US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News ::
DoD Memo: Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz
23 Apr 2002
Modified: 24 Apr 2002
Not entirely accurate, especially about the "Osama Did It" notion, but quite revealing about Wolfowitz and the internal conflicts within The Establishment....

Fire Paul Wolfowitz

Memo To: Don Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: The Monkeys on your Back

In case you have not noticed, Don, your deputy at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, has promoted himself and is now the Defense Secretary, and you are his deputy. We still see you quoted here and there, but Paul has already wrested policymaking from your hands and is making it himself. It is almost as if you have become his press secretary. He was bored with Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden long before the strikes began Sunday, as he is maniacally determined to cut to the chase, “finishing the war against Saddam Hussein,” as his many followers in the pundit community put it.

Do you realize how much more difficult it is for President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell to hold together the coalition of the international community in the fight against terrorism when the Islamic world every day reads in the public prints or sees television commentary about how Iraq is next on the list? Do you realize that Wolfowitz, and his pal Richard Perle who chairs your Defense Policy Board, have been calling all their friends in the press corps, urging them to beat the drums for war with Iraq? Perle actually signed the “famous” letter of 41 drafted by Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, who is Perle’s mouthpiece in Washington. (Bill Safire of the NYTimes is of course Perle’s mouthpiece in New York.) It is incomprehensible to me that you would allow Perle to remain at that post, where he is permitted to read all the most sensitive secret traffic flowing through the Pentagon. Not that he wouldn’t see it anyway, courtesy of Wolfowitz, but how brazen can he be and get away with it. The only thing I can conclude, Don, is that you have become so addicted to these monkeys over the years that you can’t get them off your back.

Why is Wolfowitz so maniacal about Iraq? Remember that in 1991 he was the senior member of the network created by the late Albert Wohlstetter in the Bush administration, working for then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. It was Wohlstetter to whom I introduced you in 1975 when Albert was masterminding the strategic victory over the USSR from his office at the RAND corporation in Santa Monica and his seat at the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB). In 1991, the more senior Perle had left the government to make megabucks as a consultant to foreign governments (Turkey being the most generous at $800K per year). So Wohlstetter gave Wolfowitz, next in line, the assignment of persuading Cheney to not only kick Saddam out of Kuwait, but also to chase him all the way to Baghdad, slaughtering the Republican Guard on the way. Thank God Wolfowitz failed in his assignment!! Cheney sided with Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, thus keeping our word to the Islamic world. You are a smart fellow, Don. Did you ever think of the jihad that would have begun back then if we gave the finger to our Islamic allies? Take a few minutes, take a deep breath, and try to think this through.

One of my favorite conservative columnists, who has thus far resisted the mindless entreaties of Perle and Wolfowitz to “finish the job in Iraq,” on Monday wrote a boilerplate rendition of the nonsense being turned out by the press ringleaders: Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer and Michael Kelly. It was so alarming to me that they might persuade the President to “take out Saddam” that I wrote the fellow an e-mail. I won’t mention his name, but here is how I put it:

Now that Osama bin Laden has pushed us into the arms of the Russians, Chinese and French... who have for years been advocates of lifting the embargo against is not likely that Wolfowitz is going to persuade Bush/Cheney they have to give Moscow, Beijing and Paris the finger. For the same reason, an outlay of a zillion dollars to build a silly national missile defense system that won't stop an ICBM, let alone a boxcutter, has to be forgotten.

Iraq was the least radical of all the Islamic states, the most civilized and modern and hospitable to Jews and multiculturalism.... which is why the Iran/Iraq war was fought, with Saddam doing our killing for us, at times with the chemical weapons the CIA supplied him with. After the war, our State Department gave Saddam its passive assent to grab the Kuwaiti oilfields, but when he did, Maggie Thatcher and the Wohlstetter boys persuaded Bush to kick him out. Okay. Reluctantly I went along, after swallowing some whoppers about Saddam planning to invade Saudi Arabia. But Bush also announced that we would not lift the embargo as long as Saddam was in power and Nixon agreed that was the thing to do. Bin Laden DOES speak for the entire Islamic world in noting that at least a million Iraqi civilians have died as a result of that policy. There would have been no attack on the WTC if we had dealt honestly and responsibly with Iraq. The reason Jack Kemp did not sign the Perle/Kristol letter is that I forced him to confront all these facts, which I dug out on my own. He actually assigned a researcher to check my facts because they seemed diametrically opposite of what the American people were being told. Jack met with Nizar Hamdoon when Hamdoon was Iraqi ambassador and was seriously considering a trip to Baghdad with Sam Nunn, endorsed by Jimmy Carter. But the Perle crowd was always a step ahead of any diplomatic solution, pushing the Clinton team and Mad Madeleine into expansions of the illegal no-fly zone and target-practice on Iraqi civilians. The Democrats went along with all this because the American-Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) thinks it's a good idea to keep Saddam "contained."

See also:
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


Iraq Is A Victim Of The Zionazist Conspiracy.
23 Apr 2002
Paul Wolfovitz is just an Executive. The whole Zio-Nazi
"establishment" is after Iraq and its President, Saddam
Hussein. Yes, more than a million of innocent civilians,
mostly little Iraqi children, are dead in this beautiful country with the great historical traditions, one of the most civilized places on the Earth, thanks to USA embargo.
Everybody knows today that the war between Iraq and his
neighbour Kuwait was deliberatly encouraged, even staged by USA. And it is a pity, American Jewry wants to see the blood of Irakeese people still alive and living in peace with the people of Kuwait today.
Saddam Hussein was never an anti-Semite. First of all, he
is himself a Semite. And - the most important - he respects
the Jewish religion and the Jewish people as he can see
that not all Jews are Zio-Nazis, the same as not all Germans in 1925 - 1945 have been the Gestapo torturers.
I remember the hysterics in Haifa and Tel-Aviv, in Jerusalem and Bersheeva when the scud rockets begon to
fall on the outskirts of the big cities.
Could Saddam let them fall at the city centra?.. Modern
technology permits to lead the rockets even to the second
hand cars. So why Saddam Hussain did not do it?..
He felt himself as an uncle of a crazy Jewish Semitic family who must shout to be heared... The scud rockets
falling far away from the cities have been his biblical
appeal to Israel to become a normal state, to stop the
murders in the Holy Land, to end the occupation of a
brotherly Palestinian people.
The Iraqi Jews who had fallen victims to the shameful
Zio-Nazi propaganda and settled in Israel remember with a
great nostalgia their normal, happy life in Iraq.
Why Paul Wolfovitz wants to go on with his war plans?..
Does he have shares in oil companies of the other petroleum countries?..
Of Course
24 Apr 2002
Of course Wolfowitz & Associates - and unfortunately all of US - hold shares (directly or indirectly) in these transnational oil corporations.

The question is how do we cure ourselves of our CRUDE OIL ADDICTION?

We must reprogram "our" petro-terror-opium-based banking system to a PRODUCTIVE monetary system such as TEA:

If you, my fellow "Jew", want to save the world from the ultimate holocaust, we must all work together.
See also: