US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
That's Nice, But What Did Bush Say? (english)
27 Feb 2003
Modified: 02:24:10 PM
We all know what the media-money monopoly tells us people such as Bush stand for. Sure, he's a crook like almost all politicians.

But how do we know what's really happening unless we listen to ALL sides?

"Right" vs "Left = Divide & Conquer.

I'm not a fan of Bush, but I'd like to know what he has to say rather than having everything INTERPRETED by the so-called "liberal" media.

After all, Bush had somewhat better environmental, energy and Mid-East policies than the Clinton-Mossad regime.

Just as in Venezuela, where the transnational media-money monopoly manipulates the government, what makes you think it's any different in the USA?

And why pick on blue-collar cops - the good ones and the abusive ones - instead of examining the global banking power structure that creates "profitable" civil and global wars?

http://www.rothschild.com

http://www.rothschild.info

http://TheMoneyMasters.Com

http://egroups.com/group/jpchance/links/Treasury_000993420879

Neither "right" nor "left", but real!
See also:
egroups.com/group/jpchance
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Read their lips! (english)
27 Feb 2003
You can't be serious! Why pick on so-called "blue collar cops" (literally, I suppose, given the color of uniforms) Unfortunately, I think it was the other way around! Who was -and has been- picking -and beating!- on who? And as for the cliched "liberal media" - like who, for instance? Be nice if they really did provide "all sides" of issues some day. As for Bush, Sr versus Clinton - what kind of a choice is that: Netanyahu vs. Sharon? The voters heard what he had to say the last time around, and it hasn't changed much since. Read his lips!