US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
Commentary :: DNC
Being Republican-Meaning
31 Jan 2004
The NEW meaning-21st Century!
CONSERVATIVE 20ST CENTURY THEN… Conservative Function: adjective 1. tending to resist or oppose change Synonyms die-hard, fogeyish, old-line, orthodox, reactionary, right, tory, traditionalistic 2. kept or keeping within bounds Synonyms controlled, discreet, moderate, reasonable, restrained, temperate, unexcessive, unextreme CONSERVATIVE 21ST CENTURY NOW… Conservative Function: adjective 1. tending to create wars by constant lies through media and mouth jabber Synonyms bible-thumping, war-mongering, ignoring the Bill of Rights, nazi-morons 2. preemptive wars, unequal justice for all. Synonyms uncontrolled, secretive, unreasonable, excessive, extreme, out of control, police state, invasion of privacy

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


Sounds like fascism.
31 Jan 2004
Re: Being Republican-Meaning
01 Feb 2004
Why is Bible thumping considered bad?

Via, we find that thump means:

To beat with or as if with a blunt object so as to produce a muffled sound or thud.
Obviously, one does not want to be thumped, personally. It could be painful. But is it wrong to thump a book? Especially if nobody else is using it at the time?

Is thumping not, in fact, a free and creative musical expression, akin to other proletarian percussion, of the sort exploited and commercialized by the Blue Man Group and Stomp (like beating trash cans)? Is this form of music, book-thumping, inherently inferior to any other?

And most importantly, if some book thumping is good, does the content of the book affect the artistic effect of the expression? Or is the color and message of the book meaningless compared with paper type, size, and the all-important cover thickness? If the content of the book affects the artistic (or other) merit of the thumping, then what do people think would be good books for a thumping performance?

Obviously, a stereotypical radical might be expected to thump Chomsky, Zinn, Alinsky, Marx and Lenin. Now, I don't want to get Conservative or anything, but do any of these noted and respectable works have the sheer panache of the Bible? While the Communist Manifesto spawned a worldwide revolution that has lasted over 150 years, can that really compare with the Bible, whose words have made and broken kingdoms and empires for thousands of years? Do any of those books have anywhere near the same number of pages or words as the Bible? Are any modern radical works Perhaps I should mention the many different sizes the Bible comes in, from the size of a tombstone to micro editions that fit in someone's pocket. Or the many different colors and paper width and languages available. One might be able to create a full twelve-tone ensemble simply out of thumping different editions of the Bible.