Comment on this article |
Email this article |
SUPREME INJUSTICE (from death row)
by James P. Anderson
Email: steveorchid (nospam) yahoo.com
20 Feb 2002
Free James P. Anderson!
1. RECIPE FOR DESTRUCTION, SUPREME INJUSTICE by JAMES
2. DEATH ROW ARTIST JAMES P. ANDERSON, A CASE OF
REASONABLE DOUBT with references to OJ Simpson
deleted so as not to distract attention from the
case of James P. Anderson.
3. Web sites where James P. Anderson's art can be
found, publishers can easily get permission to use a
couple of these paintings with the articles.
4. Additional web sites where people can independently
check the police reports and medical records to
check the validity of these articles.
RECIPE FOR DESTRUCTION, SUPREME INJUSTICE
by James P. Anderson
After being wrongfully convicted and sentenced to
California Death Row over 22 years ago (1979), the
California Supreme Court "DENIED" my "DIRECT APPEAL"
on May 14, 2001. (The decision for the Habeas Corpus
Petition is still pending; it was filed by
court-appointed attorney Alister McAlister). Documents
and records are readily available that show every
court appointed attorney representing me in court has
had difficulties with the California Bar Association
and has been "suspended from practicing law several
times," including an alcoholic (Keith H. Long) who had
seriously contemplated suicide "several times."
The Attorney currently appointed (Alister McAlister)
has proven himself to be "grossly incompetent," since
his appointment by the Supreme Court in 1994. I
actually wrote to the Supreme Court requesting that
the court "Relieve" both Alister McAlister and
California Appellate Project Attorney Aundre M. Herron
as my Death Penalty Attorneys, because "NEITHER" would
investigate relevant issues or obtain simple
documents, records, articles etc. directly related to
proving my innocence (most of these request could have
been accomplished by a simple phone call). The Supreme
Court failed to respond to my mailings.
An example of the Attorney's "Gross Incompetence" is
that I phoned McAlister on May 17, 2001 to inquire
about time restraints on filing motions etc. After
answering my questions McAlister stated, "Oh, by the
way, the Supreme Court reached a decision on your case
three days ago." When asked what the decision was
(twice), McAlister simply repeated his statement,
adding, "I'll send you a copy of the 73 page decision
if you want me to." To date (20 days later), I have
received a copy of the Court decision.
McAlister also waited until May 25, 2001 to file the
required "Appellate petition for Rehearing." The
court's time limit for filing this petition is 15
days; otherwise, any and all reversible issues that
the Court "DID NOT" rule or reach a decision on, can
"NEVER" be raised again in a court of law. However,
McAlister only raised (cited) 0NE issue in his
"Petition for Rehearing." Needless to say, there
different issues that could've/should've been cited in
this petition. (But with my NOT having a copy of the
court's decision as a guideline or to refer to for
specifics, it's impossible for me to name the specific
issues or how many there are. It should be noted, too,
that McAlister filed my Direct Appeal, Habeas Corpus
and Appellate Petition for Rehearing without giving me
the opportunity to review and/or discuss the contents
prior to his submitting these petitions to the Court
(defendant or appellate has the "Legal Right" to
review all documents prior to filing).
Equally important, McAlister confirmed during a
December 2000 phone call that he had NEVER possessed
or listened to six cassette taped interviews of a
prosecution witness (Debbie Baros), whom the courts in
two different states had deemed to be "Extremely
Mentally ill and delusional." Also, the court
to allow "The Jury" to be informed of her mental state
(this includes her having given birth to four
different imaginary children, an imaginary car/truck
which one of the imaginary children was killed, an
unadjudicated 1978 homicide statement that she knew I
was a member of the Mafia and that I possessed
"Telepathic powers" etc., etc. Ironically, while
Debbie Baros invented or dreamed the four children
described on the prosecution's cassette taped
interviews, she actually had given birth to two
children, but they were taken away from her by the
State of New Hampshire in 1987 or 1988 as a result of
her sexual abuse. Again, the jury was NOT informed of
these facts. (These documents are accessible through
the state of New Hampshire Child Protection Services.)
Each person reading this article should also be
informed that the victims of this crime were/are
white, and that there were all white jurors (which is
a Prima Fascie Wheeler Motion Mistrial). As well, I
have in my possession court transcripts and a letter
from a Municipal Court Judge that confirms and clearly
states that the Prosecutor of the 1979 Trial
intentionally lied to both the Trial Judge and Jury,
stating that the states alleged witness (the person
that actually committed the crimes) had been given a
polygraph test to eliminate the witness as having been
the perpetrator of the crimes, but the facts and
record prove UNDOUBTEDLY that NO P0LYGRAPH TEST was
ever given to this alleged witness. A "PART" of the
murder weapon was also found "IN THE JACKET POCKET OF
THE WITNESS." All facts considered, I believe that any
sound-minded person would agree that my conviction and
sentence were politically motivated, and that "Racism"
was/is a major factor.
As a result of the ongoing medical neglect and
deliberate indifference (see facts page), I'm unable
to pursue legal research for both the legal and
medical matters, and would appreciate any competent
legal assistance in preparing petitions for the Court
which would remedy both the wrongful conviction and
James P. Anderson
May 3, 2001
Death Row Artist James P. Anderson, A Case Of
By STEVE ARGUE
Artist James P. Anderson has sat in prison, mostly
on death row, for the past 22 years. From the prison
cells where men are warehoused to die at San Quentin
State Prison, his paintings are a reaffirmation of
beauty and humanity. James P. Anderson's painting
"Desire" seems to me to show a pathway to his desire
to live, dream, and create under a system that simply
wants him to die.
Anderson was convicted of the murder of two women
in 1979, but maintains he is innocent.
If James Anderson is innocent he's in good company.
In the year 2000 alone 58 death row inmates had their
convictions overturned largely as a result of new DNA
evidence being brought to light. Still prosecutors
have fought against the use of DNA evidence to
overturn old convictions, even when the lives of
innocent people are on the line.
James P. Anderson has not had the benefit of new
DNA evidence coming to light, especially with the
crime scene never having been secured, but a number of
major questions do cast doubts on the prosecutions
version of events.
James P. Anderson is a black man. He was convicted
by an all white jury in Riverside County, California.
All white juries do not understand issues that Blacks
face in America like police, prosecutorial, and
judicial racism. In addition death penalty juries are
always more likely to convict because all who oppose
the death penalty are excluded from these juries,
making them juries that are more biased towards
supporting the prosecution. An all white death
penalty jury is in fact one that is likely to contain
a number of people who think that all Black people are
criminals, making these jurors incapable of weighing
the evidence even if it is presented fairly. For a
Black man in racist America, an all white death
penalty jury is not a jury of his peers, and is a
violation of his constitutional rights.
The wealthy have the benefit of being defended by
the best legal representation money can buy. James P.
Anderson was defended by a public defender, Keith
Long, who was suspended from the bar while working on
his case. He was suspended after not showing up in
court for clients that had payed him to defend them.
A couple reasons he gave for not showing up were that
he was an alcoholic and that he often considered
committing suicide. Incompetent attorneys are very
common in death penalty cases, but it is almost
impossible to get a new trial based on ineffective
assistance. The systems message is clear, the lives
of the poor and working class are cheep in America,
justice in only for those who can afford it.
Anderson maintains that he was framed-up by the
actual killer who he says is Fred Anders. Anderson
says Fred Anders, a white man, was angered by the
interracial relationship between his sister, Sheila
Lynn Anders and James Anderson. In addition Anderson
states that Fred Anders had the additional motive to
frame him because Anderson had just found out about
Fred Anders sexual assault of a 9-year old girl.
The prosecution called only one eyewitness to the
murders to testify, Fred Anders. A crucial piece of
police evidence does back up Anderson's claim that it
was Fred Anders who committed the crime, a piece of
the murder weapon was found in Fred Anders jacket
pocket. That section of the murder weapon was a 3 to
4-foot piece of rope that forensically attached to the
rope used to hang Louise Flanagan. Also found in Fred
Anders pocket was a knife.
The District Attorney on the case, Thomas Douglas,
told the jury that Fred Anders had passed a polygraph
test with flying colors. Later, under questioning,
that same DA admitted he had lied, stating that no
polygraph was given, even though his statement during
the trial is part of the court record.
Fred Anders was the brother of Anderson's
girlfriend, Sheila Lynn Anders. All three had been
traveling together although Anderson didn't really
know Fred Anders. James Anderson informed this
reporter that it was while the three were driving that
he found out the extreme prejudice of Fred Anders.
Detective B. Byers wrote in his police report that
Sheila Lynn Anders had stated that her blood brother,
Fred Anders, and not James P. Anderson, had committed
the murders. She later changed her story after the
prosecution, in violation of federal law, allowed Fred
Anders to visit her in jail. Suddenly she changed her
story and backed up her brother, but she wasn't called
as a witness by the prosecution. Obviously her
testimony would have been useless to the prosecution
with her earlier statements to Detective Byers being
on record, but she was now useless to the defense as
Particularly damaging to the defense of James P.
