US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this feature | View comments | Email this feature | Printer-friendly version
News :: Organizing
10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
28 Apr 2006
65654_primate3.jpg
Besides Harvard economist destabilization of Russia, besides Harvard investment in war, slaughterhouses, earth destruction, besides Harvard's abuse of the community and exploitation of labor, Harvard is one of the world's most barbaric animal torturers.
primateresearchatharvardhiddeninsouthborough.jpg
10 MORE REASONS TO BOYCOTT HARVARD

1. Harvard researcher David Adams has repeatedly tried to transplant
pig kidneys and hearts into baboons. This failed at least 11 times,
killing both animals every time. Primates and pigs rank 2nd and 4th
in animal intelligence. We'd be hard pressed to give David Adams
such a high ranking.

2. As of 1999, Harvard researcher John Assad was attaching PERMANENT
head restraint bolts to primates' skulls so he can keep them still
to benefit his research. John, John, now how could you really think
this was an okay thing to do? Didn't your mother teach you the
Golden Rule?

3. At Harvard, primates can be denied food and water for up to 23
hours a day and restrained in restraint chairs, unable to move, for
up to 104 hours in a row. These factors induce the uncontrolled
variable of a considerable level of stress (which surpresses the
immune system)and compromises any research results. So basically,
researchers can't really know WHAT their data shows. Except that
they need to publish or perish so it's business as usual.

4. Harvard researchers have implanted electrodes into primates'
brains and eyes. This is a very common practice. Can you spare a few
hours this weekend to help us say this is wrong?

5. Because primates don't get AIDS and humans don't get SAIDS
(simian AIDS), Harvard researchers have combined the two, creating a
new and highly fatal disease. You don't have to have a Harvard
degree to know the last thing we need are new genetically engineered
diseases.

6. According to IDA's Lawrence Carter-Long, "Researchers from
Harvard and Boston Universities concluded that medical measures
(drugs and vaccines) accounted for between 1 and 3.5% of the total
decline in mortality rates since 1900. Scores of animals were killed
in the quest to find cures for tuberculosis, scarlet fever, smallpox
and diphtheria, among others, but was their unwilling contribution
important to the decline of these diseases? Dr. Edward Kass of
Harvard Medical School, asserts that the 'primary credit for the
virtual eradication of these diseases must go to improvements in
public health, sanitation and the general improvement in the
standard of living.' These benefits have nothing to do with animal
studies." If only 1-3.5% of improved life expectancy comes from
medical measures, then why is NIH giving researchers tens of
billions of our tax dollars every year?

7. According to Harvard's own researchers, the only effective
welfare measure for lab primates is group housing but nationwide 35%
of primates are not group housed in labs.

8. According to Michael Budkie, executive director of SAEN, 605
primates at NEPRC may have been exposed to pain in 2003 but Harvard
claims that zero primates were exposed to pain. In a 2002 analysis
of NEPRC research, Budkie noted a discrepancy of 49 deaths in
differing research reports (one reported 368 deaths and another
reported 417). Not only can't Harvard seem to count very well, but
it's hard to imagine that over 400 primates died in 1 year and all
of them simply "passed away in their sleep."

9. The Animal Welfare Act was violated 1780 times by laboratories
during the 2005 reporting year, a three-year increase of over 60%.
Think how high that number would really be if a) The AWA were truly
enforced and b) if it applied to ANYTHING that goes on during the
experiments. You see, the AWA ONLY covers cage size, feeding
schedules, etc., all of which can be ignored if it is deemed "vital"
to the experiment. So basically, it is an "anything goes" situation
in reality. Talk about a loophole!

10. Nationwide, more researchers are studying monkey sex and
reproduction (37 studies total) than either heart disease (29
studies) or cancer (21 studies), the #1 and #2 human killers. Hey
brainiacs, go study monkey sex on your own dime. Or better yet,
don't study it at all.

In case you missed our first 10 reasons to attend the protest on
Saturday at Harvard, here they are:

1. To commemorate World Week for Animals in Laboratories, an
international week of protest to help lab animals. All over the
world, activists will be taking to the streets for lab animals.

2. Harvard ranks 2nd in the nation in federal tax dollars received
for animal experimentation, about 300 million dollars. That's enough
to pay for health insurance for over 20,000 families.

3. Despite decades of saying that they apply the 3R's (reduction,
refinement, and replacement), Harvard has EXPANDED its primate
population by over 50% in the last 8 years.

4. Harvard is expanding to provide primates to the BU Bioterror Lab.
There, BU will expose primates and other animals to Ebola, anthrax,
bubonic plague, and other nightmare diseases.

5. There are 3 phases of human trials for drug safety. 91% of all
drugs tested on animals FAIL in the FIRST phase. This most recently
occurred in England where 6 people were sent to the Intensive Care
Unit after taking a tiny dose of a drug "tested safe" on primates in
large doses.

6. Harvard pulls in about 2 million dollars a year to give drugs to
animals, that's enough to treat over 1000 addicts. Harvard has
published 75 separate papers and studies about cocaine use in
primates. One researcher, Bertha Madras, has been giving drugs,
mainly cocaine and heroin to animals for over 40 years. So we say to
Harvard: we have plenty of addicts to study, and recreational drug
research is not exactly cutting edge technology worthy of torturing
our closest animal relatives.

7. Researcher Roger Spealman addicts monkeys to cocaine, breaks them
of their addiction, then "induces social stress" to see if they re-
addict. Oh, pulease. You don't have to be a Harvard professor to
know this is stupid and wastes tax dollars; any drug counselor can
tell you that stress can cause re-addiction, and, the last we knew,
monkeys don't naturally seek out cocaine in the first place!

