US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Gender
Spain: Defend Abortion Rights! FEMEN Topless Protest at Catholic Church
22 Jun 2014
The Catholic Church in Spain, and around the world, works to restrict abortion rights. FEMIN is a direct action propaganda group. They seek to spread their ideas widely by putting on dramatic protests that may be seen by many.
Click on image for a larger version

Byoa7DZihG.jpg
Spain: Defend Abortion Rights! FEMIN Topless Protest at Catholic Church
Click on image for a larger version

aFhhBEP2Dx.jpg
Spain: Defend Abortion Rights! FEMIN Topless Protest at Catholic Church
Click on image for a larger version

EFs9ZR7d0S.jpg
Spain: Defend Abortion Rights! FEMIN Topless Protest at Catholic Church
( June 13, 2014 ) Sextremists of the international movement FEMEN, have burst into the main altar of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid to protest against the advance of Gallardón’s law about abortion in Spain, that is imposing a new measure where the woman who aborts is economically punished by a fine.

Coinciding with the day in which the General Criminal Council meets to make a decision about our right to decide, the activists have chained to the crucifix of Juan de Mena of the altar under the slogan "abortion is illegal, let's take the altar". According to the new law, if they take our right to abortion and we have no clinics or hospitals where do it safely, we will return to obscurantism and hiding. This is why FEMEN proposes and encourages all Spanish women to assault its churches and its cathedrals, to recover by force what the government is removing by force: our right to choose!

If they do not respect our freedom, do not respect their temples! A sacred place for a sacred right! We cannot wait any longer, we have to react to this Spanish State of the modern Inquisition. Torquemada would be proud of Gallardon, who has taken his relay, taking any pro-abortion woman as a criminal.
Abortion is a right, women’s body is women’s freedom. This is just one step in our holy war for our rights! Thier crucifixes don’ t frighten us, nor your prisons, women will continue to have abortions legally or illegally. But we will not consider the second one!

Abortion is sacred!
IF ABORTION IS ILLEGAL, WOMEN WILL TAKE THE ALTAR!

http://femen.org/gallery/id/327

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re' FEMIN
22 Jun 2014
Click on image for a larger version

FEMenn.png
Click on image for a larger version

sw-4.jpg
Click on image for a larger version

sw-3.jpg
More photos
Re: Spain: FEMIN Topless Protest
22 Jun 2014
Click on image for a larger version

sw-1.jpg
Click on image for a larger version

sw-2.jpg
Click on image for a larger version

sw-5.jpg
More pics ......
Re: Spain: FEMIN
22 Jun 2014
Click on image for a larger version

sw-6.jpg
Click on image for a larger version

sw-7.jpg
Click on image for a larger version

sw-8.jpg
Pics of street action....
Defend Abortion Rights!
27 Jun 2014
‘Obvious Child’ a breakthrough on abortion rights

By Sue Davis on June 22, 2014

On some issues, U.S. movies lag decades behind social change. Abortion is one of them, especially when statistically one woman out of three has an abortion during her lifetime.

Finally, 41 years after the Supreme Court legalized abortion, there is a female-centered movie, “Obvious Child,” which puts a positive, realistic, honest spin on why one woman chooses to have an abortion. This is a first for U.S. films.

The story line in recent films like “Juno,” “Waitress” and “Knocked Up” shows young women choosing to go through with an unexpected pregnancy. In the last film, the beautiful blonde star even marries the goofy overweight guy. Up to now, if U.S. movies dared show a woman having an abortion, she often dies at the end, is shamed or punished, or terribly regrets her decision.

Women in European films have tended to fare better, though “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” shows, while women survived, having an illegal abortion in Romania was scary and expensive. In “Vera Drake,” an English working-class woman who moonlights by doing illegal abortions in 1950 is shown in a very sympathetic light.

Women on TV shows in the U.S. have fared a bit better, beginning in 1972 with “Maude,” who aborts her menopausal pregnancy with no regrets. But it wasn’t until 2011 on “Grey’s Anatomy” that Dr. Cristina Yang has an abortion without anguish. In the intervening 39 years a lot of characters, like Miranda Hobbes in “Sex in the City,” opt for motherhood, though her friends note that while having an abortion is complicated, it is a positive decision.

Disgusted with the “pro-motherhood way” being unexpectedly pregnant was handled in recent films, writer and director Gillian Robespierre based her first full-length feature on a short film with the same title that she created in 2009 starring comedian Jenny Slate of TV’s ”Parks and Recreation.” Encouraged by the positive reception the short received, she decided to expand it in collaboration with Slate. The film made waves at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival and opened in New York on June 7.

Donna Stein, played winningly by Slate, exhibits all the quirky, wiseass sensibilities of a middle-class, college-educated, Upper West Side New Yorker who’s a stand-up comedian in her late 20s. The plot centers on Donna’s struggle to find her way when her boyfriend dumps her for a girlfriend, and she loses her job, ends up pregnant after a liquor-fueled one-night stand and schedules an abortion on Valentine’s Day.

Donna knows she can’t have — nor does she want — a child. At the same time, no one shames or punishes her. One moving scene is between Donna and her often-at-odds, businesswoman mom, who, after Donna joins her in bed, confides that she had an illegal abortion during college.

“Obvious Child” is not a movie that speaks universally about why women have abortions, though it proudly carries the pro-choice banner with great wit, warmth, compassion and even a sly romance. It does not reflect the grim reality of millions of poor women, disproportionately women of color, young, immigrant, lesbian and transgender, and those living in rural areas, who are struggling in this anti-woman, anti-abortion political climate in dozens of states where harsh limitations forbid abortions.

Writing in Salon on June 6, Katie McDonough calls the movie a “revolutionary fairy tale” — “revolutionary” because it unabashedly affirms a woman’s right to choose abortion and a “fairy tale” because it does not tell the intense, desperate story of women daily denied access to reproductive services. That story must be told.

Sue Davis, a longtime reproductive justice activist, wrote the pro-choice novel, “Love Means Second Chances.”

http://www.workers.org/articles/2014/06/22/obvious-child-breakthrough-ab/
The Future of the Kingdom of Spain
27 Jun 2014
Click on image for a larger version

guy-bourdin-ongles.jpg
Abdication or the Crisis of the Second Bourbon Restoration

by DANIEL RAVENTOS and JULIE WARK


Barcelona.

With the abdication of King Juan Carlos I and proclamation of his son as the new King of Spain, Felipe VI (followed by two solid hours of hand-kissing by a fashionable line-up of 2,000 guests), Spanish newspapers have recently been awash with articles, cringeful in their servility and unctuously detailing the infinite array of personal, political – even sportsmen’s – virtues that readers are supposed to believe have come to roost in the House of Bourbon genes of this father-son duo. A few pages, very few by comparison, have linked the abdication with the crisis of the regime which was installed in 1978 and known to some as the Second Bourbon Restoration.

There are at least five notable symptoms of the crisis, which we shall detail below in an order that does not imply either greater or lesser significance. Indeed, they are all interrelated. First, is the deterioration of the royalist two-party system led by the rightwing PP (Partido Popular – People’s Party) and the “socialist” PSOE (Partido Socialista Obrero Español – Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party), which was spectacularly confirmed and aggravated in the recent European Parliamentary elections in which the PP narrowly beat the PSOE while new, smaller political movements won two out of five votes. In particular the group Podemos (We Can), which emerged just a few months ago from the indignados and other mass-based movements won five seats (7.9% of votes). Podemos leader, Pablo Iglesias, expressed this first symptom very clearly when he told journalists, “We can’t talk about the end, but we can talk about the beginning of the end of bipartisanship. We have to throw them out because they’re the ones who have ruined the country”.

Second, is the irruption on to the scene of the so-called “territorial conflict” which, for some time, has been causing more than a few conniptions and attacks of apoplexy, not to mention serious allergy, in the Kingdom of Spain. Notable here is the widely supported Catalan democratic campaign for the right to decide, which has shaken up Catalonia, Spain and the regional and national parties. Some analysts relate this increasingly vocal movement with the economic crisis but for anyone who wants to understand the economic crisis, the Catalan campaign for the right to decide, or both, such simplistic lumping together of two very different signs of the times only muddies the waters. Naturally, there are points of intersection and overlap but there is one fact that is very clear to everyone: the crisis and the government’s kneejerk economic policies in response have hit – bashed, more like it – lower-income groups in Catalonia, La Rioja, Asturias, Cantabria, Extremadura, Madrid and Murcia, for example, yet the burgeoning claim for the right to decide has come from Catalonia but not from La Rioja Asturias, Cantabria, Extremadura, Madrid or Murcia. It’s easy to understand why this is so but part of the left doesn’t get it. One still hears people of impeccable leftwing credentials saying things like, “Yes, we want independence for Catalonia but independence from the markets too”. The logical response can be formulated fairly succinctly with a few questions like, if Catalonia achieved independence from Spain, would it be more dependent on the markets than it is now? Wouldn’t the right to decide help to bring down the regime that has emerged from the Second Bourbon Restoration at a time when demonstrations against it are getting bigger not smaller? Wouldn’t the Catalan democratic process support Spanish self-determination in defence of a republic and in opposition to the Bourbon monarchy which was imposed by the dictator Franco?

One of the more impressive examples of party disintegration brought about by the Catalan process is the PSC (Partido de los Socialistas de Cataluña – Socialists’ Party of Catalonia) whose tinny, hypocritical “federalism” partly explains its demise. The PSC has failed to understand that any federalism worthy of the name must recognise the right to self-determination and, by opposing this right, it has become just another royalist unionist party. After its dismal performance in last month’s European elections when its share of the votes dropped to 14% from 36% of the Catalan vote in 2009, the former governing party is today’s also-ran, suffering from an ailment taking the form of excruciating fissures which some have diagnosed as PASOKitis. Only a few months ago intellectuals, opinion makers and journalists of all stripes and talents were asserting that the right-to-decide movement was a soufflé that was going to flop very soon, a fly-by-night phenomenon without many supporters, that it was going to be manipulated by the right … and some of them are still saying the same things but shouting louder, as if that could negate the fact that the movement is growing, that it has a solid mass base and that it is increasingly vocal, lucid and well organised. To add to the regime’s woes, on 29 May the Basque parliament proclaimed that Euskal Herria (Basque Country) “has the right to self-determination and this right resides in the power of its citizens to decide its political status freely and democratically”. More fuel to the flames that are cooking something rather more substantial than a soufflé in this regime crisis.

Third, is the tremendously obvious decline in political representation, mainly due to pervasive corruption – throughout the system, from the national executive and judiciary to many organs of local government – the vassalage of public institutions to big business, part of which is a busy revolving door ushering politicians through to highly paid sinecures. In the energy sector alone, the “Benidorm of the politicians”, former (PSOE) president Felipe González, present (PP) austerity manager, Cristóbal Montoro, former minister (PSOE) Elena Salgado, former (PP) Minister for the Interior Ángel Acebes and plenty of others are all over-feeding from the same trough.

Fourth, is the Bourbons’ fall from whatever grace they might have had. On 25 June, a court upheld corruption charges against the new king’s outcast sister, Princess Cristina (conspicuously absent from the coronation and erased from the royal family website), thus paving the way for an unprecedented criminal trial, which will bring revelations that a delete button and exile in Geneva can’t whitewash. The Spanish public already knows that Princess Cristina’s husband, royal brother-in-law and swindler Iñaki Urdangarin says that women aren’t intelligent, that he made obscene jokes about the new Queen Letizia and that King Juan Carlos had to try to find him a job. As for his wife, she is accused of using her husband’s dodgy business to launder embezzled public money for home decoration, salsa classes, clothes, trips and other such royal needs in a country brought to its knees by the economic crisis and the government’s ham-fisted “austerity” measures that have caused the unemployment figure for the under-25s to rise to a shocking 57%. The fallen princess showed symptoms of serious amnesia regarding her profligacy with public money when questioned in court some months ago. Her father, desperately trying to shore up the royal image when the scandal broke, was obliged to claim that, “Justice is equal for all”. It isn’t of course. The PP is now desperately trying to push through a law considered by many jurists as anti-constitutional, to give his former majesty retroactive impunity. With at least two paternity claims against him from offspring preceding his official brood, the hurry is understandable. Then again, and even more pressing, questions are being raised as to how a once-impoverished king got to acquire a fortune of around two billion dollars. What was the exact nature of his friendship with the criminal tax-evading commodity trader, Marc Rich, who was mysteriously pardoned by President Clinton in his last hours in office after he was pressured by the King of Spain and several high-up Israeli officials? Or were his friendships with some of the less savoury Arab potentates, including Libya’s Gaddafi, really in the interests of the Spanish people? This is a very opaque fortune.

Fifth, and the logical corollary of the other four points, is increasing repression, a common symptom in moribund regimes. A series of laws and legal “reforms”, approved or in the process of being so (abortion law, gagging laws, et cetera), all constitute attacks on citizens’ freedoms. On the day of his coronation, Felipe VI swore he would uphold democratic freedoms even while displays of the red, yellow and purple flag of the Second Republic were banned, and several demonstrators showing the colours were arrested. The repression is selective of course, as recent examples show. Two well-known high-class serial mega-swindlers Díaz Ferrán and Fèlix Millet got two- and one-year sentences respectively, while striking Andalusian workers who forced a bar to close in the last general strike got four years. In April this year Amnesty International published a report titled Spain: The Right to Protest Under Threat, warning that the right to peaceful protest is under threat, and that the police are using batons and rubber bullets against demonstrators, injuring and maiming both protestors and bystanders with complete impunity. Under Spanish law, individuals deemed to be leaders of unauthorised demonstrations can be fined up to 30,050 euros. Yet, undeterred by all this, more and more people are coming out into the streets and squares to protest, in addition to organising democratic, grassroots, and ethical forms of representation at both national and local levels.

There are other symptoms of the crisis of the regime of the Second Bourbon Restoration but empires have been toppled for less than these five.

Daniel Raventós is a lecturer in Economics at the University of Barcelona and author inter alia of Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom. He is on the editorial board of the international political review Sin Permiso www.sinpermiso.info).

Julie Wark is an advisory board member of the international political review Sin Permiso. Her last book is The Human Rights Manifesto (Zero Books, 2013).