US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

The Boston Underground (archive)
Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Hidden with code "Policy Violation"
Commentary :: DNC : GLBT/Queer : International : Organizing : Politics
And Sammy 'the Fifth Scalito' Makes Five...
28 Jan 2006
.

Should the Jews hate political suppression more than anything or anyone? I would think so. It would have been the cruelest experience imaginable to be with thousands of people who had absolutely no power to communicate or conspire to escape, but go to their deaths because of forced silence. When we consider the many historical parallels, it is no wonder that freedom of assembly and speech formed the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
.

("DC-IMC is an outstanding site, one of the best in the network.") Oh yeah? Substantiate that statement, please.


The first and only ‘indymedia’ website to bar me from uploading was IMC DC. I think an editor or editors got peeved when I sent a screen-capture of the front page that contained my headline, which discussed the very issue of IMC censorship. I think I made them look bad through such demonstrative proof of biased censorship, but I do not need IMC DC to post anything more. I will just make links to my archived articles that remain hidden there, so when people arrive there in context they will see how biased they are at IMC DC.


Here is an example of the kind of article that IMC DC will remove and call ‘policy violation’:


The accumulation of five out of nine Supreme Court Justices in 20 years is not a bad score for Catholics, but I find the sudden historical surge of power just a tad unsettling, and cringe to think who will be next, after Alito’s confirmation and Justice John Paul Stevens retires. It seems like Republicans have been predominantly favoring Catholic Justices.


Antonin Scalia was the first Catholic Associate Justice selected in 30 years. He took his seat on September 26, 1986. [Republican - Ronald Reagan Appointment] He and Anthony M. Kennedy ruled as the second and third Catholic Justices with William J. Brennan, Jr. [Republican – Dwight D. Eisenhower Appointment] until Brennan’s July 20, 1990 retirement due to health reasons.


Anthony M. Kennedy was ruling as the third Catholic Justice since February 18, 1988, then second Catholic Justice with Antonin Scalia since Justice Brennan’s retirement in 1990. [Republican - Ronald Reagan Appointment]


Clarence Thomas has been ruling as the third Catholic Justice with Scalia and Kennedy since October 23, 1991. [Republican - Bush Sr. Appointment]


John Roberts is the first Catholic Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 84 years. He has been ruling as the fourth Catholic Justice with Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas since September 29, 2005. [Republican - Bush Jr. Appointment]


Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. was born on April 1, 1950, and if confirmed, at 55 he will be the fifth Catholic Justice to serve with Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Roberts. [Republican - Bush Jr. Appointment]


The aging Justice John Paul Stevens [Republican – Gerald Ford Appointment] will be 86 on April 20, 2006. Will there soon come forth another Catholic to make six Catholic Justices on the US Supreme Court? Will we see a 2 to 1 standing against those in defiance of Catholic moral convictions?


Imagine the United States Supreme Court with five Catholics, one Episcopalian (Souter) and one Protestant (Stevens) appointed by five Republican Presidents, and two Jews appointed by one Democrat President. Upon his confirmation, Sam Alito will be the seventh sitting Justice and the fifth Catholic Justice selected by Republican Presidents, and only two Jewish Supreme Court Justices (Ginsburg and Breyer) will remain who were appointed by the Democrat President Bill Clinton.


Do you think the editors should remove this article?


People did not ‘smell the coffee’ on the trains to Auschwitz, because no one was able to broadcast the Furor’s plans.


Should the Jews hate political suppression more than anything or anyone? I would think so. It would have been the cruelest experience imaginable to be with thousands of people who had absolutely no power to communicate or conspire to escape, but go to their deaths because of forced silence. When we consider the many historical parallels, it is no wonder that freedom of assembly and speech formed the First Amendment to the US Constitution.


I think any Jewish Senator who would not stand up against Sammy ‘the Fifth’ Scalito’s Confirmation is brain-dead. People came to power during the third Reich, with more media sophistication and manipulation than the negligent Administration that we see in America today, either because Hitler tricked the religious leaders into endorsing him for his religious rhetoric, or they were privy to it and gave him media advice. Whoever was behind that vile mindset had an explicit understanding of the mechanisms of ‘revealed’ religion. The Third Reich could not have risen by any other means than the sly gradual ensnarement of society through media control, suppression, taking control of the courts – and of course, creating scapegoats based on religious reasoning.


The old historical pattern is emerging again. More and more peoples’ rights are being taken away, and they are being pushed into a corner, and only those few brave enough are standing up in rebellion to the strangle hold that ‘revealed’ religion has on democracy. Look at Palestine now, or Iraq, and see how democracy walks a fine line between religious freedom and religious domination, then think why many nations are uncomfortable with the newly elected Hamas Party. I hope that this will finally be the unveiling and the undoing of unfair religious infiltration of the democratic process, and a need for consensus government.


I think deists ought to be on the Supreme Court, because they make much more sense than these ‘professed’ assholes of apostasy. Deists do not claim to be doing some god’s will, but the will of one people under many gods – that is, the right to reason without being slandered by dominant ‘revealed’ religious leaders and cut off from the media.


If people wish to label me, let them call me a deist whistleblower that sees how the big finale of the Fourth Reich will require so-called messiahs who are actually antichrists, and so-called antichrists that are actually true seers devoured by masses of people blindly incited by religious-political media-dominating ringleaders.


The Politics of a Deist


To my dying day, I will give my blood, sweat and tears – sell my very soul - to see the tax-exempt foundation ripped out from beneath the zealots of so-called ‘revealed’ religion - zealots like Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson or John Hagee. They are Zionist fools who would fool others into going to see a destructible man in a destructible temple saying that he is the messiah. They confuse the archetypical ‘temple’ of human media and ‘the veil’ of suppression with some manmade structure where Christ himself warned, “Go not Forth”.


Trough feeders, who swindle big bucks from the very people that their tongues mislead and oppress, buy airtime so that they can spew more hatred and cause vicious deaths. It makes my blood boil when I think about their propaganda, and how it causes violent deaths like that of the sweet young man Matthew Shepard.


Falwell and Robertson, those obvious false prophets, then hide behind flaws in the First Amendment, saying that it is their right to believe and to speak hatred disguised as ‘good news’. I can imagine that those thugs who killed Matthew Shepard did so rationalizing ‘Fag, sinner, scapegoat – who cares because the courts do not seem to’. I am sure it was nothing like, ‘He is the son of a Supreme Court Justice – we will get slaughtered’.


I am very proud of Matthews’s parents for speaking out against the Death Penalty. I am glad to see that instead of going to sleep – nighty-night – Matthew’s killers can haul their little Asses down to the machine shop and make ‘license plates’ until they rot, or else write something that would inspire peace among humankind - like Tookie Williams did. I will refrain from going on about the innocent people slaughtered by government-sanctioned death, and how I feel that it is the family’s right to decide the fate of their loved one’s killers. Again, those nasty preachers who stir up controversy with the abortion issue, are so quick to turn to the death penalty with their eye for an eye rhetoric, while ignoring the fact that the death penalty is the ultimate act of not forgiving and failed atonement.


I am a deist who sees the two-spirit being as a very important transition to the perfection of human spiritual development, and their oppressors as agents of evil, who trample scapegoats while biblically ‘justifying’ their cause (i.e. Hitler) as ‘God’s will’.


I cannot encourage or forbid abortion, nor leave it to the courts to decide, because they are merely comprised of flawed beings that are no more capable of judging Jane Doe that the rest of us humanoids. Abortion is exactly that, an issue of individual judgment and not collective prohibition imposed by those who will hand such decisions to a Vatican-guaranteed five-out-of-nine Supreme Court decision. Do you know what happened to the Liberal-Democrat Catholic JFK? Be sure that Sammy ‘the Fifth’ Alito will keep Pope Benedict XVI very happy in the public eye.


As a deist, I see the spiritual whoredom of so-called ‘revealed’ religion and Caesar’s tax-advantaged, big mouth, troublemakers who divide and spiritually conquer like that dirty old businessman Pat Robertson.


As a deist, I can plainly see organized religion pitted against non-conformists. I would encourage discussion of the policies of those who would forbid this discussion, and analyze the ‘revealed’ religious root of that forbiddance.


Christ had seen martyrs in his day. He very well knew when to back off and head for cover like an illuminati. The crucifixion whether or not, still strongly symbolizes suppression. Several years later, along came the Apostle Paul. He was an atrocity from birth to death, and ironically, if it were not for his convoluted writings the Christian Church would not have been as divided up as it has. Our modern world makes it quite evident that Paul planted the seeds of division among Christ’s subordinates. If you get into a doctrinal debate with a person from another branch of Christianity, you will find all doctrinal controversies entirely based upon Paul’s writings.