8. Another researcher studies fear in monkeys. He has trained
raptors (hawks and other birds of prey) attack young monkeys in
order to monitor their fear reactions. This is both cruel and
moronic.

9. Peta recently ranked the worst institutions in the nation for lab
animal treatment and abuse; Harvard ranked as 6th worst out of
thousands of institutions. Harvard's own research revealed that 89%
of monkeys studied had psychological abnormalities, and 1 in 4
injured themselves.

10. Harvard has claimed since 1989 to be right around the corner on
an AIDs vaccine breakthrough. The rest of the AIDS research
community has rejected primate research for about 10-15 years.
Monkeys don't get AIDS so these bozos aren't even studying human
diseases.

Bonus point: Harvard keeps close tabs on how many activists turn up
for the protests.

Please help us stand up for these animals. Harvard primate labs:
shut them down!

http://www.massanimalrights.org
65654_primatecrucifixion.jpg
65654_primate3.jpg
See also:
http://www.massanimalrights.org
http://www.neavs.org

This work is in the public domain.
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
27 Apr 2006
JOHN LE CARRE:

How do corporations achieve their strangLehold on our society?
When they're not shooting they're buying. They buy good minds
and tie them to their wagon wheels. They buy students and
castrate their thought processes. Twenty years from
now there will not be a university that has not sold its soul
to corporate bigotry. There won't be a contrary voice that's
worth a whore's embrace.
by Le Carre, John
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
27 Apr 2006
I don't know why Harvard has such a "progressive" reputation. You lefites should regularly picket the place, especially the Law School, Medical School and Business School. Oh, and the saintly "Kennedy" School of Government.

The trade school hacks in those departments swarm thru the big law firms, corporations and Administrations and Research Institutes of BOTH major political parties. You cannot be appointed to a major judicial seat in this country unless you've gone to Harvard, Yale, Stanford or Columbia Law.

This joint doesn't pay taxes to Cambridge and is a training school for overpaid corporate bureaucrats and lawyers. why does it only get annoyed when you guys have a PC fight with a fat jerk like Summers? Harvard per se is a threat to democracy and workers rights.

Stop worrying about cultural crap like aboriton and feminism. Harvard and its Ivy League cohorts, along with Chicago and Stanford are the breeding grounds for the vampires who have caused the gap between business bosses way up top and everybody else to widen to levels unheard of in any nation in the world.

I have tried to figure out the difference between an organized crime training school and Harvard, but I can't!
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
01 May 2006
"5. Because primates don't get AIDS and humans don't get SAIDS (simian AIDS), Harvard researchers have combined the two, creating a new and highly fatal disease. You don't have to have a Harvard degree to know the last thing we need are new genetically engineered diseases. "

The current theory is that HIV jumoed species and developed from SIV. It seems reasonable that to understand how that jump occured, researchers would re-create a bridge disease that affects both species.

So, yes. We may very well need to create new, genetically engineered diseases in laboratories in order to understand naturally occuring diseases that are killing millions of people.

Regardless, I doubt you have any technical qualifions or experience in evaluting the merits of biomedical research.

Echoing mindless scare tactics accomplishes nothing.
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
01 May 2006
""Researchers from Harvard and Boston Universities concluded that medical measures (drugs and vaccines) accounted for between 1 and 3.5% of the total decline in mortality rates since 1900."

This is complete and utter bullshit.

Penicillin was invented after 1900.
Smallpox was eradicated after 1900.
Polio was cured after 1900.

Those alone account for hundreds of millions of lives saved.

Please, stop the lies.
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
01 May 2006
I just don't see how that could work. at all. Animals have different body types than people do. If you feed animals chocolate, if it's more than like, a few crumbs, they die. Humans don't. People need to learn to think sometimes ya know? Honestly.
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
01 May 2006
This is so very disturbing. I understand the need to test medicine- but this is terrifying. Just because the animals aren't "human" they aren't respected life. Imagine if they were treating people this way... Oh wait - we leave that up to the military.

Perhaps something we should all focus on is how all these issues... War, capitalism, animals rights, human rights and the environment are all part of the same issue and are symptoms of the larger virus, or perhaps disease is a better word.

Solidarity.
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
02 May 2006
"This is complete and utter bullshit.
Penicillin was invented after 1900."

Yes, but this life saving anti-biotic was not accured from the testing on primates, in fact no animals were used for this, but in fact people.

Testing these products on animals is halting medical research for life saving ailments. They know this. But if they were to stop, they'd lose the annual federal funding that lines their pockets.
Re: 10 More Reasons to Boycott Harvard
03 May 2006
The current theory is that HIV JUMOED species and developed from SIV. It seems reasonable that to understand how that jump occured, researchers would re-create a bridge disease that affects both species.

So, yes. We may very well need to create new, genetically engineered diseases in laboratories in order to understand naturally occuring diseases that are killing millions of people.

Regardless, I doubt you have any technical QUALIFIONS or experience in evaluting the merits of biomedical research.

Echoing mindless scare tactics accomplishes nothing.

I doubt you have the qualifications or expierence to post comments gramactically equal to that of a three year old. It is not necessary to torture animals in the quest to abolish AIDS. Understanding the bridge between SAIDS, and AIDS would help in the effort for a cure, but that by no means merits animal abuse.
Best Reason To Boycott Harvard
03 May 2006
Criminal Bush actually graduated with a Masters in Business from Harvard. Since they graduated a terrorist and dummy! They should be shut down!