Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this article |
I Told You So!
by David Charles
31 May 2002
Modified: 12:47:13 PM
Was the Bush administration aware of the forthcoming events of Sept. 11.
9-11 Warnings - I Told You So May 22, 2002 -
by David Charles
I Told You So!
by David Charles
e-mail = x20dcx (at) yahoo.ca
Vice President Cheney is now trying to do damage control. Be a good
American and turn off your brain. Thinking will hurt the war effort. We
know what to do. Trust us!
What was the intelligence and how much was received about any of this? How
much of it was acted on? Why did it not raise eyebrows so strongly that
something was done?
In 1993 the WTC was bombed. This should have put that building along
with others on a list that terrorists might want to hit. Nothing appears to
have been done.
A Representative or a Senator was interviewed on CNN regarding
security after Sept. 11. He had no luck in getting the media to pay attention to their
report (in July 2001). It mentioned the use of an airplane as a weapon.
During the first week of coverage, CNN covered a wide variety of questions
concerning why, who, what, when, were asked. But hours later that
particular part of the CNN program was shelved.
There is another man who phoned (FBI) many times. His concerns were
that a fully laden (fuelled) airplane could be used a bomb. He was
concerned that no body was taking him seriously. Then there is a man who
phoned and complained (I believe to the FBI) about people undergoing flight
lessons that were not interested in taking off and landing.
One FBI agent by the name of Kenneth Williams from Phoenix, wrote a
memo about the flight schools. This internal report went no where? Another
report was censored, the idea of using a hijacked airplane as a bomb was
thought to be a bad idea that someone might act on.
Summer of 2001, an Iranian man phones and warns of an imminent attack
on the WTC.
Then theres the foreign services of Russia warning in the summer of
2001, 25 men trained to attack; that is followed by Putin warnings of an
imminent attacking in August; in June 2001; BND, Germany and Israel
providing information on planes being used as a bomb! The Philippines
supplied even better information from Al Qaeda; after torturing some
members. This too concerned airplanes as bombs.
Tom Dachle is "gravely concerned;" "Why did it take eight months for us
to receive this information?" Tenet was extremely worried that it caused him some
sleep problems. Supposedly, there was "something big coming."
But, we are being told that nobody had ever thought of this idea or the
use of it. "We never imagined hijackers using planes as missiles," says
Rice. But then John Ashcroft was not using commercial airplanes around this
time. What did he know?
Then there was the U.S. airliner a few years back, that was hijacked to
be used as a weapon. A smart thinking pilot banked the aircraft, foiling
the attempt. Then the French stopped an attempt in France. Allegedly the
airplane was going to be used to destroy the Eiffel Tower. Still, nobody knew
of an idea that planes might be used as weapons!
We are now told of news from August (2001) that an airplane that might be hijacked. This came from Phoenix and Minneapolis. It also concerned Moussaoui. The British, in the years before had also supplied
information about hijackings. Further, when Bush attended the G8 Conference Genoa (summer of 2001), somebody thought to provide anti-aircraft weapons around the
buildings. Why, there had been intelligence (airplanes used as weapons) that this sort of attack might happened.
Then, there is the case of an Investigator (referring to another man)
who says there is allegedly a signed and sealed document in a Canadian
court mentioning the hijacking and naming some of the buildings to be targeted. If
this is only partially true, it will be damning evidence. The alleged name of
this man is Lt. Delmart, U.S. Navy.
Again on CNN within the first week. A report that the airlines had
lobbied against no more costs for security. This was not long staying on
CNN. What simple measures could have been taken to ensure that an airplane plane was less easily hijacked, or equipped not to be able to be hijacked?
September 3 to 10, MS-NBC reports of an attack in the offing. Just days
before the hijacking and massive tragedy, the FAA removed the right of
Pilots to carry firearms. The reason, minimal usage. But a congressional
source told WND of planned attacks around July 5, 2001. The FAA also claims
warnings were given to the airlines in July (July 22, 2001) and August of 2001. The
airlines don't have any recollection of these warnings.
The question asked again; what is intelligence? It is the gathering of
minute pieces of information. The sum total maybe only 5%. From there,
experienced intelligence officers attempt to create a picture of 100% Using
both intelligence officers and specialists in various fields, eg,
Afghanistan, Taliban, Al Qaeda and terrorism. From this info is created an
idea as to what will or is happening.
In this case the information supplied was 100% of what was going to
happen. The only missing component was the dates and the targets. The WTC
would or should have been high on the list, the symbols of American
dominance (military?) based on the alleged perpetrator bin Mohammed Osama
bin Ladin. This should have generated a small list of targets. The example
(coming easily) being the White House, the Pentagon.
Now were told (by the administration) that someone is playing politics
with this information. Yes, we know who they are ...
Give me a break, Mr. Vice-President!
So Were the Liebermans....
by Jon Chance
jpchance (nospam) egroups.com (unverified)
31 May 2002
Israel Plans Blitzkrieg to Capture Arab Oil Fields
Operation Shekhinah, Part One
In early March 2001, a leading European intelligence agency received disturbing news from its most senior and trusted agent in Tel Aviv. Aware of growing international resistance to its ruthless and murderous suppression of the Palestinians, the Israeli Cabinet had met to discuss the limited ways in which it could proceed with its plans to annex the rest of Palestine, with or without the support of principal ally America, or the “International Community”. At the time, the Israeli Cabinet had no idea that the subject matter of its March meeting would later become one of the prime reasons for the September attack on the World Trade Center.
The Israeli Cabinet was seriously worried. Despite effective control of the western media by the Jewish-American lobby, risk assessment conducted in Tel Aviv showed there was still a high probability that continued ruthless Israeli activity in Palestine, would lead in turn to increased sanctions by the western nations. Initially the sanctions would take the form of decreased arms shipments to Israel, followed later by increasingly large cuts in overseas financial “aid”, still provided in the main by unwitting American taxpayers. Sooner or later financial aid might dry up completely, but this was not the worst case scenario.
Eventually, if western public opinion became strident enough, America and Europe might feel compelled to impose a complete oil embargo on Israel. With no natural resources of its own, and only limited strategic oil reserves in the country, Israel’s armed forces would grind to a complete standstill in only a few weeks. Aircraft and battle tanks have an almost insatiable thirst for petroleum products, and when those products run out, the aircraft and tanks are no more use to their owners than chunks of aluminum and steel waiting for the recycling smelters.
Clearly then, the Israeli Cabinet had to find an alternate source of oil, and find it quickly. Moreover, bearing in mind they would no longer be able to pay for the oil because of financial sanctions, the new source would have to be “free”. Back in the sixties, ambitious Israelis had made detailed plans to acquire just such an alternate source of oil by force, but the plans had to be shelved for geopolitical reasons. Those geopolitical restrictions no longer existed in 2001, so the old plans were taken out of storage, dusted off, and renamed Operation Shekhinah.
Stealing oil reserves from another nation is certainly not an original idea. The closest historical precedent for Operation Shekhinah was probably back in 1941, when Roosevelt imposed a total oil embargo on Japan during the first American “War on Terror”. Seeing conflict as inevitable and recognizing its desperate need for an alternate source of oil, the Japanese responded accordingly, acutely aware that in order to reach and utilize the oil reserves in the Dutch East Indies, it would first have to overwhelm the [then] vastly superior US Navy.
It was in this context that Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Japanese Combined Fleet, suggested an air attack on the US Pacific Fleet, which had moved from its usual base at San Diego on the American west coast, to a mid-Pacific location at Pearl Harbor in May 1940. Yamamoto's plan was a development of the traditional Japanese defensive strategy. He gambled on a surprise attack to destroy the American naval capability in the Pacific, including its all-important aircraft carriers, and create enough time, perhaps six months, to enable Japan to complete its territorial conquests.
Simultaneous attacks by the Japanese army on Hong Kong, Malaya, the Philippines, Guam and the Dutch East Indies would capture the strategically important bases and areas rich in raw materials Japan felt was vital for its national survival and would also now be needed to sustain its war with America. The rest, as they say, is history.
Along much the same lines, and for similar strategic reasons in 2001, Israel intended to launch a surprise attack against southern Iraq, capture its southern oil fields, then use the old existing Trans Arabian Pipeline [“Tapline”], to pump the oil back to its own refineries at Haifa. Technical details of the operation will be provided later in this report, and in part two to follow, but first we need to examine the chances of the operation succeeding, and the subsequent reaction of the western nations and Russia.
Back in the sixties, when the operation was first planned by Israel, the British, Russians and Europeans had huge investments in the middle east, so an outraged backlash against Israel would have been immediate, and probably terminal for any ongoing “Jewish State” in Palestine. It was on this basis that the Iraqi plan was shelved and left to gather dust. However, during the years that followed, the entire geopolitical landscape changed. By March 2001, the Israeli Cabinet considered the risks to be minimal, and probably non-existent if Operation Shekhinah was handled correctly. What had changed the odds was the new status of Iraq.
During the late eighties and nineties, the fledgling “New World Order” and the media had spent millions of dollars demonizing President Saddam Hussein, to the point where he was eventually regarded by 95% of the western public as “The Butcher of Baghdad”. Not only was this Iraqi demon allegedly manufacturing weapons of mass destruction almost identical to those stored in America, he was also the tyrant who “gassed his own Kurds at Halabja”.
In fact President Hussein did no such thing. In February 1990 the US Army War College published a report titled “Iraqi Power & US Security in the Middle East”, which proved the Kurds of Halabja died as the direct result of an Iranian Phosgene gas attack. But the western media, firmly in the grip of the Jewish-American lobby, wasn’t going to let the hard truth get in the way of its frantic vilification campaign.
In light of Saddam Hussein’s new demonic status, the Israeli Cabinet reasoned in March 2001 that no one would now object to Israel taking strenuous action against this “known war criminal and killer of babies”. Instead, it was calculated that the action would be seen by the western public as daring. Once again the brave Jews would have taken a stand against a dictator in the sacred name of democracy; and hopefully the western public would not notice the millions of barrels of stolen Iraqi oil flowing back to its refineries in Haifa. And even if they did notice, what could they do about it with Israel already in occupation?
Before Operation Shekhinah could be launched, Israel needed its own “tame” Arabs on the ground in both northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq. Detailed plans of the area had to be drawn up or updated, and airfields and assembly points for incoming Israeli aircraft and ground troops arranged. In order to avoid suspicion or unwanted prying eyes, Israeli agents infiltrated the areas and started offering certain Shi’ite Muslims in the area “free passage” to other countries away from their enemy Saddam Hussein, plus spending money to take with them, in exchange for their ramshackle homes in the area.
Predictably there was no shortage of takers, and by mid April 2001 the preliminary operation was in full swing. Droves of Shi’ite Muslims quietly started departing the area for America, Europe and Australasia at enormous cost to the Israelis. Buying entire people smuggling operations was an incredibly expensive business, to which had to be added the ad hoc payments to the migrants and other significant expenses. Once again America unwittingly came to the rescue, with certain financial institutions in the World Trade Center laundering most of the massive funds needed. This activity was conducted with alacrity, because Israel had offered a dazzling quid pro quo to its financial juggernaut in New York City.
