US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC :
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this feature | View comments | Email this feature | Printer-friendly version
Announcement :: Human Rights
Framework for a police state – US government phone spying targets all Americans
12 May 2006
The exposure in Thursday’s USA Today of a vast and secret National Security Agency data base tracking the phone calls of hundreds of millions of Americans is further evidence of the advanced preparations for the establishment of a police state in the United States. The NSA database is a blueprint for political repression and intimidation on a massive scale.
The patently illegal government surveillance has nothing to do with preventing terrorist attacks, as claimed by President Bush and echoed by both the media and Democratic Party politicians who criticize various aspects of the program. It has been implemented by a state apparatus which sees its major opposition as coming from among the American people, not scattered bands of Islamic terrorists. At a time of growing social opposition, the government is systematically collecting data to find out what people are thinking and to whom they are talking.

The phone-tracking program has, according to the USA Today report, been underway since shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The three largest telecommunications companies in the US, AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, agreed secretly to collaborate with the Bush administration and hand over to the NSA their records of every telephone call made by every one of their approximately 200 million customers. The program, carried out without court-issued warrants or Congressional oversight, is in flagrant violation of federal statutes as well as civil liberties guarantees laid down in the Bill of Rights.

It means that the government has at its disposal information concerning the personal, business and political relationships and activities of most Americans—information that can be turned over to the FBI, the CIA, the Pentagon and other state agencies.

This program, as well as the previously leaked program of illegal NSA eavesdropping on international telephone and email communications, has been carried out with the knowledge and approval of leading members of Congress from both the Republican and Democratic parties. Whatever protests are made by politicians in either party in the wake of the program’s exposure, and whatever congressional hearings are held, their primary purpose will be to provide political cover for the collaboration of Democrats as well as Republicans in an unprecedented attack on democratic rights.

Nothing will be done to halt the illegal spying or hold accountable those, beginning with Bush himself, who have systematically lied to the American people and broken the law in order to create the infrastructure of a police state.
The willing participation of major corporations in this operation underscores the erosion of any serious support within the American ruling elite as a whole for democratic rights, and the turn toward authoritarian forms of rule to suppress growing opposition among working people to the vast concentration of wealth in the hands of a financial oligarchy.

The secret surveillance program reported by USA Today goes far beyond the program for intercepting international phone calls which was revealed last December through a leak to the New York Times. In what one source for the USA Today story called “the largest database ever assembled in the world,” the NSA has compiled a record of nearly every phone call made in the United States since 9/11, combined with a historical record of phone calls going back for many years before. The records include the phone number from which each call was made, the number dialed, and the duration of the call. While the name of the person making the call is supposedly not included in the NSA database, such information is easily obtained by cross-referencing with other government and commercial databases.

USA Today said the program did not involve actual listening to the conversations—a physical impossibility given the billions of calls monitored—but rather the amassing of information for data mining, in which complex software programs are used to find patterns in the calling. Having created “a database of every call ever made,” the NSA is in a position to track down the personal, business, social and political affiliations of any person targeted by the US government.

According to Leslie Cauley, the reporter who wrote the story, “Chances are that your cell phone calls, as well as your home phone calls, have been tracked.” She added in a press interview that there was a “high likelihood” that this information was being passed on to the FBI and CIA.

AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth control local, long-distance and cell phone service in most of the country. A fourth company, the much smaller Qwest, has refused to participate in the NSA program. The Denver-based Qwest provides local phone service in 14 western states as well as long-distance service in some areas. According to the USA Today article, Qwest balked at going along with the NSA program because of its dubious legality.

The phone companies were asked to provide the complete past telephone history of all their customers, as well as regular updates of contemporary phone usage. This means that the NSA now possesses a historical database that extends back at least to the 1984 breakup of the old AT&T monopoly, if not back to the oldest records available. The lifetime telephone usage of virtually every living American is now in a government dossier.

The NSA database could be used to track down anyone associated with political organizations opposed to the policies of the Bush administration, such as socialist, antiwar, civil rights and civil liberties groups. Anyone in regular telephone contact with such organizations is undoubtedly flagged as a potential “terrorist” in the NSA database. In the event of a roundup of such political opponents, the database would supply the names and phone numbers of all those in close contact with those targeted for arrest, thus providing a road map for further arrests and detentions.