Anderson was the testimony of Deborah Baros claiming
that she was an eyewitness to another murder committed
by James P. Anderson in 1978. This was a murder of a
gas station attendant named Jack Mackey. Yet while
the prosecution claims that her statements
are consistent with evidence, the fact of the matter
is that she gave 2 different versions as to what
happened in taped interviews. In addition Deborah
Baros claims that James P. Anderson communicates with
her telepathically, she states that she remembers many
things through dreams, and claims that her imaginary
son Anthony was riding with them in the car when they
committed the murders. The prosecution admits that
Deborah's son Anthony was imaginary based on various
evidence, but considered her a good witness even with
her unable to state one version of what took place.
Obviously Deborah Baros could not differentiate
between reality and her own dreams and hallucinations,
and the prosecutions use of her in a trial to put a
man on death row was criminal activity on their part.
Deborah Baros is under the powerful medications
premarin, Tylenol with codeine, fioricet, xanax,
darvocet, amitriptyline, mellaril, mebaral, and
prophenol. She is taking these medications as a
result of "mental anguish" caused by a New Hampshire
court taking her real children away in 1987 for her
alleged sexual abuse of them.
It is very damaging to have someone come forward
and claim to be a witness to the defendant carrying
out a similar crime to the one they are being accused.
This is true even when the witness is not very
credible and other evidence in the crime are purely
circumstantial. The accusations of similar crimes
weigh heavy in the minds of the jurors, making them
less apt to rule in favor of any reasonable doubts
they may have.
For police motivated by racism, other political
motivations, corruption, or just a desire to close a
case the manipulation of mentally vulnerable people
for false testimony has occurred in other cases. In
the case of Leonard Peltier the FBI coerced a mentally
ill South Dakota woman named Myrtle Poor Bear to
testify against him in order to gain Leonard Peltier's
extradition from Canada. Myrtle Poor Bear says that
the FBI threatened to take her children away. She
says the FBI also showed her pictures of Anna Mae with
her hands cut off. Anna Mae was an Indian activist
who is widely believed to have been murdered by the
FBI. Myrtle Poor Bear says that after the FBI showed
her the gruesome pictures of Anna Mae the FBI told her
that she would look even worse when they were done
with her, that they would put her through a meat
grinder and no one would even be able to recognize
Under this kind of intimidation Myrtle Poor Bear
testified that she was the girlfriend of Leonard
Peltier, even though they had never met, and that she
was a witness to Peltier's involvement in killing two
FBI agents, even though she was not. Myrtle Poor Bear
later recanted this testimony.
There is no evidence of such manipulation in the
particular case of the testimony of Deborah Baros, but
we should understand that someone like Deborah Baros
would be susceptible to manipulation.
The use of only two eyewitnesses: one who does not
even know the difference between reality and dreams,
and another who potentially carried out the two other
murders and who was carrying a piece of the murder
weapon in his pocket raises serious questions in this
case. The fact that the prosecution did not call a
third eyewitness, Sheila Lynn Anders, because she
originally had said that James P. Anderson was
innocent, is also telling of the weak case against
James P. Anderson.
The standard for guilt is supposed to be guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt, yet an all white pro-death
penalty jury raised on the prejudices of the
mainstream media does not usually have a proper grip
of reality to understand what a reasonable doubt is
and why it is important. The fact that juries are
selected in death penalty cases, eliminating all who
have the sense to oppose the death penalty, is one
more reason why the death penalty should be abolished.
The flimsy evidence used to convict James P. Anderson
and how unreliable convictions really are should make
everyone question the death penalty. Death is
permanent. Besides the fact that the prosecution
never proved a reasonable case against James P.
Anderson, the contribution he is making to the world
through his art is another reason James P. Anderson
When I spoke to James P. Anderson on the phone from
San Quinton he told me that before all this happened
he had no idea how corrupt the system really is.
Really the death penalty is a weapon of terror held by
a racist system, and nobody is safe. Adding to the
inhumane treatment of being on death row, James P.
Anderson has not been able to get proper medical
attention for a condition that has impaired his sight
and gives him constant headaches.
While the abolition of the death penalty will not
assure justice, there will be no justice as long as
there is a death penalty.
The racist death penalty must be abolished!
Death penalty juries must be abolished!
We demand proper medical attention for James P.
Free James P. Anderson!
For more information, and to see James P. Anderson's
James Anderson Interviews, The Dagger Magazine
Canadian Coalition Against The Death Penalty (CCADP)
Web Page for James Anderson
The Art of James Anderson: The Dagger Magazine
The Art of James Anderson: Canadian Coalition Against
the Death Penality
The Art of James Anderson: Iconoclast Productions
James Anderson: Surviving the System
James Anderson T-Shirts
PO Box C 11400 2E66
San Quentin State Prison
San Quentin, California