US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
Howard Dean's Constitutional Hang-up (english)
13 Aug 2003
Modified: 04:03:40 PM
Dean's subversion of the constitution through his judicial appointment policies. Dean's general constitutional ignorance.
Dean's subversion of the constitution through his judicial appointment policies. Dean's general constitutional ignorance.

See Story below......

http://www.counterpunch.org/frank08122003.html
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

One giant leap against Howard Dean (english)
13 Aug 2003
The article by Josh Frank linked to a comment entitled "Howard Dean's Constitutional Hang-up" made unjustified conclusions and leapt to unwarrented assumptions. Take the following exerpt from the article:


"These are not the only examples of Howard Dean's intentions to subdue the Bill of Rights. Shortly after the September 11th attacks Dean was quoted in the Rutland Herald claiming that the United States needs a "re-evaluation of the importance of some of our specific civil liberties."

Later when asked if he thought the Bill of Rights needed to be altered he said, "I think it is unlikely, but I frankly haven't gotten that far I think our freedom is what they find so threatening, our freedom and the power that I think results from that freedom."

So according to Dean since terrorists are after our sought after freedoms, we might consider scathing back certain liberties in order to decrease the threat of future strikes. John Ashcroft must be pleased."


Clearly Dean is quoted as saying he thinks it is unlikely that the constitution will not be revised and never does he give a personal opinion stating whether or not he feels the constitution SHOULD be revised. The conclusion the Frank comes to has no basis in the words of Dean and should be considered libel.
Gadfly on a crusade (english)
13 Aug 2003
It is worth noting that Mr. Huminski is the source and litigant in the losing court cases in the story he cites as Dean's "fascist" approach to civil liberties. He is also the "source" for the thoroughly flawed piece of drivel written by Josh Frank at Counterpunch he is promoting.

I dissect that piece line by line, which are based on Mr. Huminski's personal legal crusade, here:

http://gore4dean.blogspot.com

Mr. Huminski is a gadfly and a failed business owner whose main occupation seems to be suing and counter-suing anyone and everyone, including state and federal judges in whose courts he losses in.

Mitch Gore
See also:
http://gore4dean.blogspot.com
Re: Howard Dean's Constitutional Hang-up (english)
18 Jan 2004
In the Iowa Presidential Debate of 1/04/04, Howard Dean stated concerning the Vermont gubernatorial records lawsuit that,

"What we have done is we have stepped aside. We have turned everything over to the attorney general of the state of Vermont. And the attorney general of the state of Vermont will go to court, and a judge will look over every document in our records. And they are free to release whatever they'd like, and that's fine with me."

On 12/08/03, Dean made the same statement to the press. Sandwiched in between these two public statements, on 12/23/03 in Washington County Superior Court, Dean demands that the Court, "dismiss the complaint and deny all relief requested by the plaintiffs".
Dean's public statements and his court filings can't both be true.

Unfortunately, for the man who appointed the vast majority of the Vermont judiciary, a defendant in a civil lawsuit can not "step aside". One would expect that the man who appointed judges for over a decade in Vermont and who now wishes to appoint federal judges could grasp this fundamental legal concept. Smoke, mirrors and deception. Defendant Dean, is this the candor we can expect from you, your campaign and your appointees such as Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Howard - - no comment - - Dean

Conflict of Interest infected Dean’s Vermont Record concerning police shooting. Dean refuses multiple press requests for comment.

On two consecutive days, Dean’s campaign refused to respond to press requests from Connecticut and Vermont newspapers about his corrupt behavior concerning his conflict of interest with William Sorrell, Vermont Attorney General, related to a police shooting and how that conflict tainted his decision relating to the appointment of a special prosecutor. No comment. Couldn’t be reached. Wouldn’t return calls. See articles below.