Searches of the NSA database could also pinpoint all those who regularly called selected countries overseas, thus generating a list of potential targets for immigration raids. The database could also be used to monitor phone calls made to the media—such as those from the whistleblowers who spoke to the Washington Post about secret CIA torture centers in Eastern Europe or who exposed the illegal NSA monitoring of international phone calls. The White House could also identify government employees who regularly call Democratic members of Congress.

The information could be used to intimidate and blackmail individuals and coerce them into informing on friends, relatives and business associates.

As with all its other attacks on democratic rights, the Bush administration is defending the massive NSA phone spying as an “anti-terrorist” measure. But it is preposterous to claim that the federal government needs information on the call patterns of every American in order to locate and monitor a handful of terrorists. Nor would there be any reason, in relation to anti-terrorist investigations, for the NSA to accumulate the records of phone calls made long before Al Qaeda came into existence.

President Bush essentially confirmed the USA Today report in a brief prepared statement issued Thursday after the article sparked a flurry of commentary in the media and on Capitol Hill. Bush did not deny the substance of the newspaper’s account, while claiming that all the administration’s surveillance actions are legal and are solely directed against Al Qaeda and other foreign terrorist groups. “The privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities,” he claimed. “We’re not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans.”

The credibility of this statement can be judged by recalling what Bush said after the New York Times first reported the secret NSA warrantless surveillance of international telephone calls. Bush claimed at the time that only international phone calls made by or to terrorist suspects were being monitored. “In other words,” he said, “one end of the communication must be outside the United States.” It has since emerged that the NSA eavesdropped illegally on thousands of domestic phone calls as well.

Bush used a similarly deceptive formulation in his statement Thursday. “The government does not listen to domestic phone calls without court approval,” he declared, although what USA Today reported did not concern listening to phone calls, but rather recording private call information, which is equally illegal under Section 222 of the 1934 Communications Act. The Bush administration did not seek approval for the call-monitoring program from the secret court set up under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, just as it bypassed the FISA court for the warrantless phone-tapping.

Bush added this claim: “The intelligence activities I authorized are lawful and have been briefed to appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat.” The White House has briefed only a handful of members—although the legal requirement is for briefing of the entire membership of both Senate and House intelligence committees. Nonetheless, Bush has repeatedly cited the briefing of key Democrats on his administration’s domestic spying programs to highlight the collaboration of the Democrats, exposing the hypocrisy of their pro-forma protests.

On Monday, Bush demonstratively reaffirmed his intention to continue these programs by naming Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden to head the CIA, replacing Porter Goss, who was ousted last week. Hayden, now deputy director of national intelligence, headed the NSA from March 1999 to April 2005, and was therefore responsible for the establishment of the call-tracking program.
Both Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee said that they would question Hayden about the program during his confirmation hearings, scheduled to begin next week. Hayden has vociferously defended the NSA program of warrantless interception of international phone calls. He called it “targeted and focused,” adding, “This is not about intercepting conversations between people in the United States.” The phone-tracking program, however, is the opposite: a massive dragnet targeting every telephone call placed by every person in the US.

Last month, during an appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales asserted that the White House might have the legal authority to order warrantless wiretapping of domestic phone calls as well as international calls. “I wouldn’t rule it out,” he said. Gonzales was not asked about tracking phone calls, only about listening in.

It is not yet known whether President Bush signed a secret executive order for the call-tracking, or whether the program was undertaken without such formal authorization. Bush did sign an executive order for the warrantless NSA wiretapping of international calls and emails.

The Bush administration has already moved to suppress one inquiry into illegal NSA spying. The Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) announced Wednesday that it was closing down an investigation into whether Justice Department lawyers took improper action in approving the NSA warrantless wiretapping program, on the grounds that the NSA refused to grant the OPR the security clearances required to proceed. In other words, those carrying out the illegal wiretapping used the “classified” stamp to block any investigation into their activities.

With each revelation of police state measures, the lack of any genuine commitment to democratic rights within the political establishment becomes more evident. Not a single leading Democrat, and none of the leading US newspapers, responded to last December’s exposure of NSA phone tapping by demanding that the program be halted. The Democratic leadership has opposed even a token resolution for Bush’s censure over the illegal operation.

Already the media and politicians of both parties have sought to downplay the significance of the phone-tracking program, while accepting uncritically the pretext that it is motivated by the vicissitudes of the so-called “war on terrorism.” The truth is that the program exposes the enormity and immediacy of the assault on the democratic rights of the American people.
This threat must not be underestimated. It is the outcome of a protracted breakdown of American democracy, rooted in the crisis of the capitalist system and the resulting malignant growth of social inequality.

The only social force that has a genuine interest in and commitment to democratic rights is the working class. Working people can defend these rights only by forging an independent socialist movement in opposition to the two-party system through which the corporate oligarchy maintains its rule.

[DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted as a repost from the World Socialist Web Site, Though we generally do not center reposts, we believe it's an important issue to discuss and no original work on the topic has been submitted. BIMC editors]
See also:

This work is in the public domain.
Add a quick comment
Your name Your email


Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.


No difference between today's Bush supporters and yesterday's Soviet Union
12 May 2006
"Whine whine whine"

The USSR had a Constitution and that Constitution guarenteed freedom of speech. When Soviet citizens criticized the government, they were taunted by government supporters for "flaunting their rights." Just another way of saying, "Whine whine whine."

Who would have ever thought that the Republicans would become indistinguishable from the Stalinists?
12 May 2006
What a hoot. Trotskyists concerned about "privacy", a bourgeiose concept. When Trotsky was the number 2 under Lenin, there was no concern about the privacy of the Russian people. Informers and wiretappng abounded. People were shot by the Cheka on the basis of hearsay.

The "Socialtist Equity Party", a paper party run
by 3 Australians and a kangaroo qualified to write HTML, is hardly qualified to decide what privacy rights of the American people have been violated (if any).

The matter has to be decided, if someone believes their rights have been infringed, in a court. Only a court in the US can make such a determination. In the meantime, shut up you Trot phonies. You destroyed civll liberties in the Soviet Union so when Stalin took over there were no institutions to protect you and your egomaniac leader Trotsky and his gang of intlellectuals like Zinoviev. I despise Stalin but at least he rid the world of those Trot losers.i
Serious Invasion Of Privacy!
13 May 2006
Anyone who jokes about this article? Doesn't believe in any type of Democracy. Or, for that matter, take Democracy seriously.
I'm very worried about the direction of our freedom.
If we really have any freedom left?
Y'all Spy on Yer Fellow Man Fer Jesus and Yull Git Tuh Heaven
13 May 2006
Bush: "And the Lord said to me George Ye must Spy on Yer Fellow Man Fer Jesus So Ye can git tuh Heaven. So it was written. And so it was done. The Gospel according Me."
13 May 2006
US media, Democrats deflect opposition to government spying on Americans
By Barry Grey from World Socialist Web Site
13 May 2006

One day after the revelation that the National Security Agency has been secretly compiling a data base of the telephone calls of some 200 million Americans, the response from the media and both Democratic and Republican politicians already makes clear that there will be no serious opposition from within the political establishment to this further step in the direction of a police state.

On Friday, as General Michael Hayden, who presided over the NSA spying program as head of the agency from 1999 to 2005, made the rounds of Senate offices in advance of next week’s confirmation hearings on his nomination to head the CIA, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, praised him as “a good man” and declared, “I have no problems with General Hayden going into the hearing.”

Reid, along with other top Democrats in Congress, was well aware of the NSA’s domestic spying program, having been briefed along with leading Republicans by the Bush administration.

As for the media, it did not take long after USA Today published its May 11 exposé on the spying operation for the networks and press to begin their efforts to confuse and disorient the American people and condition them to accept this unprecedented attack on democratic rights.

The Washington Post led the way, publishing as the lead article on its web site early Friday the results of an overnight poll conducted jointly by the Post and ABC News. The survey purported to show that 63 percent of Americans supported the NSA domestic spying operation that was authorized by President Bush shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Under the program, the three largest US telecommunications companies—AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth—are handing over to the NSA the records of every telephone call made by every one of their customers, including the date, the duration of the call and the phone number dialed. This is being done without securing court warrants and without Congressional oversight, in flagrant violation of both the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution and federal statutes.

The existence of the program exposes as lies previous statements made by Bush and Hayden, following last December’s exposure of a secret NSA program to intercept and monitor international telephone calls and emails. At that time, Bush and Hayden said that the NSA was targeting only communications from or to countries outside the US and strictly limiting the spying to communications involving known terrorist suspects.

