|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
Would Ballot Freedom make Massachusetts elections more competitive? |
|
by Rand Wilson
Email: rand (nospam) mindspring.com (verified) |
13 Jun 2006
|
|
When politicians get a free ride, citizen’s voices are excluded from public policy. |
The Globe recently editorialized about how few incumbents are facing contested elections (“Incumbents Rule,” Boston Globe, June 3, 2006). With 68 percent of state Senate and Representative seats currently uncontested, Massachusetts ranks near the bottom of competitive elections in the U.S.
When politicians get a free ride, citizen’s voices are excluded from public policy.
Passage of the “Ballot Freedom” initiative would give voters a helpful tool to address the lack of competition in Massachusetts politics. Ballot Freedom would make it possible for voters to unite behind an alternative party’s platform, but cast their vote in coalition with a major party’s candidate.
This “open ballot” approach would give independent, issue-based parties the opportunity to grow, without having to ask supporters to waste their vote on a candidate who can’t win. Giving new political parties more options will make our elections more competitive. Giving voters more choices will also stimulate more citizen participation. |
This work is in the public domain |
Please Don't Feed the Trolls
Wikipedia defines an Internet Troll as: "An Internet troll is either a person who sends messages on the Internet hoping to entice other users into angry or fruitless responses, or a message sent by such a person." Boston IMC strives to provide both a grassroots media resource as well as a forum for people to contribute to a meaningful discussion about local issues. Please, when posting comments, be respectful of others and ignore those trying to interrupt or discourage meaningful discourse. Thank you.
-- Boston Indymedia volunteers
Due to on going anti spam work quick comments are currently broken please use the full comment form. We do hope to have quick comments back on line soon.
|
Stop lying you Democratic shill |
by Fred Bergen
f_red_bergen (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
13 Jun 2006
|
The answer is no.
This initiative paves the way for a bogus "Working Families Party" in MA. The WFP is a cynical trick to rename the Democrats.
We need a workers party, politically and organizationally independent of the capitalist parties. This initiative does nothing to build such a party; it's goal is to put obstacles in the way of working class political independence. |
|
Re: Ballot "Freedom" |
by Bruce
(No verified email address) |
14 Jun 2006
|
This is the same Democratic fecal matter in a new pail.
We need a Labor Union based Workers Party to fight for the interests of the vast majority of people. The Democratic Party is the graveyard of social movements....Rand Wilson, you are just another goul herding people to the graveyard. |
