mainstream media journalists
operate as if these books – written by the most professional of
their ranks – they operate as if these books don’t exist! Fellow
journalists, the dots exist. For goodness’ sake, connect them,
while you can.
There are plenty of what we call in the news biz “pegs.” Solid
current evidence. New dots. But these dots, past and present,
are never connected. Take this November 22nd front page
story in The Globe and Mail. I almost missed the startling
information in this myself because the headline indulges a
stereotypical Canadian self-putdown: us stupid Canadians, we
let a terrorist -- one Ali Mohamed -- get away.
The real story is buried. “Mr. Mohamed … was a U.S. Army
sergeant…but trained bin Laden’s bodyguards.”
“Ali Mohamed was in the Americans’ good books…” “…Ali
Mohamed wasn’t so shadowy in those days. He was one of
A terrorist one of the FBI’s “guys?”
The headline on this story might have read: “FBI Protected Top
al-Qaeda Operative.” And it might well have been the banner.
Ahmed’s own conclusion is that “the documentation… strongly
suggests the United States, or more precisely significant
elements of the U.S. government, military and intelligence, had
extensive foreknowledge of the 11th September attacks, and
were in various ways complicit in those attacks.”
All this and more must be considered when asking “What really
happened on Sept. 11th?”
And bin Laden? Journalist and former Los Angeles Police
Department detective Michael Ruppert quipped recently: “One
guess is that he’s in Switzerland having his nails done.”
Next week, George W. Bush and the Oiligarchy.