Beneath the headline “Poll: Most Americans Support NSA’s Efforts,” the Post said its poll also showed that 65 percent “of those interviewed” said it was “more important to investigate potential terrorist threats ‘even if it intrudes on privacy.’” An even larger majority, 66 percent, said, according to the newspaper, they would “not be bothered if NSA collected records of personal calls they had made.”

The Friday evening ABC News program featured the poll and presented it as definitive proof that a large majority of Americans supported the domestic spying. ABC News commentator, George Stephanopoulos, a former top political aide to Democratic President Bill Clinton, said the poll would convince Democrats to tone down their criticisms of both the NSA and Hayden.

Hayden was named Monday by Bush to succeed Porter J. Goss as head of the CIA. Stephanopoulos, echoing most other TV pundits, predicted that Hayden would be confirmed by the Senate.

NBC Nightly News also led its Friday broadcast with the Washington Post-ABC News survey.

Both the Washington Post-ABC News poll and uses to which it is being put are manipulative and cynical. It is, on its face, absurd to attribute any serious significance to a poll taken on the very day of the NSA program’s exposure. The general population could not possibly have adequate time or information to assess the implications of such an unprecedented invasion of privacy rights, all the more so given the deliberate efforts of the mass media to play down its seriousness and conceal from the public the full scope of the spying operation.

There is, moreover, a thoroughly worked out and well tested modus operandi for conducting polls in such a way as to slant the result in a desired direction. The manner in which questions are posed, the order in which they are presented, the size and demographics of the polling sample, and the overall framework within which the questions are asked all play a major role in the ultimate result.

All of these issues come into play in the Washington Post-ABC News poll. In its report on the poll, the Post said it was conducted by telephone May 11 among a mere 502 “randomly selected adults.” The newspaper felt obliged to issue its own caveat, writing: “The practical difficulties of doing a survey in a single evening represent other sources of error in this or any other overnight poll.”

Why then, rush into print and broadcast the poll on the evening news as though it were authoritative?

All of the questions, as listed in the Post’s report on its poll, take uncritically as their premise the government’s claim that the domestic spying operation is being conducted in order to protect the American people against potential terrorist attacks—a claim that is without any merit and is contradicted by the vast scope of the private information on ordinary Americans that is being collected.

One typically loaded question reads: “What do you think is more important now—for the federal government to investigate possible terrorist threats, even if it intrudes on personal privacy; or for the federal government not to intrude on personal privacy, even if that limits its ability to investigate possible terrorist threats?”

Even if one were to accept as valid the results of the poll, they would only underscore the pernicious role played by the media in systematically misinforming the American people, concealing the vast implications of the government’s police state measures, and working to deaden and subvert the democratic sensibilities of the population.

In any event, the Washington Post-ABC News poll is wildly at odds with other recent polls on the Bush administration’s attacks on democratic rights. On the same day as the Post published its snap poll, USA Today cited a December 2005 poll showing that Americans “by more than two to one—65%-31%—said the government shouldn’t take steps against terrorism that violate basic civil liberties.”

The underlying political motivations behind the Washington Post-ABC News poll were reflected in the editorial comments of both the Post and the New York Times. Both newspapers criticized the NSA program as an invasion of privacy, the Times noting: “By cross-referencing phone numbers with databases that link numbers to names and addresses, the government could compile dossiers of what people and organizations each American is in contact with,” and the Post calling it a “massive intrusion on personal privacy.”

But both newspapers carefully avoided any call for the program to be halted, for any measures to be taken against Bush or other administration officials, or for General Hayden to be rejected by the Senate as the new CIA head. As the Times put it in its inimitable two-faced way: “The confirmation hearings of Michael Hayden, President Bush’s nominee for Central Intelligence Agency director, are also a natural forum for a serious, thorough and pointed review of exactly what has been going on.”

In the end, both newspapers called for the White House and Congress to collaborate in revising existing intelligence laws to vastly expand the legal powers of the government to spy on its citizens.
will someone please hide these non comment comments??
14 May 2006
i just don't see the point.
Re: Framework for a police state – US government phone spying targets all Americans
15 May 2006
The point Comrade Liam is that a spectre is haunting you.