Two years ago, Dean was petitioned by grieving friends of a slain Vermont man (Justice for Woody) to appoint a special prosecutor/investigator to look into the police shooting. The group strongly objected to the results of an investigation conducted by William Sorrell, Vermont Attorney General. Dean accepted the request to look at the matter and take appropriate action if he deemed it appropriate.

When Dean accepted the report from the Justice for Woody people he failed to disclose to the group that he had an enormous conflict of interest with William Sorrell and he would never undermine his friend’s report on the shooting. To do so would usurp his friends authority and put into question Sorrell’s abilities and judgment.

See, Cronies v. Qualifications, Howard Dean’s Dilemma

http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2003/09/100936.shtml

In many State’s Dean’s conduct would be criminal under conflict of interest statutes. Not so in Dean’s Vermont. Maybe his failure to disqualify himself from evaluating his Crony’s report may not be criminal, but, it was a breach of moral and ethical standards that would apply to any profession. It’s not necessary to debate the facts of the police shooting or to even review the reports available on the issue to make a finding of corruption against Dean for failing to recuse from the matter because of a vast conflict with the Vermont Attorney General’s Office.

Dean left Vermont in a hopeless state of corruption. Conflict of interest and even acceptance of bribes by government officials are part of doing business for Vermont government officials. When quizzed by a journalist last month about official bribery cover-up in Vermont, Sorrell responded, like Dean, with no comment. Why doesn’t Dean wish to address the conflict of interest charges leveled at him in the below articles? Similarly, why did Dean try to seal his records for 20 years? There’s much more to look at in Vermont. We can start with Dean’s #1 appointee and favorite crony, Vermont Attorney General, William Sorrell.

--------------------------------------------
Friends of shooting victim say Howard Dean failed him

By ADAM BOWLES


Norwich Bulletin, 12/02/03


Two years after a Norwich Free Academy graduate was fatally shot by police while inside a Vermont church, Robert Woodward's friends claim that presidential candidate Howard Dean mishandled the case.

Woodward's supporters are upset that Dean, governor of Vermont at the time of the shooting, did not appoint an independent investigation into the shooting.

Dean, instead, said he was comfortable with a report by the state attorney general that cleared the police of any wrongdoing, the supporters say.

Members of the "Justice for Woody" group say Dean and Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell are lifelong friends and that Sorrell's family helped launch Dean's political career.

"We feel that (Dean) purposely did not want to cross his friend, his political crony of several decades who probably has aspirations to be part of a Dean presidential cabinet," said Keith Carlson, a member of Justice for Woody. "We may not be the ones to prove it. But the public has the right to know."

Members of the group are marking the anniversary of Woodward's death with a silent march today in downtown Brattleboro.

Dean's press office said Monday that the leading Democratic presidential candidate would not comment for this story. His spokesman did not return phone calls to the press office Monday.

FULL STORY:

http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/stories/20031202/localnews/746805.ht



*** END ***

See also,

Brattleboro Reformer, 12/03/03

"Calls to Dean's national campaign office were not returned Tuesday."

http://www.reformer.com/Stories/0,1413,102~8860~1805664,00.html


-------------------------------------------------

This corruption is also mentioned at below link along with Sorrell's cover-up of bribery and violation of criminal federal civil rights law. Dean sure chooses interesting cronies.

http://hawaii.indymedia.org/news/2003/09/3802.php


If there is any question as to the ties between these two unsavory politicians......


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/09/22/a_meteoric_rise_in/

See the 4th paragraph in this link, Sorrell and Dean are as close as family,


http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/dean/dean062303/dean062303spt.html


http://www.atg.state.vt.us/display.php?smod=70

http://www.justiceforwoody.org/media/articles/html/casa1.htm

http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/dean/dean0702/freyneint.html

http://rutlandherald.nybor.com/News/Story/68525.html

http://www.rutlandherald.com/News/Story/66910.html

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2003/09/8836.php

Commentary and compilation by Scott Huminski

s_huminski (at) hotmail.com