US Indymedia Global Indymedia Publish About us
Printed from Boston IMC : http://boston.indymedia.org/
Boston.Indymedia
IVAW Winter Soldier

Winter Soldier
Testimonies
Brad Presente

Other Local News

Spare Change News
Open Media Boston
Somerville Voices
Cradle of Liberty
The Sword and Shield

Local Radio Shows

WMBR 88.1 FM
What's Left
WEDS at 8:00 pm
Local Edition
FRI (alt) at 5:30 pm

WMFO 91.5 FM
Socialist Alternative
SUN 11:00 am

WZBC 90.3 FM
Sounds of Dissent
SAT at 11:00 am
Truth and Justice Radio
SUN at 6:00 am

Create account Log in
Comment on this article | View comments | Email this article | Printer-friendly version
News :: Education : Globalization : Politics
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
17 May 2006
1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon.
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
...
4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers.
...
5...
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon.
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

Source:
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t36565-911-for-dummies-the-five-basic

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: A HEALTHY DOSE OF COMMON SENSE
17 May 2006
POPULAR MECHANICS did an investigation of the various ‘conspiracy’ claims about 9/11.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

Healthy skepticism, it seems, has curdled into paranoia. Wild conspiracy tales are peddled daily on the Internet, talk radio and in other media. Blurry photos, quotes taken out of context and sketchy eyewitness accounts have inspired a slew of elaborate theories: The Pentagon was struck by a missile; the World Trade Center was razed by demolition-style bombs; Flight 93 was shot down by a mysterious white jet. As outlandish as these claims may sound, they are increasingly accepted abroad and among extremists here in the United States.

To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.

In the end, we were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. We learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day. Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate. Only by confronting such poisonous claims with irrefutable facts can we understand what really happened on that day.
Re: 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
17 May 2006
Loose Change video has the basic facts. 9-11 WAS a government engineered attack. Why? For CORPORATIONS. And to steal as much taxpayers money, as they could get their grubby hands on.
Now, if anyone can't accept the facts? Time to watch LOOSE CHANGE! Go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-guQaYgrWqI&search=Loose%20Change
Enjoy waking up!
I'm So Sorry
17 May 2006
There is no Cure for what ails ya, is there?
Do You Know Where Liam Was?
17 May 2006
FBI and Mossad agents lurking in the shadows of the Doomed Dark Towers. A familiar face turns away, as the flash of light lacerates the sky............
Re: 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
17 May 2006
Pop Mech only adressed conspiracy theories that I never even heard before. They didn't cover ANY of the ones I have seen on the web
This is DISINFO
18 May 2006
ANYONE who says no planes hit the towers is trying to discredit the real 911 truth movement.

planes hit the towers, but what brought them down was prepositioned explosives.

no planes in shanksville or the pentagon (no passenger jets anyway)

building 7 intentionally and illegaly demolished.

what is so hard about keeping all that straight? Nothing!

Popular Mechanics' article was written by Ben Chertoff, DHS secretary Michael Chertoff's cousin. It could not be more obvious what is being done here.

For legit 9-11 coverage, go to 911truth.org, or portland Indy's 9-11 section (why no 9-11 section here? because boston indymedia is totally compromised.)