US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
ACLU: School Vouchers Will Hurt Poor Kids (english)
03 Jul 2003
Modified: 06 Jul 2003
The voucher program encourage the violation of students' civil rights because private and religious schools would not have to comply with federal, state or local civil rights laws in order to recieve tax dollars.
ACLU Urges Congress To Reject Voucher Scheme in District of Columbia; Says Plan Hurts Already Disadvantaged Kids
June 24, 2003

WASHINGTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union today told lawmakers that if they approve a voucher program for the District of Columbia they will be funneling money away from an already debt-ridden public school system, putting most of the District's almost 80,000 public school students at a further disadvantage.

"If Congress really wants to help our children, it should seek to adequately fund the public school system, not disadvantage the vast majority of kids for the benefit of a select and privileged few," said Terri Schroeder, an ACLU Legislative Representative. "Vouchers are unproven and ultimately counter-productive in the fight to reform and improve our education system in America."

The D.C. voucher scheme was the subject of a hearing today in the full House Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA). The plan would allow certain District students to obtain tax vouchers to pay for private or parochial school education. Current estimates show that only between 2,000 and 4,000 students -- out of the almost 80,000 in the nation's capital -- could benefit from the program, which would sap significant amounts of money from the public school system.

Additionally, those 4,000 students would be attending schools exempt from accountability standards in the "No Child Left Behind" education legislation, passed in 2002. While the nation's public schools are required to hire highly qualified teachers, open statistics on students' academic achievement to the public, guarantee academic progress and account for every tax dollar they spend, private and religious schools receiving federal funds through a voucher program will not be held to any such standards.

The voucher program would also encourage the violation of students' civil rights. The private and religious schools that would receive tax money through vouchers would not have to comply with federal, state or local civil rights laws -- meaning that they could discriminate against students based on, among other things, religion and disability.

In practice, vouchers have never been shown to be effective in either increasing students' academic achievement or even in giving parents a "choice" in what school their child attends, the most popular argument in favor of vouchers. Studies in both New York City and Cleveland, cities that have instituted voucher programs, have shown no difference in achievement between voucher or public school systems. As for the promise of school choice, it is an illusion, the ACLU said, as the decision whether to admit a particular student remains with the private school itself.

"Congress has a responsibility to protect the best interests of this nation's youth," Schroeder said. "Our nation's capital deserves better than the rampant discrimination and civil rights abuses in its school system that would follow from a voucher scheme."

The ACLU's letter on the voucher plan can be found at: http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=12588&c=140
See also:
http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=12593&c=140
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Don''t Steal My Money for your Brats! (english)
06 Jul 2003
You "Liberals" have the time and money, money which you have stolen through forced taxation from the workers, you use our money to spend time figuring out more ways to steal more of our money. We need separation of economy and State. Instead of figuring out ways to steal more of my money, why not use a good argument to get our money. Why do you have to use force to get our tax money? Why not use what the church does? Why do you use force? Because only ignorant people use force. The Liberals are the most immoral, insecure, fat, lazy, parasites out there! You all want something for nothing. Pay for your own brats. They are nothing but brats anyway, you use themn to harass me, if you dont have dogs or cops around.