Once firmly established in southern Iraq, the new Israel would be at the crossroads of middle east oil, not only with direct control of the giant southern Iraqi fields, but also within easy striking distance of Kuwait, northern Iran, and the northern Iraqi pipeline routes. From this position of enormous strength, Israel would be able to either control or blackmail the local states into marketing their oil in an “organized way”, rather than allowing any old Tom Dick or Harry to buy the stuff on the Rotterdam Spot Market. Using sophisticated insider trading techniques, OPEC would be neutered, and world oil supplies would come under the exclusive de facto control of NYMEX and the New York Stock Exchange in the World Trade Center.
Concurrent with this activity, the Jewish-American Lobby was frantically urging the White House and US Department of State to step up its enforcement of the illegal “no fly” zones over northern and southern Iraq. The records show that attacks did indeed increase during this period, though the American and British pilots could not have known they were being deliberately used to “blind” the Iraqi air defenses, and ensure they stayed blinded in the run up to Israel’s Operation Shekhinah. When the Israeli surprise attack was finally launched, there would be not the slightest chance of detection by Baghdad until it was too late.
The possibility of military intervention by the United States seemed to trouble the Israeli Foreign Minister, but risk assessment came to the rescue and calmed his fears. Though a few US military aircraft based in Kuwait would probably have to be destroyed, either on the ground or in the air, it was calculated that this would not be a problem in technical or public relations terms.
Technically, the Israeli aircraft had home-grown fire control systems vastly superior to their American equivalents, and could be relied on to shoot down the US jets swiftly and with the minimum of fuss. In public relations terms the Israelis would later claim it was a case of “mistaken identity”, twist a few arms and grease a few palms in Washington, and the whole affair would be swept under the carpet. Once again the Israeli Cabinet had a sound precedent for this, in the form of the USS Liberty.
On 8 June 1967, during the Six Day War between Israel and the Arab States, the unarmed American intelligence ship USS Liberty was attacked for 75 minutes by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats. Thirty-four men died and 172 were wounded. Despite the proven fact that the USS Liberty was far offshore in international waters, and flying a bright, clean American flag, Israel insisted it was all a terrible case of mistaken identity, which it most certainly was not. Israel attacked the USS Liberty in an attempt to “blind” the American intelligence ship and prevent it forwarding details of Israel’s pre-emptive strikes to the Pentagon.
The Jewish-American Lobby went to work with a vengeance in Washington, twisting arms and handing out pieces of silver. So effective was the lobbying that the murder of thirty four American sailors on the unarmed USS Liberty went largely unnoticed by the public, and the media was predictably silent on the matter. Though the Liberty’s Captain William Loren McGonagle was later awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for conspicuous gallantry and intrepedity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty, it was presented to him quietly at the Washington Navy Yard, rather than the White House as is customary.
American politicians had bent over backwards to avoid embarrassing the murderers of the thirty-four American sailors. The Israeli Cabinet thus knew full well that any American “collateral damage” during Operation Shekhinah could be swept under the carpet in exactly the same way.
By early June 2001 the trickle of Shi’ite “migrants” out of northern Saudi and southern Iraq had swelled to a flood, which came to the attention of at least two more European intelligence agencies. For reasons unknown but presumably acting on orders, the Shi’ites were all woodenly claiming they were Afghans, which was not a good move. Afghans speak Farsi but these people couldn’t speak a word of it, which is hardly surprising. The native language in both northern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq is Arabic.
Around this time Russia also became aware of the pending Israeli operation, though it is not yet known whether the information was leaked by a European agency, or provided direct by one of its own agents in Tel Aviv. But what was known by all by this time, was the actual start date for Operation Shekhinah: 2 October 2001, the first day of a seven-day Jewish holiday, and thus a most unlikely period in which expect an attack by Israel.
Things then went very quiet for a few weeks until 12 July, when Pravda, still considered by many as the establishment voice of Russia's old guard communists who control the military and intelligence agencies, printed a story on its page one entitled “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19? That's the Opinion of Dr. Tatyana Koryagina”. Was Mother Russia using this expert, and deliberately citing the wrong date, in order to distance herself from involvement in the upcoming 11 September attack on the World Trade Center?