US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Media
why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO
04 May 2006
The bombs detonated to simulate the second impact didn't go as good as with the first "impact".
That's why the second tower to be "hit" was the first to be pulled.

This time it isn't a video hoaxed by CNN in real-time or released "short after" being hoaxed..
It is what the illuminati media until now kept away from the public: what hundreds with video and cameras got.

In the case of the second tower: some of the bombs used to suggest the wings, started to mix with the explosives set to implode it.
That's why the tower had to be pulled immediately.

Revealed worldwide first time by Matt Marriott, also the first to explain
- the WTC "impacts" (suggestion technique, with the CNN plane, added with software, disappearing behind the burning tower just before the "impact");
- the dead "passengers", a (suggestion created by murdering previously Barbara Olson)
- the pre-condition for the operation "mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan (the murder of Massood in northern Afghanistan, September 9, 2001).
The bombs detonated to simulate the second impact didn't go as good as with the first "impact".
That's why the second tower to be "hit" was the first to be pulled.

This time it isn't a video hoaxed by CNN in real-time or released "short after" being hoaxed..
It is what the illuminati media until now kept away from the public: what hundreds with video and cameras got.

In the case of the second tower: some of the bombs used to suggest the wings, started to mix with the explosives set to implode it.
That's why the tower had to be pulled immediately.

Revealed worldwide first time by Matt Marriott, also the first to explain
- the WTC "impacts" (suggestion technique, with the CNN plane, added with software, disappearing behind the burning tower just before the "impact");
- the dead "passengers", a (suggestion created by murdering previously Barbara Olson)
- the pre-condition for the operation "mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan (the murder of Massood in northern Afghanistan, September 9, 2001).

Watch the video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

this is disinfo
04 May 2006
this is fake 9-11 Truth material. These views are NOT endorsed by serious 9-11 researchers.

Planes obviously hit the towers.

Barbara Olson was NOT murdered, she and others did however fake their deaths by pretending to have been on non-existent hijacked planes (Pentagon and Pennsylvania)

For real 9-11 Truth, avoid the "Web Fairy" and ANYONE else suggesting that no planes hit the towers.

See www.911truth.org if you want to know what real 9-11 Truth research has found.
Re: why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO
04 May 2006
Leave us the f*** out of this. Cheney Rumsfeld and Silverstein are not members.
Yea, Thermite WAS Used To Take Down The Towers.
04 May 2006
Loose Change is probably one of the best films of 9-11.
This video proves that thermite was used. Jet fuel burns at 1,100 degrees...top.
To melt steel? 2,800 degrees.
Thermite WOULD melt steel.
Any questions?
Re: CURIOUSER, and CURIOUSER
05 May 2006
The 'conspiracy' hunters seen lost in the details.

So what if someone blew up the World Trade Towers or the Pentagon with something besides just planes.

What is your point? What do you expect people to do when they find out?

US Imperialism kills people every days. There is no 'conspiracy' about it. They don it in the open and sometimes film themselves.

What are you going to do about it.
Is It Liam? Or Lame? (I'd pick the latter.)
05 May 2006
The Patriot Act, NSA wiretapping, FBI spying, CIA torture and kidnappings. What do all of these have in common? 9-11. Without the phoney terrorist lies? NONE of the above would or could of happened.
So when you NEO lovers want to protect the criminals in the White House? Think of what THEY did to the people that died on 9-11. And the people that are dying from the dust of those towers. Think about the soldiers that will die from D.U.! And the 200,000 Iraqis that DIDN'T need to die. Again...from 9-11.
The government is invovled. And let's clear the air. MULLAH OMAR was the one that was paid from the ISI, to hire morons to crash jumbo jets. Not Osama. And the ISI was paid through the CIA! Which means, OUR GOVERNMENT WAS THE MAIN CRIMINAL!
Eat this for dinner!
Re:CURIOUSER, and CURIOUSER
06 May 2006
US Imperialism did not start with the events of 9/11. Revealing whatever happened to cause 9/11 will not change the world. Reality is not a story or film that has a dramatic climax were everything is understood, and all problems solved.

US Imperialism is understood by many of its victims around the world. Getting people to understand that Capitalist Imperialism hurts them is not the problem.

The question is 'What is to be done...'

You conspiracy hunters are lost in the details.
Re: why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO
06 May 2006
Liam, don't you remember our meetings in New York on this matter? You seemed to be repeating everything I said to you that day. Were you transmitting a message to your handler?
Re: why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO
06 May 2006
So Ben Laden and Zawahiri take credit for 9/11 because?????????????????????
Re: why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO
17 May 2006
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon.
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

Source:
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t36565-911-for-dummies-the-five-basic