[As a deist who respects the covered-up and obviously hidden story of Christ’s true mission, I probably should not have even insulted those mentioned, but sometimes it takes a concrete example to make a point. Then again, if truth is insulting, so be it – lies are deadly.]


~ Forward the Judgment


The true perverts in democracy are those who act in defiance of their deist forefathers by using intimidation for subordination, rather than being open to reasonable discussion. They would have individual whistle blowers paranoid of government spies and the absolute power of the president to abduct and hold people for years without a fair hearing, but they will not have time to enact their projected theory because people already ‘smell the coffee’.


It seems virtually impossible for democracy and religious freedom to co-exist without bending toward oppressive theocracy, yet it should be apparent that corrupt minds seem to spoil every good progressive ideology by exploiting ‘revealed’ religious rhetoric in order to negatively influence adherents.


I think most humans would like to think that there is a higher power that we might tap in to for our own defense from and victory over oppression, but many of us are also rightly skeptical of religious leaders who get into politics. It seems that ‘the marriage of the lamb’ will first require ‘the divorce of adherents from Babylon’s Mother Church. You might call it a ‘falling away’ – or unrevealed riddled prophetic rhetoric.


Deists, in the sense of order and peace for each individual living under a fair ‘God’ over all gods including those that do not exist for atheists, would allow all pleasures but the breaking of the golden rule - which begins by adding extra-curricular sectarian moral condemnation and censorship defecation.


Divided and conquered theocracy is not safe for any rival party to dominate, especially, as historically demonstrated, Catholic leadership.


http://utah.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/11867.php




Those who submit files that become ‘hidden’ at Indymedia Centers might actually form their own worldwide web exposing common censorship interests and other common deviations of justice.


Tell us of any experiences that may have caused you to think that Indymedia is going down hill. What kind of censorship caused you to think that an editor or editors falsely assumed to provide media that is independent of theistic, deistic or atheistic bias?



Having said that, I would like to talk about how some sorcerers like to use ‘revealed’ religion in order to dominate the polls.


It seems virtually impossible for democracy and religious freedom to co-exist without bending toward oppressive theocracy, yet it should be apparent that corrupt minds seem to spoil every good progressive ideology by exploiting ‘revealed’ religious rhetoric in order to negatively influence adherent voters.


I think most humans would like to think that there is a higher power that we might tap in to for our own defense from and victory over oppression, but many of us are also rightly skeptical of religious leaders who get into politics. It seems that ‘the marriage of the lamb’ will first require ‘the divorce of adherents from Babylon’s Mother Church. You might call it a ‘falling away’ – or unrevealed riddled prophetic ‘rhetoric’.


Deists and atheists, in the sense of order and peace for each individual living under a fair ‘God’ over all gods, including those that do not exist for atheists, would allow all pleasures but the breaking of the golden rule - which begins with ceasing extra-curricular sectarian moral condemnation and censorship defecation.


Divided and conquered theocracy is not safe for any rival party to dominate, so let us grow up and tell religious-political ringleaders to grow up and stop tarnishing America’s beautiful concept of democracy and freedom for all races and persuasions.


http://ottawa.indymedia.ca/en/2006/01/2025.shtml

http://nyc.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/63919.html

~ Richard Kobzey

~ Fellow Screen Captor
See also:
http://ottawa.indymedia.ca/en/2006/01/2025.shtml

This work is in the public domain

Comments

Re: And Sammy 'the Fifth Scalito' Makes Five...
29 Jan 2006
It is kind of interesting that Sam Alito, who likes to essentially take the Fifth Amendment during questioning, might be the fifth Catholic Supreme Court Justice who at 55 years old will give the US Supreme Court a 55.55 percent Catholic majority for the first time in its history. It is somewhat spooky though; how this happened so relatively fast - within the last twenty years.

Of the 218 years of US Catholic Bishopric, it really turned on the jets in the last 20 years by accumulating five Republican-Appointed Catholic Justices - so much for the façade of Protestant Republican Senators and Christian Zionists who pretend to be Anti-Catholic just to pacify their protestant constituents.